What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2010 FBG Post Season Contest (1 Viewer)

Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
I hope to make it through with 4 players. I have no Saints and no Colts...was counting on one of them going down. Another big Favre to Rice day could be enough...let's go San Diego!
 
Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
Yeah I'm gonna have 6, no NO players. I figured I'd be at a disadvantage but maybe there won't be a ton who made it through with 8 to make the cut off too difficult to reach.
 
ScottyFargo said:
grapeape said:
Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
Yeah I'm gonna have 6, no NO players. I figured I'd be at a disadvantage but maybe there won't be a ton who made it through with 8 to make the cut off too difficult to reach.
Same here, I'll have 6 with no Saints.
 
i have a high pct next to my team number in the sim but i will be stunned if i make it through the week. i just don't have enough players doing well. romo and austin killed me. dallas losing will kill me for next week if i advance.

 
ScottyFargo said:
grapeape said:
Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
Yeah I'm gonna have 6, no NO players. I figured I'd be at a disadvantage but maybe there won't be a ton who made it through with 8 to make the cut off too difficult to reach.
Same here, I'll have 6 with no Saints.
Moving on to the next round with:IND - Manning, ClarkNYJ - Greene, FeelyMIN - Favre, PetersonNO - ColstonCan't win it all I don't think, but I'm very likely to make it to the Super Bowl round which was my goal in putting together the team.
 
I would have to wager that there were more people loading up on Chargers than Jets to be in the SB. Might make next week a bit easier. i lose Nanee and SD D and keep Thomas Jones and DST. Maybe people still have their 2 jets, like me, though.

 
ScottyFargo said:
grapeape said:
Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
Yeah I'm gonna have 6, no NO players. I figured I'd be at a disadvantage but maybe there won't be a ton who made it through with 8 to make the cut off too difficult to reach.
Same here, I'll have 6 with no Saints.
Moving on to the next round with:IND - Manning, Clark

NYJ - Greene, Feely

MIN - Favre, Peterson

NO - Colston

Can't win it all I don't think, but I'm very likely to make it to the Super Bowl round which was my goal in putting together the team.
Hmmm... nobody else in the contest has this 4 player combo. If both teams score upsets next week, who knows? I could finish in the top group.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Projected cut according to the sim was 125? Think I should be ok.

Next week I have:

Manning

Garcon

Addai

Brees

Colston

Henderson

Greene

Jones

B Smith

if I made it through that is. I think I am about 135-140.

I am the only team with a Greene, Jones, Smith, Brees, Colston, Henderson combo. Go Saints, Jets!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If 150 gets me to the next round, I think I'm in good shape for next week, but no shot for the SB title, based on other rosters I've seen.

Manning

Wayne

Clark

Addai

Farve

Sidney Rice

Meachem

I do think the Colts and Vikings will play in the SB, although I'd love to see the Saints get there too. I just didn't load up on their players, because I assumed everyone else would.

 
Looks like I snuck in with 119, but my goose is cooked. Just not enough horses left with the Cowboys done.

Good luck all!

 
Missed cut by 1.1pts. Can't say I'd do too much differently except predict that Phi/Dal game correctly. Would have been good this week with 7 Ind/NYJ/Min/NO players counting. Oh well good luck all who are left.

 
Moving on, but will run out of steam soon.

Holy cow, did you see the team that has the high score for the week ... has Manning, Brees and Favre. Barely made it through in the first week (less than a pt, I believe) but is not sitting very pretty.

 
Think my luck will run out unless Colts/Vikes SB and Chester Taylor runs wild.

Remaining:

Peyton Manning $29 0.00 23.10

Reggie Wayne $23 0.00 20.30

Hank Baskett $2 0.00 0.00

New York Jets $7 7.00 6.00

Chester Taylor $8 0.00 4.90

Sidney Rice $19 0.00 38.10

TOTAL 151.60 151.50

CUTOFF 128.80 117.70

 
:cry: ;)

The Turk Got Me!!!! :(

Oh well, was a very fun and interesting contest. Swung for the fences and whiffed badly with the Cardinals as it turns out.

:goodposting:

Good luck to those who are left.

-QG

 
Well, banked on SD getting into the SB and that ended awfully. Looks like my best chance is a Indy-NO matchup, but too many of you have way more players in that match up than I do. :thumbup:

Remaining Players:

Peyton Manning

Pierre Garcon

Jerricho Cotchery

Robert Meachem

Devery Henderson

Brett Favre

Well, barely made the cut in the first two rounds, let's see if I can sneak into the final round this weekend. Good luck!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Holy cow, did you see the team that has the high score for the week ... has Manning, Brees and Favre. Barely made it through in the first week (less than a pt, I believe) but is not sitting very pretty.
Thanks. I think Ill make it to the Superbowl for sure, but I didnt have the guts to go all in on 2 teams.
 
My expectations were for a Vikings / Indy or Vikings / Chargers bowl. I loaded up on Vikes though, and only took two of each afc team. Now I'll get either Reggie Wayne and Garcon or Thomas Jones and Jets D combined with Favre, Rice, Harvin, Shiancoe, Kleinsasser and Greg Lewis if things go my way and the Vikes win. I think it made more sense to spread out only a little bit and buy more into one team that you felt was going to be in the Superbowl.

 
My expectations were for a Vikings / Indy or Vikings / Chargers bowl. I loaded up on Vikes though, and only took two of each afc team. Now I'll get either Reggie Wayne and Garcon or Thomas Jones and Jets D combined with Favre, Rice, Harvin, Shiancoe, Kleinsasser and Greg Lewis if things go my way and the Vikes win. I think it made more sense to spread out only a little bit and buy more into one team that you felt was going to be in the Superbowl.
sure if you pick right. i went chargers-cowboys. had romo, austin, rivers, gates and about 5 others on the two teams.
 
Anyone think I have a good shot advancing this week with this group-

Manning, Wayne, Clark, Addai

Farve, Sidney Rice

Meachem

 
Anyone think I have a good shot advancing this week with this group-Manning, Wayne, Clark, AddaiFarve, Sidney RiceMeachem
Is the "Championship round sim" out? I'd like to see your percentage to advance as well as mine. We that are still in would greatly appreciate it. One more time!, Doug. Thanks.
 
i got through, but pretty much have NO shot left, with the Chargers (Rivers, Gates & DST), Cowboys (Romo, F. Jones, Crayton, Witten & DST) and Cardinals (Warner, Fitz & Rackers) losing, here's what I hvae left:

Jets - T. Jones & S. Greene

Vikings - C. Taylor

Saints - David Thomas

Colts - none

If I advance, something is seriously odd.

 
331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
Update?
Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.
That's kind of an understatement. Nearly 45% of the entries that made the second-to-last cut are already eliminated. My guess is that approximately the same percentage will be found when looking at the 1000 or so that make the final cut.
 
331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
Update?
Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.
That's kind of an understatement. Nearly 45% of the entries that made the second-to-last cut are already eliminated. My guess is that approximately the same percentage will be found when looking at the 1000 or so that make the final cut.
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure there are more people mathematically alive right now than there would be if it was a cumulative points contest with no eliminations. That's the thing with these playoff contests. There are just so few games/teams that it's impossible to have a contest where you set-and-forget your entry before the playoffs start and you DON'T have a huge percentage of entries mathematically eliminated before the championship games. Or at least I haven't figured out how to do it.

 
331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
Update?
Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.
That's kind of an understatement. Nearly 45% of the entries that made the second-to-last cut are already eliminated. My guess is that approximately the same percentage will be found when looking at the 1000 or so that make the final cut.
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure there are more people mathematically alive right now than there would be if it was a cumulative points contest with no eliminations. That's the thing with these playoff contests. There are just so few games/teams that it's impossible to have a contest where you set-and-forget your entry before the playoffs start and you DON'T have a huge percentage of entries mathematically eliminated before the championship games. Or at least I haven't figured out how to do it.
Nothing wrong with this format (coming from someone eliminated last week). Some of those eliminated entires didn't understand the concepts/rules. The rest didn't peg the right teams advancing which is part of the contest.Load up on Super Bowl team players and save enough cash to use on the best pt/$ producers on the teams to advance to the Super Bowl.

Assuming even distribution, next week 3/4's of the teams will be mathmatically eliminated right off the bat based on not having both bowl teams. Will be more is the Jets advance and less if the Colts advance.

 
I have Thomas Jones, Jets D, and 5 Vikings...probably still alive to win it, but my % chance for this week will be low with only 4 players counting.

 
I wonder what the percentages are for teams that have 8, 6, and 4 players to go this week. I am not sure if I should feel like I am at a great disadvantage with only 6 running this week.

 
ScottyFargo said:
I wonder what the percentages are for teams that have 8, 6, and 4 players to go this week. I am not sure if I should feel like I am at a great disadvantage with only 6 running this week.
6 seems really solid to me when only 50% of the teams are getting cut. All of the SD players are out, and it would have been tough to make it out of round 1 with 2 players each from Indy, Minn, and NO.
 
331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
Update?
Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.
That's kind of an understatement. Nearly 45% of the entries that made the second-to-last cut are already eliminated. My guess is that approximately the same percentage will be found when looking at the 1000 or so that make the final cut.
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure there are more people mathematically alive right now than there would be if it was a cumulative points contest with no eliminations. That's the thing with these playoff contests. There are just so few games/teams that it's impossible to have a contest where you set-and-forget your entry before the playoffs start and you DON'T have a huge percentage of entries mathematically eliminated before the championship games. Or at least I haven't figured out how to do it.
Yeah, it's very hard no matter what. Even with the question format of last year (I still like that format too btw :goodposting: ) there's only so many things that could change in the finale and tip the balance of power.Random suggestion - maybe it's crazy but maybe it'll help add more variation and thus possibly spice up the finale. Just thought of it - maybe it's horrible maybe not.

Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.

For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.

Whatcha think, Turk? :)

-QG

 
Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.Whatcha think, Turk? :)
That's a very interesting idea and would undoubtedly introduce some variation into the entry pool. I'm not sure it would have a huge impact on the lay of the land, but couldn't hurt. Unfortunately, it's not feasible for an FBG contest, where the rules and the entry form have to be kept more simple than that. One idea I was toying with (which might also be thrown out for the same reason as yours) was allowing you to buy players for just the Super Bowl. For example, Peyton Manning might cost $27 or whatever, but you would also have the option of buying Peyton Manning's Super Bowl-Only points for something like $10. That would open up some different strategical possibilities.
 
Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.Whatcha think, Turk? :)
That's a very interesting idea and would undoubtedly introduce some variation into the entry pool. I'm not sure it would have a huge impact on the lay of the land, but couldn't hurt. Unfortunately, it's not feasible for an FBG contest, where the rules and the entry form have to be kept more simple than that. One idea I was toying with (which might also be thrown out for the same reason as yours) was allowing you to buy players for just the Super Bowl. For example, Peyton Manning might cost $27 or whatever, but you would also have the option of buying Peyton Manning's Super Bowl-Only points for something like $10. That would open up some different strategical possibilities.
Maybe you do it for all 4 weeks. Could lead to a certain amount of :shrug: when you have, say, Manning for the divisional round, but not for the conference championship :)Figured the design might be a bit much (always easy to make suggestions when you don't have to program them :) I guess you could replace the checkboxes with dollar allocations :lmao:Will be interesting to see how many folks have a chance before the last cut. Very hard to do something where all 1000 finalists would have a chance - frankly if you have even as many as 100 or so with a shot that would be pretty impressive :)Thanks as always for the hard work :thumbup: -QG
 
The sim gave me a 5% chance the first week, a 20% chance the second week and a 99% chance this week.

Not so sure I like my chances...

 
Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.Whatcha think, Turk? :)
That's a very interesting idea and would undoubtedly introduce some variation into the entry pool. I'm not sure it would have a huge impact on the lay of the land, but couldn't hurt. Unfortunately, it's not feasible for an FBG contest, where the rules and the entry form have to be kept more simple than that. One idea I was toying with (which might also be thrown out for the same reason as yours) was allowing you to buy players for just the Super Bowl. For example, Peyton Manning might cost $27 or whatever, but you would also have the option of buying Peyton Manning's Super Bowl-Only points for something like $10. That would open up some different strategical possibilities.
Maybe you do it for all 4 weeks. Could lead to a certain amount of :unsure: when you have, say, Manning for the divisional round, but not for the conference championship :)Figured the design might be a bit much (always easy to make suggestions when you don't have to program them :) I guess you could replace the checkboxes with dollar allocations ;)Will be interesting to see how many folks have a chance before the last cut. Very hard to do something where all 1000 finalists would have a chance - frankly if you have even as many as 100 or so with a shot that would be pretty impressive :)Thanks as always for the hard work :lmao: -QG
Again, might be hard to run but what if you lowered the prices on all the players. Each week you got to pick as many players as you wanted and spend as much as you wanted but only got XXX amount for the entire playoffs. You re enter your lineups and can use different players each week.First week you spent 40 of 500 on Rogers and Warner and advance. Next week you have 460 left to go on the 2nd round and so on....
 
Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.Whatcha think, Turk? :)
That's a very interesting idea and would undoubtedly introduce some variation into the entry pool. I'm not sure it would have a huge impact on the lay of the land, but couldn't hurt. Unfortunately, it's not feasible for an FBG contest, where the rules and the entry form have to be kept more simple than that. One idea I was toying with (which might also be thrown out for the same reason as yours) was allowing you to buy players for just the Super Bowl. For example, Peyton Manning might cost $27 or whatever, but you would also have the option of buying Peyton Manning's Super Bowl-Only points for something like $10. That would open up some different strategical possibilities.
Maybe you do it for all 4 weeks. Could lead to a certain amount of :wall: when you have, say, Manning for the divisional round, but not for the conference championship :)Figured the design might be a bit much (always easy to make suggestions when you don't have to program them :) I guess you could replace the checkboxes with dollar allocations ;)Will be interesting to see how many folks have a chance before the last cut. Very hard to do something where all 1000 finalists would have a chance - frankly if you have even as many as 100 or so with a shot that would be pretty impressive :)Thanks as always for the hard work <_< -QG
Again, might be hard to run but what if you lowered the prices on all the players. Each week you got to pick as many players as you wanted and spend as much as you wanted but only got XXX amount for the entire playoffs. You re enter your lineups and can use different players each week.First week you spent 40 of 500 on Rogers and Warner and advance. Next week you have 460 left to go on the 2nd round and so on....
They need to have a set it and forget it format for many reasons.
 
We also need logarithmic scoring, using a different base for each position :rant:

j/k of course :) I think :pickle:

I totally understand the unworkable nature of my original premise but through it out there just in case there's a :goodposting: who had a more elegant suggestion :)

-QG

 
I spent enough time messing around with my entry as is...

I personally would prefer Not to see another layer of complexity added to the contest.

 
I spent enough time messing around with my entry as is... I personally would prefer Not to see another layer of complexity added to the contest.
Is there an easy to find your team on the SIM list. My eyes just go crossed when I try to look through all those numbers. I was counting heavily on the chargers and lost 5 of them this week, so I dont think I have a prayer.....but if the Jets and Saints win , I'll have 5 players in the bowl...maybe I can break the top 200.
 
I spent enough time messing around with my entry as is... I personally would prefer Not to see another layer of complexity added to the contest.
Is there an easy to find your team on the SIM list. My eyes just go crossed when I try to look through all those numbers. I was counting heavily on the chargers and lost 5 of them this week, so I dont think I have a prayer.....but if the Jets and Saints win , I'll have 5 players in the bowl...maybe I can break the top 200.
Ctrl F and input your team number to jump to it on the page. You'll have to know your team number of course, so use the link in one of the first posts to log in and see it.
 
I spent enough time messing around with my entry as is... I personally would prefer Not to see another layer of complexity added to the contest.
Is there an easy to find your team on the SIM list. My eyes just go crossed when I try to look through all those numbers. I was counting heavily on the chargers and lost 5 of them this week, so I dont think I have a prayer.....but if the Jets and Saints win , I'll have 5 players in the bowl...maybe I can break the top 200.
Ctrl F and input your team number to jump to it on the page. You'll have to know your team number of course, so use the link in one of the first posts to log in and see it.
Thanks! I have a 19% chance. Thats about what I thought.I have a feeling that subscribing to this site is going to teach me a lot more about computers!Thanks again,PV
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top