The jerk store called and they are running out of you.......Bill Cartwright 80s C
(damnit.....nice pick. It's where I was going next)
The jerk store called and they are running out of you.......Bill Cartwright 80s C
I agree with that but he was saying in 2021 teams shot threes X times per game. However, I’m sure that number was lower the first half of the decade. Using 2021 pace of efficiency or style of play isn’t how we should look at the entire 10-11 period.The 2010s should be judged like any other decade, in my opinion. We’re not going to judge a 70s player based on their last couple years before they retire, we’re (or at least I am) going to look at a combination of their peak and their career accomplishments.
A current veteran player, let’s say Derrick Rose in my case, shouldn’t be judged just on their current level of play but based on their total career as well as their peak. (And current young players shouldn’t project anything they haven’t done yet).
This is why having multiple judges will be helpful to make sure different points of view will be accounted for.
Just my thoughts.
Crazy to think seven more 80s centers have to be taken. Cartwright was skilled, just had a broken-down body for a while. Kind of had an Antonio McDyess career arc -- came back from missing a season and lasted a long time as limited-minutes a rotational player.Bill Cartwright 80s C
Yeah, it’ll be a difficult decade to judge because of how drastically the style of play has changed.I agree with that but he was saying in 2021 teams shot threes X times per game. However, I’m sure that number was lower the first half of the decade. Using 2021 pace of efficiency or style of play isn’t how we should look at the entire 10-11 period.
50s-60s is the other. You look at a HOFer like Slater Martin and his per game stats look like a joke next to 60s guards who weren’t HOFers but when you factor in the shot clock, it completely changes the game. In the 50s the top scorers are averaging about 23-28 a game. In the 60s we see that go up to 35-50.Yeah, it’ll be a difficult decade to judge because of how drastically the style of play has changed.
Is today the gold standard for evaluating teams for this? I am not sure if this is the best metric necessarily. Each era has plusses and minuses that would make other era players have issues to some degree. How are officials going to call these pick up games? Like today or like the 70's. I mean can you throw punches and still remain in the game?wikkid's 70s team
PG - Calvin Murphy
SG - Charlie Scott
SF - Cazzie Russell
PF - Bad News Barnes
C - Dave Cowens
Followed the Heinsohn model by responding to the stultifying stiltness of the 70s with some mobility. Cal in for JoJo, Bad News in for Silas, Cazzie in for Hondo. Like most of the teams i'm building in this, this squad could play today. Where my trophy at?
Costanza: Did I receive a call? Constanza?Bill Cartwright 80s C
Who?21.4 - Andre Miller 00's PG
He'll play good defense, distribute and knock down FT's and is far and away the next best PG in the decade (I had him ranked above one that was already drafted, also).
decidedly not. this team is designed to rule in the 70s just as the multiple 70s champion Celtics did. but i was one of the ones clamoring about what the stats were saying during the 25 years that the NBA had the 3 point line before factoring it into their strategy of play. just as now, i'm thinking a 2pt expansion league would be fun to watch. being ready to play with and against type is the secret to winning basketball (next to the P&R anyways) - getting shots, steals and stops.Is today the gold standard for evaluating teams for this? I am not sure if this is the best metric necessarily. Each era has plusses and minuses that would make other era players have issues to some degree. How are officials going to call these pick up games? Like today or like the 70's. I mean can you throw punches and still remain in the game?
just looked up consistent. no picture....21.4 - Andre Miller 00's PG
If you look up consistent in the dictionary, Andre Miller's picture will be there. He played 17 seasons and is #11 on the all-time assists list, but only led the league on 1 occasion. No all-star games, no all-defensive teams, no all-NBA teams and no rings. Played in every game 10 of his 17 years.
I don't need a stud with my current squad to come in and start chucking it, I need a guy to get the team in the right spots, control the flow and let Pierce and Boozer go to work in the half court. He'll play good defense, distribute and knock down FT's and is far and away the next best PG in the decade (I even had him ranked above one that was drafted before him).
@Ilov80s
It’s funny, I was going to give you a hard time for calling out Martin because I still had him on my list and didn’t realize you had drafted him a while back. Was surprised he was still out there, and this explains why.50s-60s is the other. You look at a HOFer like Slater Martin and his per game stats look like a joke next to 60s guards who weren’t HOFers but when you factor in the shot clock, it completely changes the game. In the 50s the top scorers are averaging about 23-28 a game. In the 60s we see that go up to 35-50.
i was so tempted to take him. He made a a good amount of money on the Sixers in a game where he hit 2 FTs in OT to cover a spread. Almost grabbed him based soley on that21.4 - Andre Miller 00's PG
If you look up consistent in the dictionary, Andre Miller's picture will be there. He played 17 seasons and is #11 on the all-time assists list, but only led the league on 1 occasion. No all-star games, no all-defensive teams, no all-NBA teams and no rings. Played in every game 10 of his 17 years.
I don't need a stud with my current squad to come in and start chucking it, I need a guy to get the team in the right spots, control the flow and let Pierce and Boozer go to work in the half court. He'll play good defense, distribute and knock down FT's and is far and away the next best PG in the decade (I even had him ranked above one that was drafted before him).
@Ilov80s
Mike Bibby. Outside of ppg, Miller is better than him in every stat and especially advanced stats, which are usually not as kind to guys who play as long as Miller.Who?
On a side note, Mike Bibby coaches a HS team and his squad came to a showcase tournament here in Springfield (Bass Pro Tournament of Champions), which is a big deal around these parts because there is usually 1 or 2 pros that play every year.Mike Bibby. Outside of ppg, Miller is better than him in every stat and especially advanced stats, which are usually not as kind to guys who play as long as Miller.
I had Miller on my short list but ended up pulling the trigger on Terrell Brandon who I thought was a notch above.Mike Bibby. Outside of ppg, Miller is better than him in every stat and especially advanced stats, which are usually not as kind to guys who play as long as Miller.
Loved Andre Miller and his old man game. He had a herky jerky nature to his game that was surprisingly delightful to watch. He also did a fantastic job of pushing the ball up the court for fast breaks even though he was never moving fast.21.4 - Andre Miller 00's PG
If you look up consistent in the dictionary, Andre Miller's picture will be there. He played 17 seasons and is #11 on the all-time assists list, but only led the league on 1 occasion. No all-star games, no all-defensive teams, no all-NBA teams and no rings. Played in every game 10 of his 17 years.
I don't need a stud with my current squad to come in and start chucking it, I need a guy to get the team in the right spots, control the flow and let Pierce and Boozer go to work in the half court. He'll play good defense, distribute and knock down FT's and is far and away the next best PG in the decade (I even had him ranked above one that was drafted before him).
@Ilov80s
I had Brandon in the 90's (so I didn't compare them directly) but his objective ranking number was calculated better than Miller's.I had Miller on my short list but ended up pulling the trigger on Terrell Brandon who I thought was a notch above.
10 minute warning!!!
Looked at him and decided to take Doug Collins instead. Nice pick up at this juncture21.07 - Phil Chenier, PG, 1970
20pts, 4 Rbs, 3.5 ast. He was 6'3" 180lbs so I'm slotting him in at PG.
NBA champion (1978)
3× NBA All-Star (1974, 1975, 1977)
All-NBA Second Team (1975)
NBA All-Rookie First Team (1972)
First-team All-Pac-8 (1971)
No. 45 retired by Washington Wizards
good that u dont have any usage guys, since there wont be any room to drive the lane. Wes aint a PF - it was tried\I think I did pretty well for the 70's:
PG - Phil Chenier
SG - Billy Knight
SF - Rick Barry
PF - Wes Unseld
C - Bob Lanier
Nice team. Can Barry play the point 3? Ball handling is lacking. My 70s knowledge is limited but I think Chenier was a jump shot specialist. Knight is already out of position at the 2 spot.I think I did pretty well for the 70's:
PG - Phil Chenier
SG - Billy Knight
SF - Rick Barry
PF - Wes Unseld
C - Bob Lanier
you ask Barry can he play the point, the answer will be "yes". you ask Barry can he stuff the Stilt, the answer will be "yes". you ask Barry was the song "John Henry" written about him, the answer will be "yes". you ask Barry can he take over for Streep in Sophie's Choice, the answer will be "yes"Nice team. Can Barry play the point 3? Ball handling is lacking. My 70s knowledge is limited but I think Chenier was a jump shot specialist. Knight is already out of position at the 2 spot.
That is true. I had to move guys around to make it fit, so it's more of an All-Decade All-Star team.Nice team. Can Barry play the point 3? Ball handling is lacking. My 70s knowledge is limited but I think Chenier was a jump shot specialist. Knight is already out of position at the 2 spot.
Nice snag, that's who I had locked on this round.21.07 - Phil Chenier, PG, 1970
20pts, 4 Rbs, 3.5 ast. He was 6'3" 180lbs so I'm slotting him in at PG.
NBA champion (1978)
3× NBA All-Star (1974, 1975, 1977)
All-NBA Second Team (1975)
NBA All-Rookie First Team (1972)
First-team All-Pac-8 (1971)
No. 45 retired by Washington Wizards
I looked at him for several rounds as the top guy on my board. Statistically, he's a dynamo. But it was all vs the slowwhites of 50s NBA. Plus he looks like Ichabod Crane. I finally could put him on ignore once I moved Rajah to the 60s. At this point, I think he is a great pick.21.6 SF George Yardley, 60s
Career: 19.2ppg, 8.9rpg
Peak: 22.2ppg, 10.3rpg
Hall of Famer
6x All-Star (in 7 career seasons)
2x All-NBA
1 scoring title
Averaged 20.2/7.9 in his final season, then retired to open an Engineering Company.
He has been on my short list for the last couple turns but I just don't know anything about these old dudes and it's more fun for me to argue about players that I've seen.I looked at him for several rounds as the top guy on my board. Statistically, he's a dynamo. But it was all vs the slowwhites of 50s NBA. Plus he looks like Ichabod Crane. I finally could put him on ignore once I moved Rajah to the 60s. At this point, I think he is a great pick.
I looked at him like 8 rounds ago but saw his picture and just laughed while crossing his name off my mental list.He has been on my short list for the last couple turns but I just don't know anything about these old dudes and it's more fun for me to argue about players that I've seen.
Dude is in danger of timing out. He hasn't been on in 5 hours. I sent him a PM a bit ago, but he's still a no-show.
Will do. I'm taking a spot Instinctive already has filled, but someone else may snag his player if he doesn't hop on soon.Dude is in danger of timing out. He hasn't been on in 5 hours. I sent him a PM a bit ago, but he's still a no-show.
ETA: I guess he technically is at an hour now.
@trader jake, don't trip as you run up to the podium.
When your writeup makes me think, "dang, I should have drafted this guy", you did a good job.21.09 Hersey Hawkins – SG 90s
The forgotten great player of the 1990s. In an era where outside shooting was still vastly underrated, The Hawk brought it. He shot over 40% on 3’s in 8 of his first 10 seasons (on good volume), and started all but seven games over that entire 10-year stretch. The advanced numbers help his case as well (Hawkins played 13 seasons – his closest win share comp is Jason Kidd).
This consistency should not have been a surprise to NBA observers because he played every game of 4-year college career. He made the US Olympic team, finished as a consensus 1st team All-American (leading the nation in scoring), won every Player of the Year Award, and finished his collegiate career as the 4th-leading scoring in NCAA Division 1 history. He entered the Association in 1989 as the #6 overall pick, made the All-Rookie team, and the All-Star game two seasons later.
Besides being among the best 3pt shooters in the 1990s, he was consistently among the league leaders in free throws, FT%, steals, and true shooting. He finished #4 in the NBA in offensive rating in 1996-97 and #6 overall in 97-98 while his defensive win shares was top 15 in 1995-96. Hawkins was a humble leader in the locker room, was extremely well-respected around the league, and won the NBA’s Sportsmanship Award in 1999. Today he'd make a gazillion dollars.
Crap. This is who I wanted to fill out my 90s team, but then I forgot about him.21.09 Hersey Hawkins – SG 90s
The forgotten great player of the 1990s. In an era where outside shooting was still vastly underrated, The Hawk brought it. He shot over 40% on 3’s in 8 of his first 10 seasons (on good volume), and started all but seven games over that entire 10-year stretch. The advanced numbers help his case as well (Hawkins played 13 seasons – his closest win share comp is Jason Kidd).
This consistency should not have been a surprise to NBA observers because he played every game of 4-year college career. He made the US Olympic team, finished as a consensus 1st team All-American (leading the nation in scoring), won every Player of the Year Award, and finished his collegiate career as the 4th-leading scoring in NCAA Division 1 history. He entered the Association in 1989 as the #6 overall pick, made the All-Rookie team, and the All-Star game two seasons later.
Besides being among the best 3pt shooters in the 1990s, he was consistently among the league leaders in free throws, FT%, steals, and true shooting. He finished #4 in the NBA in offensive rating in 1996-97 and #6 overall in 97-98 while his defensive win shares was top 15 in 1995-96. Hawkins was a humble leader in the locker room, was extremely well-respected around the league, and won the NBA’s Sportsmanship Award in 1999. Today he'd make a gazillion dollars.
The 2010s should be judged like any other decade, in my opinion. We’re not going to judge a 70s player based on their last couple years before they retire, we’re (or at least I am) going to look at a combination of their peak and their career accomplishments.
A current veteran player, let’s say Derrick Rose in my case, shouldn’t be judged just on their current level of play but based on their total career as well as their peak. (And current young players shouldn’t project anything they haven’t done yet).
This is why having multiple judges will be helpful to make sure different points of view will be accounted for.
Just my thoughts.
I agree with that but he was saying in 2021 teams shot threes X times per game. However, I’m sure that number was lower the first half of the decade. Using 2021 pace of efficiency or style of play isn’t how we should look at the entire 10-11 period.
the judging between decades is a great point. that was why i went high on a guy in the 60s who averaged over 20 ppg knowing the scoring was so much lower back then.Yeah, it’ll be a difficult decade to judge because of how drastically the style of play has changed.
It's all this @Jayrodtalk of how dominate his team is. Everyone is starting to give up.Not a good day for the streak
@Instinctive skipped![]()
@Mister CIA 10 minutes left
@Doug B on deck
@higgins in the hole
The Google Sheet is current?
It is for my team.....except I was supposed to have Cousy as my 60's PG, Moses Malone as my 80's C, and Jordan as my 90's SG......other than that it looks right.The Google Sheet is current?
My teams are correct last I looked an hour or 2 agoThe Google Sheet is current?