packersfan
Footballguy
What says you all?
I really liked both.I actually liked the book a lot. Much better then the movie.
I thought both suckedI really liked both.I actually liked the book a lot. Much better then the movie.
I agree.I really liked both.I actually liked the book a lot. Much better then the movie.
Bale was perfect as Bateman.I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.
Boy, lot more catalog readers around here than I thought.I agree.I really liked both.I actually liked the book a lot. Much better then the movie.
Leonardo DiCaprio was linked to the film for awhile before it was made. It's hard to see him in that role at that time. Now I think he'd be able to pull it off because he's really matured as an actor but I'm not sure he could've pulled it off successfully at that time. I think two of the reasons why the film wasn't successful was because the violence served to blot out the satiric elements of the story and the ending leaves you with no idea if he really committed the murders or if it was just a figment of his twisted imagination. But I agree Bale was great and his "in-depth" analysis of songs from people like Phil Collins and Huey Lewis is outstanding.Bale was perfect as Bateman.I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.
The business card scene and Huey Lewis stuff were almost verbatim right out of the book. Why do you consider the book so "awful"?massraider said:Awful, awful book. Pretty good flick, but I think I enjoyed the movie just because the book sucked so bad.The business card scene is classic. As is the Huey Lewis speech.
And that's bad? Leaving unanswered questions is a plus in my book.packersfan said:Leonardo DiCaprio was linked to the film for awhile before it was made. It's hard to see him in that role at that time. Now I think he'd be able to pull it off because he's really matured as an actor but I'm not sure he could've pulled it off successfully at that time. I think two of the reasons why the film wasn't successful was because the violence served to blot out the satiric elements of the story and the ending leaves you with no idea if he really committed the murders or if it was just a figment of his twisted imagination.Jack Daniel said:Bale was perfect as Bateman.jdoggydogg said:I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.
But I agree Bale was great and his "in-depth" analysis of songs from people like Phil Collins and Huey Lewis is outstanding.![]()
This is the correct answer.One of the great cult classics....Bale was terrific.
I had no problems with it but I don't think it would be unrealistic to assume a lot of moviegoers would. There are plenty of people who go to movies who like everything explained to them and like to have the story all make sense at the end. "American Psycho" is the anti-thesis of that.And that's bad? Leaving unanswered questions is a plus in my book.packersfan said:Leonardo DiCaprio was linked to the film for awhile before it was made. It's hard to see him in that role at that time. Now I think he'd be able to pull it off because he's really matured as an actor but I'm not sure he could've pulled it off successfully at that time. I think two of the reasons why the film wasn't successful was because the violence served to blot out the satiric elements of the story and the ending leaves you with no idea if he really committed the murders or if it was just a figment of his twisted imagination.Jack Daniel said:Bale was perfect as Bateman.jdoggydogg said:I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.
But I agree Bale was great and his "in-depth" analysis of songs from people like Phil Collins and Huey Lewis is outstanding.![]()
My main problem with Rules of Attraction was VanderBeek playing Bateman with that perpetual evil look on his face. He played him like a blatant psychopath and it was too over the top (maybe that's how the character was written in the book? I never read it). So that detracted from the film for me and made it far less effective.It also didn't help that Jessica Biel didn't get naked for her sex scene.I am a huge fan of this movie, as well as Rules of Attraction (which I think is underrated)
Pretty good as Batman as well.Bale was perfect as Bateman.I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.
Except for his degree from the Jack Bauer school of voice acting.Pretty good as Batman as well.Bale was perfect as Bateman.I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.![]()
I thought it was a very subtle form of growling out his dialogue.Except for his degree from the Jack Bauer school of voice acting.Pretty good as Batman as well.Bale was perfect as Bateman.I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.![]()
I imagine most of us grew up on Adam West's voice delivery....but Bale's inflection is how the character is described as speaking in the comics.Except for his degree from the Jack Bauer school of voice acting.Pretty good as Batman as well.Bale was perfect as Bateman.I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.![]()
Shtick taken, bub.i never really read the book. i remember when it came out, the hullaballoo about it and read parts of it. i never really cared for macinerny's style of writing, so it didn't surprise me that this didn't appeal to me.
Unintelligible?I imagine most of us grew up on Adam West's voice delivery....but Bale's inflection is how the character is described as speaking in the comics.Except for his degree from the Jack Bauer school of voice acting.Pretty good as Batman as well.Bale was perfect as Bateman.I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.![]()
Just saw this thread and want to respond, but I have to go return some video tapes.
And thank god there are films that don't explain everything.I had no problems with it but I don't think it would be unrealistic to assume a lot of moviegoers would. There are plenty of people who go to movies who like everything explained to them and like to have the story all make sense at the end. "American Psycho" is the anti-thesis of that.And that's bad? Leaving unanswered questions is a plus in my book.Leonardo DiCaprio was linked to the film for awhile before it was made. It's hard to see him in that role at that time. Now I think he'd be able to pull it off because he's really matured as an actor but I'm not sure he could've pulled it off successfully at that time. I think two of the reasons why the film wasn't successful was because the violence served to blot out the satiric elements of the story and the ending leaves you with no idea if he really committed the murders or if it was just a figment of his twisted imagination.Bale was perfect as Bateman.I don't see how people can say this film sucks. Great satire.
But I agree Bale was great and his "in-depth" analysis of songs from people like Phil Collins and Huey Lewis is outstanding.![]()