This was posted at the Cowboys boards. Here is a poster who asks some good rhetorical questions:
=================================================================================================================================================================
What are you guys are expecting out of our starting OLB opposite Ware? I don't think it is feasible that the guy who is assigned to play run-first be racking up 10-12+ sacks every year.
I may be completely wrong here, but from what I understand, when the SOLB is not dropping into pass coverage in this defense, his assignments are to 1) Stop the run, and 2) Rush the passer.
This would mean that after the snap, Spencer has to check to see if it is a running play. If it is, he plays the run. If it isn't, he then has to mentally process that there is somebody covering the RB in the flats, then finally proceed to rush the QB, giving him at least a 1.5 second late start in his pass rush. One and a half seconds doesn't sound like a long time, but it is an eternity when pass rushing. I don't think that it is required of his position to be a pass-rushing monster.
I personally am happy with Anthony Spencer, regardless of where he was drafted. He has been a very good SOLB for the Cowboys opposite Ware. It's not feasible to expect him to pin his ears back and just rush the QB all the time. Why do you think our run defense is so good?
I'm sure he's got a lot to do with it, and for the sake of my arguement I'll count TFL as a sack. It's negative yardage. I'll refer to it as NYP (negative-yardage plays). If you look at him compared to DeMarcus Ware:
DeMarcus Ware since 2007: 80 sacks, 34 TFL = 114 NYP.
Anthony Spencer since 2007: 21.5 sacks, 21 TFL = 42.5 NYP.
Now, I understand that Anthony Spencer looks horrid when compared to DeMarcus Ware. But, let's put him against some players in a comparable situation (opposite an elite pass rusher):
Brian Robison since 2007 (opposite Jared Allen): 21.5 sacks, 12 TFL = 33.5 NYP.
Robert Mathis since 2007 (opposite Dwight Freeney): 48.5 sacks, 13 TFL = 61.5 NYP.
Lamarr Woodley since 2007 (opposite James Harrison): 48 sacks, 15 TFL = 62 NYP.
So, over the course of the past 5 years, Anthony Spencer has made about 20-less NYP than the best.
Keep in mind that the Colts play in a horrible, horrible division, as do the Steelers and Vikings. Mathis has spent the past few years feasting on the likes of Garrard and Kerry Collins for goodness sake.
Steelers play the Browns and Bengals each twice a year. Lamarr Woodley isn't the guy going up against Joe Thomas, and the rest of that line is not good.
The Vikings get to go up against the sieve that is the Bears O-Line, and less recently, a piss parade of awful QB'ing within the Lions franchise.
The NFC East still is one of the toughest divisions to play in in the NFL. I guess what I'm trying to say is, if Anthony Spencer covered that ground, and made one more sack or TFL every 3 games over the past 5 years, would that all of a sudden make him that much greater?
Anthony Spencer is very good at his position, in my opinion. I think that it could be much, MUCH worse and a lot of Cowboys fans take him for granted. Maybe, try looking past the sack tally and search a little more in depth before you hate a player, or hate the organization for valuing him as a very good piece of the defense.
=================================================================================================================================================================================