Leroy Hoard
Footballguy
Call me a puck head, but I am also going against Easton Stick.Raiders are locked and loaded

Call me a puck head, but I am also going against Easton Stick.Raiders are locked and loaded
Sorry if my post was confusing, rock.
Keep in mind… LV is not a very good defense!Mia or LV?????? Stressing out.
No. Washington gave up 37 points to a Good Humor truck, and 43 points to a quilting club.What are your thoughts oh Defense Geniuses!!
Is Washington a good enough defense to get and hold for their week 16 play as they play the Jets in the Meadowlands??
I am struggling this week in my decision:
Atlanta vs Carolina (my choice this morning)
New Orleans vs NY Giants (would have chosen earlier, but Giants played well last week)
Cleveland vs Chicago Bears (do I hang on to Cleveland's early season greatness?)
Thoughts??
Ruh roh.Keep in mind… LV is not a very good defense!Mia or LV?????? Stressing out.
Yes ...im slapping myself on the back lolRaiders D playing lights out vs Chargers QB who i dont think has ever played in any games besides preseason
He shoots, he scores!Call me a puck head, but I am also going against Easton Stick.Raiders are locked and loaded![]()
Great start for the playoffs.Good call on the Raiders defense boys.
I'm going with the BearsFor those of us that did not take the Raiders who is the new hot pick?
Browns
Falcons
Saints
Titans (if Stroud is out)
Bengals
Thanks much Largent. I too will go with Atlanta then.I am struggling this week in my decision:
Atlanta vs Carolina (my choice this morning)
New Orleans vs NY Giants (would have chosen earlier, but Giants played well last week)
Cleveland vs Chicago Bears (do I hang on to Cleveland's early season greatness?)
Thoughts??
Carolina weather is going to be terrible according to forecast....if you want a super high floor, like me, I'm rolling ATL - and over CLE which is another choice of mine
Same. Gut told me, but brain didn't listen.was flip-flopping on using LV and chose wrong, damnit.
Think it's still solid, but not a smash play. CHI is playing real well. I know I'm going with them to cover +3 and possibly win.Anyone concerned about starting CLE vs CHI this week? I see CLE ranked top 3 everywhere, and their defense has been really good overall, but it sounds like they’ve had some significant injuries lately and CHI has been playing pretty well. I’m not sure CHI is the dream matchup it appeared to be weeks ago, but all the “experts” disagree.
With options like LAR vs WAS, and ATL & CAR available, I’m second guessing CLE.
Agree that CLE is a solid play, but we want more than solid in the playoffs, right? While CLE va CHI will likely be low scoring, LAR vs WAS and ATL @ CAR seem to have a greater likelihood of sacks, turnovers, and potential defensive TDs.Think it's still solid, but not a smash play. CHI is playing real well. I know I'm going with them to cover +3 and possibly win.Anyone concerned about starting CLE vs CHI this week? I see CLE ranked top 3 everywhere, and their defense has been really good overall, but it sounds like they’ve had some significant injuries lately and CHI has been playing pretty well. I’m not sure CHI is the dream matchup it appeared to be weeks ago, but all the “experts” disagree.
With options like LAR vs WAS, and ATL & CAR available, I’m second guessing CLE.
Well my opponent in the playoffs sniped me on Atlanta on the waiver wire so I picked LV playing against a stick led team who cant score especially with Keenan Allen out. Im probably going to have to send him flowers or something by taking ATL from me. LV scored 23 and would have gotten me 6 more points ( yardage and offense bonuses) had they decided to defend that last drive.my plan is ATL this week @ Carolina and also on the WW Pick up Denver vs NE and vs a Stick led Chargers team should I make it to the superbowl in weeks 16 and 17..... My plan WAS to pick up Philly for the playoffs should they sho some sort of improvement because they have a pretty good schedule but the dont seem to be able to stop anybody.
I'd go ATL.Agree that CLE is a solid play, but we want more than solid in the playoffs, right? While CLE va CHI will likely be low scoring, LAR vs WAS and ATL @ CAR seem to have a greater likelihood of sacks, turnovers, and potential defensive TDs.Think it's still solid, but not a smash play. CHI is playing real well. I know I'm going with them to cover +3 and possibly win.Anyone concerned about starting CLE vs CHI this week? I see CLE ranked top 3 everywhere, and their defense has been really good overall, but it sounds like they’ve had some significant injuries lately and CHI has been playing pretty well. I’m not sure CHI is the dream matchup it appeared to be weeks ago, but all the “experts” disagree.
With options like LAR vs WAS, and ATL & CAR available, I’m second guessing CLE.
Nobody likes Titans D vs Davis Mills minus Collins?
I'm debating between them, ATL, CHI, and CLE same as you all. Cle is being started in 87% of CBS leagues. Really hard to go away from them. Really wish I was ballsy enough to play LV
Anyone else on the Colts this week at home against Pitt?
Yes, that is what I am rolling withAnyone else on the Colts this week at home against Pitt?
It's at the top of the list when it comes to bad weather.I'd go ATL.
CAR offense stinks and it looks like there's going to be weather issues
Do we know that heavy rain is a good thing for fantasy DST production? I’m not disagreeing, just asking the question as I genuinely don’t know.I'd go ATL.Agree that CLE is a solid play, but we want more than solid in the playoffs, right? While CLE va CHI will likely be low scoring, LAR vs WAS and ATL @ CAR seem to have a greater likelihood of sacks, turnovers, and potential defensive TDs.Think it's still solid, but not a smash play. CHI is playing real well. I know I'm going with them to cover +3 and possibly win.Anyone concerned about starting CLE vs CHI this week? I see CLE ranked top 3 everywhere, and their defense has been really good overall, but it sounds like they’ve had some significant injuries lately and CHI has been playing pretty well. I’m not sure CHI is the dream matchup it appeared to be weeks ago, but all the “experts” disagree.
With options like LAR vs WAS, and ATL & CAR available, I’m second guessing CLE.
CAR offense stinks and it looks like there's going to be weather issues.
Looks like Ward will be back for the Browns and the key for them is not allowing Fields to run wild. If so, I see big things for their D.Agree that CLE is a solid play, but we want more than solid in the playoffs, right? While CLE va CHI will likely be low scoring, LAR vs WAS and ATL @ CAR seem to have a greater likelihood of sacks, turnovers, and potential defensive TDs.Think it's still solid, but not a smash play. CHI is playing real well. I know I'm going with them to cover +3 and possibly win.Anyone concerned about starting CLE vs CHI this week? I see CLE ranked top 3 everywhere, and their defense has been really good overall, but it sounds like they’ve had some significant injuries lately and CHI has been playing pretty well. I’m not sure CHI is the dream matchup it appeared to be weeks ago, but all the “experts” disagree.
With options like LAR vs WAS, and ATL & CAR available, I’m second guessing CLE.
Those are 3 tough ones to choose from. Do you have a 3 sided coin to flip?Rams at home versus a WAS team just playing it out, Commanders have a lame duck staff, Brian Robinson out, Rams are in the thick of it
other choice is Browns at home versus Bears, and Packers at home versus Bucs
three good matchups IMO, tough to decide
Giants are playing well. NO way overrated too. Think NYGs win that outright.KC or Saints?
Giants might actually throw more chances at sacks etc
Zeke might just run 30x.
I can't imagine it helps. Another variable to screw up a young QB who has enough problems.Do we know that heavy rain is a good thing for fantasy DST production? I’m not disagreeing, just asking the question as I genuinely don’t know.I'd go ATL.Agree that CLE is a solid play, but we want more than solid in the playoffs, right? While CLE va CHI will likely be low scoring, LAR vs WAS and ATL @ CAR seem to have a greater likelihood of sacks, turnovers, and potential defensive TDs.Think it's still solid, but not a smash play. CHI is playing real well. I know I'm going with them to cover +3 and possibly win.Anyone concerned about starting CLE vs CHI this week? I see CLE ranked top 3 everywhere, and their defense has been really good overall, but it sounds like they’ve had some significant injuries lately and CHI has been playing pretty well. I’m not sure CHI is the dream matchup it appeared to be weeks ago, but all the “experts” disagree.
With options like LAR vs WAS, and ATL & CAR available, I’m second guessing CLE.
CAR offense stinks and it looks like there's going to be weather issues.
Theoretically, both teams will want to run the ball as much as possible. If the field conditions are terrible, neither team may have much success.This could lead to a low scoring, 3-and-out kinda game for both teams with very little passing, which means very few opportunities for sacks or INTs.
If there’s not going to be many dropbacks, where does Atlanta DST score all their points? I suppose a potential shutout, but that could easily be ruined by a Falcons fumble in their own red zone or something.
It’s possible the Falcons run game is strong even in the heavy rain, and they can score some TDs forcing CAR to throw which could provide the sacks, & INTs.
I’m just not sure which scenario is most likely in this one. I’m concerned that a monotonous run heavy game plan on both sides equals disappointing fantasy DST production.
It could help in that the struggling young QB hands the ball to his RBs all game, thereby avoiding mistakes.I can't imagine it helps. Another variable to screw up a young QB who has enough problems.Do we know that heavy rain is a good thing for fantasy DST production? I’m not disagreeing, just asking the question as I genuinely don’t know.I'd go ATL.Agree that CLE is a solid play, but we want more than solid in the playoffs, right? While CLE va CHI will likely be low scoring, LAR vs WAS and ATL @ CAR seem to have a greater likelihood of sacks, turnovers, and potential defensive TDs.Think it's still solid, but not a smash play. CHI is playing real well. I know I'm going with them to cover +3 and possibly win.Anyone concerned about starting CLE vs CHI this week? I see CLE ranked top 3 everywhere, and their defense has been really good overall, but it sounds like they’ve had some significant injuries lately and CHI has been playing pretty well. I’m not sure CHI is the dream matchup it appeared to be weeks ago, but all the “experts” disagree.
With options like LAR vs WAS, and ATL & CAR available, I’m second guessing CLE.
CAR offense stinks and it looks like there's going to be weather issues.
Theoretically, both teams will want to run the ball as much as possible. If the field conditions are terrible, neither team may have much success.This could lead to a low scoring, 3-and-out kinda game for both teams with very little passing, which means very few opportunities for sacks or INTs.
If there’s not going to be many dropbacks, where does Atlanta DST score all their points? I suppose a potential shutout, but that could easily be ruined by a Falcons fumble in their own red zone or something.
It’s possible the Falcons run game is strong even in the heavy rain, and they can score some TDs forcing CAR to throw which could provide the sacks, & INTs.
I’m just not sure which scenario is most likely in this one. I’m concerned that a monotonous run heavy game plan on both sides equals disappointing fantasy DST production.
I'd go GB.Alright who do you guys go for week 16, GB vs Bryce Young or PHI vs Devito and the Giants?
I just picked up the Jets for next week against Washington over the roostered Cleveland and Houston (having a bye is fun). I hate going with a defense with a bad QB, but the Commies give up a ton of sacks.My jets vs Washington is available but I’d have to drop multiple players that have been languishing in my IR spot (Noah Brown, Michael Wilson, Pop Douglas, Waller, and GB DST).
Yeah my thought process is choosing the better defense vs the vulnerable team vs a mid defense vs the vulnerable team. if I make it to next week.I just picked up the Jets for next week against Washington over the roostered Cleveland and Houston (having a bye is fun). I hate going with a defense with a bad QB, but the Commies give up a ton of sacks.My jets vs Washington is available but I’d have to drop multiple players that have been languishing in my IR spot (Noah Brown, Michael Wilson, Pop Douglas, Waller, and GB DST).
Of course I started CLE over Ten and ChiNobody likes Titans D vs Davis Mills minus Collins?
I'm debating between them, ATL, CHI, and CLE same as you all. Cle is being started in 87% of CBS leagues. Really hard to go away from them. Really wish I was ballsy enough to play LV
You have some good options. None of those are available for me but I have been rostering CLE all year and picked up CHI last week. Probably rolling with red hot Chi defense vs ARI.OK, for those still alive, who are we looking at for Week 16? I currently have KC vs LV and Cle @ Hou, but there are some attractive streamers on the wire
- Den vs NE -- not as attractive as it looked a couple weeks ago, especially since Zappe seems to have restored a baseline level of competence to NE's offense. Still, Denver has a good D, and NE has a bad offense, so that still makes them a good option. Added bonus that they get the Chargers again in W17
- Philly vs NYG -- another one that I'm a little less excited about. In this case it's because Philly's pass D has been God-awful. Still, will TDV and/or Tyrod really be able to take advantage of that?
- GB @ Car -- Panthers offense remains execrable. But Packers seem to be falling apart. They blew a game to the Giants and got torched by TB
- Cinci @ Pitt -- Steelers also seem to be melting down, and Rudolph now in at QB
- Other possibilities: Chi vs Ari, Wash @ NYJ
OK, for those still alive, who are we looking at for Week 16? I currently have KC vs LV and Cle @ Hou, but there are some attractive streamers on the wire
- Den vs NE -- not as attractive as it looked a couple weeks ago, especially since Zappe seems to have restored a baseline level of competence to NE's offense. Still, Denver has a good D, and NE has a bad offense, so that still makes them a good option. Added bonus that they get the Chargers again in W17
- Philly vs NYG -- another one that I'm a little less excited about. In this case it's because Philly's pass D has been God-awful. Still, will TDV and/or Tyrod really be able to take advantage of that?
- GB @ Car -- Panthers offense remains execrable. But Packers seem to be falling apart. They blew a game to the Giants and got torched by TB
- Cinci @ Pitt -- Steelers also seem to be melting down, and Rudolph now in at QB
- Other possibilities: Chi vs Ari, Wash @ NYJ
Think it was DEN's third game in a row on the road. DET came to play and it's not like you can't run on them. The success through the air was shocking to be honest.Anybody else here a little concerned about starting the Broncos DST the next two weeks after the showing they had last night?
They looked stout the past several weeks and have incredible matchups against the Pats and Chargers, but last night made them look more like they looked against Miami earlier in the season. I’m now second guessing and considering other options.
Or will they right the ship? Any Denver homers know if there were key injuries to the defense? Or are they still good but just outclassed last night by a Super Bowl contender?
Feeling the same with with CHI D. Not sure what's going on but it seems like this D is really been disruptive lately. Hoping for some weather in Chicago as well for the AZ warm team.You have some good options. None of those are available for me but I have been rostering CLE all year and picked up CHI last week. Probably rolling with red hot Chi defense vs ARI.OK, for those still alive, who are we looking at for Week 16? I currently have KC vs LV and Cle @ Hou, but there are some attractive streamers on the wire
- Den vs NE -- not as attractive as it looked a couple weeks ago, especially since Zappe seems to have restored a baseline level of competence to NE's offense. Still, Denver has a good D, and NE has a bad offense, so that still makes them a good option. Added bonus that they get the Chargers again in W17
- Philly vs NYG -- another one that I'm a little less excited about. In this case it's because Philly's pass D has been God-awful. Still, will TDV and/or Tyrod really be able to take advantage of that?
- GB @ Car -- Panthers offense remains execrable. But Packers seem to be falling apart. They blew a game to the Giants and got torched by TB
- Cinci @ Pitt -- Steelers also seem to be melting down, and Rudolph now in at QB
- Other possibilities: Chi vs Ari, Wash @ NYJ