I hope to make it through with 4 players. I have no Saints and no Colts...was counting on one of them going down. Another big Favre to Rice day could be enough...let's go San Diego!Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
Yeah I'm gonna have 6, no NO players. I figured I'd be at a disadvantage but maybe there won't be a ton who made it through with 8 to make the cut off too difficult to reach.Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
Same here, I'll have 6 with no Saints.ScottyFargo said:Yeah I'm gonna have 6, no NO players. I figured I'd be at a disadvantage but maybe there won't be a ton who made it through with 8 to make the cut off too difficult to reach.grapeape said:Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
Moving on to the next round with:IND - Manning, ClarkNYJ - Greene, FeelyMIN - Favre, PetersonNO - ColstonCan't win it all I don't think, but I'm very likely to make it to the Super Bowl round which was my goal in putting together the team.Same here, I'll have 6 with no Saints.ScottyFargo said:Yeah I'm gonna have 6, no NO players. I figured I'd be at a disadvantage but maybe there won't be a ton who made it through with 8 to make the cut off too difficult to reach.grapeape said:Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
Hmmm... nobody else in the contest has this 4 player combo. If both teams score upsets next week, who knows? I could finish in the top group.Moving on to the next round with:IND - Manning, ClarkSame here, I'll have 6 with no Saints.ScottyFargo said:Yeah I'm gonna have 6, no NO players. I figured I'd be at a disadvantage but maybe there won't be a ton who made it through with 8 to make the cut off too difficult to reach.grapeape said:Also curious how many teams have more than 5 players who will count towards their final score next week (taking into account a max of 2 per team).
NYJ - Greene, Feely
MIN - Favre, Peterson
NO - Colston
Can't win it all I don't think, but I'm very likely to make it to the Super Bowl round which was my goal in putting together the team.
Thanks. I think Ill make it to the Superbowl for sure, but I didnt have the guts to go all in on 2 teams.Holy cow, did you see the team that has the high score for the week ... has Manning, Brees and Favre. Barely made it through in the first week (less than a pt, I believe) but is not sitting very pretty.
sure if you pick right. i went chargers-cowboys. had romo, austin, rivers, gates and about 5 others on the two teams.My expectations were for a Vikings / Indy or Vikings / Chargers bowl. I loaded up on Vikes though, and only took two of each afc team. Now I'll get either Reggie Wayne and Garcon or Thomas Jones and Jets D combined with Favre, Rice, Harvin, Shiancoe, Kleinsasser and Greg Lewis if things go my way and the Vikes win. I think it made more sense to spread out only a little bit and buy more into one team that you felt was going to be in the Superbowl.
Is the "Championship round sim" out? I'd like to see your percentage to advance as well as mine. We that are still in would greatly appreciate it. One more time!, Doug. Thanks.Anyone think I have a good shot advancing this week with this group-Manning, Wayne, Clark, AddaiFarve, Sidney RiceMeachem
Update?331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.Update?331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
That's kind of an understatement. Nearly 45% of the entries that made the second-to-last cut are already eliminated. My guess is that approximately the same percentage will be found when looking at the 1000 or so that make the final cut.Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.Update?331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure there are more people mathematically alive right now than there would be if it was a cumulative points contest with no eliminations. That's the thing with these playoff contests. There are just so few games/teams that it's impossible to have a contest where you set-and-forget your entry before the playoffs start and you DON'T have a huge percentage of entries mathematically eliminated before the championship games. Or at least I haven't figured out how to do it.That's kind of an understatement. Nearly 45% of the entries that made the second-to-last cut are already eliminated. My guess is that approximately the same percentage will be found when looking at the 1000 or so that make the final cut.Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.Update?331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
Nothing wrong with this format (coming from someone eliminated last week). Some of those eliminated entires didn't understand the concepts/rules. The rest didn't peg the right teams advancing which is part of the contest.Load up on Super Bowl team players and save enough cash to use on the best pt/$ producers on the teams to advance to the Super Bowl.Yeah, but I'm pretty sure there are more people mathematically alive right now than there would be if it was a cumulative points contest with no eliminations. That's the thing with these playoff contests. There are just so few games/teams that it's impossible to have a contest where you set-and-forget your entry before the playoffs start and you DON'T have a huge percentage of entries mathematically eliminated before the championship games. Or at least I haven't figured out how to do it.That's kind of an understatement. Nearly 45% of the entries that made the second-to-last cut are already eliminated. My guess is that approximately the same percentage will be found when looking at the 1000 or so that make the final cut.Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.Update?331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
6 seems really solid to me when only 50% of the teams are getting cut. All of the SD players are out, and it would have been tough to make it out of round 1 with 2 players each from Indy, Minn, and NO.ScottyFargo said:I wonder what the percentages are for teams that have 8, 6, and 4 players to go this week. I am not sure if I should feel like I am at a great disadvantage with only 6 running this week.
Yeah, it's very hard no matter what. Even with the question format of last year (I still like that format too btwYeah, but I'm pretty sure there are more people mathematically alive right now than there would be if it was a cumulative points contest with no eliminations. That's the thing with these playoff contests. There are just so few games/teams that it's impossible to have a contest where you set-and-forget your entry before the playoffs start and you DON'T have a huge percentage of entries mathematically eliminated before the championship games. Or at least I haven't figured out how to do it.That's kind of an understatement. Nearly 45% of the entries that made the second-to-last cut are already eliminated. My guess is that approximately the same percentage will be found when looking at the 1000 or so that make the final cut.Yeah, it looks like 898 of the remaining 2000+ teams are mathematically eliminated from winning first place. That's kind of a bummer.Look for a sim tonight or tomorrow.Update?331 currently-live teams are mathematically eliminated by virtue of the fact that there is at least one other team with all the same players and the first tiebreaker advantage.
) there's only so many things that could change in the finale and tip the balance of power.Random suggestion - maybe it's crazy but maybe it'll help add more variation and thus possibly spice up the finale. Just thought of it - maybe it's horrible maybe not.
That's a very interesting idea and would undoubtedly introduce some variation into the entry pool. I'm not sure it would have a huge impact on the lay of the land, but couldn't hurt. Unfortunately, it's not feasible for an FBG contest, where the rules and the entry form have to be kept more simple than that. One idea I was toying with (which might also be thrown out for the same reason as yours) was allowing you to buy players for just the Super Bowl. For example, Peyton Manning might cost $27 or whatever, but you would also have the option of buying Peyton Manning's Super Bowl-Only points for something like $10. That would open up some different strategical possibilities.Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.Whatcha think, Turk?![]()
wow, better than I thought at 85%
Maybe you do it for all 4 weeks. Could lead to a certain amount ofThat's a very interesting idea and would undoubtedly introduce some variation into the entry pool. I'm not sure it would have a huge impact on the lay of the land, but couldn't hurt. Unfortunately, it's not feasible for an FBG contest, where the rules and the entry form have to be kept more simple than that. One idea I was toying with (which might also be thrown out for the same reason as yours) was allowing you to buy players for just the Super Bowl. For example, Peyton Manning might cost $27 or whatever, but you would also have the option of buying Peyton Manning's Super Bowl-Only points for something like $10. That would open up some different strategical possibilities.Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.Whatcha think, Turk?![]()
when you have, say, Manning for the divisional round, but not for the conference championship
Figured the design might be a bit much (always easy to make suggestions when you don't have to program them
I guess you could replace the checkboxes with dollar allocations
Will be interesting to see how many folks have a chance before the last cut. Very hard to do something where all 1000 finalists would have a chance - frankly if you have even as many as 100 or so with a shot that would be pretty impressive
Thanks as always for the hard work Again, might be hard to run but what if you lowered the prices on all the players. Each week you got to pick as many players as you wanted and spend as much as you wanted but only got XXX amount for the entire playoffs. You re enter your lineups and can use different players each week.First week you spent 40 of 500 on Rogers and Warner and advance. Next week you have 460 left to go on the 2nd round and so on....Maybe you do it for all 4 weeks. Could lead to a certain amount ofThat's a very interesting idea and would undoubtedly introduce some variation into the entry pool. I'm not sure it would have a huge impact on the lay of the land, but couldn't hurt. Unfortunately, it's not feasible for an FBG contest, where the rules and the entry form have to be kept more simple than that. One idea I was toying with (which might also be thrown out for the same reason as yours) was allowing you to buy players for just the Super Bowl. For example, Peyton Manning might cost $27 or whatever, but you would also have the option of buying Peyton Manning's Super Bowl-Only points for something like $10. That would open up some different strategical possibilities.Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.Whatcha think, Turk?![]()
when you have, say, Manning for the divisional round, but not for the conference championship
Figured the design might be a bit much (always easy to make suggestions when you don't have to program them
I guess you could replace the checkboxes with dollar allocations
Will be interesting to see how many folks have a chance before the last cut. Very hard to do something where all 1000 finalists would have a chance - frankly if you have even as many as 100 or so with a shot that would be pretty impressive
Thanks as always for the hard work
-QG
They need to have a set it and forget it format for many reasons.Again, might be hard to run but what if you lowered the prices on all the players. Each week you got to pick as many players as you wanted and spend as much as you wanted but only got XXX amount for the entire playoffs. You re enter your lineups and can use different players each week.First week you spent 40 of 500 on Rogers and Warner and advance. Next week you have 460 left to go on the 2nd round and so on....Maybe you do it for all 4 weeks. Could lead to a certain amount ofThat's a very interesting idea and would undoubtedly introduce some variation into the entry pool. I'm not sure it would have a huge impact on the lay of the land, but couldn't hurt. Unfortunately, it's not feasible for an FBG contest, where the rules and the entry form have to be kept more simple than that. One idea I was toying with (which might also be thrown out for the same reason as yours) was allowing you to buy players for just the Super Bowl. For example, Peyton Manning might cost $27 or whatever, but you would also have the option of buying Peyton Manning's Super Bowl-Only points for something like $10. That would open up some different strategical possibilities.Perhaps you could modify the dollars allocated to a player and thus get a multiple of their scoring.For example: Rodgers costs $30. Let's say I put $45 of my cap value on him and get 1.5 times his stats. Say I like Beanie Wells, but not enough to go whole hog. I can put $4 of my cap onto him and get .4 times his stats since his value is $10.Whatcha think, Turk?![]()
when you have, say, Manning for the divisional round, but not for the conference championship
Figured the design might be a bit much (always easy to make suggestions when you don't have to program them
I guess you could replace the checkboxes with dollar allocations
Will be interesting to see how many folks have a chance before the last cut. Very hard to do something where all 1000 finalists would have a chance - frankly if you have even as many as 100 or so with a shot that would be pretty impressive
Thanks as always for the hard work <_< -QG
Is there an easy to find your team on the SIM list. My eyes just go crossed when I try to look through all those numbers. I was counting heavily on the chargers and lost 5 of them this week, so I dont think I have a prayer.....but if the Jets and Saints win , I'll have 5 players in the bowl...maybe I can break the top 200.I spent enough time messing around with my entry as is... I personally would prefer Not to see another layer of complexity added to the contest.
Ctrl F and input your team number to jump to it on the page. You'll have to know your team number of course, so use the link in one of the first posts to log in and see it.Is there an easy to find your team on the SIM list. My eyes just go crossed when I try to look through all those numbers. I was counting heavily on the chargers and lost 5 of them this week, so I dont think I have a prayer.....but if the Jets and Saints win , I'll have 5 players in the bowl...maybe I can break the top 200.I spent enough time messing around with my entry as is... I personally would prefer Not to see another layer of complexity added to the contest.
Thanks! I have a 19% chance. Thats about what I thought.I have a feeling that subscribing to this site is going to teach me a lot more about computers!Thanks again,PVCtrl F and input your team number to jump to it on the page. You'll have to know your team number of course, so use the link in one of the first posts to log in and see it.Is there an easy to find your team on the SIM list. My eyes just go crossed when I try to look through all those numbers. I was counting heavily on the chargers and lost 5 of them this week, so I dont think I have a prayer.....but if the Jets and Saints win , I'll have 5 players in the bowl...maybe I can break the top 200.I spent enough time messing around with my entry as is... I personally would prefer Not to see another layer of complexity added to the contest.