What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2021 Buffalo Bills - Same as it ever was*** (2 Viewers)

If the Bills think that they can trade up and get a QB that has a good chance of being a franchise QB, then I think they should do it regardless of the cost.

I know that the analytics supposedly say that drafting is a 50/50 proposition at best and that trading away picks has a negative expected return...but, I think that the analysis used in that reasoning misses some important things. 

A QB is undoubtedly the most important position in football. A franchise QB gives a team a much MUCH greater chance of winning year after year than a star at any other position. 

But it goes further than that. Yes, it is possible to build a contender by having really good players at a ton of positions, but the ability to keep that team intact over the long haul is virtually impossible because then you have a whole bunch of guys looking to get paid. And then you either run into salary cap issues or you have to constantly look to replace those players by either gambling on vets with question marks or by drafting more players at 50/50 returns.

But if you have an elite QB, you pay ONE player a bunch of money and have the luxury of surrounding him with lesser talented guys that he makes up for. An elite QB makes such a huge difference for 10-15 years and gives the franchise much more flexibility and breathing room.

To get that QB, history says that they're generally drafted pretty high in the first round. Talented ones do fall sometimes, but the odds are much lower the lower you get.

So some would say, then just pick a bunch of lower ones and eventually you'll hit on one rather than trade away draft picks.

Only, that's no guarantee either and how much of a waste would it be to keep using draft picks every year on lower odds picks while wasting season after season? Unless your team is terrible, it's very difficult to trade up to get a QB. The Bills have the resources to trade up. There is no guarantee that they will be in a position to draft a QB in the top 5 anytime again in the near future.

All that being said, if they are not fairly certain that the guy they are trading up to get is a franchise QB, then they should sit and wait. Don't get desperate and trade up for a guy that you think is as likely to be Blake Bortles as he is to be Ben Roethlisberger. If you aren't sure, then don't waste the resources. Take Jackson/Mayfield/Allen at 12 or Rudolph at 22 and fill in other gaps.
I agree with most of this in general, but how can anyone be fairly certain that they guy they draft is going to be a franchise QB? Here is the list of QBs drafted in the 1st round going back to 2000 (not including last year)- presumably all of those teams felt the guys they were taking were franchise QBs, but clearly most were wrong. The odds are better the higher you draft one, but they still aren't good, and I have a hard time giving up 4-5 (or more) premium picks for 1 guy with those type of odds.

 
I agree with most of this in general, but how can anyone be fairly certain that they guy they draft is going to be a franchise QB? Here is the list of QBs drafted in the 1st round going back to 2000 (not including last year)- presumably all of those teams felt the guys they were taking were franchise QBs, but clearly most were wrong. The odds are better the higher you draft one, but they still aren't good, and I have a hard time giving up 4-5 (or more) premium picks for 1 guy with those type of odds.
The thing is, if you never take your shot at finding a QB - you'll likely never find one.

It's a classic "risk v. reward" situation. In the NFL, for the most part, you're only as good as your QB. And yes I know you can list many outliers but it doesn't change the overall point.

 
The thing is, if you never take your shot at finding a QB - you'll likely never find one.

It's a classic "risk v. reward" situation. In the NFL, for the most part, you're only as good as your QB. And yes I know you can list many outliers but it doesn't change the overall point.
Few if any have talked about getting a QB more than me in this thread, so we're on the same page there. I was against the EJ pick because it was pretty obvious to me that he wasn't good, but even after that pick I wanted them to take another QB in the same draft because the position is so important. I wish they would have signed Bridgewater along with McCarron for the same reason. The fact that they mistakenly thought they had a franchise QB in Fitzpatrick and Tyrod caused them to pass up the opportunity to get several QBs who have become franchise guys as well. I want them to draft/sign one or two every year until they are certain they have a good one.

It's all about your 2nd paragraph. If they already had a top 4 pick, it would be a no-brainer. To give up 4, 5, or 6 good picks to get it? That's a very different calculation.

 
Few if any have talked about getting a QB more than me in this thread, so we're on the same page there. I was against the EJ pick because it was pretty obvious to me that he wasn't good, but even after that pick I wanted them to take another QB in the same draft because the position is so important. I wish they would have signed Bridgewater along with McCarron for the same reason. The fact that they mistakenly thought they had a franchise QB in Fitzpatrick and Tyrod caused them to pass up the opportunity to get several QBs who have become franchise guys as well. I want them to draft/sign one or two every year until they are certain they have a good one.

It's all about your 2nd paragraph. If they already had a top 4 pick, it would be a no-brainer. To give up 4, 5, or 6 good picks to get it? That's a very different calculation.
No question, giving up a ton to move up would be a risky proposition. As much as I loved them overachieving and making the playoffs, it had a potentially hugely negative affect on their future. What sucks is there are so many decent QB prospects this year, but so many QB needy teams picking in the top 10 as well. Although I have a feeling that QBs may fall more than people think.

As much as I think Kiper has been passed by and isn't worth listening to, I would take his latest mock draft for the Bills in a heartbeat: Tremaine Edmunds at 12 and Lamar Jackson at 22. But with everything Beane has said about QBs, I can't see them taking a guy like Jackson, even if he is more of a pocket passer than he gets credit for.

 
Is there any consensus on the plus / negatives of Mason Rudolph?

I don't see a lot of talking heads spending time on him, I was wondering if anyone on here would hate him as a pick at 22 and if so why?  Or using a creative but not too expensive  package of picks to get him early in the second round if he were still there.
I don't like him because he was a 1 read QB who would immediately pull the ball down and take off with it rather than progress to the next read. Steep learning curve ahead of him.

I'm wondering the same. There just isn't much out there on him. Chris Trepasso, formerly of Buffalo Rumblings and now with CBS, has had Rudolph as his #1 QB all along. His argument is that Rudolph seems to be the most pro ready right now, even more than Rosen. Only thing is his potential is probably capped whereas the other guys could become better than what they are now. Seems like Rudolph has realized his full potential and team that draft him takes him for what he is and that's it. At least that's what I've heard.

I would be completely fine if the Bills drafted him at 22. Crappy thing is there will be no way to know if the Bills really liked someone else and just couldn't move up to draft their guy, or if they really liked Rudolph this whole time and knew they could wait.
I've never been a fan of Trepasso and actually stopped following BR when he took over for Brian Galliford. But this just is incredible. The #1 QB? He will be eating those words.

 
No question, giving up a ton to move up would be a risky proposition. As much as I loved them overachieving and making the playoffs, it had a potentially hugely negative affect on their future. What sucks is there are so many decent QB prospects this year, but so many QB needy teams picking in the top 10 as well. Although I have a feeling that QBs may fall more than people think.

As much as I think Kiper has been passed by and isn't worth listening to, I would take his latest mock draft for the Bills in a heartbeat: Tremaine Edmunds at 12 and Lamar Jackson at 22. But with everything Beane has said about QBs, I can't see them taking a guy like Jackson, even if he is more of a pocket passer than he gets credit for.
Not a bills fan but why would you want L Jackson?  He is similar to T Taylor and scored 13 on wonderlic.   

 
Not a bills fan but why would you want L Jackson?  He is similar to T Taylor and scored 13 on wonderlic.   
I wouldn't worry about the Wonderlic. But I wouldn't want Jackson for that same reason. During 2017 season it seemed apparent that the Bills wanted a pocket passer. That is not want Jackson is, so I question that fit.

 
Not a bills fan but why would you want L Jackson?  He is similar to T Taylor and scored 13 on wonderlic.   


I wouldn't worry about the Wonderlic. But I wouldn't want Jackson for that same reason. During 2017 season it seemed apparent that the Bills wanted a pocket passer. That is not want Jackson is, so I question that fit.
I disagree. I think Jackson absolutely is a pocket passer. He's much much more natural and comfortable there than Tyrod has ever been. 

Jackson just happens to have an additional ability to run that no other QB has.

https://fullpresscoverage.com/2018/01/22/lamar-jackson/

 
I would be totally happy with Lamar Jackson if the Bills think they can win with him.  Tyrod Taylor's issues weren't caused by him being a mobile QB.  He's not in Buffalo anymore because he wouldn't throw to open receivers.  

 
GroveDiesel said:
I disagree. I think Jackson absolutely is a pocket passer. He's much much more natural and comfortable there than Tyrod has ever been. 

Jackson just happens to have an additional ability to run that no other QB has.

https://fullpresscoverage.com/2018/01/22/lamar-jackson/
Can't remember where I saw it on this site but someone did an analysis of QBs and their wonderlic scores.  The stats were very telling.  Avg to good QB in the NFL need 25 or better to succeed.

 
Can't remember where I saw it on this site but someone did an analysis of QBs and their wonderlic scores.  The stats were very telling.  Avg to good QB in the NFL need 25 or better to succeed.
I saw it & they didn't say that.  What they said is that 25 seems to be the max for returns.  That is, up to 25 it is significant to some degree.  Above 25 doesn't seem to make the QB more likely to succeed.  (ex: QB1 has 15, QB2 has 25, QB3 has 35.  In this case QB2 & QB3 have an equal chance of success.  Each would also have a better chance of success than QB1.)

 
I saw it & they didn't say that.  What they said is that 25 seems to be the max for returns.  That is, up to 25 it is significant to some degree.  Above 25 doesn't seem to make the QB more likely to succeed.  (ex: QB1 has 15, QB2 has 25, QB3 has 35.  In this case QB2 & QB3 have an equal chance of success.  Each would also have a better chance of success than QB1.)
It basically said, a Qb with wonderlic below 25 had a less of a chance for success then one with 25 and higher.  Given whats at stake here, why would you draft a Qb with a 13 wonderlic??

 
So would you draft L Jackson if you were Bills Gm in 1st round??
If I did or did not, it would have absolutely nothing to do with his Wonderlic score.

Ryan Fitzapatrick scored nearly perfectly on it and he's one of the dumbest decision makers on the field that I have ever watched play.

 
If I did or did not, it would have absolutely nothing to do with his Wonderlic score.

Ryan Fitzapatrick scored nearly perfectly on it and he's one of the dumbest decision makers on the field that I have ever watched play.
So you're saying QB intelligence doesn't matter at all??   :lmao:  

 
So you're saying QB intelligence doesn't matter at all??   :lmao:  
Actually I did not, and since you interpret it that way (even offering a childish emoticon) it may say something about yours.

Maybe the Wonderlic isn't the best predictive tool for in-game intelligence, understand?

 
Actually I did not, and since you interpret it that way (even offering a childish emoticon) it may say something about yours.

Maybe the Wonderlic isn't the best predictive tool for in-game intelligence, understand?
I'm going to make an educated guess that something the entire NFL uses for the past 30 years is an important tool to evaluate players on and off the field.  But apparently you know something everyone else doesn't so please share what you would use??

 
I'm going to make an educated guess that something the entire NFL uses for the past 30 years is an important tool to evaluate players on and off the field.  But apparently you know something everyone else doesn't so please share what you would use??
I would use game tape, discussions with his college coaches concerning his ability to learn a playbook and how much they allowed him to change plays, and interviews with the player giving him some plays and then asking him to talk through his pre-snap decision making based on given defenses.

 
I'm going to make an educated guess that something the entire NFL uses for the past 30 years is an important tool to evaluate players on and off the field.  But apparently you know something everyone else doesn't so please share what you would use??
Honestly, you should actually look into what the wonderlic actually consists of and what the scores mean.  Maybe then you would temper your assumptions as to what actually those in a position to draft look for.

 
Welp, Incognito is retiring. Maybe.

I was pretty surprised when he took a straight pay cut entering the final year of his deal this year. And then he fired his agency rather publicly. And now he has tweeted out that he is done. And Peter King has tweeted out that Incognito has told him that he is retired but would play one more year at the "right price".

So sounds to me like the Bills went to his agent and asked him to take a straight pay cut and the agency didn't relay that information to Incognito properly. And he's not only not happy at all about, but is willing to walk away rather than suffer that insult.

This team should not waste assets to trade up this year. They have a lot of holes and will have even more next year. And there is a very good chance that they will be drafting in the top 5 next year where they can then grab a QB.

 
Update: Vic Carucci tweeted that Incognito is done. But that Incognito told him that the doctor told him that his liver and kidneys are shutting down and that's the reason. 

 
This team should not waste assets to trade up this year. They have a lot of holes and will have even more next year. And there is a very good chance that they will be drafting in the top 5 next year where they can then grab a QB.
I still say if they have a guy they really like they need to go get him. Holes can be filled after you find a plug for the most important hole (by far).

Also, we thought they'd have a top 5 pick this year, right? There's nothing to say McCarron wouldn't step in and lead the team to another 8-9 win season, and we'll be debating this all over again. And next year they won't have the ammo they have this year.

 
GroveDiesel said:
Welp, Incognito is retiring. Maybe.

I was pretty surprised when he took a straight pay cut entering the final year of his deal this year. And then he fired his agency rather publicly. And now he has tweeted out that he is done. And Peter King has tweeted out that Incognito has told him that he is retired but would play one more year at the "right price".

So sounds to me like the Bills went to his agent and asked him to take a straight pay cut and the agency didn't relay that information to Incognito properly. And he's not only not happy at all about, but is willing to walk away rather than suffer that insult.

This team should not waste assets to trade up this year. They have a lot of holes and will have even more next year. And there is a very good chance that they will be drafting in the top 5 next year where they can then grab a QB.
I know this won't be popular, but I think they should get rid of McCoy and Clay and go full-on rebuild. They are both near the top of the league in cap hits at their position, their production doesn't justify their cost, and neither is likely at all to be part of the team in another year or two when the team actually will have a chance to be good.

 
I know this won't be popular, but I think they should get rid of McCoy and Clay and go full-on rebuild.
I was saying the same thing last year when they were unloading a lot of other guys, but I'm pretty sure their contracts make them pretty much worthless in terms of trade value.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah they won't get much for those guys. 

Better to keep them and give the rookie SOME help. It is better than NONE. 

Developing who they draft is priority #1, far more important than the result this year, or building draft capital for future years. 

 
I know this won't be popular, but I think they should get rid of McCoy and Clay and go full-on rebuild. They are both near the top of the league in cap hits at their position, their production doesn't justify their cost, and neither is likely at all to be part of the team in another year or two when the team actually will have a chance to be good.
I want to agree with you but I think @The Duff Man nailed it. Plus, it’s too late too do that. They would’ve had to have done that prior to FA to make the cap space gained more useful. 

 
Clay they wouldn't get anything thing for, he'd be a straight salary dump. I think they'd be able to get some type of pick for McCoy, but even if they couldn't, I think they're better off in the long run without him (and his salary).

I agree that it would have been better to do this earlier so they could have gone after free agents this off season, but it would still free up space to possibly extend guys who could contribute in the future, and even if they don't use a penny of it this year it would all roll over to next. These two aren't likely to live up to their contracts for next year, and even if they did, the most likely scenario is that it would only hurt their draft position and leave them with less money to improve the team in the future. Seems like a lose/lose.

I also agree with the idea of giving the new QB (be it McCarron or a rookie) some help, but really, how much help are those two guys? Can't a 2nd-4th round pick put up close to similar numbers at a fraction of the cost? Plus you'd have them under cheap control for several more years, with reason to believe they should improve in the future instead of decline like McCoy and Clay. Anyway you slice it, unless you think this is a playoff bound team this year (which is a big stretch), IMO it doesn't make sense to keep them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excessive painkillers would do the trick, especially if combined with alcohol.
The alcohol part certainly seems like a good possibility. Not sure how else to explain this tweet this morning:

Check out @68INCOGNITO’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/68INCOGNITO/status/984009337789145091?s=09

Dude can talk all he wants about retiring because of health issues, it's pretty obvious he wouldn't be retiring if he wasn't ticked off about the pay cut his agents agreed to.

If this keeps up, it seems like a good bet that the Bills will be going after the $2.5M in signing bonus left that they can go after.

 
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000925891/article/ask-5-which-team-is-most-likely-to-trade-up-for-qb-in-2018-draft

"Conclusion: These are some very interesting responses. I believe the Bills are the team most likely to trade up for a top QB given the package of picks they could offer. They signed AJ McCarron to be their "bridge" QB, but they are still in the market for a franchise quarterback. The fact that they have a workout scheduled with Sam Darnold tells me they have convinced his representation that they are working on trading into the top five of the draft -- I can't see Darnold working out for a team destined to pick outside of the top 10."

 
Bills/Bengals week 3 of preseason.

Basically Woodstock 4 :wub:

NFL gets something right for once.

-QG

 
Last edited by a moderator:
given that you guys are the Andy Dalton appreciation society and all the players we've swapped (and that you guys returned the Dalton favor by making sure that we don't resign Bodine) it should be a big old Bengals-Bills lovefest up in Buffalo in preseason week 3.

Andy and Boyd can thank you guys for all the donations in person.

-QG

 
Matt Waldman: Lamar Jackson is the best pocket passer in this class.

If the Patriots take Jackson and he is an unstoppable force that allows them to dominate the NFL in a couple of years I'm going to just quit the NFL.
I want to like him, but his personality and the stuff with his mom really turn me off.  Refusing to do the 40 at all, making it difficult to interview him, and other things would scare me off a little.  

But there’s no doubt he could be dangerous.  If the Bills don’t trade up, take bpa at 12, and then somehow land Jackson at 22 then I would be happy.  We’re probably going to need a mobile QB now that we have no offensive line.  

 
Incognito tweeting that he’s not retiring. I would have to imagine that this is likely tied to some type of money issue. Probably a roster bonus or something. I’m not competent enough of contracts to know how this would work though. @Hankmoody any thoughts?

 
Incognito tweeting that he’s not retiring. I would have to imagine that this is likely tied to some type of money issue. Probably a roster bonus or something. I’m not competent enough of contracts to know how this would work though. @Hankmoody any thoughts?
now he is asking to be released. I know the dude is kind of nuts and a ##### but is this CTE?

 
They need to trade Richie. He is obviously not happy. I wonder if the "I am retiring....no I'm not" is schtick based on what happened with line mate Woods. 

 
Incognito tweeting that he’s not retiring. I would have to imagine that this is likely tied to some type of money issue. Probably a roster bonus or something. I’m not competent enough of contracts to know how this would work though. @Hankmoody any thoughts?


They need to trade Richie. He is obviously not happy. I wonder if the "I am retiring....no I'm not" is schtick based on what happened with line mate Woods. 
He was on the last year of his deal and recently signed a 1 year deal taking a straight pay cut. People were surprised he did that.

Apparently he was too, because within a week or two he fired his longtime agency and then a couple of more weeks later the drama/meltdown started.

Who knows what happened, but clearly he was not onboard with taking a pay cut with nothing in return but signed that deal anyway. Who knows if the Bills got one over on his agents, his agents screwed up and didn't communicate things clearly to him or if he's just a big dummy that didn't realize what was happening until he had already signed the deal. 

All the health excuses was just obvious :bs:

At this point, he's making himself look like a total clown. His beef should be 100% with his former agents. It was their job to negotiate and to make sure he understood anything he was signing. He could have said no to a pay cut and the Bills could have either paid him his last year of his deal or cut him. But he agreed and signed the new deal. Be a man and play it out. If you're upset, sue you previous agents if you think they messed up.

 
Couple of Vic Carucci tweets from Brandon Beane.

Seems to be hinting about a trade-up for a franchise QB.

------------------------------------------------------

Vic Carucci‏Verified account @viccarucci 6h6 hours ago

#Bills have met with all the QBs in the draft, according to Beane, and feel like they "know them all pretty well."

Vic Carucci‏Verified account @viccarucci 6h6 hours ago

Beane: "We're at 12. I don't know what quarterback's going to be there. I don't know whether we're going up or going down. Even if I wanted (to trade), it takes a partner to do it." #Bills

Vic Carucci‏Verified account @viccarucci 6h6 hours ago

Beane: "You've got to have a franchise quarterback. That's one of the main jobs of the GM." #Bills

-------------------------------------------------------

 
Ok, I'll start...

at Balt - Win
vs LAC - Win
at Min - Loss
at GB - Loss
vs Tenn - Win
at Houston - Loss
at Indy - Win
vs NE - Loss
vs Chi - Win
at NYJ - Win
vs Jax - Loss
at Mia - Win
vs NYJ - Win
vs Detroit - Loss
at NE - Loss
vs Mia - Win 

9-7

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top