Sigh is about right, because I haven't been given one straight answer and what is meant by defund the police. The most popular answer when the protesters are asked is to eliminate the police department with no plan to replace it.Sigh...
Sigh is about right, because I haven't been given one straight answer and what is meant by defund the police. The most popular answer when the protesters are asked is to eliminate the police department with no plan to replace it.Sigh...
He never said he wanted to defund teachers. He used it as an analogy. Goodness.I think it’s straightforward to you. But in the details it’s not straightforward at all. How would defund teachers work in your mind?
Sigh...He never said he wanted to defund teachers. He used it as an analogy. Goodness.
Sigh.It is like wanting to improve education by starting a defund the teachers campaign.
Only if "sigh" actually means "to emit a long, deep, audible breath."I guess "Sigh" is Tool's way admitting defeat?
Someone should send a note to the family on behalf of PSF...he wasn't a hero and the pension makes it all worth it.happened last week:
Henderson County, NC deputy Ryan Hendrix has died from his injuries
In a press conference, Henderson County Sheriff Lowell Griffin said Deputy Ryan Hendrix, 35, was shot in the face while responding to a call early Thursday morning. Sheriff Griffin said deputies were responding to reports of a vehicle break-in at around 2:50 a.m.
Early this morning while the world slept, Ryan responded to assist a family needing help when they became innocent victims of a violent encounter. We all know the tragic outcome, but Ryan refuses to let the story end there. Even in passing Ryan continues to exemplify a servant’s heart. You see, Ryan was also an organ donor. He will continue to help strangers for a lifetime, even after making the ultimate sacrifice.
https://wlos.com/news/local/shots-fired-in-henderson-county
? What is hard to see. Wanting to improve policing by defunding the police is like wanting to improve education by defunding teachers. That ia about as straight forward of an analogy as you can get.
Neither of you have ever supported school vouchers (defunding public education) and such ideas?He never said he wanted to defund teachers. He used it as an analogy. Goodness.
What are you talking about? The post was an analogy and nobody said anything promoting the actual defunding of teachers or educations. I vote to keep school tax levies every time that they are on the ticket.Neither of you have ever supported school vouchers (defunding public education) and such ideas?
As for the analogy it fails because it is backwards. School vouchers want to remove the "easy" stuff from public education and just leave the problems behind but without the resources. Defunding the police wants to shift the stuff that police aren't well suited for elsewhere and leave behind "police work" and working towards properly allocating resources.
As for this thread I find it funny that on 9/11 you guy were talking about this while I suspect a great deal of communities (even with the list reduced because of Covid 19 restrictions) were celebrating first responders including those of the NY fire department and police department that died on that day. And like my little city celebrating its own fire and police simultaneously with many wearing Black Live Matters items.
This is simply not a true statement for all. It is possible it is a true statement for some people in some circumstances, but not fair to state this as fact.If you want to defund the police you are anti police, because you want them to lose their jobs.
All of this.This is simply not a true statement for all. It is possible it is a true statement for some people in some circumstances, but not fair to state this as fact.
Let's say my town has a $10m budget for police, and those police do everything from catching criminals and preventing crime to dealing with homeless and harmless mentally disturbed people.
Let's say our original plan was to increase the police budget from $10m to $11m. But instead we keep the police budget $10m and invest that extra $1m in social workers instead. The police focus just on catching criminals and preventing crime. The social workers focus on homeless and harmless mentally disturbed people, as well as on helping neighborhood kids find their path in life. And let's say by allowing the social workers to do this, some homeless and mentally disturbed people improve their lives in a way that prevents them from committing a criminal act in the future, and some kids end up on a better path that does the same for them.
In this fictional example, the work of the police is made easier, as some of the burden is shifted to others, and the number of criminals the police have to deal with goes down.
This is an example of what some people mean by "defund the police" - shifting a portion of the budget from police to other services with the intent of improving the results.
If I believe in this example of "defunding the police" it does not at all mean I am anti police or that I want them to lose their jobs. And it does not mean I don't appreciate all that the police do for us, that I don't applaud all of the examples being posted in this thread. If anything, I think I am pro-police in that I want to make changes to society that would help make the job of police easier.
Now you can of course argue you don't think this fictional example would work, or that it would cost too much, etc., and there can be healthy debate there on what can or can't be done. But please don't lump together everyone who says they want to "defund the police" as all being people who are anti-police or want them to lose their jobs.
Agree with this and the thoughtful post above.All of this.
"Defund the police" is one of the most unfortunate phrases to have come up. It does not describe what most are looking for, which is police reform and using funds for better/different uses. There may be some that want to completely do away with police forces, but I think that's the minority and it's certainly not my position (nor the posters that I've seen here).
It's a perfect example, btw, of why words matter.
I agree. And maybe I'm wrong and there are more people that are actually calling for those radical changes. I would hope not, but it's certainly evident in at least a few spots.Agree with this and the thoughtful post above.
However, the "defund" usage is not just a misapplied turn of phrase, to be swept under the rug as is often done here and in the media. It's been adopted by the entire "movement" as a symbol of exactly what is wanted by those vocalizing it. Not dissimilar to Medicare4All.
There are very real city council proposals (e.g. Denver, Mpls) that call for divesting the police of funds and abolishing the police force as we know it. Not keeping their budget the same and creating additional public svcs to offload misapplied police duties.
How can the general public take true progressive reformers seriously if they continue to let the radicals a) be their spokespeople, and b) also the ones leading the city council initiatives?
... and safer.If I believe in this example of "defunding the police" it does not at all mean I am anti police or that I want them to lose their jobs. And it does not mean I don't appreciate all that the police do for us, that I don't applaud all of the examples being posted in this thread. If anything, I think I am pro-police in that I want to make changes to society that would help make the job of police easier.
"Defunding teachers" as in the very real and not just a mind exercise hypothetical "school choice" or vouchers means skimming off the best parts of the job and leaving behind for public school teachers the problems while "defunding police" hopefully means skimming off the problematic tasks and leaving behind what they do best. The analogy also fails because we know what "defunding teachers" means in practice, while we are still feeling our way through what "defunding police" might mean.What are you talking about? The post was an analogy and nobody said anything promoting the actual defunding of teachers or educations.
73 Year old woman used her flagpole to defend her family from intruders in South Salt Lake City. Police officers who apprehended the criminal return to her house with a new flag to replace the one that she had used in self-defense, and helped her mount it to the front of her house. LinkAn American flag became an impromptu weapon of self-defense for a 73-year-old woman who says she and her family were attacked by a stranger at their Utah home.
Lejune Timmerman said a deranged man jumped over a fence at her family’s home Monday morning and began attacking her brothers.
“He beat them up for no reason. He was beating on me, choked me,” Timmerman said.
During the attack, Timmerman grabbed an American flag on a pole from the front porch of the house and fought back.
99.9 % of what they do contributes - I highly respect police for what they do, its a thankless job in today's world and this new target on their backs put their bu the radical left is horribleto house examples of policemen and policewomen contributing to society.
Underpaid? I used to do loans for many of them. I can assure you, they are not underpaid.Just did a search on this board using only the word police. Almost 20,000 results came back, and after reviewing a few pages, it seemed most matched the same cesspool of commentary that you could find when you watch the nightly broadcast media news.
There are over 800,000 uniformed police officers in the United States. Like teachers, they are underpaid, under-appreciated public servants. Almost all of them go about their duties every day without ending up on the news. They don't go looking for trouble, they are who you rely on when trouble finds you.
I've known many police officers, both personally and professionally. They do a thankless job in our society.
Starting this thread to house examples of policemen and policewomen contributing to society.
The starting salary for a Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy is between $5500 and $6000 per month. Are you ready to leave your job/career/business and put your life on the line every day, possibly being subjected to someone randomly approaching your vehicle and shooting you in the jaw, face or neck like what happened to the two officers on the LA County sheriff's force for this salary?Underpaid? I used to do loans for many of them. I can assure you, they are not underpaid.
Oakland County MI in Metro Detroit has had almost half of their cadets and potential sheriffs drop out of their academy since June.Just did a search on this board using only the word police. Almost 20,000 results came back, and after reviewing a few pages, it seemed most matched the same cesspool of commentary that you could find when you watch the nightly broadcast media news.
There are over 800,000 uniformed police officers in the United States. Like teachers, they are underpaid, under-appreciated public servants. Almost all of them go about their duties every day without ending up on the news. They don't go looking for trouble, they are who you rely on when trouble finds you.
I've known many police officers, both personally and professionally. They do a thankless job in our society.
Starting this thread to house examples of policemen and policewomen contributing to society.
That doesn't include the overtime 'scam'. Their words, not mine. Never seen any of them make less than $120k.The starting salary for a Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy is between $5500 and $6000 per month. Are you ready to leave your job/career/business and put your life on the line every day, possibly being subjected to someone randomly approaching your vehicle and shooting you in the jaw, face or neck like what happened to the two officers on the LA County sheriff's force for this salary?
I guess that's a "no" on the answer to my question then.That doesn't include the overtime 'scam'. Their words, not mine. Never seen any of them make less than $120k.
Depends. At my age, definitely not. If a younger version of myself knew then what I know now probably. Retiring before 60 is a great enticement, although the divorce rate is relatively high and I'm not good at looking the other way when it comes to corruption.I guess that's a "no" on the answer to my question then.
So, is it now OK to post YouTube clips and/or article links from other Police Captains, Police Chiefs or LEOs who also speak out against the hypocrisy of any politician who panders to the issue of the day? Asking for a friend.Sometimes being a hero simply means saying the hard things that others don't want to hear. It means calling out the hypocrisy of politicians who pander to the issue of the day. It means talking common sense about the truth between gun legislation and violent crime. It means questioning the intelligence of societal laws that exist but aren't enforced because DA's and elected officials would rather appease rioters and criminals masquerading as protesters than enforce laws on their books.
This Police Captain in Rochester, NY recently spoke some heroic words. In 2020, it is almost a certainty that the most likely outcome from speaking out is the woke crowd will call for his resignation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaojD65baX8
I think defund the police is the wrong approach. It’s more about reform police work to make them more effective at preventing crime, to make things safer for the public and make their jobs safer. There is absolutely research showing what works but in many cases police departments have not taken those approaches or have taken the opposite approach. Best practices can make the streets safer for police and civilians which is the ultimate goal imo.Why do I need a plan? Those holding up defund the police signs have no idea what that would work.
I like how he says they don't enforce existing gun laws and immediately realizes he messed up and tried to fix it. Then takes the typical issue with courts and releasing people who haven't been found guilty.Sometimes being a hero simply means saying the hard things that others don't want to hear. It means calling out the hypocrisy of politicians who pander to the issue of the day. It means talking common sense about the truth between gun legislation and violent crime. It means questioning the intelligence of societal laws that exist but aren't enforced because DA's and elected officials would rather appease rioters and criminals masquerading as protesters than enforce laws on their books.
This Police Captain in Rochester, NY recently spoke some heroic words. In 2020, it is almost a certainty that the most likely outcome from speaking out is the woke crowd will call for his resignation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaojD65baX8
I have seen a lot, and I mean a lot at these rallies, of hatred and disgust projected at police officers. Certainly the moderates want to spin it as some common sense reforms, but those screaming hatred want the police gone. It is quite remarkable when you see these mothers talking at rallies how what they fear is their children getting gunned down by police and not gang members.I think defund the police is the wrong approach. It’s more about reform police work to make them more effective at preventing crime, to make things safer for the public and make their jobs safer. There is absolutely research showing what works but in many cases police departments have not taken those approaches or have taken the opposite approach. Best practices can make the streets safer for police and civilians which is the ultimate goal imo.
Oh I know and I think it’s a lot of frustration on their part that the problems aren’t getting addressed. Also it’s expectations. We expect gang members to be killers, we expect cops to help. When that doesn’t happen, it is really difficult for people to handle. I’ve seen some really crappy things from cops, I’ve seen racial profiling and my uncle who I know was a good man (and I think was a good copy) shared lots of horror stories of cops he worked with. It’s a challenging issue but I don’t think we’ve really done a good job addressing it and it’s made things less safe for low SES citizens and the officers who patrol those neighborhoods. It’s really unfair to both sides how we have failed to unilaterally adopt reform. I hope that can change but the water has been so poisoned that it’s going to take either really high quality local leaders or bi-partisan commitment from the top.I have seen a lot, and I mean a lot at these rallies, of hatred and disgust projected at police officers. Certainly the moderates want to spin it as some common sense reforms, but those screaming hatred want the police gone. It is quite remarkable when you see these mothers talking at rallies how what they fear is their children getting gunned down by police and not gang members.
Certainly, police have a lot of power and unfortunately police work doesn't always attract the best quality of people. There are hundreds of thousands of police and the bell curve suggests there will be thousands on the low end. The people abuse their position and sometimes it will manifest in racism. That is reality. There is room for reforms to improve certain aspects, but to some degree no amount of education or reforms is going to solve all the problems.Oh I know and I think it’s a lot of frustration on their part that the problems aren’t getting addressed. Also it’s expectations. We expect gang members to be killers, we expect cops to help. When that doesn’t happen, it is really difficult for people to handle. I’ve seen some really crappy things from cops, I’ve seen racial profiling and my uncle who I know was a good man (and I think was a good copy) shared lots of horror stories of cops he worked with. It’s a challenging issue but I don’t think we’ve really done a good job addressing it and it’s made things less safe for low SES citizens and the officers who patrol those neighborhoods. It’s really unfair to both sides how we have failed to unilaterally adopt reform. I hope that can change but the water has been so poisoned that it’s going to take either really high quality local leaders or bi-partisan commitment from the top.
I agree that there is bad in every job. There’s bad teachers who are lazy, rude, don’t communicate well, etc. There will always be a bottom tier of police. However we can actually have some cutoffs that say, no teacher who does X can work anymore period. We should have that with police. We also know there are best practices that can on a whole improve teaching and we are pretty much mandated to follow those. We can do that with police as well. It is to their benefit in the long run. It’s just a weird spot we are in right now where I don’t see many widespread committed efforts to actually improve things. Even when we have all the evidence of why we need to and how we can.Certainly, police have a lot of power and unfortunately police work doesn't always attract the best quality of people. There are hundreds of thousands of police and the bell curve suggests there will be thousands on the low end. The people abuse their position and sometimes it will manifest in racism. That is reality. There is room for reforms to improve certain aspects, but to some degree no amount of education or reforms is going to solve all the problems.