I wouldn't be surprised if Gossage is the only one that gets enough votes...I bet Blyleven gets screwed again![]()
He wasn't a HOF pitcher. Sorry.I bet Blyleven gets screwed again![]()
Don Mattingly has no business being near the HOF without a paid admission ticket.My votes (allowed to vote up to 10 names)Rich "Goose" GossageTim RainesDale MurphyAndre DawsonDon MattinglyMark McGwireETA: Jim Rice Knew I missed someone.
That's a bit harsh...but true.Don Mattingly has no business being near the HOF without a paid admission ticket.My votes (allowed to vote up to 10 names)Rich "Goose" GossageTim RainesDale MurphyAndre DawsonDon MattinglyMark McGwireETA: Jim Rice Knew I missed someone.
Goose wasn't a HOF last year, but he is (maybe) one this year. Does anyone have a link to his 2007 stats because I'm curious what he did in 2007 to help his cause.
Look at his stats compared to Sutter. Enough said.Goose wasn't a HOF last year, but he is (maybe) one this year. Does anyone have a link to his 2007 stats because I'm curious what he did in 2007 to help his cause.![]()
Sutter didn't belong in either - put his numbers up against 1/2 of today's closers and they don't hold up.All I'm saying is Goose went from under 70% last year to almost 90% this year without throwing another pitch. The HOF voting is a complete joke done by a majority of guys who couldn't hit a curve in Little League and now take out their frustrations on guys that do not deserve it.Look at his stats compared to Sutter. Enough said.Goose wasn't a HOF last year, but he is (maybe) one this year. Does anyone have a link to his 2007 stats because I'm curious what he did in 2007 to help his cause.![]()
That's the flaw in your argument.Closers back in the day (70s & 80s) weren't one inning specialists. Perhaps you go back and see how many 2 and 3 inning saves guys like Mike Marshall and Rollie Fingers had. They had FAR more multi-inning saves than not. You cannot compare Mariano Rivera and Goose Gossage and find the latter wanting. Goose has to be compared to those in his era -- Fingers, Sutter, etc.Sutter didn't belong in either - put his numbers up against 1/2 of today's closers and they don't hold up.All I'm saying is Goose went from under 70% last year to almost 90% this year without throwing another pitch. The HOF voting is a complete joke done by a majority of guys who couldn't hit a curve in Little League and now take out their frustrations on guys that do not deserve it.Look at his stats compared to Sutter. Enough said.Goose wasn't a HOF last year, but he is (maybe) one this year. Does anyone have a link to his 2007 stats because I'm curious what he did in 2007 to help his cause.![]()
Over the seven seasons from 1982 to '88, he led the National League in singles, doubles, triples and walks. Now think about what it is you'd like your leadoff hitter to do. Get on base, right? Well, this fellow was better at reaching base every single way you could reach it (outside of catcher's interference, maybe) than anyone else in his league. You'd also want your leadoff hitter to be able to steal a base, don't you think? So how about this: Not only was Tim Raines the only player in history to swipe at least 70 bases six years in a row, he stole 808 bases in his day while compiling the best SB percentage of all time (84.7 percent). Beyond that, he was an above-average defender, a leader on every team he played on and a player ranked by Bill James as the greatest leadoff hitter in history not named Rickey Henderson. And, if you're still not convinced, chew on these three factoids: • Raines is one of only two players in history with 500 stolen bases, 150 homers and a career on-base percentage over .375. The other: Barry Bonds. • He's one of only four left fielders whose on-base percentage was at least 50 points higher than the average player of his era. The others: Bonds, Henderson and Carl Yastrzemski. • And, finally, instead of counting hits the way we do with other candidates, let's count times on base, considering we're talking about a leadoff man. Well, Raines reached base more times (3,977) than Tony Gwynn, Honus Wagner, Lou Brock, Roberto Clemente or Richie Ashburn. And there isn't a single eligible player who reached base as many times as Raines did and had as high an on-base percentage (.385) who isn't in the Hall of Fame.
So yesterday's closers are today's Scot Shields? You say that, but when looking at Gossage's season totals, there are only 4 years where he worked as a closer and exceeded 100 innings. Where is the love for Jeff Reardon? 11 straight seasons of 20+ saves - something Gossage did not do in essentially the same era.That's the flaw in your argument.Closers back in the day (70s & 80s) weren't one inning specialists. Perhaps you go back and see how many 2 and 3 inning saves guys like Mike Marshall and Rollie Fingers had. They had FAR more multi-inning saves than not. You cannot compare Mariano Rivera and Goose Gossage and find the latter wanting. Goose has to be compared to those in his era -- Fingers, Sutter, etc.Sutter didn't belong in either - put his numbers up against 1/2 of today's closers and they don't hold up.All I'm saying is Goose went from under 70% last year to almost 90% this year without throwing another pitch. The HOF voting is a complete joke done by a majority of guys who couldn't hit a curve in Little League and now take out their frustrations on guys that do not deserve it.Look at his stats compared to Sutter. Enough said.Goose wasn't a HOF last year, but he is (maybe) one this year. Does anyone have a link to his 2007 stats because I'm curious what he did in 2007 to help his cause.![]()
Nope....he wasn't suspended for throwing a spitter until his 21st (next to last ) season in the league.Is Gaylord Perry's cheating any better than the steroid players'?
Ill vote:Gossage
But there were 543 ballots returned. 543 * 75% = 407.25 ballots. Now if Rice got 14 more votes he would have received 74.76%, not the 75% required. The HOF does not round up as evidenced by Nellie Fox not being inducted in 1985 with 74.7% of the vote. LinkThis year's resultsJim Rice, the former star of 16 seasons, all with the Red Sox, barely missed by 14 votes as he fell 2.8 percent (72.2) below the necessary 75 percent to gain admission to the hallowed red-brick Hall on Main Street in Cooperstown.
Player Total Votes PercentageRich Gossage 466 85.8%Jim Rice 392 72.2%Andre Dawson 358 65.9%Bert Blyleven 336 61.9%Lee Smith 235 43.3%Jack Morris 233 42.9%Tommy John 158 29.1%Tim Raines 132 24.3%Mark McGwire 128 23.6%Alan Trammell 99 18.2%Dave Concepcion 88 16.2%Don Mattingly 86 15.8%Dave Parker 82 15.1%Dale Murphy 75 13.8%Harold Baines 28 5.2%Rod Beck 2 0.4%Travis Fryman 2 0.4%Robb Nen 2 0.4%Shawon Dunston 1 0.2%Chuck Finley 1 0.2%David Justice 1 0.2%Chuck Knoblauch 1 0.2%Todd Stottlemyre 1 0.2%Jose Rijo 0 0%Brady Anderson 0 0%
Kinda curious, do you think Vinny Testaverde should get into the HOF?He's 6th all-time in passing yards and 8th all-time in passing TDs.guys like Raines and Blyleven are penalized for playing for poor teams in poor markets.to further the case for Blyleven:
There is only one pitcher in the history of baseball who has more wins, strikeouts, and shutouts than Blyleven - Nolan Ryan.Punch up Blyleven at baseball-reference.com and who comes up as his most similar pitchersCode:[b]Wins SO SHO[/b]Bert Blyleven 17th 5th 8thSteve Carlton 6th 4th 13thFerguson Jenkins 19th 11th 17thWalter Johnson 1st 9th 1stGaylord Perry 12th 8th 14thNolan Ryan 8th 1st 6thTom Seaver 13th 6th 6thDon Sutton 8th 7th 9th
on Sutton (914) * Gaylord Perry (909) * Fergie Jenkins (890) * Robin Roberts (876) * Tom Seaver (864) * Early Wynn (844) * Phil Niekro (844) * Steve Carlton (840) *All 8 - are in the hall of fame. Anyone can be good for one year (Joe Charboneau anyone?) It takes talent to stay in baseball that long (unless you're a lefty) and be a "compiler".
Bonds and Clemens are 10 times the player McGwire was.Ridiculous that McGwire did noit get in. If Barry Bonds or Clemens gets voted in before McGwire it will be a travesty. If McGwire does not get in, neither should any of them.This is the era baseball has become. The dead ball era, the live ball era, the steroid era. I guess we should not expect any of todays players to get in.
really???1998 83 18% 1999 70 14% 2000 87 17% 2001 121 24% 2002 124 26% 2003 145 29% 2004 179 35% 2005 211 41%2006 277 53%2007 260 48%2008 336 62%seems like an upward climb to meNext year's class is extremely weak for pitching. None of the pitchers behind him are going to leap him and next year's overall class includes:Steve Avery, Jay Bell, John Burkett, David Cone, Mike Bordick, Ron Gant, Mark Grace, Rickey Henderson, Denny Neagle, Dean Palmer, Dan Plesac, Greg Vaughn, Mo Vaughn, Matt Williams, Mike WilliamsRickey is the only one who belongs on a ballot and his speech should be hilariousBlyleven is done. The decline in his support has really begun imo.
You really think McGwire deserves to be in? Really all he has to hang his hat on is 583 HRs. In 16 seasons:He never won an MVP.Won ROY.Won 1 GG.Led the league in RBIs once.Won 3 silver slugger awards.To put that in perspective, in 4 seasons Ryan Howard has won ROY, MVP, 1 silver slugger and lead the league in RBIs once.Ridiculous that McGwire did noit get in. If Barry Bonds or Clemens gets voted in before McGwire it will be a travesty. If McGwire does not get in, neither should any of them.This is the era baseball has become. The dead ball era, the live ball era, the steroid era. I guess we should not expect any of todays players to get in.
Oh come on now. Im not a Mattingly HOF proponent but this post is ridiculous.You really can't make the case that a player belongs in the Hall of Fame because he's similar to a marginal Hall of Famer. What you need to do is make that case that a player belongs in the Hall of Fame because he's better than everybody else who is eligible who ISN'T in the Hall. Cecil Cooper, Will Clark, Steve Garvey, John Olerud, Wally Joyner.Mattingly isn't necessarily that much better than that list of comperable first basemen. Personally, I think his numbers aren't as good as Clark and Olerud.
Prove it wrong.Will Clark and John Olerud have higher OBP, Slugging and have more Runs, HRs, RBI. I'd argue that both guys had better and longer "peak" years than Mattingly and NEITHER of them benefited the way Mattingly did by playing half their games with a Lefty's "short porch" artificially inflating their power numbers like Mattingly did at Yankee Stadium.Oh, and I forgot Keith Hernandez too. Better OBP/OPS than Mattingly.shadyridr said:Oh come on now. Im not a Mattingly HOF proponent but this post is ridiculous.Workhorse said:You really can't make the case that a player belongs in the Hall of Fame because he's similar to a marginal Hall of Famer. What you need to do is make that case that a player belongs in the Hall of Fame because he's better than everybody else who is eligible who ISN'T in the Hall. Cecil Cooper, Will Clark, Steve Garvey, John Olerud, Wally Joyner.Mattingly isn't necessarily that much better than that list of comperable first basemen. Personally, I think his numbers aren't as good as Clark and Olerud.
Everyone with 500+ HRs is in EXCEPT McGwire of those eligible.He also held the single season HR and Rookie HR records. Went to 3 straight WS winning 1. He and Sosa saved MLB after the strike.Most writers agree his numbers get him in but they do not vote for him due to his appearance before congress.Snotbubbles said:You really think McGwire deserves to be in? Really all he has to hang his hat on is 583 HRs. In 16 seasons:He never won an MVP.Won ROY.Won 1 GG.Led the league in RBIs once.Won 3 silver slugger awards.To put that in perspective, in 4 seasons Ryan Howard has won ROY, MVP, 1 silver slugger and lead the league in RBIs once.B Maverick said:Ridiculous that McGwire did noit get in. If Barry Bonds or Clemens gets voted in before McGwire it will be a travesty. If McGwire does not get in, neither should any of them.This is the era baseball has become. The dead ball era, the live ball era, the steroid era. I guess we should not expect any of todays players to get in.
Why should I prove anything wrong? You're the one who made the statement. Plus I cant look at numbers at work. What kind of ABs did those other guys have? And none of them had a bad injury like Mattingly.Prove it wrong.Will Clark and John Olerud have higher OBP, Slugging and have more Runs, HRs, RBI. I'd argue that both guys had better and longer "peak" years than Mattingly and NEITHER of them benefited the way Mattingly did by playing half their games with a Lefty's "short porch" artificially inflating their power numbers like Mattingly did at Yankee Stadium.Oh, and I forgot Keith Hernandez too. Better OBP/OPS than Mattingly.shadyridr said:Oh come on now. Im not a Mattingly HOF proponent but this post is ridiculous.Workhorse said:You really can't make the case that a player belongs in the Hall of Fame because he's similar to a marginal Hall of Famer. What you need to do is make that case that a player belongs in the Hall of Fame because he's better than everybody else who is eligible who ISN'T in the Hall. Cecil Cooper, Will Clark, Steve Garvey, John Olerud, Wally Joyner.Mattingly isn't necessarily that much better than that list of comperable first basemen. Personally, I think his numbers aren't as good as Clark and Olerud.
Great, they still are the poster boys for the era and should not get in over McGwire. Bonds may even be going to jail.shadyridr said:Bonds and Clemens are 10 times the player McGwire was.B Maverick said:Ridiculous that McGwire did noit get in. If Barry Bonds or Clemens gets voted in before McGwire it will be a travesty. If McGwire does not get in, neither should any of them.This is the era baseball has become. The dead ball era, the live ball era, the steroid era. I guess we should not expect any of todays players to get in.
Bonds and Clemens most certainly deserve to be in over McGwire.I highly doubt McGwire ever gets in, and rightfully so imo. I doubt Palmeiro gets in either. Sammy Sosa probably will have the biggest grudge if he isn't voted in, although I think Sosa gets in.Great, they still are the poster boys for the era and should not get in over McGwire. Bonds may even be going to jail.shadyridr said:Bonds and Clemens are 10 times the player McGwire was.B Maverick said:Ridiculous that McGwire did noit get in. If Barry Bonds or Clemens gets voted in before McGwire it will be a travesty. If McGwire does not get in, neither should any of them.This is the era baseball has become. The dead ball era, the live ball era, the steroid era. I guess we should not expect any of todays players to get in.
Like I said all he has to hang his hat on is his HRs. Unfortunately for McGwire, 500 HRs used to mean something about 10-15 years ago. It doesn't anymore. That number has been tainted by steriods.Everyone with 500+ HRs is in EXCEPT McGwire of those eligible.He also held the single season HR and Rookie HR records. Went to 3 straight WS winning 1. He and Sosa saved MLB after the strike.Most writers agree his numbers get him in but they do not vote for him due to his appearance before congress.Snotbubbles said:You really think McGwire deserves to be in? Really all he has to hang his hat on is 583 HRs. In 16 seasons:He never won an MVP.Won ROY.Won 1 GG.Led the league in RBIs once.Won 3 silver slugger awards.To put that in perspective, in 4 seasons Ryan Howard has won ROY, MVP, 1 silver slugger and lead the league in RBIs once.B Maverick said:Ridiculous that McGwire did noit get in. If Barry Bonds or Clemens gets voted in before McGwire it will be a travesty. If McGwire does not get in, neither should any of them.This is the era baseball has become. The dead ball era, the live ball era, the steroid era. I guess we should not expect any of todays players to get in.