Ajayi, Royce Freeman, Lat Murray. 12 teamer, 8th pick and took Gronk @ 2.05Who did you draft aside from Gordon?
I reached early for Adams as he was just getting carries before their bye. Scooped up Jackson earlier than non Gordon owners would want to after his initial carries because everyone figured the rostered Ekeler was the only show in town. Gus, welp right place right time in the WW. Samuels was let go just last week by the Conner owner in a necessary roster move. He's above me in the standings so his loss my gain!I would be if our #6 seed hadn’t spent $50 on his bid
you picked all of those guys off the WW in the last 5 or so weeks?
Can't disagree. It feels wrong but for me it's a small potential consolation prize for getting burned by Gronk this year.Starting Mixon, Lindsay, AP and Samuels (in TE slot) in my main Yahoo league. Seems cheesy to be able to do it but whatever, it's in within the rules I guess.
Pick up Lamar Jackson and go for the FF record of 5 RBs.Unique situation to say the least. Never in my 26 years of FF have I seen it
RB - Justin Jackson (Melvin)
RB - Gus Edwards
Flex - Josh Adams
TE - Jaylen Samuels
Particularly for me in that league where i've been stuck starting such luminaries as Vance Mcdonald and Jonnu Smith at the position after losing Olsen early.Can't disagree. It feels wrong but for me it's a small potential consolation prize for getting burned by Gronk this year.
Absolutely. If it wasn't for name value, he'd be ranked as like TE14 or worse each week.I could start S. Barkley, L. Miller, Jaylen Samuels, and Ingram, but I have an opposition towards using the RB, TE designation to my benefit.
I drafted, Gronk, too. So you're saying you're going Samuels over Gronk, huh?
Yup. I took him in the second also. I'm a Jets fan so I've watched in AFC East games for years. He looks...awful.Absolutely. If it wasn't for name value, he'd be ranked as like TE14 or worse each week.
Truly awful. He's basically Jesse James without the blazing speed.Yup. I took him in the second also. I'm a Jets fan so I've watched in AFC East games for years. He looks...awful.
I've rethought this. He may very well go in my lineup. I saved the FAAB to bid on something like this and might as well take advantage of it.rockaction said:I could start S. Barkley, L. Miller, Jaylen Samuels, and Ingram, but I have an opposition towards using the RB, TE designation to my benefit.
I drafted, Gronk, too. So you're saying you're going Samuels over Gronk, huh?
100% agree. It’s a scramble replacing a decent-good back. The more on my bench, the better.Leroy Hoard said:You really can never have too many running backs.
I have 2 of the 4.... but lost out on Wilson & Samuels BB Waiver... would have started Samuels along side Chubb & Kamara.... not starting Josh Adams vs Dallas.Unique situation to say the least. Never in my 26 years of FF have I seen it
RB - Justin Jackson (Melvin)
RB - Gus Edwards
Flex - Josh Adams
TE - Jaylen Samuels
Yeah I'm thinking of flexing Gronk over Adams @ Dallas as well. That's really not a good matchup and they just haven't targeted him enough to keep him involved if that game script plays out.I have 2 of the 4.... but lost out on Wilson & Samuels BB Waiver... would have started Samuels along side Chubb & Kamara.... not starting Josh Adams vs Dallas.
PPR league so WR are more valuable (OBJ, B Cooks, D' Hopkins)
Flex = Justin Jackson & Adam Humphries
Why? He was a RB/WR/TE hybrid in college. At the combine he worked out as a TE.starting Samuels at TE feels a little like cheating. Technically not but doesn't seem right.
I feel the same way as you, so I'm not.starting Samuels at TE feels a little like cheating. Technically not but doesn't seem right.
Because he's playing running back and not Tight endWhy? He was a RB/WR/TE hybrid in college. At the combine he worked out as a TE.
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2018/3/3/17073238/jaylen-samuels-position-combine-draft-2018
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/jaylen-samuels?id=32462018-0002-5599-3042-1fab298cb54e
It's stuff like this that needs to be in his profile thread. People keep saying it's bull for him to be designated as a TE, and many of them aren't aware of his work in college or just don't care.
Moral high ground will not win you championships my friend. I mentioned that it feels "wrong" but that's only semantics. A better word would have been dirty but I'm alright with that. You are playing by the same rules as everyone else so it's all fair. If you want to put your foot down, avoid yahoo or sites that allow for a multi-position designation in the future. Don't do it to your detriment if playing Samuels betters your team.I feel the same way as you, so I'm not.
All well and good, but he really needs to adopt the nickname of Flex.Why? He was a RB/WR/TE hybrid in college. At the combine he worked out as a TE.
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2018/3/3/17073238/jaylen-samuels-position-combine-draft-2018
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/jaylen-samuels?id=32462018-0002-5599-3042-1fab298cb54e
It's stuff like this that needs to be in his profile thread. People keep saying it's bull for him to be designated as a TE, and many of them aren't aware of his work in college or just don't care.
"Flex" Samuels... you know what? I like it.All well and good, but he really needs to adopt the nickname of Flex.
Points noted. Thanks for the input, man.Moral high ground will not win you championships my friend. I mentioned that it feels "wrong" but that's only semantics. A better word would have been dirty but I'm alright with that. You are playing by the same rules as everyone else so it's all fair. If you want to put your foot down, avoid yahoo or sites that allow for a multi-position designation in the future. Don't do it to your detriment if playing Samuels betters your team.
First off there is nothing wrong if someone wants to play Samuel at TE since yahoo screwed up.Why? He was a RB/WR/TE hybrid in college. At the combine he worked out as a TE.
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2018/3/3/17073238/jaylen-samuels-position-combine-draft-2018
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/jaylen-samuels?id=32462018-0002-5599-3042-1fab298cb54e
It's stuff like this that needs to be in his profile thread. People keep saying it's bull for him to be designated as a TE, and many of them aren't aware of his work in college or just don't care.
I get that it's 14 teams, I get that it's deep but I am absolutely certain you can take a better stab than Patterson at this point. He was a thing because of NE desperation but that's not the case now.I am technically starting 6 RBs based on Yahoo designations.
WR: C. Patterson
RB: Zeke
RB: David Johnson
Flex: Cohen
Flex: Lindsay
TE: Samuel's
14 team, large roster, 3 WR sports. This is why Patterson starts.
With multiple flex spots, we can start 4 RBs or 7 WRs (6 if we start 2 TEs)I get that it's 14 teams, I get that it's deep but I am absolutely certain you can take a better stab than Patterson at this point. He was a thing because of NE desperation but that's not the case now.