What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

50% Catch Rate + 40 % Deep rate + 15YPC (1 Viewer)

Concept Coop

Footballguy
*2012 Update Below, post #13**

I have been looking a combination of stats as a gage for future production, over the last couple days, and wanted to get some outside opinions.

Filtering players who posted 50% catch rate on a 40% deep rate with 15YPC rendered three groups of players: Elite playmakers, elite deep threats, and situational deep threats. That is the difference between Steve Smith (Car), DeSean Jackson and Malcolm Floyd, who all look to be equally productive per target: Smith received more attention, double teams, and was a bigger threat everywhere else on the field. DeSean can be the best player on his team and still be an elite deep threat. Floyd's production is heavily influenced by his situation.

When dealing with a young player, or a player whose role has yet to be expanded beyond a deep threat, you have to determine if the player can be a threat everywhere else on the field.

As a small exercise: Take the players that make the cut, and ask a couple questions:

-Is the player capable of being a team's best possession WR and deep threat?

-Does their production project to continue as the player becomes (if not already) a teams best WR?

If both questions are yes, we are looking at an elite WR (Britt/Rice/Green).

If only the 2nd question is yes, we are looking at a (fantasy) WR2. (The Jacksons)

A couple explanations:

Kenny Britt (2009/10): Britt had an amazing season in 2010, catching 60% of his balls, 40 % of which were deep. Looking at Britt, we should have been able to conclude that he is a threat everywhere on the field, as he runs great routes, has great hands, thus, can be a teams possession WR, and it's deep threat. He did match up with the opposing team's best CB often and did not have another WR on his roster more worthy of a double team. This exercise should have told us that Britt is poised to be an elite NFL and fantasy WR.

Malcolm Floyd (Every year): We should note that Floyd played with a very good NFL QB, played across a better, more double-team-worthy WR who is also an elite deep threat. Unlike Britt, Floyd is not a great route runner and is not likely to be a threat all over the field. We should conclude that Floyd is a situational deep threat, both in the NFL and as a FF asset.

Others that I would, at the time, put in the elite WR category:

-Sidney Rice (2009)

-Santonio Holmes (2007)

-Roy Williams (2006) <--I would have been very wrong.

-Roddy White (2006) <--Almost forgot he was considered primarily as a deep threat.

-Brandon Lloyd (10) <--Not young at the time, but he showed an great deal of change. He won't make this list if we take age into account.

-Dwyane Bowe (10)

Those I would have pegged as deep threats as a #1 target:

-Vincent Jackson (07)

-DeSean Jackson (08)

-Mike Wallace (2009/10) <--He showed he could be a teams do-all WR for a stretch, when need (think SB). But he returned to his old role with the emergence of Brown.

Others that I would have relegated to the situational deep threat category:

-Mario Manningham

-Nate Washington

-Lance Moore

-Robert Mecham

-Steve Breaston

A few that I would we as owner need to answer the above questions about, based on 2011:

-Eric Decker*

-AJ Green

-DHB

-Brandon LaFell

-Demarius Thomas *

-Torrey Smith

Green is obvious, but I would categorize them as such, based on potential:

Elite Category:

Green

Thomas*

Elite Deep Threat as a team's best WR:

DHB

Decker*

Smith

Situational Deep Threat:

LaFell

*Included due to the Tebow factor. Their Catch rates were below 50%, but close enough to assume 50%, should they ever get catchable targets.



2012 UPDATE:

Players meeting criteria (Thru w4):

AJ Green

Torrey Smith

R. Barden

Steve Smith (CAR)

DeSean Jackson

Nate Washington

Malcomn Floyd

Miles Austin

Golden Tate

Jon Baldwin** 14.8 YPC (Very close)

The list is full of very good WRs. Barden is one game, I am not putting anything into it, yet.

If this were to continue, the guys we would need to pay attention to, and potentially make a determination on:

Golden Tate

Jon Baldwin

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Others that I would have relegated to the situational deep threat category:

-Mario Manningham

-Nate Washington

-Lance Moore

-Robert Mecham

-Steve Breaston

How did you make this determination? Was it a statistical measure of catch %? Or just your intuition? I don't know the catch % stats for all these guys but I know Meachem's has been high.

 
Perhaps the NO guys on the boards can do better than I, but Lance Moore really strikes me as a yards after catch guy, and not a deep threat in the traditional sense of the word. I've seen him run fly routes and stuff (I think I'm thinking of some old Tampa games), but he's more of a short pass guy, isn't he? I think Meachem is much more of a 15+-in-the-air kind of player.

I get that it might be pure fantasy stat stuff, so I guess you'd have to figure out where yards after catch fit into what you want to do with respect to the player and his situation.

 
Whole lot of subjectivity in there, from what I can tell.

I watched Oakland play San Diego in week 17 and Floyd was the best WR on the field for either team. If he was 24 and a former first round pick, would he suddenly be an elite talent? We can say that guys like Breaston and Floyd probably aren't the next superstar simply because we've seen enough of their careers to know that it's unlikely. That doesn't mean that guys like DHB and LaFell are any less fraudulent. They've just had less opportunities to prove their mediocrity.

 
Others that I would have relegated to the situational deep threat category:-Mario Manningham-Nate Washington-Lance Moore-Robert Mecham-Steve BreastonHow did you make this determination? Was it a statistical measure of catch %? Or just your intuition? I don't know the catch % stats for all these guys but I know Meachem's has been high.
I think based on his first post that these guys fall into the Floyd category. Their stats look good because they aren't the main threat, i.e. Nicks and Colston open the field up for them, they aren't the best WRs on their team.That said, not so sure about Washington. While I don't think he is elite in any way, he did perform well after Britt was out. I think he would end up in the other category based on his criteria, but would be a "wrong" like Roy Williams.
 
Where does Denarius Moore stack up? Seems like he would fit as a possible candidate for elite or elite deep threat/teams best WR. I haven't looked at his stats though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whole lot of subjectivity in there, from what I can tell. I watched Oakland play San Diego in week 17 and Floyd was the best WR on the field for either team. If he was 24 and a former first round pick, would he suddenly be an elite talent? We can say that guys like Breaston and Floyd probably aren't the next superstar simply because we've seen enough of their careers to know that it's unlikely. That doesn't mean that guys like DHB and LaFell are any less fraudulent. They've just had less opportunities to prove their mediocrity.
You are right: it is all subjective, beyond the initial criteria. I believe the statline shows that a player made plays. We then have to decide what that means, and how to project moving forward. I am not so quick to write of DHB, however. LaFell can be explaned by Newton being one of the best deep ball passers in the NFL - I believe that. That, and the fact that Cam can run can cause defenses to play a lot of zone, so LaFell is not "beating" CBs. I have the luxary of hindsite, so you are right: it is easy to say Floyd is not elite, looking back. That is why I included those that reached the feat this year, who are young and whose careers are still being defined.
 
Others that I would have relegated to the situational deep threat category:-Mario Manningham-Nate Washington-Lance Moore-Robert Mecham-Steve BreastonHow did you make this determination? Was it a statistical measure of catch %? Or just your intuition? I don't know the catch % stats for all these guys but I know Meachem's has been high.
I think based on his first post that these guys fall into the Floyd category. Their stats look good because they aren't the main threat, i.e. Nicks and Colston open the field up for them, they aren't the best WRs on their team.That said, not so sure about Washington. While I don't think he is elite in any way, he did perform well after Britt was out. I think he would end up in the other category based on his criteria, but would be a "wrong" like Roy Williams.
You are correct on your first point.Re:Washington, I had a hard time categorizing him. He had a great year last season. As opposed to Roy Williams, I think he would fall into a group with Brandon Lloyd: guys who had uncharacteristic seasons that came after typical "developmental" years. After thinking about what Washington did, outside of his per target stats, I am not so sure he couldn't repeat it, the same way many came to view Lloyd as a talented NFL WR 1. As far as what these stats say about Washington, I think they suggest that his year was as good as his basic stats indicate (rec/yrds/tds). Many guys have outlier seasons in basic stats, while not being overly efficient on a per/target basis: Mike Williams (TB) comes to mind.
 
Where does Denarius Moore stack up? Seems like he would fit as a possible candidate for elite or elite deep threat/teams best WR. I haven't looked at his stats though.
Moore had a catch % of 45% or so, IIRC. I think he can come to be in the DeSean Jackson catagory, but he has some work to do. I wouldn't discourage anyone from investing in him - he passes the eye test, when it comes to being a playmaker. He just needs to better balance the great catches and the boring ones.
 
Perhaps the NO guys on the boards can do better than I, but Lance Moore really strikes me as a yards after catch guy, and not a deep threat in the traditional sense of the word. I've seen him run fly routes and stuff (I think I'm thinking of some old Tampa games), but he's more of a short pass guy, isn't he? I think Meachem is much more of a 15+-in-the-air kind of player. I get that it might be pure fantasy stat stuff, so I guess you'd have to figure out where yards after catch fit into what you want to do with respect to the player and his situation.
The deep % stat ONLY takes into consideration passes that traveled more than 15 yards. So, 40+% of Moore's targets came beyond 15 yards.
 
Perhaps the NO guys on the boards can do better than I, but Lance Moore really strikes me as a yards after catch guy, and not a deep threat in the traditional sense of the word. I've seen him run fly routes and stuff (I think I'm thinking of some old Tampa games), but he's more of a short pass guy, isn't he? I think Meachem is much more of a 15+-in-the-air kind of player. I get that it might be pure fantasy stat stuff, so I guess you'd have to figure out where yards after catch fit into what you want to do with respect to the player and his situation.
The deep % stat ONLY takes into consideration passes that traveled more than 15 yards. So, 40+% of Moore's targets came beyond 15 yards.
Cool. That's surprising to me.
 
2012 UPDATE:

Players meeting criteria (Thru w4):

AJ Green

Torrey Smith

R. Barden

Steve Smith (CAR)

DeSean Jackson

Nate Washington

Malcolmn Floyd

Miles Austin

Golden Tate

Jon Baldwin** 14.8 YPC (Very close)

The list is full of very good WRs. Barden is one game, I am not putting anything into it, yet.

If this were to continue, the guys we would need to pay attention to, and potentially make a determination on:

Golden Tate

Jon Baldwin

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Find someone that thinks T.Smith is a fluke, and buy him now. A CRAZY 67.9% of his routes are deep, and he is catching 57% of them. Almost 70% are deep! He is making game changing plays.

For ref, the next highest deep % (aside from Barden's single game) is 52% (S.Smith).

Insane.

 
As for Tate and Baldwin - I really think this is a good sign. Sample size is obviously very small, but it matches what my eyes have told me: they are making plays, when given the opportunity.

 
I traded for Floyd because of his Pro Football Focus aDOT ranking, where aDOT= average depth of target. He's constantly up there in the category.

I like this thread. T. Smith is a must-have. I'd love having him.

 
This is pretty interesting. The lack of passes in KC is going to hurt Baldwin this year. If Bowe is allowed to walk, Baldwin will be a hot commodity next year.

 
Players currently meeting criteria:

Chris Givens

Calvin Johnson

Malcolm Floyd

Players very close:

AJ Green

Golden Tate

Denarius Moore

Torrey Smith

Vincent Jackson

Donnie Avery

TY Hilton

Josh Gordon

Nate Washington

Cecil Shorts

Emanual Sanders

Of the players meeting criteria, Givens is the only unknown. Our formula would suggest taht we need to make a call on him, and that he could be in the DeSean Jackson, Torrey Smith, Denarius Moore tier of playmakers.

When we include those very close to the mark, we get a lot more guys with question marks: Tate, Avery, Hilton, Gordon, Shorts, Sanders.

Tate is the one I am most interested in. Not because he has the most value, but because he seems to be the least sexy, based on market value. He seems to be a prime throw in candidate, and a guy I will be targeting. He isn't a player that most would assume on this list, I think.

I am having a very hard time placing a lot of these guys, and will need the off-season to sort it out. But right now, I'd say (potential, of course):

Elite:

Gordon, Shorts

Deep threat capable of being NFL WR1: Hilton, Sanders, Tate

Situation deep threat: Avery

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Tate.

He's not a target guy he's a scoring guy and Wilson throws a great deep ball. At Chicago does not look great but after?

14 ARI

15 @BUF

16 SF

 
I'm not sure how useful this metric really is. Looking only at the five guys on your list that we can actually categorize today you get...

Top end/elite WRs -- Calvin Johnson, Vincent Jackson

Role players/not elite WRs -- Malcolm Floyd, Nate Washington, Emmanuel Sanders

So three of the five who fit the criteria are just guys. Useful guys to be sure, but nowhere near being WR1s.

 
I'm not sure how useful this metric really is. Looking only at the five guys on your list that we can actually categorize today you get...Top end/elite WRs -- Calvin Johnson, Vincent JacksonRole players/not elite WRs -- Malcolm Floyd, Nate Washington, Emmanuel SandersSo three of the five who fit the criteria are just guys. Useful guys to be sure, but nowhere near being WR1s.
All the metric shows is that a guy has a high catch/deep target ratio. The rest is subjective. It has helped me take a look at guys like Torrey, and now Golden Tate. I posted about Tate meeting the criteria early in the season, and he has kept it up. I wouldn't have noticed other wise. It helped me see how close Torrey Smith's rookie year was to Mike Wallace's, when Wallace was top 10 and Torrey was a rookie coming off a good season. Now their value is very close. It is simply another thing to look at, to capture things that raw stats don't. I don't think it is anything more or less than that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top