Pipes
Footballguy
As you can say committing a felony wasn't a dealbreaker for the HRC supporters.Of course not everyone who voted for Trump is a racist, but one thing you can say about all of them is that racism wasn't a dealbreaker for them.
As you can say committing a felony wasn't a dealbreaker for the HRC supporters.Of course not everyone who voted for Trump is a racist, but one thing you can say about all of them is that racism wasn't a dealbreaker for them.
They'd have to be pretty dense if that's the case.
<Bingo bongo>
I'm giving them more credit than that.
<Not a great idea>
Not gonna lie, I was as devastated as Koya, still am.
But- I look at the Trump supporters in this forum, most of them: SIDA, RBM, Loan Sharks, Court Jester, etc- and they're not racists, and they're not fascists. We disagree on a lot of issues but these are good dudes
Or, judging by their responses and tone in this thread alone, perhaps they are not such good dudes after all.Maybe you shouldn't have spent the last year implying/claiming that they are.
No idea how the conversation went.O Rlly. Please tell me how the conversation went. TIA
Yeah some of the responses are terrible.
Or, judging by their responses and tone in this thread alone, perhaps they are not such good dudes after all.
Except Obama never said he was going to go take everyone's guns away. Again, let's have a fair and honest discussion if you want to bring up past events and history.Hopefully the Trump fears will be just as valid as Obama taking all the guns away fears.
I never did. I defended almost all of them, with very few exceptions, at every opportunity. I suggested continually that Trump supporters were either ignorant of his bigoted rhetoric or tolerant of his bigoted rhetoric but that very drew were actually supportive of his bigoted rhetoric.Maybe you shouldn't have spent the last year implying/claiming that they are.
Totally. Can't stand Clinton, for many of the reasons most people do. I just don't buy into the overhyped 30 year smear campaign's propaganda which people are drawn to like sheep - which has me in the odd position of seemingly always defending someone whom I don't like to begin with.You won't see any disagreement from me there. Clinton botched it bigly.
I just can't believe people would look at the two and think Clinton would hurt us as a nation worse.
I appreciate the thought out post, but when you are pointing to his bull#### lies as a POSITIVE, that says a lot.Let me offer a counter-take regarding Trump and what he needed to do to win.
1. He had lost the media. The media was all-in against him. So he had to go full-counter. You know how you get a lot of Twitter followers. You post crazy stuff. You take those 140 characters and you blast out stuff that shocks and offends. It gets people talking about you (good and bad), but publicity is publicity. It was the perfect way to separate himself against a flock of other Republicans.
2. He is a star of a reality-TV show. What's his signature line, "You're Fired". Reality TV is popular when there is massive drama. Gary Bussey, Dennis Rodman...the crazier the better the ratings. The MSM media would cover his antics as they were in on the plan to get him to face Hillary (as one of the few people she polled well against). So he used this to his advantage to secure the GOP nomination.
3. To win the overall election, he could not just do an about-face and now be a nice-guy. He needed the crazies that bought into 1 and 2 above to press forward. His followers (some racist, sexist, etc) were doing a lot of the heavy lifting as he raced around the country giving big speech after big speech. In the end the media was in a full-out assault against him. Personally I think some of people's fears have been pushed hard on all of us from that bought off media with an agenda.
I have no idea what kind of President that Donald Trump will be. I definitely think the President-Elect has been way mellower though than the guy who needed to get lots of attention just in hopes of getting elected. I am not giving him a pass for the rhetoric (and no one else should either), but it's quite possible that a lot of it was schtick just to get elected.
Campaigning: We are gonna build a wall. 12 feet tall. It will be the best wall ever...
Now: We are going to tighten up the borders and look to deport the worst criminals that are here illegally
Campaigning: Repeal and Replace Obamacare
Now: We need to make some changes, but some of it makes sense.
If it's something you both would like (as well as his wife), let him know that you can usually be the Godfather as long as the Godmother is Catholic.I don't think his wife is Jewish. My friend is Jewish and his wife is Catholic. He hinted that he wanted me to be the Godfather but then said I wasn't eligible because I wasn't Catholic.![]()
Just because conservatives make a ridiculous argument doesn't mean we have to act like it's reasonable. Trump isn't like previous nominees.One other thing that needs to be said: it would have been far easier for liberals to call Trump a bigot and a fascist if they hadn't also used these terms to describe George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and so many other Republicans. I can't tell the number of conservatives I know who said to me, in response to my concerns about Trump, "Yeah but they say that about EVERY conservative." I include my own father and father in law.
I knew what you meant but I was just trying to be difficult.No idea how the conversation went.I'm saying it isn't true that you can't be a godparent. The rules do say that, but technically, only one godparent is needed. Therefore, I've seen many time where non-Catholics are also allowed to be the other godparent.
I think people are misunderstanding some of the Trump angst. As far as I can tell from within my east coast liberal bubble, at the moment it's more about confronting the fact that the country voted for him and what THAT gesture means and will mean than it is about how he will govern. The fact that people were willing to condone his bigotry (whether genuine or used for political gain), sexual assaults, rejection of civility and transparency during a national campaign to a degree we've never seen, and lack of basic understanding of issues and the role of government because of _____ is hard to deal with. Because its hard to fathom how you could fill in the blank with something more important than rejecting those things. Those are really bad things.Let me offer a counter-take regarding Trump and what he needed to do to win.
1. He had lost the media. The media was all-in against him. So he had to go full-counter. You know how you get a lot of Twitter followers. You post crazy stuff. You take those 140 characters and you blast out stuff that shocks and offends. It gets people talking about you (good and bad), but publicity is publicity. It was the perfect way to separate himself against a flock of other Republicans.
2. He is a star of a reality-TV show. What's his signature line, "You're Fired". Reality TV is popular when there is massive drama. Gary Bussey, Dennis Rodman...the crazier the better the ratings. The MSM media would cover his antics as they were in on the plan to get him to face Hillary (as one of the few people she polled well against). So he used this to his advantage to secure the GOP nomination.
3. To win the overall election, he could not just do an about-face and now be a nice-guy. He needed the crazies that bought into 1 and 2 above to press forward. His followers (some racist, sexist, etc) were doing a lot of the heavy lifting as he raced around the country giving big speech after big speech. In the end the media was in a full-out assault against him. Personally I think some of people's fears have been pushed hard on all of us from that bought off media with an agenda.
I have no idea what kind of President that Donald Trump will be. I definitely think the President-Elect has been way mellower though than the guy who needed to get lots of attention just in hopes of getting elected. I am not giving him a pass for the rhetoric (and no one else should either), but it's quite possible that a lot of it was schtick just to get elected.
Campaigning: We are gonna build a wall. 12 feet tall. It will be the best wall ever...
Now: We are going to tighten up the borders and look to deport the worst criminals here illegally
Campaigning: Repeal and Replace Obamacare
Now: We need to make some changes, but some of it makes sense.
OP, as a fellow member of the tribe, I know exactly what you mean.Or, judging by their responses and tone in this thread alone, perhaps they are not such good dudes after all.
This is exactly the strategy that my friend told me he was following. He heard it second hand from one of Trump's friends.Let me offer a counter-take regarding Trump and what he needed to do to win.
1. He had lost the media. The media was all-in against him. So he had to go full-counter. You know how you get a lot of Twitter followers. You post crazy stuff. You take those 140 characters and you blast out stuff that shocks and offends. It gets people talking about you (good and bad), but publicity is publicity. It was the perfect way to separate himself against a flock of other Republicans.
2. He is a star of a reality-TV show. What's his signature line, "You're Fired". Reality TV is popular when there is massive drama. Gary Bussey, Dennis Rodman...the crazier the better the ratings. The MSM media would cover his antics as they were in on the plan to get him to face Hillary (as one of the few people she polled well against). So he used this to his advantage to secure the GOP nomination.
3. To win the overall election, he could not just do an about-face and now be a nice-guy. He needed the crazies that bought into 1 and 2 above to press forward. His followers (some racist, sexist, etc) were doing a lot of the heavy lifting as he raced around the country giving big speech after big speech. In the end the media was in a full-out assault against him. Personally I think some of people's fears have been pushed hard on all of us from that bought off media with an agenda.
I have no idea what kind of President that Donald Trump will be. I definitely think the President-Elect has been way mellower though than the guy who needed to get lots of attention just in hopes of getting elected. I am not giving him a pass for the rhetoric (and no one else should either), but it's quite possible that a lot of it was schtick just to get elected.
Campaigning: We are gonna build a wall. 12 feet tall. It will be the best wall ever...
Now: We are going to tighten up the borders and look to deport the worst criminals that are here illegally
Campaigning: Repeal and Replace Obamacare
Now: We need to make some changes, but some of it makes sense.
Yeah, that's kind of where I am too.One other thing that needs to be said: it would have been far easier for liberals to call Trump a bigot and a fascist if they hadn't also used these terms to describe George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and so many other Republicans. I can't tell the number of conservatives I know who said to me, in response to my concerns about Trump, "Yeah but they say that about EVERY conservative." I include my own father and father in law.
Heart felt teary eyed crap is still crap. You aren't helping people by patting them on the back and saying there there terrible Trump.Moron I can accept. Someone so uncaring as to reply like that to a truly heartfelt post is obviously someone of terribly weak character. That we should never accept.
Did the Left speak up as vocally against President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton as they did President Bush when the Obama Administration pursued interventionist foreign policies that were similar?Will you and others stand up, vocally, as vocal as you were against Hillary, if Trump looks to seed his administration with lobbyists and other swamp creatures, and worse yet, then pursues policies that follow the same?
Hey, the left has a lot of issues to deal with, including systemic and historical ugliness. And the hyperbole from both sides does no one any good.One other thing that needs to be said: it would have been far easier for liberals to call Trump a bigot and a fascist if they hadn't also used these terms to describe George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and so many other Republicans. I can't tell the number of conservatives I know who said to me, in response to my concerns about Trump, "Yeah but they say that about EVERY conservative." I include my own father and father in law.
When voting for 1 of 2 (or 3) candidates, how do you determine who to vote for? I'm sure just about everyone uses a different criteria.Of course not everyone who voted for Trump is a racist, but one thing you can say about all of them is that racism wasn't a dealbreaker for them.
I think people are misunderstanding some of the Trump angst. As far as I can tell from within my east coast liberal bubble, at the moment it's more about confronting the fact that the country voted for him and what THAT gesture means and will mean than it is about how he will govern. The fact that people were willing to condone his bigotry (whether genuine or used for political gain), sexual assaults, rejection of civility and transparency during a national campaign to a degree we've never seen, and lack of basic understanding of issues and the role of government because of _____ is hard to deal with. Because its hard to fathom how you could fill in the blank with something more important than rejecting those things. Those are really bad things.
Fights about what will come over the next four years will take place when those things actually happen.
Liberal complaints lose their effectiveness when they're used for every candidate.Just because conservatives make a ridiculous argument doesn't mean we have to act like it's reasonable. Trump isn't like previous nominees.
I just don't think most racist people believe they are racist. At least that is all I can come up with after much thought.When voting for 1 of 2 (or 3) candidates, how do you determine who to vote for? I'm sure just about everyone uses a different criteria.
Some are single issue voters. Abortion is an issue that has a lot of people on the right locked in. You come out pro-life and there are a certain number of voters that will follow you no matter what. I believe there are probably some environmental people on the left that will vote for whoever is the most environmentally conscious no matter what.
Some people care about a specific ideology/platform. These people vote straight party ticket. They are registered, died in the wool, Dems or Repubs.
Some people sit in the middle and try to make a determination based on any number of criteria. Maybe they look at character, maybe they make checklists of each issue and let that lead them. Maybe they listen to the debates and vote for who they think won. Maybe they vote based on who will help their personal situation the most. And maybe they post solely on appearance.
A "dealbreaker" for people in an election sometimes is simple (like single issue or straight party voters), or very complex. Also, what level of racism are you talking about? Being racist, appearing to be racist, maybe being racist, hanging out with racist people...what exactly makes someone "racist"? Maybe friends with racist isn't a dealbreaker, but making a racist statement is. And maybe a vague comment that could be considered racist isn't a dealbreaker, but making racist jokes is.
Long post short; I'm sure most people would call racism a deal breaker, but we probably all have varying degrees of what level of racism makes it a deal breaker.
So lemme ask:Heart felt teary eyed crap is still crap. You aren't helping people by patting them on the back and saying there there terrible Trump.
It is utter bull#### that people have allowed this much fear to be built up inside them.
Pathetic.
I know that I hit the "like" button here. But I really appreciate this post.When voting for 1 of 2 (or 3) candidates, how do you determine who to vote for? I'm sure just about everyone uses a different criteria.
Some are single issue voters. Abortion is an issue that has a lot of people on the right locked in. You come out pro-life and there are a certain number of voters that will follow you no matter what. I believe there are probably some environmental people on the left that will vote for whoever is the most environmentally conscious no matter what.
Some people care about a specific ideology/platform. These people vote straight party ticket. They are registered, died in the wool, Dems or Repubs.
Some people sit in the middle and try to make a determination based on any number of criteria. Maybe they look at character, maybe they make checklists of each issue and let that lead them. Maybe they listen to the debates and vote for who they think won. Maybe they vote based on who will help their personal situation the most. And maybe they post solely on appearance.
A "dealbreaker" for people in an election sometimes is simple (like single issue or straight party voters), or very complex. Also, what level of racism are you talking about? Being racist, appearing to be racist, maybe being racist, hanging out with racist people...what exactly makes someone "racist"? Maybe friends with racist isn't a dealbreaker, but making a racist statement is. And maybe a vague comment that could be considered racist isn't a dealbreaker, but making racist jokes is.
Long post short; I'm sure most people would call racism a deal breaker, but we probably all have varying degrees of what level of racism makes it a deal breaker.
This was many years ago so that ship has long since sailed. Thx for the suggestion though.If it's something you both would like (as well as his wife), let him know that you can usually be the Godfather as long as the Godmother is Catholic.
To be fair, Obama and Clinton didn't start a decade-long trillion dollar war against the wrong country.Did the Left speak up as vocally against President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton as they did President Bush when the Obama Administration pursued interventionist foreign policies that were similar?
No. So why hold people on the other side of the political aisle to a higher standard than your side failed to live up to?
Yeah, maybe you already had a lower opinion of people than I did.I'm in the same bubble as you are good buddy, as are most of my friends, I have to say I'm having a hard time with the hand wringing and the "can you believe that our America just did this?" plastered all over my Facebook wall. From people I really like.
And my response is: ummmm, yes, I can pretty easily believe it. Humans are effing animals. It's not a shocker. I don't know what to say other than: "huh."
Looks like Krugman has now snapped as wellRachel Maddow had a meltdown like this on election night, Chris Matthews was practically laughing at her telling her to calm down, that Trump isn't going to do this and that, stuff Maddow was freaking out about. It was funny seeing him being the voice of reason.
The Left just doesn't understand that this was a vote against politics as usual. It was a vote to change the political landscape and to wake the parties up. I hope this did it. I know Lefties who voted for Trump for that exact reason.
THE WORLD IS NOT GOING TO END
No problem. Thought that might have been the case, but wasn't sure.This was many years ago so that ship has long since sailed. Thx for the suggestion though.
Agreed. What I'm saying is the degree matters. People are freaking out over Trump much more than past conservative candidates and officeholders.Liberal complaints lose their effectiveness when they're used for every candidate.
You're probably right because I don't recall them ever being that religious.No problem. Thought that might have been the case, but wasn't sure.
The wife probably knew anyway, but just used it as the excuse to keep you out.![]()
And to my specific post and the people I reference...I think people are misunderstanding some of the Trump angst. As far as I can tell from within my east coast liberal bubble, at the moment it's more about confronting the fact that the country voted for him and what THAT gesture means and will mean than it is about how he will govern. The fact that people were willing to condone his bigotry (whether genuine or used for political gain), sexual assaults, rejection of civility and transparency during a national campaign to a degree we've never seen, and lack of basic understanding of issues and the role of government because of _____ is hard to deal with. Because its hard to fathom how you could fill in the blank with something more important than rejecting those things. Those are really bad things.
Fights about what will come over the next four years will take place when those things actually happen.
Yup, that's another perspective I've heard. I think SNL made light of this, with all the white people reacting with shock at the revelation that America is willing to condone bigotry and stupidity and the black people basically saying "duh."I'm in the same bubble as you are good buddy, as are most of my friends, I have to say I'm having a hard time with the hand wringing and the "can you believe that our America just did this?" plastered all over my Facebook wall. From people I really like.
And my response is: ummmm, yes, I can pretty easily believe it. Humans are effing animals. It's not a shocker. I don't know what to say other than: "huh."
There is no way we are going through the next four years without at least a minor recession.Not at this level, right? That's impossible. If the economy doesn't get better, we'll know the pouting has something to do with it.
How are you measuring the degree to which people are freaking out? I seem to recall a lot of angst after W was elected for a second term but maybe I'm wrong.Agreed. What I'm saying is the degree matters. People are freaking out over Trump much more than past conservative candidates and officeholders.
He will still be my friend. My more hard and fast comment is I doubt he'd ever be my children's godfather. He clearly has shown a lack of understanding, and more so appreciation, for what they face in this world. He's smart enough to know and care, and yet he supports a bigoted racist campaign none the less.To @Koya, I know this hurts. And do what you want. And if this is a deal breaker, then it is. But a friend for 30 years has given you a lot. And you have done the same for him.
Can you give an example of some left-wing propaganda that you identified and dismissed?This is someone that should know a BS right wing propaganda machine just like I can tell one from the left
Yeah. Chet's argument strikes me as a fine argument the next time we attack a guy like Romney or even McCain or something (and I have a much lower opinion of McCain than most people). Politics tends to make people exaggerate an opponent's flaws so we make "binders full of women" cracks when we knew that however much we wanted to appoint Supreme Court justices MItt Romney would have made a competent president.Agreed. What I'm saying is the degree matters. People are freaking out over Trump much more than past conservative candidates and officeholders.
Don't forget about the spirit cooking!Maybe Clinton smiled and appeared nice to people, but how do people really reconcile these things:
- She knew that Saudi and QATAR governments funded 9/11, yet she sold them massive weapons and took on huge donations from both. She also was willing to take campaign contributions from additional governments that were horrible abusers of equal rights.
- Her sloppiness with emails / protocols basically handed our worst enemies blueprints of what she would do if she were President.
Instead of tweeting some things that offended people, She actually did things put all of us in a lot of danger. People voted against Hillary in record numbers. Don't group all-Trump voters with a stereotype. Many voted to stop the Clintons from getting to the Whitehouse.
Those that feel as strongly as Koya should have done more to get like-minded people to vote for their candidate. 49.6% of the people did not vote. A ton of these non-voter are now rioting in the streets over a system that they chose to sit out.