Why not?Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
Because he doesn't play for the Red Sox or Yankees. You know the rules.Why not?Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
Jackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
Not sure why you would think this.Only stat that Jackson is better than Beckett is ERA, and at least part of this has to do with their respective home ball parks.I think Greinke may be the most deserving, but it wouldn't surprise me to see Beckett win it. Beckett has been dominating this year, and his team is 16-5 in games he has started, best in the league. Plus Beckett pitches in the toughest division.I'd say Greinke wins, followed by Beckett/HalladayJackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
Beckett has more strikeouts, but Jackson has a significantly better ERA (0.63 better). Their WHIPs are the same. Beckett's superior W/L record is largely irrelevant, since he gets a lot more run support (only three times in the AL have scored less runs than Detroit). Jackson has had five games this year where he pitched 6 innings or more, gave up 2 runs or less, and got a loss or no-decision.Beckett simply has more name recognition, and while he has had a very good year, he really shouldn't be a top 3 Cy Young candidate right now, unless you really think W/L is more important than ERA.Not sure why you would think this.Only stat that Jackson is better than Beckett is ERA, and at least part of this has to do with their respective home ball parks.Jackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
FIP - Fielder Independant Pitching on an ERA scale3.03 Beckett3.84 JacksonBeckett has gone deeper in more games (IP per game sorted by IP):Beckett has more strikeouts, but Jackson has a significantly better ERA (0.63 better). Their WHIPs are the same. Beckett's superior W/L record is largely irrelevant, since he gets a lot more run support (only three times in the AL have scored less runs than Detroit). Jackson has had five games this year where he pitched 6 innings or more, gave up 2 runs or less, and got a loss or no-decision.Beckett simply has more name recognition, and while he has had a very good year, he really shouldn't be a top 3 Cy Young candidate right now, unless you really think W/L is more important than ERA.Not sure why you would think this.Only stat that Jackson is better than Beckett is ERA, and at least part of this has to do with their respective home ball parks.Jackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
EJ JB4 4.25 55 66 66 66 66 66.1 66.1 6.27 77 77 77 77 77 77 77.1 7.27.2 88 88 99 9
Can I go find some obscure stat where Jackson is better?Alias said:FIP - Fielder Independant Pitching on an ERA scale3.03 Beckett3.84 Jackson
Beckett has pitched 3 1/3 more innings than Jackson. Both have started 21 games. That means Beckett has faced no more than about a half of a batter more per game than Jackson. Bravo!Alias said:Beckett has gone deeper in more games (IP per game sorted by IP):
Voters usually give W/L record more credence than they should, for sure. Beckett's team is winning 75% of the time he starts, okay, but he gets ridiculous run support, especially compared to Jackson In the games Beckett has started, the Red Sox have scored 113 runs/5.38 runs per game. In the games Jackson has started, the Tigers have scored 80 runs/3.81 runs per game. Wonder what Jackson's record would be if he got the kind of run support Beckett does. Yes, ball park is a factor, but that is almost impossible to objectively compare. Beckett obviously faces the tougher offensive division, but only eight of his 21 starts have been against the AL East, and three of those were against the offensively-challenged O's, so let's not act like Beckett is winning all of these games against those tough AL East offenses. If the season ended right now, with his W/L record, Jackson would have no chance of winning, but Beckett shouldn't, either. Remember, my argument was not that Jackson should win; it was that Jackson, right now, is more deserving than Beckett, which he is, unless you honestly think that the Red Sox having a much better offense than the Tigers somehow makes Beckett a better pitcher. And, yes, it is still early, but it is still fun to talk about.I'll have to strongly disagree with you that Beckett is not a top 3 Cy Young candidate.Again, Jackson has a better ERA, sure - but you are not taking into account ball park or division strength.I'm not sure if you've followed Cy Young voting in the past, but w/l record does play a small factor. And the fact that Beckett's team is winning at > 75% when he takes the mound, you just can't discount that. Oh, and let's come and revisit this mid September.
My point was that ERA also depended on fielding, your main point was the strength of Jackson's ERA. I'm too lazy to look up each of their ERA+ stats, but if you have the time I'd be curious how they compare.Can I go find some obscure stat where Jackson is better?Alias said:FIP - Fielder Independant Pitching on an ERA scale3.03 Beckett3.84 Jackson![]()
Again, Jackson has a better ERA, sure - but you are not taking into account ball park or division strength.
11 Fenway Park (Boston, Massachusetts) 1.037 0.901 0.992 1.319 1.000 0.95112 Comerica Park (Detroit, Michigan) 1.023 0.941 0.938 0.971 1.444 1.103
Ridiculous. Who would you rather face, Beckett or Jackson?Ghost Rider said:Beckett has more strikeouts, but Jackson has a significantly better ERA (0.63 better). Their WHIPs are the same. Beckett's superior W/L record is largely irrelevant, since he gets a lot more run support (only three times in the AL have scored less runs than Detroit). Jackson has had five games this year where he pitched 6 innings or more, gave up 2 runs or less, and got a loss or no-decision.Beckett simply has more name recognition, and while he has had a very good year, he really shouldn't be a top 3 Cy Young candidate right now, unless you really think W/L is more important than ERA.Not sure why you would think this.Only stat that Jackson is better than Beckett is ERA, and at least part of this has to do with their respective home ball parks.Jackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
I don't think it would matter. The odds of me making contact with either are about the same as you starting a thread that isn't a fishing trip.Ridiculous. Who would you rather face, Beckett or Jackson?
Pretty clearly Beckett.Ridiculous. Who would you rather face, Beckett or Jackson?Ghost Rider said:Beckett has more strikeouts, but Jackson has a significantly better ERA (0.63 better). Their WHIPs are the same. Beckett's superior W/L record is largely irrelevant, since he gets a lot more run support (only three times in the AL have scored less runs than Detroit). Jackson has had five games this year where he pitched 6 innings or more, gave up 2 runs or less, and got a loss or no-decision.Beckett simply has more name recognition, and while he has had a very good year, he really shouldn't be a top 3 Cy Young candidate right now, unless you really think W/L is more important than ERA.Not sure why you would think this.Only stat that Jackson is better than Beckett is ERA, and at least part of this has to do with their respective home ball parks.Jackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
Pretty clearly Beckett.Ridiculous. Who would you rather face, Beckett or Jackson?
bostonfred said:Pretty clearly Beckett.Ridiculous. Who would you rather face, Beckett or Jackson?It'd be fun just to be able to say you faced 2009's best pitcher.
You've lost a step.bostonfred said:Pretty clearly Beckett.Ridiculous. Who would you rather face, Beckett or Jackson?It'd be fun just to be able to say you faced 2009's best pitcher.
And the best postseason pitcher in history. Gotta love that coming from the guy with the Lions Logo, right bostonfred?
Not you too, DD...not you.You've lost a step.bostonfred said:Pretty clearly Beckett.Ridiculous. Who would you rather face, Beckett or Jackson?It'd be fun just to be able to say you faced 2009's best pitcher.
And the best postseason pitcher in history. Gotta love that coming from the guy with the Lions Logo, right bostonfred?
I was in aweVerlander pitches 119-123 were all 99 or 100mph today. Pretty impressive.
Beckett not in the lead. Beckett is the 4th horse in a 3 horse race.At this point I have the race realistically coming down to Beckett, Halladay, Hernandez, and Verlander, and I see Beckett in the lead right now. Guy has like a 1.8 ERA in his last 14 starts. He looks like a reasonable bet for 20 wins. 20 wins will lock it up for him, but even without I think he is the likeliest at this point in the season
Not sure why you would think this.Only stat that Jackson is better than Beckett is ERA, and at least part of this has to do with their respective home ball parks.I think Greinke may be the most deserving, but it wouldn't surprise me to see Beckett win it. Beckett has been dominating this year, and his team is 16-5 in games he has started, best in the league. Plus Beckett pitches in the toughest division.I'd say Greinke wins, followed by Beckett/HalladayJackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.
Greinke looking real nice his last two starts. 15K's and now a CGSO 1 hitter.Not sure why you would think this.Only stat that Jackson is better than Beckett is ERA, and at least part of this has to do with their respective home ball parks.I think Greinke may be the most deserving, but it wouldn't surprise me to see Beckett win it. Beckett has been dominating this year, and his team is 16-5 in games he has started, best in the league. Plus Beckett pitches in the toughest division.I'd say Greinke wins, followed by Beckett/HalladayJackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.![]()
Not really tough lineups he pitched against in those two starts...Greinke looking real nice his last two starts. 15K's and now a CGSO 1 hitter.Not sure why you would think this.Only stat that Jackson is better than Beckett is ERA, and at least part of this has to do with their respective home ball parks.I think Greinke may be the most deserving, but it wouldn't surprise me to see Beckett win it. Beckett has been dominating this year, and his team is 16-5 in games he has started, best in the league. Plus Beckett pitches in the toughest division.I'd say Greinke wins, followed by Beckett/HalladayJackson would be a more deserving winner than Josh Beckett right now.Although he doesn't warrant Cy Young consideration, Edwin Jackson has been a bulldog.![]()
I'm positive the voters will take this into account. Thanks for posting.Not really tough lineups he pitched against in those two starts...
While I think he's the best pitcher in baseball this year, the voters aren't going to like that last place finish. May be another year where someone gets screwed because the wrong team drafter them.Aaron Rudnicki said:Grienke had this locked up in April.
He doesn't get to face the Royals.Not really tough lineups he pitched against in those two starts...Greinke looking real nice his last two starts. 15K's and now a CGSO 1 hitter.
And Verlander... 2nd in wins, 6th in ERA, 1st in strikeouts, 8th in WHIP, T-5th in BAA... And his team is in first...He has to be in the mix as well...I think this is a two horse race now - Greinke vs Hernandez
Wins Above Replacement (WAR) and rankingGreinke 7.6 1Verlander 6.2 2Halladay 5.9 3Felix 5.5 4Lester 5.5 5CC 5.4 6Rivera 1.8 40GrienkeHernandezVerlanderSabathiaall in the mix but how can Mariano not even get a mention. I realize hes a closer but dude has given up 1R since June and has an ERA below 0.90 in save situations this year. That is insane.
I think this is a two horse race now - Greinke vs Verlander
Probably not but still a great story.Any chance Scott Feldman makes a run at it?16-4 w/a 3.46 ERA.
Greinke is the man2 er in his last 35 innings coming down the stretchOne more start, shut him down, and then let the Royals start their drive for last place in 2010.I think this is a two horse race now - Greinke vs Hernandez