Rick James
Footballguy
Another atrocious "defenseless receiver" call in the Philly game.
I agreeAnother atrocious "defenseless receiver" call in the Philly game.
Hope Collie is alright though.. Classic philly fans booing the call when the guy is down not moving.. bad call probably but that ain't right.
That was a helmet to helmet hit from the 2nd Eagles defender. Those are going to draw penalties. Get used to it.
Already been done by Brady.Only a matter of time until players start faking injuries like in soccer to draw flag
Completely agree, but the flag doesn't surprise me.I doubt the Eagles cb intentionally tried to hit him helmet to helmet but I guess that doesn't matter under this rule. Collie was hit by the first cb into the 2nd cb who had already started diving at him. It's a violent game... what can you say?
Once be has possession and is a runner that 'hit' is allowed to happen. The receiver caught the ball and changed HIS level causing this. That penalty was BS
Actually, the call on the field was unnecessary roughness on a DEFENSELESS RECIEVER. Never before in the NFL has a guy who catches the ball, turns forward and tucks it into his gut with both arms and lowered his shoulders been a defenseless receiver. Either the rules are changing in the NFL, or that was a terrible call that resulted in a TD for the Colts that wouldn't have happened. Deal with it.They are just treat a HTH hit like an unintentional facemask now. Intentions don't matter, only the fact it happened. Coleman hit Collie HTH. I seriously doubt it was intentional. Collie was trying to steel himself against the hit by the other defender and put himself into a horrible position for Coleman. But he still got hit HTH, and that now results in 15 yards, and is going to from now on. Deal with it.
That was a helmet to helmet hit from the 2nd Eagles defender. Those are going to draw penalties. Get used to it.
escept by the league office you are wrong because his second foot wasn't down so he hadn't caught the ball but i;m sure youll tell us how that's wrong and b.s. and howyou played h.s. football while Austin lies motionless on a stretcher stay classy!Once be has possession and is a runner that 'hit' is allowed to happen. The receiver caught the ball and changed HIS level causing this. That penalty was BSall you need to know
Huh?The 2nd football of the receiver was not down, that's ruled defenseless.
Yeah, if he had both feet down, then shouldn't that have been a fumble? They called it incomplete. FWIW.escept by the league office you are wrong because his second foot wasn't down so he hadn't caught the ball but i;m sure youll tell us how that's wrong and b.s. and howyou played h.s. football while Austin lies motionless on a stretcher stay classy!Once be has possession and is a runner that 'hit' is allowed to happen. The receiver caught the ball and changed HIS level causing this. That penalty was BSall you need to know
X -2.No helmet to helmet from either defender. They just showed it repeatedly on the halftime show and the second guy never touches Collie's helmet.Hope Collie is alright though.. Classic philly fans booing the call when the guy is down not moving.. bad call probably but that ain't right.That was a helmet to helmet hit from the 2nd Eagles defender. Those are going to draw penalties. Get used to it.x 2
if you can watch thisX -2.No helmet to helmet from either defender. They just showed it repeatedly on the halftime show and the second guy never touches Collie's helmet.Hope Collie is alright though.. Classic philly fans booing the call when the guy is down not moving.. bad call probably but that ain't right.That was a helmet to helmet hit from the 2nd Eagles defender. Those are going to draw penalties. Get used to it.x 2
LOL thanks, let me explain more in English.The 2nd foot of the receiver was not down......not the 2nd football.There's a rule in the NFL that the 2nd foot of the receiver must come down and then the receiver is not ruled "defenseless", Collie did not have his 2nd foot down yet and was "defenseless."Huh?The 2nd football of the receiver was not down, that's ruled defenseless.![]()
I see possession and a fumble...and I also see a H2H hit by the 2nd defender albeit not intentional. It should have been a fumble and a personal foul (since they threw the flag) but Eagles ball. It was not an incomplete pass.if you can watch thisX -2.No helmet to helmet from either defender. They just showed it repeatedly on the halftime show and the second guy never touches Collie's helmet.Hope Collie is alright though.. Classic philly fans booing the call when the guy is down not moving.. bad call probably but that ain't right.That was a helmet to helmet hit from the 2nd Eagles defender. Those are going to draw penalties. Get used to it.x 2
I'm wrong. I didn't notice that they hit side to side with helmets. But he didn't lead with it, hit with the shoulder almost instantaneously. Clean play.LOL thanks, let me explain more in English.The 2nd foot of the receiver was not down......not the 2nd football.There's a rule in the NFL that the 2nd foot of the receiver must come down and then the receiver is not ruled "defenseless", Collie did not have his 2nd foot down yet and was "defenseless."Huh?The 2nd football of the receiver was not down, that's ruled defenseless.![]()
You are completely wrong. Watch the play please.LOL thanks, let me explain more in English.The 2nd foot of the receiver was not down......not the 2nd football.There's a rule in the NFL that the 2nd foot of the receiver must come down and then the receiver is not ruled "defenseless", Collie did not have his 2nd foot down yet and was "defenseless."Huh?The 2nd football of the receiver was not down, that's ruled defenseless.![]()
Collie took 3 steps with the ball in both his hands. How many do you need for a catch? I didn't play football in high school.escept by the league office you are wrong because his second foot wasn't down so he hadn't caught the ball but i;m sure youll tell us how that's wrong and b.s. and howyou played h.s. football while Austin lies motionless on a stretcher stay classy!Once be has possession and is a runner that 'hit' is allowed to happen. The receiver caught the ball and changed HIS level causing this. That penalty was BSall you need to know
So I can just make sure my facemask hits your hand so I can draw a penalty? Seriously?I get your point, but you can't compare the two. If you grab the facemask, it's a penalty. Period.If you have a HTH, it is not always a penalty.They are just treat a HTH hit like an unintentional facemask now. Intentions don't matter, only the fact it happened. Coleman hit Collie HTH. I seriously doubt it was intentional. Collie was trying to steel himself against the hit by the other defender and put himself into a horrible position for Coleman. But he still got hit HTH, and that now results in 15 yards, and is going to from now on. Deal with it.
Funny thing is that there's far fewer rules and controversies, and therefore stoppages in play, in professional soccer games. You can watch an entire match in 2 hours flat. I can't think of a sport that requires you know so many penalties and fouls and exceptions to penalties and fouls as the NFL now does. It's a lawyer's wet dream but it's crap to watch anymore.Only a matter of time until players start faking injuries like in soccer to draw flag
call the league office and tell them all about it and let us know if they care but I bet they don't because they said the second foot hadn't come down.i agree with you he had more the just two steps though, for whatever its worth, butit isn'tworth anything because i don't call the games or levy the fines.Collie took 3 steps with the ball in both his hands. How many do you need for a catch? I didn't play football in high school.escept by the league office you are wrong because his second foot wasn't down so he hadn't caught the ball but i;m sure youll tell us how that's wrong and b.s. and howyou played h.s. football while Austin lies motionless on a stretcher stay classy!Once be has possession and is a runner that 'hit' is allowed to happen. The receiver caught the ball and changed HIS level causing this. That penalty was BSall you need to know
Or remove all protective gear. I played Rugby in high school and when you are tackling someone and neither of you are wearing pads you tackle differently.The game has become too fast. It's only a matter of time before somebody dies on the field. Either make them wear helmets made of pillows or have everyone carry a 25LB bag of weights on their back to slow down the action.
I think he did protect himself. He caught the ball, got two feet down, and lowered his shoulder. Just because it looked bad, doesn't mean the rules were broken. I think this is a good example of why you cannot legislate hard hits out of the game. IMO, there was nothing wrong and it was a call that changed the momentum of the game.From the NFL Rule Book :
"12-2-8-h Defenseless Receiver [unnecessary roughness] includes ... f a receiver has completed a catch and has not had time to protect himself, a defensive player is prohibited from launching (springing forward and upward) into him in a way that causes the defensive player’s helmet, facemask, shoulder, or forearm to forcibly strike the receiver’s head or neck area—even if the initial contact of the defender’s helmet, facemask, shoulder, or forearm is lower than the receiver’s neck."
The question is whether the 2nd defensive player did or did not "launch" ("spring forward and upward") into Collie. I would argue that because Collie dropped lower after the 1st hit, it wasn't an forward/upward sort of tackle like one in which a player aims for the upper chest area and the momentum of the hit carried him upwards into the player's helmet. Either way, it's a tough call to make. After seeing Collie lie motionless on the ground, the refs might have overreacted on par with the NFL's new dangerous hit agenda.
This is the solution, but they'll never go with it. It's too radical and not obvious.Or remove all protective gear. I played Rugby in high school and when you are tackling someone and neither of you are wearing pads you tackle differently.The game has become too fast. It's only a matter of time before somebody dies on the field. Either make them wear helmets made of pillows or have everyone carry a 25LB bag of weights on their back to slow down the action.
and it wouldnt be called football anymoreThis is the solution, but they'll never go with it. It's too radical and not obvious.Or remove all protective gear. I played Rugby in high school and when you are tackling someone and neither of you are wearing pads you tackle differently.The game has become too fast. It's only a matter of time before somebody dies on the field. Either make them wear helmets made of pillows or have everyone carry a 25LB bag of weights on their back to slow down the action.
Why not? That's how the game started, didn't it? Almost all of the pads and uniforms and rules we're talking about were added later.and it wouldnt be called football anymoreThis is the solution, but they'll never go with it. It's too radical and not obvious.Or remove all protective gear. I played Rugby in high school and when you are tackling someone and neither of you are wearing pads you tackle differently.The game has become too fast. It's only a matter of time before somebody dies on the field. Either make them wear helmets made of pillows or have everyone carry a 25LB bag of weights on their back to slow down the action.
This is probably the first questionable officiating call in the history of football. I don't think football can withstand these kind of controversies. But we shall see....And BTW, Philly fans still suck.
You are quick.This is probably the first questionable officiating call in the history of football. I don't think football can withstand these kind of controversies. But we shall see....And BTW, Philly fans still suck....Oh, I get it, you're trying to be sarcastic, hip and dismissive. Cool.
Without all the crazy rules in the NFL, if you just watched the play, the play looked clean. Then again, I thought Calvin Johnson caught a TD pass to win the game against the Bears earlier this year too.They hit helmets, I agree he didn't lead with it but they did hit and I think the WR was in the "defenseless" position, meaning the two feet were not down while he had possession. So whatever the league wants to do with that.I'm wrong. I didn't notice that they hit side to side with helmets. But he didn't lead with it, hit with the shoulder almost instantaneously. Clean play.LOL thanks, let me explain more in English.The 2nd foot of the receiver was not down......not the 2nd football.There's a rule in the NFL that the 2nd foot of the receiver must come down and then the receiver is not ruled "defenseless", Collie did not have his 2nd foot down yet and was "defenseless."Huh?The 2nd football of the receiver was not down, that's ruled defenseless.![]()
Best fans in all of sports. And they're in your head! Wouldn't have it any other way. HahahahaThis is probably the first questionable officiating call in the history of football. I don't think football can withstand these kind of controversies. But we shall see....And BTW, Philly fans still suck.