What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

12 Movies that the critics were wrong about (1 Viewer)

Like Scorsese, for instance.
This is starting to get pretty hipsterish now.
:shrug:

His subject matter doesn't speak to me and I can't root for his anti-heroes.
I'm not a huge fan of Elvis but I can recognize his contributions and impact.
And I didn't say Scorsese's not an important and/or skilled director.

I'll give this to him - I'd rather watch his movies than Woody Allen's.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like Scorsese, for instance.
This is starting to get pretty hipsterish now.
:shrug:

His subject matter doesn't speak to me and I can't root for his anti-heroes.
I'm not a huge fan of Elvis but I can recognize his contributions and impact.
And I didn't say Scorsese's not an important and/or skilled director.

I'll give this to him - I'd rather watch his movies than Woody Allen's.
Common ground

Although I did like a couple very early Woody Allen films.For instance Everything You Wanted To Know About Sex and Sleeper.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think Wes Anderson is self-important. I think he's self-indulgent, but that's something different. The guy makes the movies that appeal to him. They're kind of the furthest thing from "important" or "serious." They're whimsical and silly. I generally like them (he's had movies too twee even for me, but they're the exception).

Spielberg is about 1000 times more self-important than Wes Anderson. Wes Anderson would never make Munich or Amistad, for better of for worse.
Self-indulgent. Yes, that's the term I was looking for.
couldn't a lot of top directors be described like that though?
Yes, and it's likely that when you started listing them that I'd say I don't like most of their work.

Like Scorsese, for instance.
He would come to mind.

Would also put Tarantino at the top of a list like that, and O.Stone comes to mind. Spielberg has a bit of that in him too. As they should, I think most directors when they have the ability to do so, will make movies that they want to see on screen. Why wouldn't they?

 
I don't think Wes Anderson is self-important. I think he's self-indulgent, but that's something different. The guy makes the movies that appeal to him. They're kind of the furthest thing from "important" or "serious." They're whimsical and silly. I generally like them (he's had movies too twee even for me, but they're the exception).

Spielberg is about 1000 times more self-important than Wes Anderson. Wes Anderson would never make Munich or Amistad, for better of for worse.
Self-indulgent. Yes, that's the term I was looking for.
couldn't a lot of top directors be described like that though?
Yes, and it's likely that when you started listing them that I'd say I don't like most of their work.

Like Scorsese, for instance.
This is starting to get pretty hipsterish now.
Hipster would be saying the only Scorsese movies worth watching are Bringing out the Dead and Kundun.

 
Are there really people out there who think that Schindler's List is a bad or mediocre film?
I've never seen it. I have this strange idea that I will see it and not like it. Then when I die I'll go straight to hell.

I'm sure I'm not the only one with this fear.

 
Are there really people out there who think that Schindler's List is a bad or mediocre film?
Ill give it as an important film but its too much for me. Barely made it through one viewing. Will never watch again. I dont think that makes it good though.

 
I always thought that Unforgiven was supposed to be a kind of antithesis of or a revisionist western; to the point that it kind of destroys the traditional Western that permeated the 50s, 60s and 70s. For sure there were others,......but I thought Unforgiven kind of makes such a point it kind of makes any future going back to the traditional Western motifs and imageries kind of silly. It killed the traditional Western.
Interestingly there are two westerns being unveiled at Cannes now. The Homesman by Tommy Lee Jones and The Salvation with Mads Mikkelsen

 
I always thought that Unforgiven was supposed to be a kind of antithesis of or a revisionist western; to the point that it kind of destroys the traditional Western that permeated the 50s, 60s and 70s. For sure there were others,......but I thought Unforgiven kind of makes such a point it kind of makes any future going back to the traditional Western motifs and imageries kind of silly. It killed the traditional Western.
Interestingly there are two westerns being unveiled at Cannes now. The Homesman by Tommy Lee Jones and The Salvation with Mads Mikkelsen
I don't know anything about The Salvation but The Homesman doesn't sound like a typical western to me.

 
timschochet said:
Are there really people out there who think that Schindler's List is a bad or mediocre film?
I thought they were really heavy-handed when it came to the "bad guys". Spielberg obviously had an ax to grind.
Finally! Someone stands up for the Nazis.
I was gonna say, although I'd only watched half of it decades ago, the only character I remember as being interesting was the German who'd shoot jews from the balcony. The rest of it was :yawn:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top