Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
If they get both....Crowder and Bradley are redundant. Not re-signing IT would also be ok too.
Sounds good to me. If Fultz is who they identified as the guy they want, those future picks aren't going to mean much.
close to what i'm hearing, too, but i dont believe Trader Danny will give a division rival a high-profile player they covet without making it huuuurt. that might be value but that dont hurt
I think you mean the 21 Sixers pick won't mean much, but next year's Lakers pick should certainly be valuable.
I think this is what their cap situation is if they renounce everybody and cut all unguaranteed contracts:Just Win Baby said:
i would be good with this.thecatch said:
There will probably be a vet that wants to join the show at that point. You have a lot of talented unselfish distribution between Simmons, Futz and Saric.
Yes, those are great ideas, especially KCP, though everyone says it's a lock he will be re-signed. Porter slightly less of a lock and a little more of a concern, I think.
Me too...this deal makes a ton sense for both teams...both are getting great value...
Because Butler is way better then handing out whatever Hayward would cost. Plus the picks I believe wouldn't be the C's it'd be picks acquired from others.tommyGunZ said:
At least the LA Pick and Possible the Nets pick I think Chic would want another 1st and maybe a 2nd. If AInge wants to include players gladly take Smart and Olynk off his hands.Just Win Baby said:
I don't know enough or follow them enough to really give a say. I will say if Devin Booker is available I'm listening on Chicago's Behalf.
There doesn't seem to be much to the Butler rumors. I haven't seen any connection to Butler in this trade to any of the national writers. Local Chicago writers don't think Butler is going to be traded, and most believe they will bring back Rondo, Wade, Butler, Mirotic and just define more consistent playing time for their younger players. In other words, if you're a Bulls fan, make the playoffs if everything goes perfectly, but get knocked out quickly.
That's true. The thing with Chicago those is would they do a deal or are looking to trade him now. Any rumors with Okafor I remember was speculated leaked by Sixers or beat writers trying to drum up interest on him and Chi was never at all interested in him.
Who is the dude on the left
Rumor is its this years #3, Lakers #1 in '18 and Celtics choice of Phillys #1 in either of next two drafts (18/19).
Not sure but it seems that Celtics don't care about the protection since they aren't keeping the picks. Apparently another trade coming
You can't look at the price tag here. Sixers had assets and they identified Fultz as the guy that fits them best right now. They probably didn't think any potential players in the years to come would fit their team as well or they didn't want to wait that long for it to all come together.
Bobby MarksVerified account @BobbyMarks42 8m8 minutes agothecatch said:
If I'm a Sixers fan I'd much rather go get an established star rather then a maybe player. It's a huge risk to trade all of that for potential that could be another Anthony Bennet. I'd rather take a Star if I'm in the Sixers spot. They have their core they just need that star now.
No, you missed the point. Boston cares about the protection because it affects the value of the asset, and the other team they are dealing with will care about the value of the asset.
