6 - 1 x 0 + 2 ÷ 2 = ? (1 Viewer)

[otello]

What is the answer?

 

[rodg12]

7

 

[fantasycurse42]

1x1

 

[Freelove]

France.

 

[Leroy Hoard]

Somewhere between 0 and 2.

 

[D_House]

5

 

[In The Zone]

7

 

[Jules Winnfield]

7

 

[Jules Winnfield]

Ann Margaret

 

[shadyridr]

7

 

[ChiefD]

Someone who hasn't been in my kitchen

 

[shadyridr]

6-0+1

 

[snogger]

7

7

7

 

[spOOfy]

6 - (1 x 0) + (2 ÷ 2) = 7

6 - 0 + 1 = 7

 

[Leroy Hoard]

Someone who hasn't been in my kitchen

My kitchen can't hold 7 people.

 

[Bucky86]

Ball cancer

 

[Fat Nick]

Please excuse my dear Aunt Sally

 

[NCCommish]

42

 

[Leroy Hoard]

Ball cancer

See post #5.

 

[comfortably numb]

yoga pants?

 

[Bucky86]

Ball cancer

See post #5.

:whoosh:

 

[Instinctive]

7

 

[xulf]

Ball cancer

See post #5.

 

[eoMMan]

Sieben

Siete

 

[msommer]

yoga pants

 

[spOOfy]

Ball cancer

See post #5.

 

[Angry Beavers]

7

 

[dickey moe]

7

 

[Sinn Fein]

-5^2

 

[Harry Manback]

I got 7

 

[timschochet]

So the rule is to assume parenthesis even if there aren't parenthesis? I didn't realize this. (Or at least if I learned it in math I've forgotten it.) I would have gotten that wrong.

 

[Sinn Fein]

So the rule is to assume parenthesis even if there aren't parenthesis? I didn't realize this. (Or at least if I learned it in math I've forgotten it.) I would have gotten that wrong.

wat?

 

[Quez]

$1

 

[DA RAIDERS]

1

 

[Gawain]

So the rule is to assume parenthesis even if there aren't parenthesis? I didn't realize this. (Or at least if I learned it in math I've forgotten it.) I would have gotten that wrong.

Order of Operations. PEMDAS and the like.

 

[Harry Manback]

So the rule is to assume parenthesis even if there aren't parenthesis? I didn't realize this. (Or at least if I learned it in math I've forgotten it.) I would have gotten that wrong.

If there are no parenthesis then you do order of operations which means multiplication and division come before addition and subtraction.

 

[Fennis]

69

 

[Harry Manback]

If it were (6-1) x (0 +2) / 2 then you'd have 5.

I think.

 

[johnnycakes]

So the rule is to assume parenthesis even if there aren't parenthesis? I didn't realize this. (Or at least if I learned it in math I've forgotten it.) I would have gotten that wrong.

Order of Operations. PEMDAS and the like.

I was helping my 6th grader with this subject just a few weeks ago.

 

[Sinn Fein]

So the rule is to assume parenthesis even if there aren't parenthesis? I didn't realize this. (Or at least if I learned it in math I've forgotten it.) I would have gotten that wrong.

Order of Operations. PEMDAS and the like.

I was helping my 6th grader with this subject just a few weeks ago.

Maybe you can get him(her) to teach you how to underline?

 

[Mr. Ected]

7

7

7

YUP!

So the rule is to assume parenthesis even if there aren't parenthesis? I didn't realize this. (Or at least if I learned it in math I've forgotten it.) I would have gotten that wrong.

wat?

No, as Gawain Said Order of Operations.

PEDMAS

 

[Fennis]

If it were (6-1) x (0 +2) / 2 then you'd have 5.

I think.

0

eta: 5

 

[Officer Pete Malloy]

Nobody likes math.

 

[lod01]

What is the answer?

Google.

 

[heckmanm]

If it were (6-1) x (0 +2) / 2 then you'd have 5.

I think.

0

theta: 5

 

[Sinn Fein]

What is the answer?

Google.

OK

 

[timschochet]

OK- so why do we have an order of operations rule? I get that we have one but what's the logic of it? Wouldn't it be far simpler to go from left to right unless there were parenthesis?

 

[tonydead]

So the rule is to assume parenthesis even if there aren't parenthesis? I didn't realize this. (Or at least if I learned it in math I've forgotten it.) I would have gotten that wrong.

If there are no parenthesis then you do order of operations which means multiplication and division come before addition and subtraction.

Working left to right.

Or we could just get jon_mx in here to get the answer wrong three times, stumble upon the right answer and tell everyone why he's the best at math.

 

[Sinn Fein]

OK- so why do we have an order of operations rule? I get that we have one but what's the logic of it? Wouldn't it be far simpler to go from left to right unless there were parenthesis?

We have rules, so that people do not die.

 

[heckmanm]

OK- so why do we have an order of operations rule? I get that we have one but what's the logic of it? Wouldn't it be far simpler to go from left to right unless there were parenthesis?

Aside from destroying the commutative property and all proofs that depend on it, sure.