What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2016-17 NBA Thread: Finals are over, please go away (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
thisnis the most rational trade I've proposed in years here!  Come on!

then send crowder to Hoiston for Harrell and something and boom bobs your uncle. 
I'm pretty sure LA could do better if they really wanted to trade Griffin and his Bird rights. Crowder's a nice player, but Gay is crap and only has a year left. nlake goes and you risk Paul following him out the door next summer. 

 
One of the users here, can't recall who, described it as "Duncan has the bigger mountain.  Shaq has the higher peak."  I feel bad that I don't remember who said that, because IMO it's an eloquent image of the argument.  Like the player who was better at their very best?  Shaq's your guy.  Put a premium on longevity? You're leaning Duncan.  
Pretty sure that was swc.

 
caught myself watching 3 Sixers summer league games recently

man that Simmons guy cannot shoot. even free throws. lots of work to do on making him a threat from beyond 8 feet.

creative passer and you can see he understands the game and moves well but... holy ####... i shoot better.

 
I tend to weigh player's peaks more heavily than longevity, but I also put a very high premium on MVP's.  I think the career peaks of Shaq & Duncan are actually pretty close.  Shaq's very best season is better than Duncan's very best, but the more years you add to the comparison, the more Duncan gains to the point that when comparing their best 5 seasons it isn't even a debate.

1. MJ  2. Kareem  3. Wilt  4. LeBron  5. Russell  6. Bird  7. Magic  8. Duncan  9. Shaq

 
mr. furley said:
caught myself watching 3 Sixers summer league games recently

man that Simmons guy cannot shoot. even free throws. lots of work to do on making him a threat from beyond 8 feet.

creative passer and you can see he understands the game and moves well but... holy ####... i shoot better.
Wait, are you suggesting he's not some sort of unholy combination of Magic Johnson and Lebron James?

 
I can see doc trading Blake for a small forward who can score and an energy forward like crowder.  Exhibit A: Austin rivers extension.  But to placate the masses, throw the nets 18 first to them too. 

 
“What I’m hearing here in Las Vegas from some GMs is that they think not only Russell Westbrook will get traded, that it’ll be sooner than later,” Beck said in a video posted Wednesday morning, “and that the most likely destination now would be the Boston Celtics.”

:coffee:

LINK

 
“What I’m hearing here in Las Vegas from some GMs is that they think not only Russell Westbrook will get traded, that it’ll be sooner than later,” Beck said in a video posted Wednesday morning, “and that the most likely destination now would be the Boston Celtics.”

:coffee:

LINK
This would probably be OKC's best bet as I don't see any chance he stays...the issue for the C's is can you resign him...if so do what it takes...but if there is a doubt they need to be real careful...they need to get a long-term fixture for those Brooklyn picks not a one-year rental...those picks (or dealing those picks) are the path to contending for a championship...they can't be too risky with them...they won't get this opportunity again...

 
The current rule for away-from-the-play fouls applicable to the last two minutes of the fourth period (and last two minutes of any overtime) – pursuant to which the fouled team is awarded one free throw and retains possession of the ball – will be extended to the last two minutes of each period.

:thumbdown:

Garbage.

 
The current rule for away-from-the-play fouls applicable to the last two minutes of the fourth period (and last two minutes of any overtime) – pursuant to which the fouled team is awarded one free throw and retains possession of the ball – will be extended to the last two minutes of each period.

:thumbdown:

Garbage.
The other rule is the garbage one, IMO.

* For inbounds situations, a defensive foul at any point during the game that occurs before the ball is released by the inbounder (including a "legitimate" or "natural" basketball action such as a defender fighting through a screen) will be administered in the same fashion as an away-from-the-play foul committed during the last two minutes of any period (i.e., one free throw and possession of the ball).

 
Wait, are you suggesting he's not some sort of unholy combination of Magic Johnson and Lebron James?
well, at this point of his career he's already clearly much better than either of them at their peak but his jumper looks like he's just learned to put his arms above his head for the first time

 
This would probably be OKC's best bet as I don't see any chance he stays...the issue for the C's is can you resign him...if so do what it takes...but if there is a doubt they need to be real careful...they need to get a long-term fixture for those Brooklyn picks not a one-year rental...those picks (or dealing those picks) are the path to contending for a championship...they can't be too risky with them...they won't get this opportunity again...
The Celtics would have a year to convince Westbrook that they are the best place for him and would be able to offer him the most money, I think it is a risk worth taking depending on the price.  At minimum I would think you are looking at next year's Brooklyn pick and Brown.

 
“What I’m hearing here in Las Vegas from some GMs is that they think not only Russell Westbrook will get traded, that it’ll be sooner than later,” Beck said in a video posted Wednesday morning, “and that the most likely destination now would be the Boston Celtics.”

:coffee:

LINK
Nobody deserves a break quite like those tortured Boston sports fans.

 
Nobody deserves a break quite like those tortured Boston sports fans.
We don't know what they'd be giving up yet. :shrug:

One has to assume that it'll be at least Thomas and the Brooklyn pick. That's a pretty good start in terms of starting over. I think OKC is wise to just cash in RWB, instead of trying to tread water and pray that Westbrook re-signs.

 
 I think the career peaks of Shaq & Duncan are actually pretty close.  Shaq's very best season is better than Duncan's very best, but the more years you add to the comparison, the more Duncan gains to the point that when comparing their best 5 seasons it isn't even a debate.
I feel like you have forgotten how good Shaq's five best seasons really were.

For example, looking at some of the advanced stats that get thrown around in here, Shaq has eight seasons with a better PER than Duncan's best season. Looking at the Win Shares/48 season for each, Shaq has five of the top six between them. 

Those are just two numbers and people argue over their value, but I don't really see a case for Duncan's five best being better than Shaq's five best, much less "not even a debate".

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I feel like you have forgotten how good Shaq's five best seasons really were.

For example, looking at some of the advanced stats that get thrown around in here, Shaq has eight seasons with a better PER than Duncan's best season. Looking at the Win Shares/48 season for each, Shaq has five of the top six between them. 

Those are just two numbers and people argue over their value, but I don't really see a case for Duncan's five best being better than Shaq's five best, much less "not even a debate".
going strictly off memory of Shaq and the games i watched Duncan play

when Duncan was at his peak and the Spurs were winning titles it always felt like "he's difficult to stop and he's going to impact the game" but when watching Shaq it was "jesus effing cheese he just destroys people at will".

 
We don't know what they'd be giving up yet. :shrug:

One has to assume that it'll be at least Thomas and the Brooklyn pick. That's a pretty good start in terms of starting over. I think OKC is wise to just cash in RWB, instead of trying to tread water and pray that Westbrook re-signs.
Feel like they'd try to hang on to Thomas.  Avery or Smart and Crowder or Brown and the Nets pick?

 
The Celtics would have a year to convince Westbrook that they are the best place for him and would be able to offer him the most money, I think it is a risk worth taking depending on the price.  At minimum I would think you are looking at next year's Brooklyn pick and Brown.
Oddly enough the Big O just convinced me on the radio why you have to make this move ( or one for Griffin) even if there are questions about him resigning...I am onboard...if you only have to give up one Net pick that would be great...gotta believe Isiah maybe part of a deal...don't see him fitting in with Westbrook...if you can get something done with one Net pick, Thomas and a choice of other picks and/or players not named Brown, Crowder, Bradley and Horford that would put them in a position to contend now and for years to come...

 
I feel like you have forgotten how good Shaq's five best seasons really were.

For example, looking at some of the advanced stats that get thrown around in here, Shaq has eight seasons with a better PER than Duncan's best season. Looking at the Win Shares/48 season for each, Shaq has five of the top six between them. 

Those are just two numbers and people argue over their value, but I don't really see a case for Duncan's five best being better than Shaq's five best, much less "not even a debate".
I think you are right.  I stand corrected.  Duncan doesn't seem to really surpass Shaq in those kind of stats until like year 7.

I guess I was mainly hung up on the MVP's.

 
Feel like they'd try to hang on to Thomas.  Avery or Smart and Crowder or Brown and the Nets pick?
If the Thunder are blowing it up, I'm not sure they should be all that interested in those guys as they aren't going to move the needle. I'd be pushing for a ton of picks, including both Nets picks. 

 
If the Thunder are blowing it up, I'm not sure they should be all that interested in those guys as they aren't going to move the needle. I'd be pushing for a ton of picks, including both Nets picks. 
Well, you only get so much with no guaranteed signing.  I'd think Avery/Brown and the Nets pick would be a pretty good haul, for example.

I think Thomas would happily go back to being a stud 6th man on a contender.

 
Brooklyn is going to have a starting 5 of Lin, Bogdanovich, Hollis-Jefferson, Booker, and Lopez. That team is going to be really, really bad. Those draft picks in 2017 and 2018 are super, super valuable. 

Man, Billy King was one ####### terrible GM. Holy balls

 
Well, you only get so much with no guaranteed signing.  I'd think Avery/Brown and the Nets pick would be a pretty good haul, for example.

I think Thomas would happily go back to being a stud 6th man on a contender.
That's what I'd be asking for if I'm the Thunder, not necessarily what the C's would/should do. Avery Bradley doesn't do anything to keep me out of the bottom of the West, and IMO Jaylen Brown isn't a great prospect though intelligent people may differ on that. 

All that said, if the C's are in win now mode, hanging onto Crowder is worth quite a bit. Ainge already demonstrated a willingness to overpay for guys using draft capital in the proposed Winslow deal, which may be a very self-aware acknowledgement that he's not the best drafter in the league. If they think there's a solid chance that Westbrook resigns I don't think that's a terrible trade for Boston. 

 
The current rule for away-from-the-play fouls applicable to the last two minutes of the fourth period (and last two minutes of any overtime) – pursuant to which the fouled team is awarded one free throw and retains possession of the ball – will be extended to the last two minutes of each period.

:thumbdown:

Garbage.
I'm torn on this one. Don't really like the rule, but my team has Andre Drummond, so...

 
Brooklyn is going to have a starting 5 of Lin, Bogdanovich, Hollis-Jefferson, Booker, and Lopez. That team is going to be really, really bad. Those draft picks in 2017 and 2018 are super, super valuable. 

Man, Billy King was one ####### terrible GM. Holy balls
Billy King is terrible, but he was also under a specific mandate from ownership (by all accounts), which has finally been relaxed.

 
Brooklyn is going to have a starting 5 of Lin, Bogdanovich, Hollis-Jefferson, Booker, and Lopez. That team is going to be really, really bad. Those draft picks in 2017 and 2018 are super, super valuable. 

Man, Billy King was one ####### terrible GM. Holy balls
"Today, the basketball gods smiled on the Nets," said Nets Principal Owner Mikhail Prokhorov. "With the arrival of Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce, we have achieved a great balance on our roster between veteran stars and young talents. This team will be dazzling to watch, and tough to compete against."

 
I'm torn on this one. Don't really like the rule, but my team has Andre Drummond, so...
Refs will also have the discretion to rule Hack-A-Fouls away from the ball as Flagrant-1s.  So the stuff we've seen the last few years of a player jumping on Andre Jordan's back 50 feet away from the play the instant LAC gets possession now carries the risk of a Flagrant Foul call.

 
Po llll

Except if Westbrook bolts next year
That is the x-factor (and it's a big one) but I think you gotta roll the dice on it and hope he wants to stay...having him here for a year means you can pay him more than anyone else and more often than not players who come to Boston like it...it is near impossible to get these elite players so you need to take this risk...especially if you can do it and keep one Brooklyn pick...with him there they will be a legit contender with a young core...I would like to see them keep Brown...he and Westbrook on the court together could make for some very entertaining highlights...serious athleticism that could really create some issues...

 
Shaq got hosed on at least 1 MVP. Poor criteria to look at.
At the peak of his powers, Shaq had awesome not-quite-full seasons that hurt him come MVP voting time.  1998 was amazing on a per-game basis, but he only played 60 games.  Same deal with 67-game 2002.  His 49-game 1999 wasn't injury-shortened; that was a lockout-shortened 50-game season where he was the best player but LAL was only the 4-seed in the West, so Karl Malone got MVP instead since his team won six more games.

 
I wonder if the NBA has put Hinkie on the Black list. Seems like Brooklyn could use a little bit of the Process.

 
Except that BRK has to give up its next two first rounders and has no assets to really acquire any picks besides some conditional late first rounders or something

 
The other rule is the garbage one, IMO.

* For inbounds situations, a defensive foul at any point during the game that occurs before the ball is released by the inbounder (including a "legitimate" or "natural" basketball action such as a defender fighting through a screen) will be administered in the same fashion as an away-from-the-play foul committed during the last two minutes of any period (i.e., one free throw and possession of the ball).
Yeah, this is awful.  Unfairly increases the risk on a defensive team trying to force a 5 second violation.

 
What are your thoughts on the new Hack-A-Shaq rules? Couldn't they just simplify it by making it a F-1 and just allow any shooter shoot the free-throws? 
Changing the rules because a few guys can't make a fundamental play (which a 12 year old girl can) is ####### stupid.

 
It seems to me that Akeem Olajuwon is getting overlooked here when looking at all time greats.  I see MJ at the top but Akeem is ahead of Shaq imo.  My memory is that head to head Akeem owned Shaq.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Changing the rules because a few guys can't make a fundamental play (which a 12 year old girl can) is ####### stupid.
I sort of agree, but away from the ball intentional fouls are crap plays.  They have nothing to do with the game and make for poor entertainment.  I think if the guy has the ball, hack away, but if he is just running down the court after a rebound they should be treated like the intentional foul that they are.

 
I sort of agree, but away from the ball intentional fouls are crap plays.  They have nothing to do with the game and make for poor entertainment.  I think if the guy has the ball, hack away, but if he is just running down the court after a rebound they should be treated like the intentional foul that they are.
Or... the 3 or 4 guys could either learn to shoot free throws or feel the shame and embarrassment every time they get fouled.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top