>>>>"It wasn't just Archer's speed that impressed the Steelers; it was the manner in which he ran. He needed just 18 strides to run the 40 -- the same amount of steps as Detroit receiver Calvin Johnson, who is 6-5."
Of course they're going to say that but is it true and do they really believe it? I don't think the situation is as grave as some (most) others do because if they can get better (which we think they have) in the front 7 that takes a lot of pressure of the DBs and by having Shazier who is not the liability Williams/Garvin are you can get Troy back into more of a rover role instead of a pseudo linebacker.this is interesting...
The Steelers are not in a hurry to rush Richardson into a role on defense. As it turned out, cornerback was not as big of a need for the Steelers as many analysts had believed.
Lake agreed with defensive coordinator **** LeBeau, who said Friday that he liked many of the free-agent cornerbacks on the roster. Lake singled out Antwon Blake, who joined the team in 2013, and Brice McCain, who was signed as a free agent earlier this spring.
"Antwon Blake is one, very fast, quick aggressive corner that I liked coming out last year," Lake said. "We were fortunate to grab him in free agency, and he's turned out to be very productive for us, especially on special teams. We got Brice McCain in the offseason, who I have been working with on the field the last couple of weeks. I'm really impressed with the way he moves.
"I think these guys are just getting started. They have the ability to cover and stay close to receivers. For guys who have been picked up in free agency that may have been overlooked in the past, I'm pretty excited about them. I think we have the ability to plug in and play some of the players we've picked up."
Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/steelers/2014/05/11/Steelers-coach-Lake-offers-Shaquille-Richardson-a-second-opportunity/stories/201405110156#ixzz31RiPvcRZ
Kiper approvalTrey Wingo: "... give me the team you thought did really well."
Mel Kiper: "Im going to go with the Pittsburgh Steelers. The rival of my Baltimore Ravens. Look what they did. They got that attitude back on defense with Ryan Shazier, Stephon Tuitt. Added Dri Archer that could be a Darren Sproles type. Martvius Bryant when you think about what he can do as a receiver coming in. I think this team did a good job from start to finish. Love some of their day 3 picks as well."
His overall grade landed Pittsburgh with an A-.
The other panel members picked Rams, Ravens and 49ers.
I think pretty much everyone is "stuck" on the Archer pick. His first NFL TD will change that.Im optimistic Archer can be effective in the NFL and maintain the explosiveness he displayed in college, but Im still not sure taking him was a better idea than going CB with that pick and taking someone like Seastrunk in the 5th round instead.
I didnt like the pick until we selected Bryant in the 4th -- still wasnt crazy about it but was fine with it once we selected him.I think pretty much everyone is "stuck" on the Archer pick. His first NFL TD will change that.Im optimistic Archer can be effective in the NFL and maintain the explosiveness he displayed in college, but Im still not sure taking him was a better idea than going CB with that pick and taking someone like Seastrunk in the 5th round instead.
IMO, a big part of the reason they took Archer (and why I predicted he might be the pick after looking at who was still available) is that there wasn't tremendous value at the need positions. I would have defended taking Bryant there, but he's uber raw and a developmental prospect who likely didn't warrant a day 2 selection based on production in the NCAA. He's all upside. There simply wasn't a CB available that projected as an early starter, that ship sailed when they passed on Dennard in the first round. So, they went with a guy that's going to inject speed into the offense. When you look at a lot of their FA pickups and draft picks, there's a common thread there. Heyward-Bey. Mitchell. Shazier. Archer. Bryant. It's clear that the Steelers brass felt like the whole team was a step slow last year and they clearly had a laser focus on upgrading the speed and athleticism across the roster. DHB and Bryant add speed to the WR corps, Shazier to the front 7, Mitchell to the secondary. Archer does this for the return game, the backfield, and the slot all in one fell swoop.I think pretty much everyone is "stuck" on the Archer pick. His first NFL TD will change that.Im optimistic Archer can be effective in the NFL and maintain the explosiveness he displayed in college, but Im still not sure taking him was a better idea than going CB with that pick and taking someone like Seastrunk in the 5th round instead.
Just playing devil's advocate here, but how many kicks will he be returning when I dunno, 80-90% of kickoffs are going thru the back of the endzone? There very well might be a handful of games where he has 0 kick returns.I didnt like the pick until we selected Bryant in the 4th -- still wasnt crazy about it but was fine with it once we selected him.I think pretty much everyone is "stuck" on the Archer pick. His first NFL TD will change that.Im optimistic Archer can be effective in the NFL and maintain the explosiveness he displayed in college, but Im still not sure taking him was a better idea than going CB with that pick and taking someone like Seastrunk in the 5th round instead.
I agree that once we see him returning kicks we will be alright w/ the pick.
On average, about 50% of kickoffs go for touchbacks. Considerably fewer are considered "unreturnable," though that is of course subjective.Just playing devil's advocate here, but how many kicks will he be returning when I dunno, 80-90% of kickoffs are going thru the back of the endzone? There very well might be a handful of games where he has 0 kick returns.I didnt like the pick until we selected Bryant in the 4th -- still wasnt crazy about it but was fine with it once we selected him.I think pretty much everyone is "stuck" on the Archer pick. His first NFL TD will change that.Im optimistic Archer can be effective in the NFL and maintain the explosiveness he displayed in college, but Im still not sure taking him was a better idea than going CB with that pick and taking someone like Seastrunk in the 5th round instead.
I agree that once we see him returning kicks we will be alright w/ the pick.
Exactly. And this is a huge upgrade over Felix Jones going backwards. Very few of the kickoffs are going through the endzone so he'll be able to return quite a few that would be touchbacks for a lesser (Felix) player. And he'll be used on more than just kickoffs.On average, about 50% of kickoffs go for touchbacks. Considerably fewer are considered "unreturnable," though that is of course subjective.Just playing devil's advocate here, but how many kicks will he be returning when I dunno, 80-90% of kickoffs are going thru the back of the endzone? There very well might be a handful of games where he has 0 kick returns.I didnt like the pick until we selected Bryant in the 4th -- still wasnt crazy about it but was fine with it once we selected him.I think pretty much everyone is "stuck" on the Archer pick. His first NFL TD will change that.Im optimistic Archer can be effective in the NFL and maintain the explosiveness he displayed in college, but Im still not sure taking him was a better idea than going CB with that pick and taking someone like Seastrunk in the 5th round instead.
I agree that once we see him returning kicks we will be alright w/ the pick.
It's an advantage no matter how you slice it, if you have a potentially great return guy returning half of all kickoffs, or if you force them to kick away from him, thus giving up field position, or if you get them to try to force it deeper than the natural kicking motion will allow, generating more mistakes, i.e. out-of-bounds kicks.
You can't say the KR is the weapon it was during the prior era, but it's still a weapon in the field position game.
He can return punts too. Only reason he didn't last year, according to his coach, is because he was injured and they didn't want to expose him to too many hits. Won't be a problem in Pittsburgh.Just playing devil's advocate here, but how many kicks will he be returning when I dunno, 80-90% of kickoffs are going thru the back of the endzone? There very well might be a handful of games where he has 0 kick returns.I didnt like the pick until we selected Bryant in the 4th -- still wasnt crazy about it but was fine with it once we selected him.I think pretty much everyone is "stuck" on the Archer pick. His first NFL TD will change that.Im optimistic Archer can be effective in the NFL and maintain the explosiveness he displayed in college, but Im still not sure taking him was a better idea than going CB with that pick and taking someone like Seastrunk in the 5th round instead.
I agree that once we see him returning kicks we will be alright w/ the pick.
4.38 at 237 lbs.42" VJ.I have a lot of Dolfan buddies down here that thought he was the guy at 19. IG the Steelers traded down any significant number of picks, he wasn't going to be there. They must really like him. His combine and pro day were pretty dazzling and he also had terrific on field production for a big school. 3rd in the nation in tackles last year AND 2nd in TFL. He's a playmaker.GB was definitely going to take him at 21, Cowboys were rumored to at 16. Seems like he was taken around the right place. Dennard is the 3rd or worse CB taken for a reason. Us mortals definitely overrated him.I don't think Shazier was anywhere close to BPAI knew they didn't like Dennard. It was a kick in the nuts Fuller went to Chicago. They took the best available. Gotta think he'll play ILB not sure how I feel about it but he was pretty damn good at OSU.
Moved down 3 positions in rd1 (from 16 to 19) to get Casey Hampton in 2001Bob Magaw said:* Is it fair to say PIT in recent draft history doesn't move around a lot (down or up), especially in the firs round?
to 25) in 2006 to get Santonio Holmes.
That is a Polamalu-like hit. He was born to be a Steeler.I don't think it affects where they line him up or who dresses on game day. They'll still play him split out, lined up in the backfield, returns etc. So if he wears 13 or 34 they still keep the same personnel. IMO. You could be right though that he becomes the 5th WR on game day at the expense of someone else and they add another RB.Archer switched to #13, meaning he'll be listed as a WR. That's where I expect he'll see most/all of his time, but I'm a little surprised by this move. Steelers have nothing behind Bell and Blount and if they dress 5 receivers, that means either Bryant or DHB are likely inactive on Sundays if Archer is the return guy.
I kind of hope Heyward Beys 4.3 combine # does a bit of the same. Its still .03 faster then Mike Wallace.You think Mike Wallace scared teams running a 9 route...wait until they see this guy.![]()
Thanks, EG.Awesome stuff, Bob. Please post here more.
).Woodley frees up 8.5 million.what is the cap situation come June1? Any low cost FA out there they could go after?
Was reported he was sick.Bouchette reporting Archer is "blowing off OTA's"
And then it was reported he was in LA the next day at a rookie expo.Was reported he was sick.Bouchette reporting Archer is "blowing off OTA's"
You do rookies expos when you are sick.And then it was reported he was in LA the next day at a rookie expo.Was reported he was sick.Bouchette reporting Archer is "blowing off OTA's"
Douchette is more like itBojang0301 said:Bouchette reporting Archer is "blowing off OTA's"
@jimwexellhttps://twitter.com/jimwexellhttps://twitter.com/jimwexell
· 22hhttps://twitter.com/jimwexell/status/472079785703649281
.@StevenTanner1 For Spence, looks like nothing ever happened. The game-day burst will be the all-important but so far so good.
@jimwexellhttps://twitter.com/jimwexellhttps://twitter.com/jimwexell · 19h
“@SteelCurtainRis: So @jimwexell, if Spence isn't limited by the injury, could he legitimately challenge for time in #Steelers defense?” Yes
OLD AND SLOW? LOL!
Jim Wexell
Publisher SteelCityInsider.net
This isn't your father's -- or even your older brother's -- Steelers defense anymore. As one RB put it, "Athleticism is taking over."
Thursday was a day to work on the long ball, and Le'Veon Bell got his. Bell, the running back who lines up as a receiver at times, ran even with William Gay but Ben Roethlisberger got rid of it early and timed it perfectly, or just before the new free safety, Mike Mitchell, could get over to the far sideline. Bell came down with the ball, a rare defeat for Mitchell, who's the Steelers' new free safety, and a fast one.
While Ryan Clark showed the Steelers how to win with brains, it's also true that speed kills. And Mitchell, who was timed in the 40 by the Oakland Raiders at 4.39 at his 2009 pro day, is just another speedy addition to the Steelers' next-era defense.
Has Le'Veon noticed a difference? "Most definitely," said Bell. "For one I think a lot of guys are able to play faster because it's their second year, guys like Jarvis (Jones) and Shamarko (Thomas), guys like that knowing exactly what they've got to do and doing it a lot faster. Obviously Ryan Shazier is a very fast guy. He can close fast. And LT (Lawrence Timmons) is obviously a fast guy. Overall they're playing faster and they know where they have to be. Athleticism is taking over."
The Steelers lost leadership in Clark, LaMarr Woodley, Larry Foote and Brett Keisel this off-season, but added speed in Mitchell, first-round pick Shazier, second-round pick Stephon Tuitt and free agent Arthur Moats.
Shazier, the new mack linebacker, was timed by the Steelers at 4.40, while Tuitt, a 310-pound defensive end, was once timed at 4.78. Moats, the backup to Jason Worilds at LOLB, was timed at 4.69 at the 2010 combine. As Bell pointed out, the Steelers are also expecting faster play from second-year players such as Jones and Thomas, as well as Vince Williams and Terence Garvin. They also signed cornerback Brice McCain, who was timed at 4.33 seconds during the 2009 draft season. Throw recovering linebacker Sean Spence into the mix -- and even the fastest LB coach in the NFL, Joey Porter -- and the national media can finally stop using Warren Sapp's "old and slow" comment from 2011 to describe the Steelers' defense. "Even the nose tackle can move," said reporter and former player Craig Wolfley. "I was standing on the sideline when Steve McLendon was running past me to get to the ball down the field. I think I now know what it's like to run with the bulls at Pamplona."
No one on the unit flashes to the sideline like Shazier, but the most obvious upgrade is Mitchell, who was described by one Steelers scout as "an overdrafted core special-teamer until he broke out last year." The scout said that Mitchell "made one wow play after another last year," but Mitchell, who had 4 interceptions, 2 forced fumbles and 3 1/2 sacks last season, was too humble to pick out a favorite.
"I have a wow moment," he said, "and that was beating the Saints at home and clinching our division and then beating Atlanta (and) getting our bye. That was a wow experience for our whole team. Me, personally, I don't know. We had some good moments. I made some decent plays but I feel that was just me sticking my toe in the water. I expect to make even bigger, better plays this year, and I've got a great guy to learn from in Troy Polamalu." And that's more speed, because spring absentees Polamalu and Ike Taylor have long been the fastest guys on the Steelers' defense. Maybe they don't run in the 4.3s as they did coming out of college, but their honed instincts no doubt make them the fastest graybeards in the league.
"When he gets here I'm going to be all in his pocket trying to figure out what he does," Mitchell said of meeting Polamalu. "I don't know if I'll be jumping over the center, but I do plan on taking the ball away."
And that could very easily become a theme for this defense.
Archer was selected to be the Steelers representative at the premier event.Douchette is more like itBojang0301 said:Bouchette reporting Archer is "blowing off OTA's"
So yes, Douchette botched this one.Section 7.
Rookie Premiere:
Invited Rookies will be permitted by their respective Clubs to attend the NFL Players Rookie Premiere provided that: (i) such event is scheduled during the month of May; (ii) such event encompasses a maximum of four consecutive days, including both a Saturday and a Sunday; and (iii) the NFLPA provides the NFL with the dates for the next Rookie Premiere not later than February 1 of each year.