Neofight
Footballguy
I'd add that QBR may be the least objective single metric out there. Truly a made for TV stat that does nothing to capture a QB's importance to their team or his contributions to their success.He's always come across as a shameless homer; the intelligent thing is new. Can you enlighten me on this?Using any of the standard accepted measurables puts Luck in the middle of the pack. He was #13 in passing yards and #16 in TD passes. Even the new metrics aren't that flattering. He is #11 in QBR. I can't believe someone as intelligent as you is really advocating that Luck deserves a Pro Bowl this year.Your 2 measurables are relevant? What is the criteria used??Irrelevant. 10 quarterbacks have a better TD-INT ratio, and 28 quarterbacks have a better YPA. Luck is good, but he needs to be more consistent.Luck- beat Denver, Seattle, SF, and KC
The Pro Bowl is a joke anyway, but this makes it even more so to me.
Last edited by a moderator: