I won't believe it until there was actually substantial to base it on. Here are the best sources I can gather:These Rivers to Titans rumors seem to be picking up. Some mocks have now started showing us making the trade and grabbing Mariota.![]()
There's more to this than Rivers is saying, IMO. It's a complete joke that he doesn't want to uproot his family when his games would only be 2 hours down the road. He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.I won't believe it until there was actually substantial to base it on. Here are the best sources I can gather:These Rivers to Titans rumors seem to be picking up. Some mocks have now started showing us making the trade and grabbing Mariota.![]()
- Rivers says he likes SD and isn't sure he would want to uproot his family and move to LA, and wants to play out his contract. I have no idea why this would be news. This is what I would expect him to say.
- TEN wants to add a qb.... Didn't they just lose Locker who was the opening day starter last year? Of course they want to add a qb even if they like Mett.
It just sounds like a bunch of sports writers using each others rumor as a source for their rumor if you ask me.
I wouldn't trade Rivers straight up and I only think he has 2-3 years left in the tank. Now if they would have used that first rounder on Bridgewater last year however....
Send him to ####### Cleveland then, or the Jets. Does he have some sort of no trade clause?He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.
Completely disagree. He doesn't want to raise his family in LA. He is a family man and isn't going to leave his family, including 7 kids, in SD while he has to live in LA most of the time. The fact that they would be 2 hours away doesn't really matter... Either they would be uprooted or they would be apart. Moreover, he hasn't said he won't play in LA. He has said he would prefer not to. He happens to be in position where his contract situation enables him to consider alternatives if the team does announce a move. What's wrong with that? You're ready to throw him under the bus based on that?There's more to this than Rivers is saying, IMO. It's a complete joke that he doesn't want to uproot his family when his games would only be 2 hours down the road. He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.I won't believe it until there was actually substantial to base it on. Here are the best sources I can gather:- Rivers says he likes SD and isn't sure he would want to uproot his family and move to LA, and wants to play out his contract. I have no idea why this would be news. This is what I would expect him to say.These Rivers to Titans rumors seem to be picking up. Some mocks have now started showing us making the trade and grabbing Mariota.![]()
- TEN wants to add a qb.... Didn't they just lose Locker who was the opening day starter last year? Of course they want to add a qb even if they like Mett.
It just sounds like a bunch of sports writers using each others rumor as a source for their rumor if you ask me.
I wouldn't trade Rivers straight up and I only think he has 2-3 years left in the tank. Now if they would have used that first rounder on Bridgewater last year however....
WTF is wrong with you guys?Send him to ####### Cleveland then, or the Jets. Does he have some sort of no trade clause?He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.
Trade bim to the jets and theyll win the gd superbowlSend him to ####### Cleveland then, or the Jets. Does he have some sort of no trade clause?He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.
Homer behavior jwb. Ur a rivers fan not really a bolt fan. I dont gwt the whole rivers wants out angel. I dont think he does.WTF is wrong with you guys?Send him to ####### Cleveland then, or the Jets. Does he have some sort of no trade clause?He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.
How does this sound like he wants to be a Charger:Completely disagree. He doesn't want to raise his family in LA. He is a family man and isn't going to leave his family, including 7 kids, in SD while he has to live in LA most of the time. The fact that they would be 2 hours away doesn't really matter... Either they would be uprooted or they would be apart.Moreover, he hasn't said he won't play in LA. He has said he would prefer not to. He happens to be in position where his contract situation enables him to consider alternatives if the team does announce a move. What's wrong with that? You're ready to throw him under the bus based on that?There's more to this than Rivers is saying, IMO. It's a complete joke that he doesn't want to uproot his family when his games would only be 2 hours down the road. He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.I won't believe it until there was actually substantial to base it on. Here are the best sources I can gather:- Rivers says he likes SD and isn't sure he would want to uproot his family and move to LA, and wants to play out his contract. I have no idea why this would be news. This is what I would expect him to say.These Rivers to Titans rumors seem to be picking up. Some mocks have now started showing us making the trade and grabbing Mariota.![]()
- TEN wants to add a qb.... Didn't they just lose Locker who was the opening day starter last year? Of course they want to add a qb even if they like Mett.
It just sounds like a bunch of sports writers using each others rumor as a source for their rumor if you ask me.
I wouldn't trade Rivers straight up and I only think he has 2-3 years left in the tank. Now if they would have used that first rounder on Bridgewater last year however....
There is zero evidence that he has any ulterior motive, much less that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.
If his family loves SD so much why would they not want to stay there and have him commute to LA? Also would it kill them to move a little closer, say Newport Beach?Asked on Tuesday if he thinks he will play his current contract out rather than agreeing to extend the deal that ends after the upcoming season, Rivers said, “Yes.”
Asked if he envisioned any circumstance causing him to reconsider, he said, “Honestly, nothing.”
That quote simply shows him keeping his options open. It changes nothing about what I posted.cstu said:How does this sound like he wants to be a Charger:Just Win Baby said:Completely disagree. He doesn't want to raise his family in LA. He is a family man and isn't going to leave his family, including 7 kids, in SD while he has to live in LA most of the time. The fact that they would be 2 hours away doesn't really matter... Either they would be uprooted or they would be apart.Moreover, he hasn't said he won't play in LA. He has said he would prefer not to. He happens to be in position where his contract situation enables him to consider alternatives if the team does announce a move. What's wrong with that? You're ready to throw him under the bus based on that?cstu said:There's more to this than Rivers is saying, IMO. It's a complete joke that he doesn't want to uproot his family when his games would only be 2 hours down the road. He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.BoltBacker said:I won't believe it until there was actually substantial to base it on. Here are the best sources I can gather:- Rivers says he likes SD and isn't sure he would want to uproot his family and move to LA, and wants to play out his contract. I have no idea why this would be news. This is what I would expect him to say.Bucky86 said:These Rivers to Titans rumors seem to be picking up. Some mocks have now started showing us making the trade and grabbing Mariota.![]()
- TEN wants to add a qb.... Didn't they just lose Locker who was the opening day starter last year? Of course they want to add a qb even if they like Mett.
It just sounds like a bunch of sports writers using each others rumor as a source for their rumor if you ask me.
I wouldn't trade Rivers straight up and I only think he has 2-3 years left in the tank. Now if they would have used that first rounder on Bridgewater last year however....
There is zero evidence that he has any ulterior motive, much less that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.
If his family loves SD so much why would they not want to stay there and have him commute to LA? Also would it kill them to move a little closer, say Newport Beach?Asked on Tuesday if he thinks he will play his current contract out rather than agreeing to extend the deal that ends after the upcoming season, Rivers said, Yes.
Asked if he envisioned any circumstance causing him to reconsider, he said, Honestly, nothing.
I'll root for the Chargers if he stays, but good riddance if they get rid of him.
at the idea of him "commuting" to LA in season.Here, I found him the perfect home for his family in Newport Beach, an hour away from Inglewood and San Diego.That quote simply shows him keeping his options open. It changes nothing about what I posted.
Andat the idea of him "commuting" to LA in season.
I'm surprised at this overreaction to his comments by so many fans. A lot of you are going to be sorry when you get what you are wishing for and have to deal with another starting QB.
The guy has 7 kids. I assume he has them in schools they are happy in, they probably have a church they like, etc. I suspect he doesn't want to move them away, even if only an hour away. As I have stated before, he hasn't said he won't do it if the team moves to L.A. He has simply said he doesn't want to do it. If the team moves and he is franchised, he'll have to decide if he wants to keep playing or is ready to retire. If he wants to play, I expect he will move the family. If he isn't franchised and he still wants to play, that opens up other possibilities that he might prefer to L.A. But that scenario seems pretty unlikely, because that would mean the team would be letting him walk for nothing, presumably leaving them without a quality starter.Here, I found him the perfect home for his family in Newport Beach, an hour away from Inglewood and San Diego.That quote simply shows him keeping his options open. It changes nothing about what I posted.
Andat the idea of him "commuting" to LA in season.
I'm surprised at this overreaction to his comments by so many fans. A lot of you are going to be sorry when you get what you are wishing for and have to deal with another starting QB.
But he would rather play somewhere on the other side of the country than move there.
You're forgetting the supposed Bullet Train we already should have had...lolThe guy has 7 kids. I assume he has them in schools they are happy in, they probably have a church they like, etc. I suspect he doesn't want to move them away, even if only an hour away. As I have stated before, he hasn't said he won't do it if the team moves to L.A. He has simply said he doesn't want to do it. If the team moves and he is franchised, he'll have to decide if he wants to keep playing or is ready to retire. If he wants to play, I expect he will move the family. If he isn't franchised and he still wants to play, that opens up other possibilities that he might prefer to L.A. But that scenario seems pretty unlikely, because that would mean the team would be letting him walk for nothing, presumably leaving them without a quality starter.Here, I found him the perfect home for his family in Newport Beach, an hour away from Inglewood and San Diego.That quote simply shows him keeping his options open. It changes nothing about what I posted.
Andat the idea of him "commuting" to LA in season.
I'm surprised at this overreaction to his comments by so many fans. A lot of you are going to be sorry when you get what you are wishing for and have to deal with another starting QB.
But he would rather play somewhere on the other side of the country than move there.
The bottom line is that you said he has an ulterior motive which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers, but there is no evidence to support that. For example, if that were true, he could try to force a trade, but there is no indication that he has done that.
Is it really so hard to understand that he is a guy who puts family first? That is nothing to vilify him for.
As for commuting from Newport Beach to L.A., how often do you think that drive would take just an hour? Google Maps shows that drive would take 1.5-2 hours each way during early morning and evening. You think he's going to make that drive daily? You think that isn't going to take away either from his football preparation or his time with his family or both?
You are making something out of nothing.
If he really doesn't want to play for the Chargers, and the team is certain that is the case, they should trade him now and get the greatest return they can out of it. I am not saying that is certain, just what I'd like them to do if it was.WTF is wrong with you guys?Send him to ####### Cleveland then, or the Jets. Does he have some sort of no trade clause?He's not saying what he's really thinking which is that he no longer wants to play for the Chargers.
Marshawn Lynch. This year.What was the last first round running back to start in a Super Bowl?
Every mock drafter thinks they know what the team needs more than the actual fans. SMH.on a different note, getting really unhappy when every mock seems to have SD taking a RB in rd 1. And now there is a debate whether gurley or gordon is a better fit and that SD's biggest need is RB since they lost Mathews.
Exactly.Marshawn Lynch. This year.What was the last first round running back to start in a Super Bowl?
The trick is, he didn't play for the team that originally drafted him.![]()
Rb n nt is the biggest need. ShrugEvery mock drafter thinks they know what the team needs more than the actual fans. SMH.on a different note, getting really unhappy when every mock seems to have SD taking a RB in rd 1. And now there is a debate whether gurley or gordon is a better fit and that SD's biggest need is RB since they lost Mathews.
I completely agree with you, and my first reaction was pointing out the fact all these comments came within 24-hours of Big Ben signing a HUGE ridiculous deal. But keep in mind he's won multiple SB's as well so maybe he's earned more $.So by Rivers saying all this noone thinks maybe he is just trying to maintain leverage and get more $$ to pay for his 7 kids?
What % of the snaps do you think a first round RB would play?Rb n nt is the biggest need. ShrugEvery mock drafter thinks they know what the team needs more than the actual fans. SMH.on a different note, getting really unhappy when every mock seems to have SD taking a RB in rd 1. And now there is a debate whether gurley or gordon is a better fit and that SD's biggest need is RB since they lost Mathews.
I don't think they should consider trading him, but I thought you were an analytics guy and you posted a link earlier in this thread as if "failed completion" was an important analytic....A lot of you are going to be sorry when you get what you are wishing for and have to deal with another starting QB.
I guess I should've added for their original team.Marshawn Lynch. This year.What was the last first round running back to start in a Super Bowl?
The trick is, he didn't play for the team that originally drafted him.![]()
That was planned a long time ago.Chargers are dining with Mariota tonight in Oregon.![]()
Lots of smoke.
Hoefully alot of them if they use a first on one.What % of the snaps do you think a first round RB would play?Rb n nt is the biggest need. ShrugEvery mock drafter thinks they know what the team needs more than the actual fans. SMH.on a different note, getting really unhappy when every mock seems to have SD taking a RB in rd 1. And now there is a debate whether gurley or gordon is a better fit and that SD's biggest need is RB since they lost Mathews.
Do you mean because you would then expect them to trade Mariotta, or are you saying you would be fine with them drafting and keeping him on the roster with Rivers?If both Shelton/Scherff are off the board at #17 and they can't trade down I would have no problem with SD drafting Mariota and keeping Rivers.
I was thinking about this some more. The Chargers only have 4 players remaining on their roster that they drafted prior to the 2011 draft:Since 2006 it's been pretty underwhelming.First rounders since 2003:if they could land any kind of impact player in the 1st it would be better than the JAGs (or worse) they've been blowing their 1st rounders on for nearly a decade
2003 1.30 Sammy Davis, DB
2004 1.1 Eli
2005 1.12 Merriman, LB
2005 1.28 Castillo, DE
2006 1.19 Cromartie, CB
2007 1.30 Craig Davis, WR
2008 1.27 Cason, DB
2009 1.16 English, LB
2010 1.12 Mathews, RB
2011 1.18 Liuget, DT
2012 1.18 Ingram, DE
2013 1.11 Fluker, OL
2014 1.25 Verrett, CB
Definitely not great drafting, but not all bad.
I think the idea is that if he has to uproot his family, there are places he would prefer to move them over L.A. Tennessee is the closest NFL team to where he was raised in Alabama.Rivers doesn't want to uproot his family to LA but somehow Nashville will make it easy for his family to stay on SD?
I previously posted that Crabtree was among the worst WRs at failed completions (5th most, 7th worst rate). But I posted it as an additional data point, having also posted other reasons why I felt Crabtree was not a good choice for San Diego to sign.I don't think they should consider trading him, but I thought you were an analytics guy and you posted a link earlier in this thread as if "failed completion" was an important analytic....A lot of you are going to be sorry when you get what you are wishing for and have to deal with another starting QB.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2015/failed-completions-2014
According to that anaylytic isn't Rivers the #15 QB? I'm NOT a big analytic guy and this certainly isn't my link but I would have thought it would have meant something to you.
I think their poor success rate with their draft picks is a big reason they haven't been able to get over the top. Compare what they've done to what Pittsburgh has done over the same time frame.I was thinking about this some more. The Chargers only have 4 players remaining on their roster that they drafted prior to the 2011 draft:Since 2006 it's been pretty underwhelming.First rounders since 2003:if they could land any kind of impact player in the 1st it would be better than the JAGs (or worse) they've been blowing their 1st rounders on for nearly a decade
2003 1.30 Sammy Davis, DB
2004 1.1 Eli
2005 1.12 Merriman, LB
2005 1.28 Castillo, DE
2006 1.19 Cromartie, CB
2007 1.30 Craig Davis, WR
2008 1.27 Cason, DB
2009 1.16 English, LB
2010 1.12 Mathews, RB
2011 1.18 Liuget, DT
2012 1.18 Ingram, DE
2013 1.11 Fluker, OL
2014 1.25 Verrett, CB
Definitely not great drafting, but not all bad.
Weddle (2nd round, 2007)
Butler (3rd round, 2010)
Stuckey (4th round, 2010)
Scifres (5th round, 2003)
Obviously, Weddle has been great, but Butler's poor play the past two years has virtually offset Weddle's great play. Scifres has been very good, but... he's the punter. And Stuckey is just a guy.
Is this the norm, or is one reason it seems the Chargers have such a talent deficit because they drafted so poorly from 2007 to 2010 and have so little to show for it today?
The Chargers record over the past 11 years (one losing season, 7-9) shows they're doing something right.I think their poor success rate with their draft picks is a big reason they haven't been able to get over the top. Compare what they've done to what Pittsburgh has done over the same time frame.
IMO the primary reason for their record over that specific time period is that it correlates to Brees's two good seasons in San Diego followed by Rivers' run as their starting QB. The fact that they have not had more success with that 11 year run of QB play actually suggests that the team really didn't do a good job of surrounding the QB with sufficient talent/coaching.The Chargers record over the past 11 years (one losing season, 7-9) shows they're doing something right.I think their poor success rate with their draft picks is a big reason they haven't been able to get over the top. Compare what they've done to what Pittsburgh has done over the same time frame.
They are hitting on good players, just not as often as other teams.
QB is everything, either you have one, or you are looking for one. Jobs are on the line even for re-building teams, they need to win and win soon. QB gets you that.I don't get why the Titans would do this. I understand that Rivers is a huge upgrade and has worked successfully with Whisenhunt. But it doesn't seem like this trade would make them contenders. Aren't they one of the least talented teams in the league? Could they become contenders while Rivers still has something left? If not, why do it?
I understand it more from the Chargers' perspective if they assume either (a) Rivers won't resign if the team moves, and it is likely the team will move, or (b) they cannot rebuild the team into a contender within Rivers' remaining window of effectiveness, or both. Although it seems that Telesco would have to assume that his job (and McCoy's?) will be secure if the team goes through a couple of losing seasons after a trade.
How would other fans feel about the team making this deal and, say, having losing records the next two seasons?
Well the butler and early AJ years they added an immense amount of talent. crazy to think at one time this team had tomlinson, turner, sproles, brees and rivers, gates, vjax.IMO the primary reason for their record over that specific time period is that it correlates to Brees's two good seasons in San Diego followed by Rivers' run as their starting QB. The fact that they have not had more success with that 11 year run of QB play actually suggests that the team really didn't do a good job of surrounding the QB with sufficient talent/coaching.The Chargers record over the past 11 years (one losing season, 7-9) shows they're doing something right.I think their poor success rate with their draft picks is a big reason they haven't been able to get over the top. Compare what they've done to what Pittsburgh has done over the same time frame.
They are hitting on good players, just not as often as other teams.
I agree. Bringing in Norv was the biggest issue followed by the lack of ability to retain its talent. Drafting poorly and poor FA signings accentuated that fact by not bringing in suitable replacements for those they let leave.Well the butler and early AJ years they added an immense amount of talent. crazy to think at one time this team had tomlinson, turner, sproles, brees and rivers, gates, vjax.IMO the primary reason for their record over that specific time period is that it correlates to Brees's two good seasons in San Diego followed by Rivers' run as their starting QB. The fact that they have not had more success with that 11 year run of QB play actually suggests that the team really didn't do a good job of surrounding the QB with sufficient talent/coaching.The Chargers record over the past 11 years (one losing season, 7-9) shows they're doing something right.I think their poor success rate with their draft picks is a big reason they haven't been able to get over the top. Compare what they've done to what Pittsburgh has done over the same time frame.
They are hitting on good players, just not as often as other teams.
The biggest blunder of all was bringing in Norv turner, guys a loser. poor drafting since then hasnt helped. I firmly put the blame on AJ Smith
I assume you mean Charger fans, as if the Titans made that deal, I'd be really upset if they had losing records after acquiring Rivers if I was a Titan fan.Just Win Baby said:I don't get why the Titans would do this. I understand that Rivers is a huge upgrade and has worked successfully with Whisenhunt. But it doesn't seem like this trade would make them contenders. Aren't they one of the least talented teams in the league? Could they become contenders while Rivers still has something left? If not, why do it?
I understand it more from the Chargers' perspective if they assume either (a) Rivers won't resign if the team moves, and it is likely the team will move, or (b) they cannot rebuild the team into a contender within Rivers' remaining window of effectiveness, or both. Although it seems that Telesco would have to assume that his job (and McCoy's?) will be secure if the team goes through a couple of losing seasons after a trade.
How would other fans feel about the team making this deal and, say, having losing records the next two seasons?
Yes, I meant Chargers fans.I assume you mean Charger fans, as if the Titans made that deal, I'd be really upset if they had losing records after acquiring Rivers if I was a Titan fan.Just Win Baby said:I don't get why the Titans would do this. I understand that Rivers is a huge upgrade and has worked successfully with Whisenhunt. But it doesn't seem like this trade would make them contenders. Aren't they one of the least talented teams in the league? Could they become contenders while Rivers still has something left? If not, why do it?
I understand it more from the Chargers' perspective if they assume either (a) Rivers won't resign if the team moves, and it is likely the team will move, or (b) they cannot rebuild the team into a contender within Rivers' remaining window of effectiveness, or both. Although it seems that Telesco would have to assume that his job (and McCoy's?) will be secure if the team goes through a couple of losing seasons after a trade.
How would other fans feel about the team making this deal and, say, having losing records the next two seasons?
As I said up thread, if they do the right thing with the picks, I'm all for it if it's apparent Rivers doesn't want to be with the Chargers long term. If they draft Mariotta I think we're probably looking at more than 2 years of losing record - especially if they double down on the bad decision making by taking a RB with their next pick.
This is a critical point for this current set of Charger management. They screw this up, I imagine they're looking for new jobs within 3 years.
so now its Rivers for the #2 and SD would have to add? WHO would trade Rivers for Mariota straight up or even have to add a pick to get him? Maybe its the FF player in me but none of that makes sense.That article basically sums up the discussion we've already been having in here. Alsoat the Chargers have to take a RB at 17. Acee's really lost a few steps.
Because they know they're moving and Rivers isn't re-signing. So, this season would pass and they'd maybe make the playoffs and we'd have the #24-28 pick next year? We'd have to give up a lot more next year to get into a position to draft a rookie.so now its Rivers for the #2 and SD would have to add? WHO would trade Rivers for Mariota straight up or even have to add a pick to get him? Maybe its the FF player in me but none of that makes sense.That article basically sums up the discussion we've already been having in here. Alsoat the Chargers have to take a RB at 17. Acee's really lost a few steps.
And not only do they want to trade Rivers for Mariota but then take a RB with their #17?
None of this makes sense for a team that can compete for the playoffs. And once you gt in, anything can happen.
Does Acee really believe this to be true? Has he had a brain injury that's gone under-reported? I have felt he was a dope since he insisted Vincent Jackson has played his last game every few weeks..... and Vincent Jackson kept right on playing for SD for two more years.massraider said:"The only real control the Chargers have with their quarterback is now, this offseason.
So – and this is difficult to think, let alone write – they need to trade Rivers."