Ilov80s
Footballguy
Jokes on you, Egyptians can't vote in US elections.I just took my huge tax refund and gave it to a large group of Egyption cat loving women in turn for them to vote all red in November.
Jokes on you, Egyptians can't vote in US elections.I just took my huge tax refund and gave it to a large group of Egyption cat loving women in turn for them to vote all red in November.
How about reviewing his W-2's?:(
The FBI cannot ask the supermarket that employed Mark Judge for records verifying when he was employed there, NBC News reports.
Two sources familiar with the investigation said the FBI will also not be able to examine Kavanaugh’s drinking at Yale.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/white-house-limits-scope-fbi-s-investigation-allegations-against-brett-n915061
Which explains why Trump handled this like an adult and not a psychopath as he usually does.ÂIf the FBI is doing a thorough background investigation the allegations of Ramirez and Swetnick also need to be looked into. If not, then this additional investigation is incomplete and a sham.
If a Kenyan born person can become POTUS then I'm sure I can make it happenJokes on you, Egyptians can't vote in US elections.
I hadn't gotten here yet when I posted the same thing.ÂOff the top of my head....how about checking his federal tax records from that time period then?
Might be a bit difficult now that you have told a high ranking Deep State FBI agent about your plan.If a Kenyan born person can become POTUS then I'm sure I can make it happen
So that is what this is all about.See, here’s the problem. He made some ridiculous statements in defending himself from her allegations. In my opinion, it opens the door to look into those statements, to see if he’s a liar liar pants on fire.Â
Do you care about whether or not he’s a liar or lied under oath?
That's not how an FBI investigation works. Nothing can stop them from obtaining SSA documents, which they can access in about five minutes. ÂI’m not sure they can get SSA documents if they aren’t on the list of approved places to get information from the President.
This isn’t a full investigation.  It’s an expanded background check.ÂThat's not how an FBI investigation works. Nothing can stop them from obtaining SSA documents, which they can access in about five minutes. Â
Bill Clinton lost lost license to practice law for perjury. Â If Kavanaugh committed perjury so should he.ÂSo that is what this is all about.
Not whether or not a man was falsely accused of sexual assault or guilty of sexual assault.
It is about how many beers he drank on a specific day during summer vacation in high school and what slang terms in a yearbook meant.
Not accurate. But even under your definition Judge's employment records are relevant and within that mandate. ÂThis isn’t a full investigation.  It’s an expanded background check.Â
Funny, you could use that same paragraph to describe the previous administration.I've gone from a Republican to an Independent to a Democrat because the Republicans put an inept, mental midget, bullying, unqualified, man baby in the white house. He's also probably a traitor judging by the people he put in his cabinet. Disgusting.Â
And also his drinking and partying is directly related to what was going my in at that time.See, here’s the problem. He made some ridiculous statements in defending himself from her allegations. In my opinion, it opens the door to look into those statements, to see if he’s a liar liar pants on fire.Â
Do you care about whether or not he’s a liar or lied under oath?
You mean again. Right?Bill Clinton lost lost license to practice law for perjury. Â If Kavanaugh committed perjury so should he.Â
Funny, you could use that same paragraph to describe the previous administration.
I guess we will learn soon enough exactly how inept, corrupt, and traitorous he truly was.
No...it’s about if he is that dishonest with everything else...is it possible he isn’t being honest about Ford.So that is what this is all about.
Not whether or not a man was falsely accused of sexual assault or guilty of sexual assault.
It is about how many beers he drank on a specific day during summer vacation in high school and what slang terms in a yearbook meant.
False...in every possible way.Funny, you could use that same paragraph to describe the previous administration.
I guess we will learn soon enough exactly how inept, corrupt, and traitorous he truly was.
I know four women, three men, one goat, and a bunch of sheep that turned from Republican to Independent. Boom!I know 2 women and 1 man who are changing from Democrat to Independants due to the shenanigans the Democrats did to Ford and Kavanaugh by sitting on the letter for political games. Disgusting
No it’s about whether he is lying under oath.ÂSo that is what this is all about.
Not whether or not a man was falsely accused of sexual assault or guilty of sexual assault.
It is about how many beers he drank on a specific day during summer vacation in high school and what slang terms in a yearbook meant.
All that really matters to the lefties is that a conservative judge does not get appointed. Schumer and company will not vote for anyone Trump nominates.So that is what this is all about.
Not whether or not a man was falsely accused of sexual assault or guilty of sexual assault.
It is about how many beers he drank on a specific day during summer vacation in high school and what slang terms in a yearbook meant.
And how exactly do you prove how many beers someone drank on a Thursday night 36 years ago?Bill Clinton lost lost license to practice law for perjury. Â If Kavanaugh committed perjury so should he.Â
Sounds familiar.  Just replace left with right, conservative with liberal, Schumer with well anyone on the right and Trump with Obama. ÂAll that really matters to the lefties is that a conservative judge does not get appointed. Schumer and company will not vote for anyone Trump nominates.
The people thrashing about and demanding an FBI investigation for weeks wanted an FBI investigation run without interference from the White House or a time limit.  Is the FBI investigation authorized without interference from the White House without a time limit?Something tells me that even after thrashing about and demanding an FBI investigation for weeks, when it’s over, Democrats are still going to ##### and moan that it’s not enough.
How do they verify the # of beers drank on thirsty Thursday in 1982?Is the FBI allowed to verify his testimony from this past week? There's a reason the GOP wants to keep focus on ford. After that performance I'd want to keep focus off him too.Â
The facts disagree with you.False...in every possible way.
If?Bill Clinton lost lost license to practice law for perjury. Â If Kavanaugh committed perjury so should he.Â
Exactly.The people thrashing about and demanding an FBI investigation for weeks wanted an FBI investigation run without interference from the White House or a time limit. Â Is the FBI investigation authorized without interference from the White House without a time limit?
False yet again to start out.All that really matters to the lefties is that a conservative judge does not get appointed. Schumer and company will not vote for anyone Trump nominates.
Who would/could actually enforce that?Bill Clinton lost lost license to practice law for perjury. Â If Kavanaugh committed perjury so should he.Â
You didn’t state any facts and Horowitz has not backed up anything you claim.The facts disagree with you.
So does IG Horowitz.
It’s telling how wide the scope of Kavanaugh’s perjury was.  He claimed he got into Yale despite having no connections there.  He went to a $60K per year boarding school.  One of his grandfathers went to Yale.  Connections like that keep thousands of superior students out of the Ivy League every year.
No, it's about a SC nominee's ability to tell the truth under oath.So that is what this is all about.
Not whether or not a man was falsely accused of sexual assault or guilty of sexual assault.
It is about how many beers he drank on a specific day during summer vacation in high school and what slang terms in a yearbook meant.
Customer orders a Prime Ribeye.  A Select Sirloin is delivered to the table. ÂExactly.
It’s not accurate that this isn’t a full investigation? Perhaps we’re just crossing wires here. You read the article being discussed about the White House limiting the scope of what the FBI is allowed to investigate, including requesting records and interviewing witnesses?Not accurate. But even under your definition Judge's employment records are relevant and within that mandate. Â
Boy I don’t know.  Total mystery.ÂAnd how exactly do you prove how many beers someone drank on a Thursday night 36 years ago?
Or what high school clique slang terms for farting and drinking games were?
He said she said?
Ironic how you love to post "false" or "falsehoods" as a board cop and you are consistantly wrong.False yet again to start out.
Schumer and others may not...but they don’t have to in order to confirm.
Um, no, but limiting what documents may be obtained limits the ability to corroborate statements.  I don’t know the full extent of what’s being allowed but quite a bit is being disallowed.ÂSomeone thinks it is easy to hide something from the FBI. Â
Stating that all lefties want is not that a conservative Judge isn’t appointed is a complete lately false statement. You can claim it’s wrong all you want...but that too would be false.Ironic how you love to post "false" or "falsehoods" as a board cop and you are consistantly wrong.
Stop pretending politics doesn't work both ways. Do you remember Garland?All that really matters to the lefties is that a conservative judge does not get appointed. Schumer and company will not vote for anyone Trump nominates.
Schumer may not vote for anyone he appoints, but partisan voting is hardly uncommon for supreme court justices. We did see 3 democrats vote for Gorsuch (a Trump nominee) and did not see any of these hysterics surrounding his confirmationAll that really matters to the lefties is that a conservative judge does not get appointed. Schumer and company will not vote for anyone Trump nominates.
So they settled...basically admitting she was right. Â How is this a bad thing for her?She also sued another of her employers. Â
According to The Wall Street Journal, Swetnick sued New York Life Insurance for discrimination.
“Roughly a decade ago,” WSJ reported, “Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter.”
The company settled with Swetnick.  Swetnick worked for the insurance behemoth for less than two years, the newspaper reported, and does not include the position on her résumé.
There are more if you are still interested.
And to be clear, I mean you need to convince your own moderate Reps that passing an obvious, lying, partisan hack (and possible perpetrator of sexual assault) will not harm their own re-election campaigns. Of course, you don't care about their re-election campaigns, you only care about getting an anti- Roe v. Wade judge on the court.Stop pretending politics doesn't work both ways. Do you remember Garland?
Schumer was never voting for anyone Trump nominates. Yes, that's true. You need to convince your own moderate Republicans who vote with a brain. not Dems.
And plenty here that some would call lefties either said good choice or were ok with gorsuch and didn’t really oppose him beyond saying it should heave been Garlands seat.Schumer may not vote for anyone he appoints, but partisan voting is hardly uncommon for supreme court justices. We did see 3 democrats vote for Gorsuch (a Trump nominee) and did not see any of these hysterics surrounding his confirmation
Sounds like the kind of thing the FBI should ask her about. Â Oh, well.ÂShe also sued another of her employers. Â
According to The Wall Street Journal, Swetnick sued New York Life Insurance for discrimination.
“Roughly a decade ago,” WSJ reported, “Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter.”
The company settled with Swetnick.  Swetnick worked for the insurance behemoth for less than two years, the newspaper reported, and does not include the position on her résumé.
There are more people who had done her wrong, if you are still interested.
And to take a specific example, I personally said Kavanaugh would probably make a good justice even though I disagree with him on things until it came out that he’s probably been lying to Congress indiscriminately for over a decadeÂAnd plenty here that some would call lefties either said good choice or were ok with gorsuch and didn’t really oppose him beyond saying it should heave been Garlands seat.