Ugh. I bet they throw co-ed baby showers and then start forest fires with gender reveal parties. Terrible.I've heard biological men say "We're pregnant."
How about the statement “some trans men can get pregnant.” Agree or disagree?
You can't possibly believe this.The idea is to confuse people enough that they just give up and suddenly believe that men can get pregnant.
I don't believe men can get pregnant. Do you?You can't possibly believe this.The idea is to confuse people enough that they just give up and suddenly believe that men can get pregnant.
This is an easy question to answer depending on the definition of “men”. Using the traditional definition you are using, the answer is no. If one uses a newer definition which includes all those who identify as men, the answer is yes.I don't believe men can get pregnant. Do you?You can't possibly believe this.The idea is to confuse people enough that they just give up and suddenly believe that men can get pregnant.
No, it’s not a scientific question. It’s a question about language and politics.Is this where we trust the science?
This made me LOL, thanks my friend.
No, but that's not what I was referring to. I was referring to the following, which you wrote:I don't believe men can get pregnant. Do you?You can't possibly believe this.The idea is to confuse people enough that they just give up and suddenly believe that men can get pregnant.
Do you believe the above? If so can you please explain.The idea is to confuse people enough that they just give up and suddenly believe that men can get pregnant.
Why did you use the term “trans men” in your response? Is that not confusing basic biology?How about the statement “some trans men can get pregnant.” Agree or disagree?
That was not the question. Trans men are not a subset of men. There is nothing positive that is coming from confusing basic biology.
Absolutely.It’s simply a recognition that some people consider trans women to be women
There is no "newer" definition of men. There's only one definition.This is an easy question to answer depending on the definition of “men”. Using the traditional definition you are using, the answer is no. If one uses a newer definition which includes all those who identify as men, the answer is yes.I don't believe men can get pregnant. Do you?You can't possibly believe this.The idea is to confuse people enough that they just give up and suddenly believe that men can get pregnant.
But you already know this.
Why did you use the term “trans men” in your response? Is that not confusing basic biology?How about the statement “some trans men can get pregnant.” Agree or disagree?
That was not the question. Trans men are not a subset of men. There is nothing positive that is coming from confusing basic biology.
My friend is a trans woman. She looks like a woman, has breasts and a vagina. No one who meets her thinks she’s a man, or ever was a man. If asked whether she is a woman or a man, my response will be that she is a woman. If asked if she is biologically a woman, my answer would be no.
Going back to the survey question, if it were:
Some trans men can get pregnant. Agree.
Some biological men can get pregnant. Disagree.
Some men can get pregnant. Agree (on the assumption (mine) that trans men are being included).
Put another way, this isn’t some shocking or unexpected poll result. It’s simply a recognition that some people consider trans women to be women and trans men to be men from a language standpoint even though we readily understand the biological distinctions. Those poll numbers will go up in future years. And it won’t be because people are confused into thinking that biological men can get pregnant.
This is where I am at as well. If you sit down and talk to people, I believe that you would get to a point where we all agree on the basics. I don't believe people answering yes to this question literally believe that a person born as male can get pregnant. I also get why the other side would hammer the "follow the science" angle to make it look like that's what people are saying.I feel like polls like this are designed solely for the purpose of inflaming people.
Biological men can't get pregnant. A subset of people who identify with a male gender identity can get pregnant as they're biological women who have not transitioned biologically. I don't think anyone is confused about that. So, this poll is designed to play off semantic differences and not accuracy.
It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.
It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.
It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.
Great post, BB. Worded my thoughts better than I did. Like you are saying these polls aren't identifying people who believe a person born without a uterus can get pregnant, it's identifying people would include trans men in the equation when answering the question.Why did you use the term “trans men” in your response? Is that not confusing basic biology?How about the statement “some trans men can get pregnant.” Agree or disagree?
That was not the question. Trans men are not a subset of men. There is nothing positive that is coming from confusing basic biology.
My friend is a trans woman. She looks like a woman, has breasts and a vagina. No one who meets her thinks she’s a man, or ever was a man. If asked whether she is a woman or a man, my response will be that she is a woman. If asked if she is biologically a woman, my answer would be no.
Going back to the survey question, if it were:
Some trans men can get pregnant. Agree.
Some biological men can get pregnant. Disagree.
Some men can get pregnant. Agree (on the assumption (mine) that trans men are being included).
Put another way, this isn’t some shocking or unexpected poll result. It’s simply a recognition that some people consider trans women to be women and trans men to be men from a language standpoint even though we readily understand the biological distinctions. Those poll numbers will go up in future years. And it won’t be because people are confused into thinking that biological men can get pregnant.
Wouldn't this require them to have an actual platform?It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.
It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.
it is a reaction to the dems "entire active platform"...in the words of the great John Rambo..."they drew first blood, not me"
Some people worry way too much about the lives of other people.
I also didn't start a thread about it either.Some people worry way too much about the lives of other people.
This guy gets it:
"Exactly. They push this nonsense into people's faces and when those people react they get all indignant with, "OMG!!! Why are you making such a big deal about this!".
Also, just note that the same people pushing this garbage are the same people demanding you "follow the science" in the Climate Change thread."
True, but this thread wouldn't have been posted if, y'know, "the left" wouldn't be pushing this garbage in people's faces, trying to change language norms and ignoring science.I also didn't start a thread about it either.Some people worry way too much about the lives of other people.
This guy gets it:
"Exactly. They push this nonsense into people's faces and when those people react they get all indignant with, "OMG!!! Why are you making such a big deal about this!".
Also, just note that the same people pushing this garbage are the same people demanding you "follow the science" in the Climate Change thread."
I don't think you do get it, because you keep going back to that last part. To me you having a point about the same people and science if they answer yes to a question like: can a human born male get pregnant? For many people now, like BB is saying, the question reads like can a human living as a man and presenting as a man get pregnant? Something like that - so not a denial of science, but a different set of social definitions and starting POV as you.Some people worry way too much about the lives of other people.
This guy gets it:
"Exactly. They push this nonsense into people's faces and when those people react they get all indignant with, "OMG!!! Why are you making such a big deal about this!".
Also, just note that the same people pushing this garbage are the same people demanding you "follow the science" in the Climate Change thread."
I don't think you do get it, because you keep going back to that last part. To me you having a point about the same people and science if they answer yes to a question like: can a human born male get pregnant? For many people now, like BB is saying, the question reads like can a human living as a man and presenting as a man get pregnant? Something like that - so not a denial of science, but a different set of social definitions and starting POV as you.Some people worry way too much about the lives of other people.
This guy gets it:
"Exactly. They push this nonsense into people's faces and when those people react they get all indignant with, "OMG!!! Why are you making such a big deal about this!".
Also, just note that the same people pushing this garbage are the same people demanding you "follow the science" in the Climate Change thread."
I don’t get it. It seems like they are willfully ignoring the point the other side is making. It doesn’t seem to be in good faith.. I also get why the other side would hammer the "follow the science" angle to make it look like that's what people are saying.
Just pointing out that your characterization of science denial is not accurate. Your point about language norms stands though, I get your beefs on that front.I don't think you do get it, because you keep going back to that last part. To me you having a point about the same people and science if they answer yes to a question like: can a human born male get pregnant? For many people now, like BB is saying, the question reads like can a human living as a man and presenting as a man get pregnant? Something like that - so not a denial of science, but a different set of social definitions and starting POV as you.Some people worry way too much about the lives of other people.
This guy gets it:
"Exactly. They push this nonsense into people's faces and when those people react they get all indignant with, "OMG!!! Why are you making such a big deal about this!".
Also, just note that the same people pushing this garbage are the same people demanding you "follow the science" in the Climate Change thread."
The bolded is why this is a problem. It's an absurd premise to begin with. Why not just say, "Can a woman get pregnant"? That answer is a resounding, fact-based "YES!".
The point with your crowd is you're trying to confuse people by design. They aren't "living as a man" because, y'know, they are a biological woman. They have no idea what it is like to live like a man because they are not a man no matter how hard your side tries to blur the lines.![]()
Great discussion points here. Well doneWouldn't this require them to have an actual platform?It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.![]()
I meant I get it in the sense that I get why the sides would try to paint the other team in the worst light they can. Going to the science denying is a good way to do it, but yes - I agree with what you are saying. People saying that are either purposely doing it to make the other team look bad, or not actually listening to what they are trying to say.I don’t get it. It seems like they are willfully ignoring the point the other side is making. It doesn’t seem to be in good faith.. I also get why the other side would hammer the "follow the science" angle to make it look like that's what people are saying.
Yes indeed. College kids are tremendously accepting of other people and their lifestyles. Except for Conservatives of course.College students and younger are by a significant majority accepting of trans, and this appears to grow every year. In other words, woke is winning and is somewhat inevitable.
You know, when talking about our kids when I note that "our labor and delivery wasn't that bad" it really doesn't get a good reaction from my wife...I've heard biological men say "We're pregnant."
biology matters and is, in the vast, vast majority of cases, deterministic as to what sex people are.There have been a lot of threads on this subject and they all seem to have the same divide: liberals tend to be accepting of trans men and women and regard them as whatever sex they have now chosen to be. Conservatives tend to believe thattrans is a form of mental illness and that someone who begins life as a man will always be a man, and same for a woman.
Who is they? A person is not garbage man. Listen to how awful you sound. Do you not think a trans person is any more than human garbage? Why? We are all just people man. Why do you get so upset by another man or woman just being themself?It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.
it is a reaction to the dems "entire active platform"...in the words of the great John Rambo..."they drew first blood, not me"
Exactly. They push this nonsense into people's faces and when those people react they get all indignant with, "OMG!!! Why are you making such a big deal about this!".
Also, just note that the same people pushing this garbage are the same people demanding you "follow the science" in the Climate Change thread.
Why did you use the term “trans men” in your response? Is that not confusing basic biology?How about the statement “some trans men can get pregnant.” Agree or disagree?
That was not the question. Trans men are not a subset of men. There is nothing positive that is coming from confusing basic biology.
My friend is a trans woman. She looks like a woman, has breasts and a vagina. No one who meets her thinks she’s a man, or ever was a man. If asked whether she is a woman or a man, my response will be that she is a woman. If asked if she is biologically a woman, my answer would be no.
Going back to the survey question, if it were:
Some trans men can get pregnant. Agree.
Some biological men can get pregnant. Disagree.
Some men can get pregnant. Agree (on the assumption (mine) that trans men are being included).
Put another way, this isn’t some shocking or unexpected poll result. It’s simply a recognition that some people consider trans women to be women and trans men to be men from a language standpoint even though we readily understand the biological distinctions. Those poll numbers will go up in future years. And it won’t be because people are confused into thinking that biological men can get pregnant.
Good lord, he said nothing about the person being garbage. So stop twisting things. The gender ideology is total garbage. Even real feminists will tell you so unless they are in fear of being cancelled.Who is they? A person is not garbage man. Listen to how awful you sound. Do you not think a trans person is any more than human garbage? Why? We are all just people man. Why do you get so upset by another man or woman just being themself?It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.
it is a reaction to the dems "entire active platform"...in the words of the great John Rambo..."they drew first blood, not me"
Exactly. They push this nonsense into people's faces and when those people react they get all indignant with, "OMG!!! Why are you making such a big deal about this!".
Also, just note that the same people pushing this garbage are the same people demanding you "follow the science" in the Climate Change thread.
He didn't call any person garbage. Why the need to twist words around?Who is they? A person is not garbage man. Listen to how awful you sound. Do you not think a trans person is any more than human garbage? Why? We are all just people man. Why do you get so upset by another man or woman just being themself?It’s their entire active platform. No policy - just Trans people taking over girls’ sports while teaching CRT in woke classrooms and they’re going to save us from it.Republicans love their culture wars. Wow.
it is a reaction to the dems "entire active platform"...in the words of the great John Rambo..."they drew first blood, not me"
Exactly. They push this nonsense into people's faces and when those people react they get all indignant with, "OMG!!! Why are you making such a big deal about this!".
Also, just note that the same people pushing this garbage are the same people demanding you "follow the science" in the Climate Change thread.
Do you not see that this is a semantics issue?100% biological fact
men cannot get pregnant