What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2025 Team Defense & Defense by Committee Thread (7 Viewers)

Rams acquired OLB Von Miller from the Broncos in exchange for second and third round 2022 draft picks. 

In case it wasn't clear, the Rams are all in on a Super Bowl run. Miller, an eight time Pro Bowler who had 62 sacks from 2014-2018, will join a defensive line with destroyer of worlds, Aaron Donald. LA's front seven will be an even bigger nightmare for opposing offenses with Miller; through eight weeks, they lead the league with 25 sacks while blitzing on a meager 23 percent of their plays. Miller's numbers have dropped off considerably over his past two seasons (he missed 2020 with an Achilles injury). Pro Football Focus has graded Miller as the NFL's 22nd best pass rusher in 2021. With little hope for a postseason run, the Broncos got a modest return for the 32-year-old pass rusher. 

RELATED: 

Denver Broncos

SOURCE: Adam Schefter on Twitter 

Nov 1, 2021, 12:33 PM ET

 
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the Vikings fear DE Danielle Hunter suffered a torn pec Week 8 against the Cowboys. 

Hunter will have an MRI on Monday to confirm the diagnosis. If he did tear his pectoral, Hunter will almost certainly be done for the season. Hunter has registered six sacks through seven games this season. 

SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter

Nov 1, 2021, 11:30 AM ET

 
Cowboys DST | DAL

Cowboys' Trevon Diggs: Avoids serious injury

(31 mins ago) Diggs was re-evaluated Monday and should be fine after suffering a sprained ankle during the Cowboys' 20-16 win over the Vikings, Ian Rapoport of NFL Network reports.

Diggs was dealing with an ankle injury ahead of Sunday's matchup, but he was able to suit up without a designation. Though he started and played all but two of the Cowboys' defensive snaps during the contest, he apparently tweaked the ankle at some point. However, he appears to have avoided a serious injury and will likely be available for Dallas' Week 9 clash with the Broncos.


If Diggs is really okay, then I'm sticking with Dal ROS. but buyer beware, without Diggs' pick-6 in a couple of games, this unit's performance looked like yesterday, which is worse than mediocre.

 
If Diggs is really okay, then I'm sticking with Dal ROS. but buyer beware, without Diggs' pick-6 in a couple of games, this unit's performance looked like yesterday, which is worse than mediocre.


I mean... It was the Vikings? One of the best offenses in the NFL and they made Cooks and Jefferson look terrible. I think they are still a solid defense but they do lose a lot of the upside without Diggs which really made them elite. But I still think against a non top-10 offense they are startable and against a weaker offense they should be elite even without Diggs. 

Broncos are much much worse offense than Vikings... 

Praying he comes back soon though and it's not a long term injury.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I mean... It was the Vikings? One of the best offenses in the NFL and they made Cooks and Jefferson look terrible. I think they are still a solid defense but they do lose a lot of the upside without Diggs which really made them elite. But I still think against a non top-10 offense they are startable and against a weaker offense they should be elite even without Diggs.

Praying he comes back soon though and it's not a long term injury.
I think of MN as a neutral matchup. If you cant play your defense in neutral matchups then they should be thrown to the scrap heap for the next flavor of the week.

 
I mean... It was the Vikings? One of the best offenses in the NFL and they made Cooks and Jefferson look terrible. I think they are still a solid defense but they do lose a lot of the upside without Diggs which really made them elite. But I still think against a non top-10 offense they are startable and against a weaker offense they should be elite even without Diggs.

Praying he comes back soon though and it's not a long term injury.


sure, for yesterday. and in week 3 against philly. and again in week 5 against the giants. great weeks thanks to one play, pick + TD. a lot of this defense for fantasy purposes is dependent on Diggs being 100%.

 
sure, for yesterday. and in week 3 against philly. and again in week 5 against the giants. great weeks thanks to one play, pick + TD. a lot of this defense for fantasy purposes is dependent on Diggs being 100%.


Those still weren't top 10 worst offenses per fantasy scoring. They were middle of the pack and division matchups so they weren't exactly pushover weeks. I agree, to be elite they need Diggs. To be startable against a team like Jets, Houston, Denver, Atlanta I'm not sure. Especially with the garbage defenses people start against this teams... Don't think cowboys are any worse than taking a flyer on someone like Seattle vs Jacksonville.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think of MN as a neutral matchup. If you cant play your defense in neutral matchups then they should be thrown to the scrap heap for the next flavor of the week.


Could be. I am only going based off FP scored and based on the numbers, they are a negative matchup.

MIN VS CIN - Bengals score 4 points
MIN VS ARI - Cards score -2 points
MIN VS CLE - Cleveland scores 18 points
MIN VS CAR - Panthers score 2 points

Outside of CLE, the three other top 16 DSTs who faced Vikings scored 4 points or less so Dallas scoring 4 points was within expectations for me. By your logic, CIN, CAR, and ARI should also be thrown to the scrap heap. However, as we move deeper in the season I find it harder and harder to find higher ranked defenses as people start stashing and I think I'd rather have these defenses than a bottom 16 defense vs the bottom 10 offenses.


 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vikings coach Mike Zimmer confirmed DE Danielle Hunter suffered a torn pec Week 8 against the Cowboys and will miss the remainder of the season.

Hunter was averaging a sack per game before Week 8, putting him on pace for a career year. He missed all of 2020 with a herniated disc but was dominant in his prior two seasons. Hunter landed on 14.5 sacks in 2018 and 2019. His injury is a massive blow to the Vikings' defensive line. Everson Griffen now stands as the team's top pass rusher. He has five sacks and four TFLs on the year.

SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter

Nov 1, 2021, 5:19 PM ET

 
I have the luxury of having trade capital to put up for a defense, do we consider any to be trade-worthy? It feels like an bad year for team defenses, even the ones that came off the board early are struggling. I'm nearly a lock for the playoffs so I'm hoping to have a plug-and-play for week 13 on.

 
I have the luxury of having trade capital to put up for a defense, do we consider any to be trade-worthy? It feels like an bad year for team defenses, even the ones that came off the board early are struggling. I'm nearly a lock for the playoffs so I'm hoping to have a plug-and-play for week 13 on.
I hear ya.  My positional players have been bad enough, my defense and kickers have not helped at all.  I'm making all the wrong moves; this week it was the Bears with a -1.  I've averaged a whopping 10 points combined weekly from kicking and defense and looking at the playoff schedule, don't see anything that looks enticing. 

 
I have the luxury of having trade capital to put up for a defense, do we consider any to be trade-worthy? It feels like an bad year for team defenses, even the ones that came off the board early are struggling. I'm nearly a lock for the playoffs so I'm hoping to have a plug-and-play for week 13 on.


Rams... That Von Miller trade... They just became even scarier. Problem is their schedule going forward isn't the best. 4 bad matchups and a bye. GB, ARI, MIN, and BAL.

Last time they faced Arizona they got -5 and when they faced TB they got 0 so they aren't immune to bad games... But I don't know impact of Von Miller yet. May be worth a shot. When Bears were dominant and then got Mack, they become super elite.

Otherwise Bills have the best schedule going forward with no byes and 8 neutral+ matchups. 7 against the 10 worst offenses. They are also the #1 ranked fantasy defense right now. You can look at my spreadsheet for further details if you need them.

 
Rams adding that piece is a huge boost...but no way they are out there on anyone's wires?

Also, a slight downtick to them for using the gif of Teddy KGB splashing the pot to say they are all in.

Do they not know how Rounders ends?
They're going to be paying Arizona their money. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is Green Bay flying under the radar?

Tied for 7th in the league in sacks, forcing turnovers.  That first week against NO skews them down a bit in points against as well and overall scoring in FF.  Otherwise they have been a pretty steady defense.  All without having scored any defensive TDs...and all thus far without Za'Darius Smith (who may possibly return) and for weeks now without Jaire Alexander (who also may return down the stretch).

Ive got Dallas and still like them...but GB is intriguing to me as they don't live off of just turnovers and the TDs that Dallas has scored. 

In another league I have Indy and am holding them the next 2 weeks for sure...but watching GB in both.

 
I love Sig, but can anyone tell me what the point of his 'Rent a Defense' article is every week? Every single week his picks for the week are all rostered in just about every league I'm in. 

 
Is Green Bay flying under the radar?

Tied for 7th in the league in sacks, forcing turnovers.  That first week against NO skews them down a bit in points against as well and overall scoring in FF.  Otherwise they have been a pretty steady defense.  All without having scored any defensive TDs...and all thus far without Za'Darius Smith (who may possibly return) and for weeks now without Jaire Alexander (who also may return down the stretch).

Ive got Dallas and still like them...but GB is intriguing to me as they don't live off of just turnovers and the TDs that Dallas has scored. 

In another league I have Indy and am holding them the next 2 weeks for sure...but watching GB in both.
Just picked them up.  -- very consistent double digit scoring since week 3 in my league

 
Is Green Bay flying under the radar?

Tied for 7th in the league in sacks, forcing turnovers.  That first week against NO skews them down a bit in points against as well and overall scoring in FF.  Otherwise they have been a pretty steady defense.  All without having scored any defensive TDs...and all thus far without Za'Darius Smith (who may possibly return) and for weeks now without Jaire Alexander (who also may return down the stretch).

Ive got Dallas and still like them...but GB is intriguing to me as they don't live off of just turnovers and the TDs that Dallas has scored. 

In another league I have Indy and am holding them the next 2 weeks for sure...but watching GB in both.
You have a point. They're not getting huge numbers but they've been the most consistent all year in my leagues scoring system. Throwing out week 1, their low is 12 and their high is 18. Sacks and turnovers offset any yardage or point penalties. Matchups don't look great but you'd be hard pressed to find a safer option each week. 

 
I love Sig, but can anyone tell me what the point of his 'Rent a Defense' article is every week? Every single week his picks for the week are all rostered in just about every league I'm in. 
Yeah… i read them for fun / color. But I find more success looking forward for at least 4 weeks rather than streaming week to week. Streaming weekly works when you are the only one to do it. However, I think many here have others in the league doing the same which limits the pools especially in weeks where there are few good matchups to begin with.

It’s basically chess with your league mates. Got to think ahead a few steps.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah… i read them for fun / color. But I find more success looking forward for at least 4 weeks rather than streaming week to week. Streaming weekly works when you are the only one to do it. However, I think many here have others in the league doing the same which limits the pools especially in weeks where there are few good matchups to begin with.

It’s basically chess with your league mates. Got to think ahead a few steps.


100% right. That's why I just nabbed the Eagles after looking at their schedule later in the season. 

Week 10:

Denver

Week 13-17:

Giants, Jets, WFT, Giants, WFT

 
Rams adding that piece is a huge boost...but no way they are out there on anyone's wires?

Also, a slight downtick to them for using the gif of Teddy KGB splashing the pot to say they are all in.

Do they not know how Rounders ends?
Kliff is going to spot how McVay twists the top off his Oreos.

 
If New England got cut due to the game with the Chargers last week, they look like they could be getting Darnold’s backup.... which now that I mention it might be an upgrade.

 
Well with Jordan Love at QB likely giving Mahomes more chances with the ball…not thinking GB is a good play this week. Though, maybe more opportunities for sacks and turnovers.

 
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports Washington DE Montez Sweat suffered a jaw fracture and will be forced to avoid physical contact for the next month.

That means Sweat will be out for well over a month after accounting for a reasonable ramp-up period in practice. He will also be forced to alter his diet because of the injury although it will not require surgery. Sweat already had four sacks this year on top of 12 QB hits. It's a brutal injury for the third-year defensive lineman and for a Washington defense that hasn't lived up to expectations in 2021. Expect the Football Team to continue underperforming on defense after losing Sweat. 

SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter

Nov 3, 2021, 5:58 PM ET

 
sho nuff said:
Well with Jordan Love at QB likely giving Mahomes more chances with the ball…not thinking GB is a good play this week. Though, maybe more opportunities for sacks and turnovers.
Yeah, thought of this just after I picked them up 🙃.   May just roll the Ravens out there vs Minny.  Not comfortable with it, but Love is such an unknown; worry about KC getting short fields, turnovers and scoring easier. --I sure hope not as I'm starting Love 🤒

 
Joked in last night's game thread when Josh Johnson came in that it would be hilarious if the Jets keep going further and further down their QB depth chart and getting better and better production ... and then Johnson went out and threw for 317 and three tuddies in three quarters of play. 

Indy/Cinci don't have world-beating Ds, but they're both competent, and Jets hung 30 on each of them with different journeymen QBs. If it had just been White, you could maybe have convinced me that he was this undiscovered gem. But Josh Johnson? Nuh-uh. That guy is like the definition of a replacement-level QB. So maybe the answer is that Mike LeFleur knows what he's doing and can scheme up a good game regardless of who's behind center. 

Which has me wondering ... are the Jets no longer a smash play for opposing DSTs?

They play Buffalo next week, and their D is set-and-forget regardless of opponent, but after that they play the Dolphins (twice), Texans, Eagles, Saints, Jags and Bucs. Other than the Saints, I'm not sure any of those are worth elevating based on the match-up.

Of course, maybe Wilson comes back in a week or two and goes back to turning the ball over multiple times per game. Or maybe the past two weeks were a mirage. Still, something worth keeping an eye on.

 
Zach Wilson is the smash play not the jets
Not disagreeing with you that his propensity to turn the ball over has definitely boosted their opponents' fantasy totals. Still, if I told you that Josh Johnson was going to be the QB for an offense with no major stars at the skill positions, you would assume the opposing D would be a lock, right?

 
Not disagreeing with you that his propensity to turn the ball over has definitely boosted their opponents' fantasy totals. Still, if I told you that Josh Johnson was going to be the QB for an offense with no major stars at the skill positions, you would assume the opposing D would be a lock, right?
Not sure I agree with no major stars. Ok maybe not stars but Moore, Crowder, Davis (out this week), Cole, Mims, Carter,  Johnson are all talented receivers. I actually thought the Jets would have a sneaky good offense this year and Wilson ####ed it all up.

 
Not sure I agree with no major stars. Ok maybe not stars but Moore, Crowder, Davis (out this week), Cole, Mims, Carter,  Johnson are all talented receivers. I actually thought the Jets would have a sneaky good offense this year and Wilson ####ed it all up.
They're fine, I guess. But my point was, if you told me the Chiefs third stringer had a good game, I would say, "OK, he figured out how to chuck it up to Tyreek and Kelce." No one would have looked at the Jets weapons before last night's game and thought, "These guys can definitely carry Josh Freakin' Johnson to 300/3."

 
ignatiusjreilly said:
Not disagreeing with you that his propensity to turn the ball over has definitely boosted their opponents' fantasy totals. Still, if I told you that Josh Johnson was going to be the QB for an offense with no major stars at the skill positions, you would assume the opposing D would be a lock, right?
I would have asked you “who is Josh Johnson?”.

 
New England D gets a slight downgrade with CMC’s likely return (even on a snap count). Was considering starting them over Pitt D week but this news has me back on Pitt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Titans DST has my attention after Sunday night's dominant performance against the Rams. I see their name get mentioned in this thread from time to time, but shutting down the Rams has convinced me.

Pretty good schedule before their week 13 bye, and a playoffs schedule of @PIT, and then getting SF and Miami at home doesn't seem nearly as scary as it did to begin the season.

I hope I can steal them with my 11th WW priority.

 
New England was worth every penny today. Had a down week for most of my guys. Rodgers being out too. New England getting me 26 was huge.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top