What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Aaron Rodgers then, and now (1 Viewer)

smackdaddies

Footballguy
Pretty interesting article in today's Journal

2005

Last week, I spent a full day poring over practices files, game notes and a large assortment of interviews in an attempt to offer some perspective on the career of Rodgers in Green Bay.

If someone had asked after his first season whether Rodgers had a better chance to be a star or a bust, I might have answered bust. Many personnel people probably would have, too.

As a rookie, Rodgers' six substantial outings included a scrimmage against Buffalo, four exhibition games and the fourth quarter of a December night game in Baltimore.

He was brutal every time out.

2006

As the 2006 draft drew near, Rodgers told NFL Network that he had heard the rumors of the Packers possibly selecting a quarterback with the No. 5 selection in a move that would likely end his career in Green Bay. Ted Thompson, the general manager who had drafted Rodgers with the No. 24 pick the year before, didn't rule it out.

A month before the draft, a panel of 18 personnel men were asked to compare Rodgers against that year's quarterback pool led by Matt Leinart, Vince Young and Jay Cutler. Not only didn't Rodgers draw any first-place votes, he had only one second and three thirds. Eleven scouts put him fourth, and three others even had him behind Brodie Croyle and Charlie Whitehurst.

2007

"You don't want to be critical of the kid because he's in a new system," an AFC personnel director said at the time. "But it looks like it will be awhile, if ever, if he develops."

Last week, that same scout said, "After his second preseason, if they had released him, I don't know that anybody would have been shocked. I mean, he wasn't a very good player. He couldn't make a play."

Once again, Thompson said he wouldn't rule out drafting a quarterback. In April 2007, 12 of 18 scouts said Brady Quinn was a better prospect than Rodgers.

lots more at the link.

 
Well I guess he looks like an idiot now, doesn't he (the scout saying that about him)?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Based on this thread, then one could deduce that there is perhaps hope for Blaine Gabbert.
Why not? Of course there is hope for him. He's 23 years old. He never even had an offseason. He was playing for a very limited offensive coach. Hopefully he gets some real coaching, I like the kid.
 
Based on this thread, then one could deduce that there is perhaps hope for Blaine Gabbert.
Why not? Of course there is hope for him. He's 23 years old. He never even had an offseason. He was playing for a very limited offensive coach. Hopefully he gets some real coaching, I like the kid.
I am with you on your "why not?" reply. I drafted Gabbert in my dynasty rookie draft 3 spots ahead of Newton this year at #12 overall. He is young, physically gifted and very bright. He needs some improved QB coaching to get a feel for what is needed to excel at the pro game. Most if not all of the professional draft scouts had him as the top rated qb coming out in 2011 so there is hope. While he might not have been considered a great prospect, he was looked at as a very good and solid prospect. It is still too early to write him off just yet. If the Jags can get a good WR and a QB coach that can help him and he has the benefit of a full off season of preparation, I like his chance to make drastic improvements in 2012.
 
Many of today's top QBs struggled initially. The Packers teams in Rodgers first two seasons weren't very good; Favre couldn't win with them either. A lot of things need to come together for a young QB to be successful, not all of which they have control over. For him to go from struggling backup to having one of the greatest seasons ever for a QB is incredible, but these types of stories aren't unheard of for QBs. More than anything this just further illustrates how difficult it is to evaluate QB prospects and why the bust factor at QB is so high.

 
Based on this thread, then one could deduce that there is perhaps hope for Blaine Gabbert.
I was just about to post this same article. (We both must follow @jasonwilde on Twitter)But no doubt young QBs have hope. Rodgers put his head down and did everything he could to get better. You need to be in the right situation and have the right coaching as well.Of course you also need to have talent.As to the post about Gabbert, sure there's hope.
 
The first I remember of Aaron Rodgers in the NFL was week 13 in 2007 vs the Cowboys when Favre went out with injury, Rodgers came in and looked good to me and destined to be Favre's replacement. I recalled that game when I drafted Rodgers in FF in 2008, thinking he'd be a good one.

Obviously I wasn't paying much attention to Rodgers prior to that game.

Had to check the stats... he entered the game in the 2nd qtr, finished 18/26, 201 yds, 1 td, 0 int plus 30 yards rushing.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2007112900/2007/REG13/packers@cowboys#tab=recap

 
Well I guess he looks like an idiot now, doesn't he (the scout saying that about him)?
This is what bothers me about evaluation. No. The scout wasn't wrong. He was terrible at the time.People who say a player isn't very good, then get 'proven' wrong years later, wern't necessarily wrong at the time when they evaluated them. When players like Jordan drag up old coaches who thought they weren't very good, and then 'prove them wrong,' they just look dumb.You have to evaluate a player based on what you see in front of you. If Rodgers improved greatly between 2005 and now, then that's awesome. Doesn't mean the scouts watching practice and preseason 4-5 years ago were wrong though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top