Why? They're nearly $48m below the cap. This contract doesn't hurt at all.According to Rapaport its almost fully guaranteed. In no way is it a steal. they are paying full price and then some, this is a huge risk.
ETA: QB is set though. But man, that is the exact contract I was afraid of.
I have heard it may be fully guaranteed. I wonder how much is front loaded for the 2018 season, as far as how much may be left for free agency.Steal if true.
I've been over it in this thread, but I don't think Cousins is a franchise QB. He's good, but nowhere near elite. Its possible that he isn't an upgrade at all from the Teddy/Bradford/Keenum trio, though I will readily admit, he's much safer. Its just is that safety worth at least an extra 10 million a year?Did they really have a choice? That is the going rate for a "franchise" QB. Not too often one of those in on the free agent market. Considering what the Jets would/will offer it is a steal.
Not right now it doesn't. But when it comes time to re-up guys like Diggs and Hunter it might. I just hate the fully guaranteed part. That is a ton of money for somebody I don't view as elite, that's all.Why? They're nearly $48m below the cap. This contract doesn't hurt at all.
I totally disagree with the bold above. Besides, that "combo" or Teddy/Bradford/Keenum would cost more than $28 million a year.I've been over it in this thread, but I don't think Cousins is a franchise QB. He's good, but nowhere near elite. Its possible that he isn't an upgrade at all from the Teddy/Bradford/Keenum trio, though I will readily admit, he's much safer. Its just is that safety worth at least an extra 10 million a year?
I wasn't suggesting they keep all 3, I was saying that all 3 had success for the Vikings, and while I'm sure Cousins will too, I'm not sure he's a big upgrade over any of them, just more reliable.I totally disagree with the bold above. Besides, that "combo" or Teddy/Bradford/Keenum would cost more than $28 million a year.
People hear "fully guaranteed" and go into a panic. It's only a 3 year contract - would anyone expect that any major free agent contract isn't going to have at least 2 years guaranteed. So what makes adding a third year so scary?Why debate with Travdog? He said from the start he is not a fan of Cousins so you need to read everything in that light. Different strokes... different folks.
I would not call $28 mil per year and fully guaranteed $ a steal by any means, but it's a best case scenario for sure. Vikes were going to have to come hard at this point with only Bradford/Bridgewater as backup plans. It's either best workable offer, or selling to a fanbase that trading more picks to the Eagles or Bridgewater was your plan all along.
Jimmy G got 74m Fully Guaranteed. How is this a shock?
Yea, the "fully guaranteed" part matters less because its only 3 years. The normal 6 year, 160 mil deal would have had almost as much guarantee as this one - this just gives an out to the team after 3 years without dead cap., Also means if he does well, they're going to have to pay him way more - in 3 years, Goff, Rodgers, Wentz will all have gotten big money deals. Cousins will be able to cash in AGAIN, with the new benchmark being set. Normally your out with these deals is that by year 3-4, the per year cost is below market value, and you're getting relative value for a few years. You're losing that here.People hear "fully guaranteed" and go into a panic. It's only a 3 year contract - would anyone expect that any major free agent contract isn't going to have at least 2 years guaranteed. So what makes adding a third year so scary?
It's highly doubtful that Cousins will flame out, and that the third season will be seen as an albatross. It's actually more likely that he will play well and 4-5 QB contracts will surpass that amount by the start of his third season making it look quite reasonable.
Last year Keenum/Bridgewater/Bradford cost $26 million against the cap. Even if you think it's a ### for tat swap(newsflash... it's not) then they are only spending $2M more this year on the QB position.I've been over it in this thread, but I don't think Cousins is a franchise QB. He's good, but nowhere near elite. Its possible that he isn't an upgrade at all from the Teddy/Bradford/Keenum trio, though I will readily admit, he's much safer. Its just is that safety worth at least an extra 10 million a year?
Not right now it doesn't. But when it comes time to re-up guys like Diggs and Hunter it might. I just hate the fully guaranteed part. That is a ton of money for somebody I don't view as elite, that's all.
Well, for starters, and to the best of my knowledge, this is the first time that a player's contract is FULLY guaranteed in it's entirety. Insofar as this is the first time an event like this has happened, I found it shocking, in and of itself.Jimmy G got 74m Fully Guaranteed. How is this a shock?
They can also restructure going into year 3 if things are going well and have more flexibility add years while also knowing what the salary cap situation will be like at that time. I don't think this is a bad situation in any way based on current contract levels being signed around the league.Yeah, but it's a fully guaranteed 3 year contract. It's not a fully guaranteed 5 year contract.
If Cousins came to Minnesota and flopped, he'd still get a 2nd year to turn it around. If he didn't, then Minnesota would still have to take a huge cap hit to cut him after year 2 if they gave him a 5 or 6 year contract. This is still essentially the same thing, just a shorter contract. The only difference between this and say Jimmy G's contract is the Vikings won't have the last couple years with Cousins on a relatively modest deal market wise. That only matters if he shows up as a top QB, which if he does they'll have no issue giving him another big contract 3 years from now.
Fair point. But sometimes, the intangibles say a lot. For me, it's clear Bellicheck loved Jimmy G. He sat and watched and learned from Brady and arguably the best coaching staff the league has ever seen. I don't know what the heck happened in and around the time he was traded, but something was going on internally with the Pats that lead to his being traded. I believe he was absolutely the future of the team, but somehow, someway it got bungled and off he went to SF. Lynch is no dummy and the niners obviously saw a lot in Jimmy G to give him a deal like they did.Why are the more questions about Cousins than Jimmy G? That makes no sense. One has a much larger body of work. And it ain't Jimmy G.
If we've learned anything about Cousins is that if he plays well he's going to leverage it to the maximum. He only wanted a 3 year deal so he could guarantee himself another shot at mega deal.They can also restructure going into year 3 if things are going well and have more flexibility add years while also knowing what the salary cap situation will be like at that time. I don't think this is a bad situation in any way based on current contract levels being signed around the league.
For 1 QB.. Currently, have a VERY unknown as backup right now, so will have to spend more to get a backup.Last year Keenum/Bridgewater/Bradford cost $26 million against the cap. Even if you think it's a ### for tat swap(newsflash... it's not) then they are only spending $2M more this year on the QB position.
Agreed. It's hard to say anyone signing a contract like that is a steal but I like the deal for the Vikings. They can afford it and he makes them better as well as adding stability to the QB position. Nice move by them.Why debate with Travdog? He said from the start he is not a fan of Cousins so you need to read everything in that light. Different strokes... different folks.
I would not call $28 mil per year and fully guaranteed $ a steal by any means, but it's a best case scenario for sure. Vikes were going to have to come hard at this point with only Bradford/Bridgewater as backup plans. It's either best workable offer, or selling to a fanbase that trading more picks to the Eagles or Bridgewater was your plan all along.
McCown went back to Jets and I believe Fitzpatrick already re-signed with Tampa Bay.snogger said:Kirk to Vikes, Case to Denver, Bradford to Cards, Bridgewater to Jets..
So, the question becomes.. Vikings Backup.. Doubt AJ comes over..
McCown, 39 and for me at least :X
Fitzpatrick?
Or do they take a huge chance and go with who they have and draft someone in the later rounds??
I'm in a tiny minority with this perspective but I think Teddy and Bradford would have been a better value and likely just as good.BigJim® said:Why debate with Travdog? He said from the start he is not a fan of Cousins so you need to read everything in that light. Different strokes... different folks.
I would not call $28 mil per year and fully guaranteed $ a steal by any means, but it's a best case scenario for sure. Vikes were going to have to come hard at this point with only Bradford/Bridgewater as backup plans. It's either best workable offer, or selling to a fanbase that trading more picks to the Eagles or Bridgewater was your plan all along.
You can have Matt Cassell.snogger said:Kirk to Vikes, Case to Denver, Bradford to Cards, Bridgewater to Jets..
So, the question becomes.. Vikings Backup.. Doubt AJ comes over..
McCown, 39 and for me at least :X
Fitzpatrick?
Or do they take a huge chance and go with who they have and draft someone in the later rounds??
If you were to phrase it might have been I'm right there with you. If Bridgewater's near amputated leg that cost him 2 years and Bradford's recurring knee that cost him all but 1 game in 2017 allow them to be what they could be. But "would have been"? Those are insurmountable if's for me personally to assume that, and too much risk when the stakes are what they are.I'm in a tiny minority with this perspective but I think Teddy and Bradford would have been a better value and likely just as good.
I would guess that a big portion of the appeal of Cousins over Bridgwater & Bradford is his health history. That is a huge factor in spending that kind of money and B&B don't lead to confidence when it comes to staying on the field. Cousins has been extremely durable and is mobile enough to escape pressure when need be.I'm in a tiny minority with this perspective but I think Teddy and Bradford would have been a better value and likely just as good.
But there is something to be said for a QB who has been in the top of the bell curve over the last few years.
Like Matt CassellSilver & Black said:Fair point. But sometimes, the intangibles say a lot. For me, it's clear Bellicheck loved Jimmy G. He sat and watched and learned from Brady and arguably the best coaching staff the league has ever seen.
I get it, you don't agree. That's what makes the world go around. Time will tell.Like Matt Cassell
No thank you. Been there done that already. Guy is an interception machine.You can have Matt Cassell.
Wat
Who else should they target?So whats next for the vikes? Still have some money to spend in FA.
He could have had a "mega deal" with the Jets if that's what he really wanted. If we've learned anything about Cousins is that he wants to win and sacrificed some $ to do so. If he wins and he's earned another "mega deal" in 3 years good for him. I hope the Vikings can afford him. (or Sloter is ready to go...)If we've learned anything about Cousins is that if he plays well he's going to leverage it to the maximum. He only wanted a 3 year deal so he could guarantee himself another shot at mega deal.
I think dontari poe would be a solid signing at tackle. Daquon Jones maybe? Also would be interested in an edge rusher to rotate in with griffen and hunter. I kind of like adryian clatborn and alex okafor. Zim could always snag someone like that in the draft too and that’s probably a more cost effective approach.Here are a couple of lists of he top free agents. Some of the signings are tracked in these as well.
Top 100 NFL free agents of 2018
2018 NFL Free Agents: Top 100
I don't really see any defensive tackles that I feel great about at under tackle.
Dontari Poe? Suh? (seems unlikely) David Irving?
Here is just the defensive tackle list Tom Johnson is 20th on this list and a lot of these players ahead of him are more run defenders or nose tackles. The impact defensive tackles in the draft likely won't last to the Vikings 1st round pick but maybe I am wrong about that.
Things may be more promising at offensive line than defensive tackle in free agency. The draft has a lot of good guards but not any great tackles, so addressing tackle in free agency might be a better option?
.2018 NFL Free Agents: Offensive Tackles
This list doesn't look all that good to me when Andre Smith is the 7th guy on the list.
Who stands out as a player who could really help the Vikings?
His best weapon was chris thompson out of the backfield until he got hurt.great signing, Cousins was good last year, especially when you consider he had no targets to throw to, Reed always hurt, line problems, Jamison Crowder was his best weapon? wow.
now he goes to a legit offense, power run game, great defense that will always keep the vikings competitive to the very end.
great signing. Teddy who?!
Don't forget 29 million dollar man Ryan Grant!His best weapon was chris thompson out of the backfield until he got hurt.
Terrelle Pryor was a hot mess too.Don't forget 29 million dollar man Ryan Grant!