What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

After today's performance I'm convinced: (1 Viewer)

Too much of the blame is being placed on Manning and not where it should be, with Tony Dungy. He gets outcoached every year in the playoffs. Manning will never win a big game with Dungy at the helm, but I wouldn't go so far as to say he will never win one; he will probably will outlast Dungy.
And I guess Dungy is to blame for giving Peyton waaaay too much freedom to call his own plays. But I think we should be thankful Dungy isn't calling offensive plays in the first place.Tom Moore needs to put a leash on Peyton.
The problem in Indy is that Dungy was brought in to fix the defense and leave the offense alone. Manning is basically the coach on offense, which I don't think is a problem in itself, but he is so confident in his abilities that he gets caught in the emotion rather than thinking logically. If someone else were calling plays, they would have ran more than three times in the 2nd half and would have been able to keep the Steelers defense off balance.
 
Give Marino this D ...
I get tired of this. He had a D several times. They had a D in 84, but he threw two picks and only one TD. They had an adequate D in 85, but he tanked against NE barely completing 40% of his passes and again throwing 2 picks. They had the #4 rated D in 90, but he struggled against Buffalo, completing less than 50% of his passes and again throwing two picks. Near the end of career in 98, they had the #1 D in all of football- again 2 picks in a 38-3 butwhooping to Denver.In fact, save for his playoff loss to Saqn Diego, he threw at least two picks (and I am unsure how many fumbles) in every playoff loss in his career. Turnovers lose games.

 
Moon's postseason record was 3-7 with 17 TDs and 14 INTs.
Marino = 8-10 with 32 TDs v. 24 INYsManning = 3-6 with 15 TDs v. 8 INTs

The only similarity I see in these three players' post-season numbers is that all their last names begin with an "M"

 
Give Marino this D ...
I get tired of this. He had a D several times. They had a D in 84, but he threw two picks and only one TD. They had an adequate D in 85, but he tanked against NE barely completing 40% of his passes and again throwing 2 picks. They had the #4 rated D in 90, but he struggled against Buffalo, completing less than 50% of his passes and again throwing two picks. Near the end of career in 98, they had the #1 D in all of football- again 2 picks in a 38-3 butwhooping to Denver.In fact, save for his playoff loss to Saqn Diego, he threw at least two picks (and I am unsure how many fumbles) in every playoff loss in his career. Turnovers lose games.

You gotta exclude year 16 Marino from comparisons with Manning. You just gotta.That said, there is a remarkable similarity in ALL of Dan Marino's playoff losses after his first year. A dramatic spike in his attempts in the game. Why do I mention this? Because it is direct (and fairly convincing) evidence in support of my statement above that a runner like Edge, not a D like the Colts', was what was missing.

Like I said, the inability to run the ball in order to shorten the game instead of continually lengthening it, directly led to at least three of his playoff losses - including an AFC Champ game against BUffalo. If Marno was handing off to a guy like Edge in the fourth quarter of that game, the Dolphins, and not the Bills, would have been in that Bowl.

 
Marc, I can't disagree with you. All I will say is that many guys go there whole career without a guy like Edge to hand off to. I think that is the area where Manning deserves much blame- he calls many of the plays at the line of scrimmage, and all to often, he forgets about Edge, not only on runs, but screens and check downs.

 
Hmm, I actually thought there'd be a Peyton Manning circlejerk here after creating this thread. I'm delightfully mistaken.

 
Give Marino this D ...
I get tired of this. He had a D several times. They had a D in 84, but he threw two picks and only one TD. They had an adequate D in 85, but he tanked against NE barely completing 40% of his passes and again throwing 2 picks. They had the #4 rated D in 90, but he struggled against Buffalo, completing less than 50% of his passes and again throwing two picks. Near the end of career in 98, they had the #1 D in all of football- again 2 picks in a 38-3 butwhooping to Denver.In fact, save for his playoff loss to Saqn Diego, he threw at least two picks (and I am unsure how many fumbles) in every playoff loss in his career. Turnovers lose games.
You don't get to selectively quote me and then piss and moan about it. I said this D AND A RB LIKE JAMES. I can't make you stop doing this, but I can continue to point out that you're making yourself look bad every time you try it. :rolleyes:

 
Marino = 8-10 with 32 TDs v. 24 INYs

Manning = 3-6 with 15 TDs v. 8 INTs

The only similarity I see in these three players' post-season numbers is that all their last names begin with an "M"
It should also be noted that Marino had a Hall of Fame coach, Don Shula. Manning had Jim Mora (0-2) and now Tony Dungy (3-4). Either Don Shula is to blame or Dan Marino is to blame, but both of them cannot be completely excused for the lack of success for the Dolphins during Marino's reign. I excuse Shula for his proven track record, that leaves Marino to carry the blame (in my opinion).

 
I want to know why the Manning family has been anointed the face of the NFL?? Why does everyone drool over these 3 guys??Out of curiosity I looked up Archie's career stats. In 14 seasons, take a guess how many times he threw more TD's than INT's???2. That's right. Twice in 14 seasons.And Peyton is a choke artist bum. I mean Tee Martin took the same group of guys to the national title after Peyton went 0-4 vs Florida.and Eli is even worse than Peyton.I'm so sick of these guys. Win something. Anything. And then they can be the face of the NFL.

 
Give Marino this D ...
I get tired of this. He had a D several times. They had a D in 84, but he threw two picks and only one TD. They had an adequate D in 85, but he tanked against NE barely completing 40% of his passes and again throwing 2 picks. They had the #4 rated D in 90, but he struggled against Buffalo, completing less than 50% of his passes and again throwing two picks. Near the end of career in 98, they had the #1 D in all of football- again 2 picks in a 38-3 butwhooping to Denver.In fact, save for his playoff loss to Saqn Diego, he threw at least two picks (and I am unsure how many fumbles) in every playoff loss in his career. Turnovers lose games.
You don't get to selectively quote me and then piss and moan about it. I said this D AND A RB LIKE JAMES. I can't make you stop doing this, but I can continue to point out that you're making yourself look bad every time you try it. :rolleyes:
You do a great job making yourself look bad on your own. I pointed out that several times he had a D this good. So your point should have been "If he had a back like Edge..." but it wasn't. You started with the Defense, and he had one several times. Here is Marino's playoff bottom line- when he didn't get picked twice in a game, they usually won.
 
Despite his collegiate success, Warren Moon went undrafted in the the National Football League. Many pundits believe that it was because Moon is black. With no takers in the NFL, his only alternative was the Canadian Football League. Moon signed with the Edmonton Eskimos, where he and Tom Wilkinson shared signal-calling duties and helped lead the Eskimos to an unprecedented five consecutive Grey Cup victories in 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982. Moon won the offensive Most Outstanding Player award in the 1980 and 1982 games.

During his relatively short CFL career, Moon amassed amazing statistics: 1,369 completions on 2,382 attempts (57.4 completion percentage,) and 144 touchdown passes. He was inducted into the CFL Hall of Fame in 2001 and is also a member of the "Esks'" team Hall of Fame.
 
Marino = 8-10 with 32 TDs v. 24 INYs

Manning = 3-6 with 15 TDs v. 8 INTs

The only similarity I see in these three players' post-season numbers is that all their last names begin with an "M"
It should also be noted that Marino had a Hall of Fame coach, Don Shula. Manning had Jim Mora (0-2) and now Tony Dungy (3-4). Either Don Shula is to blame or Dan Marino is to blame, but both of them cannot be completely excused for the lack of success for the Dolphins during Marino's reign. I excuse Shula for his proven track record, that leaves Marino to carry the blame (in my opinion).
Shula did manage to lose two Super Bowls without Marino, including the biggest upset of all time. And the Super Bowl XVII loss was a very winnable game.To me, Marino never choked in the playoffs. I can think of only two playoff games in his career where his team was expected to win but did not. In the 1983 divisional round game, Marino led the Dolphins to a 4th quarter lead against the Seahawks, but the defense couldn't hold it and Miami fumbled two consecutive kickoff returns that denied Marino a chance to bring his team back. He might not have played his best game that day but he put his team in position to win, and it was his rookie season after all.

The other game was the 1985 AFC title game. Miami had homefield and was the best team in the AFC. The Patriots had lost 19 in a row in the Orange Bowl. Miami should have won and gotten a second shot at the Bears. Marino didn't get it done, but the whole team was flat and turned it over 6 times, two of which were Marino INT's. The defense played a role as well; New England ran the ball 59 times and only threw 12 passes, hardly Marino's fault. Marino closed it to 24-14 and was driving the team for another score when his running back fumbled and killed the rally.

 
Moon's postseason record was 3-7 with 17 TDs and 14 INTs.
A more accurate look:Year Opp Result | CMP ATT PYD PTD INT | RSH YD TD

---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------

1987 sea W,23-20 | 21 32 237 1 1 | 4 -2 0

1987 den L,10-34 | 24 43 264 1 2 | 5 15 0

1988 cle W,24-23 | 16 26 213 1 3 | 6 16 0

1988 buf L,10-17 | 17 33 240 0 1 | 5 11 0

1989 pit L,23-26 | 29 48 315 2 0 | 3 12 0

1991 nyj W,17-10 | 28 40 271 2 1 | 3 6 0

1991 den L,24-26 | 27 36 325 3 1 | 2 18 0

1992 buf L,38-41 | 36 50 371 4 2 | 2 7 0

1993 kan L,20-28 | 32 43 306 1 1 | 3 22 0

1994 chi L,18-35 | 29 52 292 2 2 | 2 9 0

---------------------+--------------------------+-----------------

TOTAL | 259 403 2834 17 14 | 35 114 0

Number from last 6 games aren't that bad...and again, check his rosters and find me a back like Edge or a receiver like Harrison.

 
Give Marino this D ...
I get tired of this. He had a D several times. They had a D in 84, but he threw two picks and only one TD. They had an adequate D in 85, but he tanked against NE barely completing 40% of his passes and again throwing 2 picks. They had the #4 rated D in 90, but he struggled against Buffalo, completing less than 50% of his passes and again throwing two picks. Near the end of career in 98, they had the #1 D in all of football- again 2 picks in a 38-3 butwhooping to Denver.In fact, save for his playoff loss to Saqn Diego, he threw at least two picks (and I am unsure how many fumbles) in every playoff loss in his career. Turnovers lose games.
You don't get to selectively quote me and then piss and moan about it. I said this D AND A RB LIKE JAMES. I can't make you stop doing this, but I can continue to point out that you're making yourself look bad every time you try it. :rolleyes:
You do a great job making yourself look bad on your own. I pointed out that several times he had a D this good. So your point should have been "If he had a back like Edge..." but it wasn't. You started with the Defense, and he had one several times. Here is Marino's playoff bottom line- when he didn't get picked twice in a game, they usually won.
It's really pathetic that you evidently do not understand the logical operation of the operator "AND". It may not have benefitted Marino to have Edge in a season when he DID NOT have the defense (and you have to admit those seasons also happened), but it sure as hell would have benefitted him to have a back like Edge during one of those seasons you're talking about. Is this really that hard for you to understand? :no:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top