rockaction
Footballguy
Thanks, BL. I can very much sympathize with the unseen dynamics of an SI reporter and Dan Campbell. In fact, I was wondering a little bit because if the guy wanted to ask about motion then why not directly ask it? That's a problem with the reporter and his knowledge of the game.
But here's the problem. I was a bit annoyed by the equivocation of the reporter who I thought (because I saw it in the context of Scott Barrett's post) didn't get to the point, and my problem is not with Campbell's attitude. At all. In fact, I understand it both as a function of annoyance and one of future strategy. I thought he might be browbeating the guy so that no future plans got divulged. But now that you give me the backstory, my problem is an entirely different one as I re-watch the clip. The reporter never gets at motion as the issue. And that's so key because Campbell volunteers that motion might just be the issue. And that's weirder. It tells me two things potentially. One, it tells me it was a problem for the Lions in the game. But worse, number two, it tells me (in conjunction with the Harmon article) that Campbell and Morton might not totally be on the same page and they've got to get together and work it out. I hope the differences that Harmon points out aren't so fundamental that the Lions suffer all season because of it.
And it leads me to a weird and stray Twitter observation that may or may not be justified, true, or even matter in three weeks but is salient now. It seems like longtime Lions fans and those in the know are crediting Tanner Engstrom as having a much more crucial role within the Lions organization than we were led to believe. It's odd because I personally was led to believe that Engstrom had an ancillary role and that Morton was the guy behind the Detroit offense and he was first choice hands down.
But why was Morton then in Denver and Engstrom in Detroit when the success of the Detroit offense was going on? And why does the Jets offense have much more similarity to Detroit's offense last year vis a vis motion and play action than Detroit's offense this year has in common with Detroit's offense last year? I dug on Twitter and there were an awful lot of people who you could tell had serious accounts that were immediately posting their laments about how the Jets and Detroit were running their offenses.
Now, this is one game. Will it bear out in the future or come to pass that this holds through seventeen games, or is Pittsburgh a paper tiger and Parsons such a difference and addition to an already loaded Green Bay corps that simply lacked one dynamic pass rusher that really we can't draw anything from this past Sunday?
Time will tell. So that I don't seem like I'm being too deferent or have no opinions of my own I'd like to say I'll bet the truth is somewhere in between and that it's messier than we think. I have a hard time reading all this and thinking that Detroit won't have serious problems because they lost intellectual and physical capital. The Jets aren't riding a new genius to thirty-plus a game. Things will settle down and people will adjust. But I think the personnel raid by the Jets hurt.
It's too bad we mosquitoe'd you guys. Kinda bummed about it and happy for my own team at the same time. Wish it came at no cost and from somewhere else. Peace.
Yeah it was kind of surprising we brought back John Morton. For two years we had been led to believe Engstrand was working closely with Ben and it was widely believed he and Kelvin Sheppard would be the new coordinators when the inevitable defections occurred.
We also have a new Passing Game Coordinator (David Shaw), new Run Game Coordinator (long time OL coach Hank Fraley took on an additional assignment), and new WR, RB & TE Assistants. Now the WR coach is the Assistant HC and old RB Coach, the RB Coach was Gibbs position coach in college, the new TE is a highly regarded young up and comer. There is absolutely no reason to question the qualifications of any of the 10 new assistants.
But every year, each team is its own entity. It takes time to get used to the rhythms of communication, establishing identity, building team cohesion. That stuff has to be organic and natural in order for guys to totally buy in.
Only 1 game, yes, but might take some time to work things out.
FWIW I’m indifferent to Ben and how he does. I just want to see them get crushed 2x a year. But I’m a huge AG stan and said often he might end up being a better HC. Dude is a great leader, and given his excellence as a player, you know the players have so much respect him. He knows how to lead men, and while he’s uber competitive, he also cares about the person. Had a lot of one on one conversations with Jamo, and it often wasn’t about football. Love that guy.
Remember Marty Morninweg was touted as an offensive genius and flopped as a HC. Then went back to being a successful OC.
Agree, AG seems to be better cut out to be a HC than Ben. Not saying Ben won`t have success but being the HC is a total different animal than being the OC or DC. Instead of being in charge of one unit the hC is in charge of everything that has to do with the team from players, the whole staff down to equipment people. Pulled in many directions.
IDK much about the Jets org, don’t pay attention to the New Jersey franchises. But we all know in Chicago Ben is hampered by a lot of organizational dysfunction.I don’t think Poles will be there long, been treading water for 4 years.
The Jets have a meddling and really suspect (I actually said ****ty at first) owner who lets his psycho teenage boys get involved in the actual club decisions who now needs to get himself and his kids the absolute heck out of the way because it seems like we lucked out into an OC and maybe (maybe God bless us) a guy who has turned the corner at QB.
Maybe.
I would will it into existence.
