No one. I'd listen to him better than Trump has, along with other experts.
You realize that for him to have been promoting "packed churches" for easter, he could not have been listening closely to Fauci right?
The only thing that's caused him to back away from his own personal view of what needed to be done was Fauci, and others, interventions. There was no reason for him to promote "packed churches" as part of any plan if he was in consultation with experts.
Sure, yes, he was finally won over in spite of his own views...but good lord the man has to get out of the way in order to do what's right. He's focused on ratings. He's focused on his political prospects and how damaging this could be to him. Get his ego out of the way...that's IMPOSSIBLE for him. How a given outcome affects HIM is always at the core of how he approaches a situation. Fauci likely has to explain how millions of deaths would be worse for TRUMP than to extend the time period.
With me, you wouldn't have such a ridiculous barrier to overcome. Plus, I have a background in sciences, with a masters degree to boot, and I don't have an aversion to experts. I assimilate information reasonably well, and have management experience where I know how to delegate.
Again, I'm not portraying myself as a perfect president, or politician. I'd be terrible at most of the aspects of the job. But in this one specific area, I'd be many times better than Trump as would MANY people who aren't narcissistic sociopaths who also happen to be chronic liars.