No kidding. RidiculousRoberson's 245th foul of the day finally put him on the pine
It was bad...very bad.Not bad for playing 5-on-8 on the road.
Well since this the SEC I think that Texas a&m gets vaulted into the top 10. Or, does that only work for football?How much better does this make Texas A&M than Louisville?does double OT count as 2 losses?OT to Texas A&M is like a loss IMOYes or moredoes double OT count as 2 losses?OT to Texas A&M is like a loss IMO
Yeah the Harrisons had a pretty brutal shooting day 6-30. I think these last couple of games have been two of the worst coaching games for Cal since he has been here. He has completely lost the trust for Lee and Johnson, but lets the Harrisons jack up 30 bricks? I get that shooters have to shoot their way out of a slump, but whne you have a 50% 3-point shooter, maybe you let him take a few shots...I just looked over the box score since I only got to half-watch the game. Harrison seriously jacked up 13 3-pt attempts and went 4-20!?
They should punch his brother in the face every time he passes to him in practice.
Poythress kept it from being 5 and 5, and then combined with less than stellar defensive play from Lee, and to a lesser extent Johnson - and Calipari is just wired to have a short bench - he still talks about a conversation he had with Wooden years ago about the importance of a short bench - let the players fight for time in practice.Why did they go away from platoon? It worked
Don't know if I'd go quite that far just yet...Only a matter of time with them playing like this. The platoon was dominating. Now they're just another pretty good team
I'd say they're another one of the top teams but don't stand out. They're going to lose a fewDon't know if I'd go quite that far just yet...Only a matter of time with them playing like this. The platoon was dominating. Now they're just another pretty good team
How about we hold off on that for a while?Can we just move Duke to the #1 spot already?
At the end of the day, it does not matter - two writers switched from UK also. More amusing that someone really can't stomach voting for UK at #1*I tried to figure out an argument for UVA over UK for #1. I think I found it: UVA is 7-0 against the RPI 50, while UK is only 6-0.
(Both are 9-0 against the RPI 100.
UK is 4-0 against the RPI 30, while UVA is 2-0. )
Mike Young of Wofford. I'll bet his Inbox is crushed right now.
Presumably the same coach who had been voting Duke over UK, is now voting UVA over UK. Someone must really hate UK or Calipari.
UK struggled this week, but hey still have a more impressive resume than UVA, or any other team out there right now.
I can deal with bad games. Bad attitudes not so muchCyclones said:Using Christmas day as the cutoff, UK is DEAD LAST in the country since then in 2 point FG %. DEAD LAST.
During that stretch, they are 3-0, with 2 road wins, including one over top 5 Louisville.
In the words of Aaron Rodgers...R E L A X. It's quite possible we just played as bad as we can play over a three game stretch and came out unscathed.
ETA - without the Harrisons we lose the Ole Miss game by 20 plus. Guys have off games - Ulis was non existent vs Ole Miss.
Back to crushing!I'd say they're another one of the top teams but don't stand out. They're going to lose a fewDon't know if I'd go quite that far just yet...Only a matter of time with them playing like this. The platoon was dominating. Now they're just another pretty good team
Yeah - Cal is funny talking last night about he wanted to get back to the platoon system - he was the one who abandoned it. The energy level with all the players is just higher when they come in for regular shifts. Certainly some players "deserve" more playing time based on skill and performance, but the team is much better when they are almost competing against the other unit.Looks like Cal agreed with you Sinn on the platoons. He was quick to pull Lee and Johnson over rebounding issues again though.
And I finally got my Booker, Ulis, Lyles, WCS, Towns lineup and it looked pretty awesome.
So if the shot clock is outlawed, Cal suddenly decides to play four starters at least 37 minutes, and the opponent shoots .786 from the floor, UK is screwed.Defenze said:Does Cal stay with the platoon system after the season ends? Going into the SEC tournament? During the NCAA's? Or does he mix and match depending on the type of team he plays? After all, it's about winning a championship, not how many minutes you get. I personally could care less about the platoon system after the season is over. By that time everyone should be good playing in either platoon. This team as it is right now reminds me of the over-whelming teams back in the 80's, Houston's Phi Slama Jama, and the tenacious Georgetown Hoyas. Hmmmm....how did they fair in their Final Four? Seems I remember some little team out of North Carolina sneaking in and defeating the Cougars. As well as the greatest upset of all time when Villanova defeated Georgetown. Sorry for the negative comparison.
The platoons make the team better - it allows players with "less" talent to play more minutes than they otherwise would have, but the energy level and cohesiveness on defense make up for that, I think.Defenze said:Does Cal stay with the platoon system after the season ends? Going into the SEC tournament? During the NCAA's? Or does he mix and match depending on the type of team he plays? After all, it's about winning a championship, not how many minutes you get. I personally could care less about the platoon system after the season is over. By that time everyone should be good playing in either platoon. This team as it is right now reminds me of the over-whelming teams back in the 80's, Houston's Phi Slama Jama, and the tenacious Georgetown Hoyas. Hmmmm....how did they fair in their Final Four? Seems I remember some little team out of North Carolina sneaking in and defeating the Cougars. As well as the greatest upset of all time when Villanova defeated Georgetown. Sorry for the negative comparison.
Hmm... I remember seeing that, but not understanding why he was upset at the time. If I am remembering correctly, UK did call the timeout, and the other unit was going in - but I thought they were already at the scorers table.I wonder if that is why Ulis spiked the ball in frustration at that one timeout.
No what I mean is, if there is a 35 second shot clock, and Cal is playing a 2 platoon system, and the opponent shoots 78% from the floor, UK is screwed. Any other team would be too. All I'm saying is the Houston 83' team had 2 HOF's on it and was called by many as being "unbeatable". Every guy on that team was a beast of a player. But when money was on the line, they got beat. So many are saying the same thing of UK, and frankly I wished they'd stop it.So if the shot clock is outlawed, Cal suddenly decides to play four starters at least 37 minutes, and the opponent shoots .786 from the floor, UK is screwed.Defenze said:Does Cal stay with the platoon system after the season ends? Going into the SEC tournament? During the NCAA's? Or does he mix and match depending on the type of team he plays? After all, it's about winning a championship, not how many minutes you get. I personally could care less about the platoon system after the season is over. By that time everyone should be good playing in either platoon. This team as it is right now reminds me of the over-whelming teams back in the 80's, Houston's Phi Slama Jama, and the tenacious Georgetown Hoyas. Hmmmm....how did they fair in their Final Four? Seems I remember some little team out of North Carolina sneaking in and defeating the Cougars. As well as the greatest upset of all time when Villanova defeated Georgetown. Sorry for the negative comparison.
Phi Slamma Jamma wasn't called "unbeatable". At this point in the 1083 season, they had already lost twice: once to a middling Syracuse team who went 9-7 in the Big East, and to Virginia who played the game without Ralph Sampson. They didn't play well in the title game, and made some tacitcal errors Calipari wouldn't make. And it still took a buzzer beater to beat them.Defenze said:No what I mean is, if there is a 35 second shot clock, and Cal is playing a 2 platoon system, and the opponent shoots 78% from the floor, UK is screwed. Any other team would be too. All I'm saying is the Houston 83' team had 2 HOF's on it and was called by many as being "unbeatable". Every guy on that team was a beast of a player. But when money was on the line, they got beat. So many are saying the same thing of UK, and frankly I wished they'd stop it.So if the shot clock is outlawed, Cal suddenly decides to play four starters at least 37 minutes, and the opponent shoots .786 from the floor, UK is screwed.Defenze said:Does Cal stay with the platoon system after the season ends? Going into the SEC tournament? During the NCAA's? Or does he mix and match depending on the type of team he plays? After all, it's about winning a championship, not how many minutes you get. I personally could care less about the platoon system after the season is over. By that time everyone should be good playing in either platoon. This team as it is right now reminds me of the over-whelming teams back in the 80's, Houston's Phi Slama Jama, and the tenacious Georgetown Hoyas. Hmmmm....how did they fair in their Final Four? Seems I remember some little team out of North Carolina sneaking in and defeating the Cougars. As well as the greatest upset of all time when Villanova defeated Georgetown. Sorry for the negative comparison.
Fascinating. Love reading and hearing about stuff like this. Reminds of me of hearing former opponents of the Arkansas "40 Minutes of Hell" at the peak of their powers. One NCAA Tournament victim (can't remember which) practiced breaking Arkansas's press using 7 defenders against five, and the seven from practice didn't cut off space as effectively as Arkansas's five in the game.Was talking to a former student that plays (sort of) for Louisville now and he said 'it looked like the court wasn't big enough' when they played UK. Also said it looked like there wasn't a passing lane anywhere, that they could get a hand on any pass anytime. Interesting to hear a first-person, floor level account...
Phi Slamma Jamma was called "most unlikely to be upset" in the NCAA tournament. Did you watch the team that year? I did. The were explosive and dominate much like Kentucky. Yes the lost twice that year. And that's my point. They lost in the season and went thru the NCAA like crap through a goose. Even Louisville's "Doctors of Dunk" lost to them. I am a Kentucky fan. Live in KY and have watch them all my life. This team is scary good and I am a pessimist. Not a good combo. I hope they win a 9th title. But would rather do my losing during the season instead at tournament time. That's all I'm saying.Phi Slamma Jamma wasn't called "unbeatable". At this point in the 1083 season, they had already lost twice: once to a middling Syracuse team who went 9-7 in the Big East, and to Virginia who played the game without Ralph Sampson.They didn't play well in the title game, and made some tacitcal errors Calipari wouldn't make. And it still took a buzzer beater to beat them.Defenze said:No what I mean is, if there is a 35 second shot clock, and Cal is playing a 2 platoon system, and the opponent shoots 78% from the floor, UK is screwed. Any other team would be too. All I'm saying is the Houston 83' team had 2 HOF's on it and was called by many as being "unbeatable". Every guy on that team was a beast of a player. But when money was on the line, they got beat. So many are saying the same thing of UK, and frankly I wished they'd stop it.So if the shot clock is outlawed, Cal suddenly decides to play four starters at least 37 minutes, and the opponent shoots .786 from the floor, UK is screwed.Defenze said:Does Cal stay with the platoon system after the season ends? Going into the SEC tournament? During the NCAA's? Or does he mix and match depending on the type of team he plays? After all, it's about winning a championship, not how many minutes you get. I personally could care less about the platoon system after the season is over. By that time everyone should be good playing in either platoon. This team as it is right now reminds me of the over-whelming teams back in the 80's, Houston's Phi Slama Jama, and the tenacious Georgetown Hoyas. Hmmmm....how did they fair in their Final Four? Seems I remember some little team out of North Carolina sneaking in and defeating the Cougars. As well as the greatest upset of all time when Villanova defeated Georgetown. Sorry for the negative comparison.
How about we just not do any losing???Defenze said:Phi Slamma Jamma was called "most unlikely to be upset" in the NCAA tournament. Did you watch the team that year? I did. The were explosive and dominate much like Kentucky. Yes the lost twice that year. And that's my point. They lost in the season and went thru the NCAA like crap through a goose. Even Louisville's "Doctors of Dunk" lost to them. I am a Kentucky fan. Live in KY and have watch them all my life. This team is scary good and I am a pessimist. Not a good combo. I hope they win a 9th title. But would rather do my losing during the season instead at tournament time. That's all I'm saying.Phi Slamma Jamma wasn't called "unbeatable". At this point in the 1083 season, they had already lost twice: once to a middling Syracuse team who went 9-7 in the Big East, and to Virginia who played the game without Ralph Sampson.They didn't play well in the title game, and made some tacitcal errors Calipari wouldn't make. And it still took a buzzer beater to beat them.Defenze said:No what I mean is, if there is a 35 second shot clock, and Cal is playing a 2 platoon system, and the opponent shoots 78% from the floor, UK is screwed. Any other team would be too. All I'm saying is the Houston 83' team had 2 HOF's on it and was called by many as being "unbeatable". Every guy on that team was a beast of a player. But when money was on the line, they got beat. So many are saying the same thing of UK, and frankly I wished they'd stop it.So if the shot clock is outlawed, Cal suddenly decides to play four starters at least 37 minutes, and the opponent shoots .786 from the floor, UK is screwed.Does Cal stay with the platoon system after the season ends? Going into the SEC tournament? During the NCAA's? Or does he mix and match depending on the type of team he plays? After all, it's about winning a championship, not how many minutes you get. I personally could care less about the platoon system after the season is over. By that time everyone should be good playing in either platoon. This team as it is right now reminds me of the over-whelming teams back in the 80's, Houston's Phi Slama Jama, and the tenacious Georgetown Hoyas. Hmmmm....how did they fair in their Final Four? Seems I remember some little team out of North Carolina sneaking in and defeating the Cougars. As well as the greatest upset of all time when Villanova defeated Georgetown. Sorry for the negative comparison.
Feeds the post better than anybody not named Ulis. I might like him better with that first group and keep Lyles with the 2nd platoon.Was just going to post that I thought Willis was putting in some good minutes then he immediately commits an offensive foup and gets taken out, lol.