BroncoFreak_2K3
sucker for Orange
At least no one will have their nuts smashed on Bo's grave this year.
They have 2 losses now. They’re out of the CFP.so what happens with OSU now?

I'm not as sure a 5-0 team gets in.Rules are made to be broken and if they have to they'll get the pitchforks out again for the Big10 commish's house to get this team where it needs to be. But honestly, I think they'll be in the playoffs regardless if they play another season game or not.
The only teams in the conference I'd want to see in a rematch is IU or PSU.
You play the teams on your schedule14-19
That's the record of OSU's opponents. That's not good.
Or not, in the case of the umaa game.If Clemson wins and Florida wins, I believe this could easily be the final 4. Wouldn't want the semis to be a repeat of those two conference title games, though. Mix them up and let the finalists fall where they may. imo.Let's say:
Clemson beats ND in the rematch. Both teams finish with 1 loss having a pretty nice resume of wins. I think BOTH are in the CFP.
Then, let's say Florida with one loss beats Bama in the SEC Championship game. I think BOTH are in the CFP.
OSU doesn't make it because they will have played only 5 MAYBE 6 total games and outside of the Indiana (who exposed their defense) win, the rest of their resume is trash.
![]()
And.....what happens if you have a 6-0 USC team WITH a conference championship sitting out there?I'm not as sure a 5-0 team gets in.![]()
The conference only has itself to blame. Once they decided to play after originally cancelling, they could have started a couple weeks earlier to allow for rescheduling.
Agreed.If Clemson wins and Florida wins, I believe this could easily be the final 4. Wouldn't want the semis to be a repeat of those two conference title games, though. Mix them up and let the finalists fall where they may. imo.
I don't disagree with your first sentence. I just think they'll get in regardless of how many wins they have.I'm not as sure a 5-0 team gets in.![]()
The conference only has itself to blame. Once they decided to play after originally cancelling, they could have started a couple weeks earlier to allow for rescheduling.
Agreed, but if you look back historically at what the committee has said in its rankings, QUALITY WINS matter. OSU has only 1 of those.You play the teams on your scheduleOr not, in the case of the umaa game.
Interesting. If they let a 5 win team in over a 6-0 conference champ... just because of potential or historical record of the 5 win team... not good.And.....what happens if you have a 6-0 USC team WITH a conference championship sitting out there?
How do you define QUALITY WINS? Does that only equate to "ranked" opponents? What are the metrics used to define this?Agreed, but if you look back historically at what the committee has said in its rankings, QUALITY WINS matter. OSU has only 1 of those.
This is a fantastic story for Buffalo and for Lance Leipold. He was the coach at University of Wisconsin-Whitewater (city where I was born) for 8 seasons, in which time he won 6 Div. III national titles with an overall record of 109 wins and 6 defeats. An absolutely incredible run in a very competitive division. He was also a high school quarterback and multi-sport star at Jefferson high school. I played against him once in a non-conference game. He's still pretty young for a head coach. I would hope he sticks around at Buffalo a couple years, but I'll bet some offers will be coming in after this season.#24 in the AP. First time ever ranked in football. Feels good, man.
Generally speaking, yes. Beating a ranked team at the time matters. However, it also seems to matter how that opponent holds up in the aftermath. So, beating a ranked team late is more advantageous than beating a ranked team early ESPECIALLY if that ranked team proves to be an early season mirage. That's why typically, conference championships are a factor in determining the final four.How do you define QUALITY WINS? Does that only equate to "ranked" opponents? What are the metrics used to define this?
I appreciate your response, however, is that the CFP Committee's definition? I ask because that definition changes every year. Once the "experts" seem to know what it means, there's a wrench that is thrown into it and the definition gets a little fuzzier. This year is unlike any other as there are no Out Of Conference games to help tie a measuring stick to these teams. The pre-season baseline used this year was flawed. B1G had 3 or 4 top 20 teams who ended up unranked by the end of the year, with the opposite happening with other teams. As another poster stated, you play who is on your schedule. There is not much OSU could do in that front, nor any other B1G team who would vie for a CFP spot. The committee has said that the "eyeball test" will be used much more than any other metric to date for this year. Every week you hear the analysts saying "that team looks like a top 4 team in the nation". It's a crapshoot that none of us can define. It's going to be a wait and see thing. The only item that has come up is a Conference Championship still having some weight. The CFP analysts have said that the number of games wouldn't weigh a factor due to covid restrictions each conference has placed on themselves. It's like comparing apples to oranges.Generally speaking, yes. Beating a ranked team at the time matters. However, it also seems to matter how that opponent holds up in the aftermath. So, beating a ranked team late is more advantageous than beating a ranked team early ESPECIALLY if that ranked team proves to be an early season mirage. That's why typically, conference championships are a factor in determining the final four.
Ohio State has beaten Rutgers, Nebraska, Michigan State, Penn State and Indiana. Only ONE of those teams has a winning record and that team exposed the soft underbelly of OSU's defense.
I'd say this: If you're an OSU fan, you better hope like hell that Bama beats Florida. Which, it probably will. And then, you really want USC to lose too. Because while I have NO DOUBT that OSU is a better team than USC, an undefeated USC team WITH a Conference Championship is going to pose a problem to OSU IF OSU doesn't play another game (including the Big10 championship, although I'm sure they'll just alter the rules in the next week or so to allow them in).I appreciate your response, however, is that the CFP Committee's definition? I ask because that definition changes every year. Once the "experts" seem to know what it means, there's a wrench that is thrown into it and the definition gets a little fuzzier. This year is unlike any other as there are no Out Of Conference games to help tie a measuring stick to these teams. The pre-season baseline used this year was flawed. B1G had 3 or 4 top 20 teams who ended up unranked by the end of the year, with the opposite happening with other teams. As another poster stated, you play who is on your schedule. There is not much OSU could do in that front, nor any other B1G team who would vie for a CFP spot. The committee has said that the "eyeball test" will be used much more than any other metric to date for this year. Every week you hear the analysts saying "that team looks like a top 4 team in the nation". It's a crapshoot that none of us can define. It's going to be a wait and see thing. The only item that has come up is a Conference Championship still having some weight. The CFP analysts have said that the number of games wouldn't weigh a factor due to covid restrictions each conference has placed on themselves. It's like comparing apples to oranges.
Whether OSU is a top 4 team or not, I don't know. I would love to see more games played. But that's just not going to happen. They'll get one more, maybe two if they're lucky. But the B1G conference has already tied their hands stating it has to be a team from within the conference. The playing pool just shrunk for them. Who knows what will happen. But to use the argument of "QUALITY WINS" doesn't seem to fit into this season for any conference.
Fair enough. I think the B1G Conference will move the goal posts as well. They put themselves into this situation by cancelling then restarting the season, but waiting over 6-8 weeks before really starting it. They're behind the 8 ball with no wiggle room. They built this mess, now they have to figure it out, if they truly believe OSU is a top 4 team in the nation. I think any conference in this position would do whatever it would take to get their team into the CFP. We'll know more over by tomorrow, I'm sure.I'd say this: If you're an OSU fan, you better hope like hell that Bama beats Florida. Which, it probably will. And then, you really want USC to lose too. Because while I have NO DOUBT that OSU is a better team than USC, an undefeated USC team WITH a Conference Championship is going to pose a problem to OSU IF OSU doesn't play another game (including the Big10 championship, although I'm sure they'll just alter the rules in the next week or so to allow them in).
I hate to use this phrase because I think it's trite, but it sure seems like the CFP will be moving goal posts to accommodate OSU.
It's very clear that he is a great football coach. He has taken a middling, average-at-best MAC team and has now put together 4 straight very solid seasons. Considering the program's history, the idea that they haven't had a losing season since 2016 is a pretty big deal. If you would've told me 10 years ago that the team would be consistently in the mix for the MAC title, consistently making bowl games, and cracked the top 25 - even if it only lasts a week - I'd have said you're crazy.This is a fantastic story for Buffalo and for Lance Leipold. He was the coach at University of Wisconsin-Whitewater (city where I was born) for 8 seasons, in which time he won 6 Div. III national titles with an overall record of 109 wins and 6 defeats. An absolutely incredible run in a very competitive division. He was also a high school quarterback and multi-sport star at Jefferson high school. I played against him once in a non-conference game. He's still pretty young for a head coach. I would hope he sticks around at Buffalo a couple years, but I'll bet some offers will be coming in after this season.
they should have to play Colorado if both are unbeatenAnd.....what happens if you have a 6-0 USC team WITH a conference championship sitting out there?
Yeah, although if I'm the Buffs, I make the case that we belong in the championship game and not USC since it was USC that had to cancel our game. So......go BUFFS!they should have to play Colorado if both are unbeaten![]()
May be worse if he gets fired this year for the Title IX issues...at least Chiz lasted 2.Is it possible Big Ed is heading down the Gene Chizik path? Once in a lifetime QB brings him a title and it’s curtains after that?
OSU vs Coastal Carolina!!Honestly, have OSU play TAMU this weekend. Who wouldn’t want to see that?
Michigan’s biggest win over OSU in 15 years.
Reschedule whomever this week and reschedule the um game on Dec 19th.Honestly, have OSU play TAMU this weekend. Who wouldn’t want to see that?
UM would have to give players 14 days of quarantine. With over 40 cases on the team, I still don't think they'd have anyone ready/available for next week.Reschedule whomever this week and reschedule the um game on Dec 19th.
They really have that many? In the press conference they said they didn't know how many they have.UM would have to give players 14 days of quarantine. With over 40 cases on the team, I still don't think they'd have anyone ready/available for next week.
That's what I read on the MGoBlog from their fans.They really have that many? In the press conference they said they didn't know how many they have.
“We believe the flexibility to play non-conference games could have been beneficial not only for Nebraska, but other Big Ten teams who may be in a similar position as the season progresses. The ability for all Big Ten members to play a non-conference game if needed could provide another data point for possible College Football Playoff and bowl consideration." --
Moos/Greene statement after Wisconsin cancellation - 10/29/2020
Yes, this is absolutely what will happen. The "rule" is just an artificial cap the conference decided to impose. It isn't really a rule in any real sense of the word since it applies to no one outside the Big Ten. Sort of like the "we aren't playing this year" "rule" they already overturned. They've already shown they are more than willing to overturn "rules" that were stupid to begin with. I'm amazed anyone would think otherwise with playoff money at risk. I think it is pretty clear it is strictly OSU hate rather than any well thought out or common sense line of reasoning to think otherwise.General Malaise said:I said that OSU will watch the CFP with the rest of the country. You indicated that was the least likely scenario. If they can't play in the Big10 championship game because they are under the threshold of games, how are they going to make the playoffs? Or are you suggesting that they Big10 will do away with that threshold and install OSU into the championship game where a win against a punchless opponent get them into the CFP?
What good are rules if we don't abide by them?
AGAIN!?! I already said up thread if that happened it should count as a negative for OSU.Hey, Nebraska can you guys play Ohio State this weekend and take one for the conference?
But should the criteria for making the playoff be having a stud QB? What would make OSU more deserving of a spot than an undefeated PAC12 champ, for instance? Is it because everyone feels like OSU vs other playoff teams would be a better game to watch? How do we know if they don't play against each other? Eye test... past performance... expectations... a better QB, stat-wise?Feels like the angst about OSU making it is based on the assumption UF beats Bama - that ain’t happening. It will be weird if OSU can’t play in the B10CG but makes the playoff but 1. This whole year has been weird and 2. I think OSU is worthy with a stud QB - they are at least as good as ND.
#24 in the AP. First time ever ranked in football. Feels good, man.
Would love to see aggie get their asses whooped.Capella said:Honestly, have OSU play TAMU this weekend. Who wouldn’t want to see that?
I personally think Ed deserves a chance to fix this mess. He rebounded from the Troy loss FFS, and there have been some strange circumstances around this team this year. The Pelini hire is gonna be expensive, but fixable. BUT, if they did want to fire him, now would be the time because the title IX stuff will possibly allow them to fire for cause and not have to buy him out.gump said:May be worse if he gets fired this year for the Title IX issues...at least Chiz lasted 2.
The Michigan cheerleaders are happyCapella said:I think Michigan’s season is hilariously over with.
Because they are a much, much better team.What would make OSU more deserving of a spot than an undefeated PAC12 champ, for instance?