Your choice will not affect his stats, IMO.My only option is Kembrall
AJ hobbled and playing seattle suggests you shouldn't start him and if we don't, he will of course go for at least 100 & 2.
Said every owner of a stud WR going against Darrelle Revis every game since 2009.Don't bench your studs and play the matchups. You will be sorry.
I actually read on roto some time this week that he would see more of browner and that hopkins would see more Sherman. Sorry no linkIf Sherman is going to shadow him like he did Boldin, I feel you bench him. Andre is hobbled and obviously not 100%. If he were 100%, then I don't think Sherman has earned the Revis-respect yet and you'd have to start him. Him being hobbled though offsets that.
Has there been any talk of Sherman shadowing or not?
Shorts was in garbage time w/ the 2nd unit.Shorts had a huge game last week. Steve smith caught a td in week 1. Whats the issue here again?
I read it also. Starting him with confidence.I actually read on roto some time this week that he would see more of browner and that hopkins would see more Sherman. Sorry no linkIf Sherman is going to shadow him like he did Boldin, I feel you bench him. Andre is hobbled and obviously not 100%. If he were 100%, then I don't think Sherman has earned the Revis-respect yet and you'd have to start him. Him being hobbled though offsets that.
Has there been any talk of Sherman shadowing or not?
Putting Sherm on the rookie?! Well, guess I'm playing Holmes over DeAndre now. Was already leaning toward it, this just helps make up my mind.I actually read on roto some time this week that he would see more of browner and that hopkins would see more Sherman. Sorry no linkIf Sherman is going to shadow him like he did Boldin, I feel you bench him. Andre is hobbled and obviously not 100%. If he were 100%, then I don't think Sherman has earned the Revis-respect yet and you'd have to start him. Him being hobbled though offsets that.
Has there been any talk of Sherman shadowing or not?
I generally agree with this but a hobbled AJ versus Stevie isn't really that big of a talent/production difference in my opinion. Add in the matchup and I think it's a reasonable move. Might really be a conservative play where you are favored in your match up and if you are the underdog, you start AJ. Benching him for someone like Andre Roberts or something would be dumb though, IMO.Don't bench your studs and play the matchups. You will be sorry.
One catch for 15 yards in the first half.Shorts had a huge game last week. Steve smith caught a td in week 1. Whats the issue here again?
Good thing fantasy points don't stop accumulating when starters are pulled.CapnJB said:One catch for 15 yards in the first half.shadyridr said:Shorts had a huge game last week. Steve smith caught a td in week 1. Whats the issue here again?
Two catches for 9 yards in the second half before the starters were pulled.
Five catches for 119 yards playing against the second team.
Zero touchdowns.
I think the argument is that it's not anticipated to be a blowout, thus we won't see the second unit.Good thing fantasy points don't stop accumulating when starters are pulled.CapnJB said:One catch for 15 yards in the first half.shadyridr said:Shorts had a huge game last week. Steve smith caught a td in week 1. Whats the issue here again?
Two catches for 9 yards in the second half before the starters were pulled.
Five catches for 119 yards playing against the second team.
Zero touchdowns.
So who are your other options to start over him? I currently have Bowe in for AJI think the argument is that it's not anticipated to be a blowout, thus we won't see the second unit.Good thing fantasy points don't stop accumulating when starters are pulled.CapnJB said:One catch for 15 yards in the first half.shadyridr said:Shorts had a huge game last week. Steve smith caught a td in week 1. Whats the issue here again?
Two catches for 9 yards in the second half before the starters were pulled.
Five catches for 119 yards playing against the second team.
Zero touchdowns.
I'm debating sitting Johnson, but I find that when I do stuff like that, I always get burned.
I currently have Hartline/E Sanders and Holmes in there. Royal/AJ on Bench. I'm probably an idiot/over thinking this all but I think Sanders clicks this week against the Vikings and Hartline is a solid high floor. I've made it a habit to go with my gut this year since if I'm going to lose, I'd rather it be my stupidity and not some ranking list.So who are your other options to start over him? I currently have Bowe in for AJI think the argument is that it's not anticipated to be a blowout, thus we won't see the second unit.Good thing fantasy points don't stop accumulating when starters are pulled.CapnJB said:One catch for 15 yards in the first half.shadyridr said:Shorts had a huge game last week. Steve smith caught a td in week 1. Whats the issue here again?
Two catches for 9 yards in the second half before the starters were pulled.
Five catches for 119 yards playing against the second team.
Zero touchdowns.
I'm debating sitting Johnson, but I find that when I do stuff like that, I always get burned.
Talk me into it.....got Bowe in there now.I think HOU will have to throw to have a chance to win. I'm rolling with AJ.
Good info thanks.. would you rolll with AJ or Bowe?With Browner back, I would imagine that they will each just play "their" side of the field rather than follow like Sherman did against SF. Browner was out that game but Hawks typically just play their corners on each side of the field.
It's also worth a thought if Hopkins warrants Sherman moreso than an injured Andre.Good info thanks.. would you rolll with AJ or Bowe?With Browner back, I would imagine that they will each just play "their" side of the field rather than follow like Sherman did against SF. Browner was out that game but Hawks typically just play their corners on each side of the field.
told u guys sonseahawks suck on the road.
start andray johnsen with confidence