davearms example is a good example of where this can be faulty, however...Does this benefit FBG in any way?The purpose of this exercise is that David wants to demonstrate that his projections are better than anywhere else. He can easily be at the wrong end of this as fantasymegageeksuperstars.comIf a player is projected to finish in the top third eg as a Top 4 QB and he finishes there he has done his job. It seems harsh to penalize one of the elite choices for the week if he goes crazy eg a 5 TD passing game or a 4 rushing TD game. If he's projected in the top 3rd and he exceeds his projection why should a site that advocated him as one of the best choices of the week get punished? If he fails to make that elite status he won't get a 100% and therefore be judged purely on the actuals vs projected. I can understand the criticism of the compromise solution, I really can and it's great that you guys care enough to argue passionately about it, but we have to stick with something soon. The whole point is to make it transparent about how we are going to score before the project begins and detail everything in advance. We need to start somewhere and if there are clear faults and you guys were right with the model, then it can be reconsidered for future years. If there are concerns as to how this method benefits David's projections, let us know.By the way, I'm not saying we are going to go with the Top 3rd option, it's just that it's my favored option right now.