Indians win the second tie breaker (division record)Cleveland has a two game lead over the Angels and the Indians play a double dip today. Did they flip a coin or something where the Indians have home field if they tie because they split their season series? Both teams will just set up their rotations from here so two games isn't a lot to make up because things are fairly unpredictable when teams are already in. I'll just save my vote until the match-ups are cemented.
Well two wins for the Indians probably does it then. I'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.Indians win the second tie breaker (division record)Cleveland has a two game lead over the Angels and the Indians play a double dip today. Did they flip a coin or something where the Indians have home field if they tie because they split their season series? Both teams will just set up their rotations from here so two games isn't a lot to make up because things are fairly unpredictable when teams are already in. I'll just save my vote until the match-ups are cemented.
thanks for checking in...Well two wins for the Indians probably does it then. I'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.Indians win the second tie breaker (division record)Cleveland has a two game lead over the Angels and the Indians play a double dip today. Did they flip a coin or something where the Indians have home field if they tie because they split their season series? Both teams will just set up their rotations from here so two games isn't a lot to make up because things are fairly unpredictable when teams are already in. I'll just save my vote until the match-ups are cemented.
Huh? Angels are virtually a lock to finish with the 3rd best record of the division winners...who finishes first and second for the Sox / Tribe is irrelevant to home field / opponentI'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.
I'm sure you're always glad to see me.thanks for checking in...Well two wins for the Indians probably does it then. I'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.Indians win the second tie breaker (division record)Cleveland has a two game lead over the Angels and the Indians play a double dip today. Did they flip a coin or something where the Indians have home field if they tie because they split their season series? Both teams will just set up their rotations from here so two games isn't a lot to make up because things are fairly unpredictable when teams are already in. I'll just save my vote until the match-ups are cemented.
I'm glad to get you up to speed on playoff scenarios, though I can understand why you would be a step behindI'm sure you're always glad to see me.thanks for checking in...Well two wins for the Indians probably does it then. I'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.Indians win the second tie breaker (division record)Cleveland has a two game lead over the Angels and the Indians play a double dip today. Did they flip a coin or something where the Indians have home field if they tie because they split their season series? Both teams will just set up their rotations from here so two games isn't a lot to make up because things are fairly unpredictable when teams are already in. I'll just save my vote until the match-ups are cemented.![]()
If the Angels win their last 4 games and Boston wins two of five Angels have home field advantage. How is that a virtual lock? Please try to use your probability knowledge in these simple situations also. Thanks.Huh? Angels are virtually a lock to finish with the 3rd best record of the division winners...who finishes first and second for the Sox / Tribe is irrelevant to home field / opponentI'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.
What do you consider the odds are that Angels win the last 4 (I am sure you recognize that they will be pulling playoff starters early, and playing the B team), all on the road? It is less then 20%, probably less then 10... Now consider what the odds are of Boston losing 3 of 5 at home are? Finally, figure out what the odds of both of these happening areIf the Angels win their last 4 games and Boston wins two of five Angels have home field advantage. How is that a virtual lock? Please try to use your probability knowledge in these simple situations also. Thanks.Huh? Angels are virtually a lock to finish with the 3rd best record of the division winners...who finishes first and second for the Sox / Tribe is irrelevant to home field / opponentI'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.
So Boston is a "virtual lock" then? Please show your work.What do you consider the odds are that Angels win the last 4 (I am sure you recognize that they will be pulling playoff starters early, and playing the B team), all on the road? It is less then 20%, probably less then 10... Now consider what the odds are of Boston losing 3 of 5 at home are? Finally, figure out what the odds of both of these happening areIf the Angels win their last 4 games and Boston wins two of five Angels have home field advantage. How is that a virtual lock? Please try to use your probability knowledge in these simple situations also. Thanks.Huh? Angels are virtually a lock to finish with the 3rd best record of the division winners...who finishes first and second for the Sox / Tribe is irrelevant to home field / opponentI'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.
92%?What do you consider the odds are that Angels win the last 4 (I am sure you recognize that they will be pulling playoff starters early, and playing the B team), all on the road? It is less then 20%, probably less then 10... Now consider what the odds are of Boston losing 3 of 5 at home are? Finally, figure out what the odds of both of these happening areIf the Angels win their last 4 games and Boston wins two of five Angels have home field advantage. How is that a virtual lock? Please try to use your probability knowledge in these simple situations also. Thanks.Huh? Angels are virtually a lock to finish with the 3rd best record of the division winners...who finishes first and second for the Sox / Tribe is irrelevant to home field / opponentI'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.
I'm glad to get you up to speed on playoff scenarios, though I can understand why you would be a step behindI'm sure you're always glad to see me.thanks for checking in...Well two wins for the Indians probably does it then. I'll still hold my comments until I know which of the Red Sox and Angels have homefield which I think is critical.Indians win the second tie breaker (division record)Cleveland has a two game lead over the Angels and the Indians play a double dip today. Did they flip a coin or something where the Indians have home field if they tie because they split their season series? Both teams will just set up their rotations from here so two games isn't a lot to make up because things are fairly unpredictable when teams are already in. I'll just save my vote until the match-ups are cemented.![]()
yep. And since they lose tiebreakers to Cle and Bos, they will almost certainly be the 3 seed. The 1 seed is up for grabs though...According to the standings in my newspaper, the Angels are actually 3 GB in the loss column to Cleveland
I see you used your head in your analysis as well. How many of those 5 games did Sabathia and Carmona pitch?I see there are a good amount of people voting with their hearts and not their heads
NY vs CLE
3 Road games (1.000 - 3-0) = 3 wins
2 Road games (1.000 - 3-0) = 2 wins
----
NY IN 4 (assuming CLE can pull ONE out)
2I see you used your head in your analysis as well. How many of those 5 games did Sabathia and Carmona pitch?I see there are a good amount of people voting with their hearts and not their heads
NY vs CLE
3 Road games (1.000 - 3-0) = 3 wins
2 Road games (1.000 - 3-0) = 2 wins
----
NY IN 4 (assuming CLE can pull ONE out)
I will throw out that they were wihtout manny/youk/coco for a good bit of this recent run. Now.. that said I agree that there are several factors that are VERY disconcerting as a Sox fan:1) Dice K has pitched 10-15% more innings this year than he did last year.. it shows. He's gassed2) Okajima was ridden hard this year and it shows. He's going through a dead-arm period and I'm not confident he can pull out3) Papelbon seems well rested but had a bad appearance or two recently. That said he was unreal since the break before that. 4) Bucholz is unproven in high-pressure playoff situations.5) Wake's back still isn't right6) Youkilis has been slumping leading into his "rest".. .not sure if he'll recoverBeckettSchillingDice KBucholz/Lester/whoeverNot bad... I don't really feel this is a WS squad though...Going with the Angels and the Yankees. I've thought the Angels were the best team in the AL for the majority of the year, not going to jump off of them here. Red Sox aren't really inspiring confidence either. They're not the same team they were back in the summer.
Correct.CC = 02I see you used your head in your analysis as well. How many of those 5 games did Sabathia and Carmona pitch?I see there are a good amount of people voting with their hearts and not their heads
NY vs CLE
3 Road games (1.000 - 3-0) = 3 wins
2 Road games (1.000 - 3-0) = 2 wins
----
NY IN 4 (assuming CLE can pull ONE out)
Just my gut. I get the feeling they'll come out firing, and if they beat CC at the jake in game one, they'll roll.Yanks in 3
Angels in 4Yeah, they're THAT good...
Fair enough. I think you're wrong, but I guess we'll see...Just my gut. I get the feeling they'll come out firing, and if they beat CC at the jake in game one, they'll roll.Yanks in 3
Angels in 4Yeah, they're THAT good...
The Mets have completely dropped the ball here. The West has been exciting all year and the Central is, well, the NL Central. BUt the Mets should have had this thing locked up at least 2 weeks ago.By comparison, no NL team has clinched a playoff spot.
Believe me, its not nut of arrogance or totally blind homerism(maybe legally blind). If you would do the incredibly boring search of looking back at what I said of this race, most Yank fans have craved the Indians, and I've been very wary of them. The Angels are wounded, Shields isn't what he was, and nor is that offense. I definately respect them, and they are pretty hot themselves. Maybe its a reflection of me thinking if the Yanks are going to win, its going to need to be a short series, because going back to the Jake for CC or Carmona, well, as a Yank fan, been there, done that, and it ends badly! Beating Sabthia would be a nice psychological edge.Fair enough. I think you're wrong, but I guess we'll see...Just my gut. I get the feeling they'll come out firing, and if they beat CC at the jake in game one, they'll roll.Yanks in 3
Angels in 4Yeah, they're THAT good...
I would say you have sized up the situation correctly. The one thing that could work against the Tribe is playoff experience, but with guys like Nixon in the clubhouse, the team could stay grounded and not be overwhelmed.Anyone who thinks CC will not be able to handle the Yanks lineup needs to take a fresh look at him. This is not the same CC NY saw last two years ago; he's better and changed his routine of attacking hitters and will have the advantage against NY at the Jake. Plus, if NY is trying to decide between old farts Clemens and Mussina for game 3 starter...Indians are way under the radar and people still doubt them. They have that magic this year, winning so many games late and just having that confidence that is underestimated. Yankees overlooked the Tigers a bit last year and once they figured out the Tigers were a tough team, it was too late. If they take the Indians for granite this series will be over in four games. Yankees have an incredible hitting team but they don't match up well against left-handed pitching and Carmona and his sinker will give them trouble. Do the Yankees have enough pitching? I'm guessing no. They are probably going to have to steal a game from Borowski to win this series but Betancourt and Perez will ensure the Indians can add late runs to pad leads. I like the Indians in this series, three games to one.
there's been a fair share of playoff series where the team that won the head-to-head season series lost. last year, the twins won the season series over the a's 6-4 and got swept in their alds. the tigers lost the season series to the Yankees 5-2 and won their alds 3-1.I see there are a good amount of people voting with their hearts and not their headsBOS vs ANA:3 Home Games (.714 - 5-2) = 2 Wins2 Road Games (.333 - 1-2) = 1 WinNY vs CLE3 Road games (1.000 - 3-0) = 3 wins2 Road games (1.000 - 3-0) = 2 wins----SOX in 5NY IN 4 (assuming CLE can pull ONE out)
I'm a Yankee fan, who through this and other threads, has given the tribe their props. Yank fans were lining up for this series, but I've been a big proponet of being careful what you wish for. That said, as a Yankee fan last year, the formula for Tiger success was easy to see last year. They were similar to the good angel teams in a power bullpen, they'll have tough ABs, and first-to-third you to death. Once they took Game 2, I had no confidence in the Unit(but I didn't think Kenny "Stinkpalm" Rogers would throw a game like that either) and you coudn't have any faith in Wright as a Yankee fan(coincidentally, a top 3 all time Torre mistake to me, starting him over Wang). However, if the Yanks can split in Cleveland, then the Yanks get Byrd and Westbrook at the stadium. An huge advantage, even with Clemens, Moose or Phil going. Wanger game 5, Pettite on 3 days rest if neccessary, I like the Yanks, but I'm a homer too so what do I know.For the record, I like them to sweep. If they can get past Sabathia, which when they have to game plan aces, they can usually put together the ABs necessary to give them an advantage, I think Cleveland will face an uphill road thereafter. I like Pettite against the lefties in Game 2, and if the Yanks are up 2 coming home, I think they step on their throats. It should be great though, I'm really looking forward to all these series, particualrly the AL ones.Tom Servo said:I would say you have sized up the situation correctly. The one thing that could work against the Tribe is playoff experience, but with guys like Nixon in the clubhouse, the team could stay grounded and not be overwhelmed.Anyone who thinks CC will not be able to handle the Yanks lineup needs to take a fresh look at him. This is not the same CC NY saw last two years ago; he's better and changed his routine of attacking hitters and will have the advantage against NY at the Jake. Plus, if NY is trying to decide between old farts Clemens and Mussina for game 3 starter...Indians are way under the radar and people still doubt them. They have that magic this year, winning so many games late and just having that confidence that is underestimated. Yankees overlooked the Tigers a bit last year and once they figured out the Tigers were a tough team, it was too late. If they take the Indians for granite this series will be over in four games. Yankees have an incredible hitting team but they don't match up well against left-handed pitching and Carmona and his sinker will give them trouble. Do the Yankees have enough pitching? I'm guessing no. They are probably going to have to steal a game from Borowski to win this series but Betancourt and Perez will ensure the Indians can add late runs to pad leads. I like the Indians in this series, three games to one.I think Steinbrenner will have to wait for Santana to become available.
nipAngels @ Red SoxRed Sox [ 27 ] ** [45.76%]Angels [ 32 ] ** [54.24%]