LOL, why are you comparing him to a WR2 at all? That is where the confusion comes from. Nobody else is, even those highest on him. His draft position is no where near a WR2. So it seems odd that a guy that no one was talking about or drafting as a WR2 suddenly gets compared to a WR2 by you, who clearly does not like him. Is this just some weak effort for you to try and emphasize your opinion that he has limited upside? I think so, and I'll move on.
I see Bryant as a solid WR3/4 with possible upside for more. You can still land him as a WR5 or so as evidence of some of the posters, but the value is dwindling fast and he is creeping into the WR3/4 range, where I think his value balances out. Like I said get him soon or you will miss out on the value. A lot of guys probably already have.
BTW, I'd love to hear your logic and reasoning as to why he has such low upside. Saying he is only worth a pick in the 16th round is very harsh of nearly any player. Especially one who looks to start as a WR2 on an NFL team and averages over 700/4 a year while facing nothing but adversity. SO you think Clev won't give the ops, why not though? What else doews this team have to do but throw the ball? The running game has been terrible over the years and the D isn't great either. They look to be one of the worst 5 teams in the NFL in a tough division and will more than likely be behind a good bit. What is so bad about Bryant's situation in your expert opinion?
Again with the reading comprehension problems and the straw man arguments. I'll humor you though, because it really is enjoyable to see you fail to understand things that are obvious. I've already said I like him as a player. I've also said his situation is very bad, limiting his potential, which outweighs his personal talent. Why would I compare him to a WR2 for fantasy purposes? Because that's the kind of ceiling I need to draft a wr in the first 10 rounds. Looking for potential starters at WR, if they don't have at least a WR2 ceiling, they're really not worth much for FF purposes. It's a very simple, initial litmus test. You should like that since it's simple. Kinda like the arguments I made last year to you about why Shaun Alexander should be drafted higher and would perform better than Clinton Portis (remember that?) - they were simple and correct. Yet you still managed to fail to comprehend. Oh well I tried to help, just like I am here.Why does he have such low upside? Well you've already mentioned he's on one of the worst NFL teams this year. And that they play in a very tough division, against some very tough defenses. That's a start. They're offensive line isn't very good. The running game is suspect. The quarterback is very below average and a system quarterback who's only ever had success when the rest of the team was near bullet proof. The guy who would draw coverage from Bryant on the other side will likely be a rookie, not getting tons of respect, making Bryant the first and probably only concern of defensive coordinators. Then there's Bryant's own chequered past. Do I need to continue? Well, just in case Cleveland's offense was 5th to last overall last year, and I think they may have gotten worse this year - they certainly haven't gotten any better. The pieces don't seem to be in place for Antonio to do much better than a 15th round pick. I know, call me crazy.
I single this quote out because it's just plain hillarious:
"Saying he is only worth a pick in the 16th round is very harsh of nearly any player. "
It's funny for so many reasons.