What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Anyone have an ADD/ADHD child? (1 Viewer)

'Hooper31 said:
'Hooper31 said:
There are lots of varying opinions with regard to A.D.D or ADHD. You're not likely to get a very helpful "ADD is a con" opinion from a member here, but I'm willing to share this link.

David Kiersey has done a lot of work in Myers Briggs personality typing. I find his information to be credible, but I'm sure others will piss all over it because he's a blasphemer when it comes to ADD.

Do I think there are kids that are helped by ADD medication? Yes, I think so.

Do I think there are too many kids that are being drugged into submission? Yes, I think so.

Is this the correct place to have this discussion? If so, I'm willing to share what little insight I have. If not, please let me know and I won't ruin your thread.
I didn't get an answer to my question, so I'll try a new question.Would you like some alternative ideas to try before you drug your child into submission and begin to atrophy their brain?
We tried, hard, for 3.5 years. It didn't help. When your son is crying his eyes out in your arms because he can't control himself, knows that he's so different from , and so desperately wants help, you'll do anything. So what are your qualifications Hooper?

 
'Hooper31 said:
'Hooper31 said:
I didn't get an answer to my question, so I'll try a new question.
My guess the lack of response was your answer.
I didn't want to assume anything. If the OP doesn't want to discuss the possibility that ADHD is a made up pseudo-science label for something that can't be objectively tested or analyzed, then I will quietly go away.
I have to admit that before I had kids I always thought "ADHD" was code for "I'm a spolied brat with bad parents" but I can assure you it isn't. It can be objectively tested AND analyzed. We had about 20 hours of testing done by Children's Hospital & another 20 hours of testing by the SSD. Then another 2 weeks, spread over 2 months, of observation at school.
 
'Hooper31 said:
We tried, hard, for 3.5 years. It didn't help. When your son is crying his eyes out in your arms because he can't control himself, knows that he's so different from , and so desperately wants help, you'll do anything.
Sounds horribly frustrating.
So what are your qualifications Hooper?
I'm a 19 year high school teacher. I have a 13 year old daughter. I've done a lot of reading on the topic and have a lot of experience with watching children on and off of their prescribed medications. I've been asked many times to fill our evaluations of students that were being assessed as potential ADD and ADHD candidates. I've formed opinions on the topic, but tried to remain objective. I've seen both good and bad. I've known students that benefited from medications. I've know parents that have benefited from medicating their children.
Although you may be around kids that have it, you don't have any idea until you live it. Speaking for our son (we have two and our youngest is nothing like our oldest, again he also has mile Asperger's as well as severe ADHD which we are told is very rare) He always tries his hardest at school to control himself. He still has issues from time-to-time but now he has IEP people that specialize in these orders to help him. We actually moved 4 months ago (far away from everything & everyone I know & love) just to get him a school that offered students like him specialized help. It has made a dramatic difference so far.Again, until you are around a kid with ADHD 24/7 for an extended period of time, it really is hard to understand.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Hooper31 said:
I have to admit that before I had kids I always thought "ADHD" was code for "I'm a spolied brat with bad parents" but I can assure you it isn't.
Do you think there is a percentage of "I'm a spoiled brat with bad parents" cases where medication is being prescribed? If so, what percentage is it?
It can be objectively tested AND analyzed. We had about 20 hours of testing done by Children's Hospital & another 20 hours of testing by the SSD. Then another 2 weeks, spread over 2 months, of observation at school.
There is no test. This isn't like diabetes, cancer, or high blood pressure. An objective test doesn't exist. There is however giant pharmaceutical corporations out there that have some pull with regard how children are being assessed, who is doing the assessments, and how treatments are being prescribed.Again, this is controversial stuff, and unless the OP states he wants to hear dissenting opinions I won't post again in this thread.
To answer your first question, I honestly know. I don't have any friends or family (other than myself at my son's age) that have kids diagnosed with ADHD.Your second statement :lmao: , yeah, there is. Are you really saying only blood tests are valid tests? Do you test your students or just DNA test their hair?
 
'Hooper31 said:
I have to admit that before I had kids I always thought "ADHD" was code for "I'm a spolied brat with bad parents" but I can assure you it isn't.
Do you think there is a percentage of "I'm a spoiled brat with bad parents" cases where medication is being prescribed? If so, what percentage is it?
It can be objectively tested AND analyzed. We had about 20 hours of testing done by Children's Hospital & another 20 hours of testing by the SSD. Then another 2 weeks, spread over 2 months, of observation at school.
There is no test. This isn't like diabetes, cancer, or high blood pressure. An objective test doesn't exist. There is however giant pharmaceutical corporations out there that have some pull with regard how children are being assessed, who is doing the assessments, and how treatments are being prescribed.Again, this is controversial stuff, and unless the OP states he wants to hear dissenting opinions I won't post again in this thread.
I have no problem with dissenting opinions. I do believe some kids are medicated as an easy way out but I also believe some kids really do suffer from ADHD/ADD and benefit from medication. We've held off for a long time and tried other alternatives but nothing has worked. Our son is not one of many kids in the class that act up, we have been told in pre-k, kindergarted, 1st grade, and now 2nd grade that he is the worst in the class. It is starting to affect his grades and his socialization.
 
Wait, this is former mod right? You don't have any idea WTF we, and most importantly our son, goes and has been through. Or are you just ####### with me because you don't like me? My kid is sick and maybe even more so than I have ever mentioned on this board. Screw you and your "opinions". You don't have any ####### idea.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So Tourette's doesn't exist either, as it's also a neurological disorder that can't be tested other than observed diagnosis.

Someone not being able to control themselves from ticking or yelling out #### is not much different than someone not being able to stay in their seat or control their impulsivity.

 
So Tourette's doesn't exist either, as it's also a neurological disorder that can't be tested other than observed diagnosis. Someone not being able to control themselves from ticking or yelling out #### is not much different than someone not being able to stay in their seat or control their impulsivity.
You can probably throw in PTSD, major depression, autism, and a bunch of other maladies in the same bucket. Fwiw, ALL these things MAY be testable... we just don't have the technology yet.
 
'Hooper31 said:
'St. Louis Bob said:
Wait, this is Shick! right? You don't have any idea WTF we, and most importantly our son, goes and has been through. Or are you just ####### with me because you don't like me? My kid is sick and maybe even more so than I have ever mentioned on this board. Screw you and your "opinions". You don't have any ####### idea.
I'm sorry Bob, but I don't know who you are. If I did something to piss you off, or you did something to piss me off I don't remember it. That was a long time ago and I never kept a notebook.I don't know you or your kid. I wouldn't attempt to give an assessment of your situation. My apologies if you think I'm passing judgment on you. I can only testify as to what I've witnessed in my own experiences.
I don't keep a notebook but I have an excellent memory.You really don't know what you are talking about. You can find plenty of convincing articles about how vaccinations leading to Austism too. Of course Autism doesn't exist because there isn't a blood test for it.You can testify what you have witnessed, I'm telling you what I have lived through. My youngest (almost 5) has none of these issues. It isn't parenting, it's biological.
 
'Hooper31 said:
It isn't parenting, it's biological.
My apologies if you took it that I was suggesting it was parenting. I would suggest there are wonderful parents that just don't know what to do and see medication as a last gasp effort when other approaches they are aware of have been exhausted. I've had success in my class with the "Abuse it - Lose it" strategy that Kiersey discusses in the link above. I'm not suggesting that its a cure-all strategy, but its one of many.
We've tried more strategies than you can imagine. Again, coupled with Asperger's, (at the age of 3 he could run the DVD/DVR had every song on the Beatles 6 DVD set memorized & knew some of the quick keys in Excel) medication has been a God send. Psychological approaches don't work for my kid. You may have some success in your class but that doesn't translate to the home environment. Again, you honestly don't understand Autism until you live with it 24/7, day, after day, after day.
 
'Hooper31 said:
It isn't parenting, it's biological.
My apologies if you took it that I was suggesting it was parenting. I would suggest there are wonderful parents that just don't know what to do and see medication as a last gasp effort when other approaches they are aware of have been exhausted. I've had success in my class with the "Abuse it - Lose it" strategy that Kiersey discusses in the link above. I'm not suggesting that its a cure-all strategy, but its one of many.
We've tried more strategies than you can imagine. Again, coupled with Asperger's, (at the age of 3 he could run the DVD/DVR had every song on the Beatles 6 DVD set memorized & knew some of the quick keys in Excel) medication has been a God send. Psychological approaches don't work for my kid. You may have some success in your class but that doesn't translate to the home environment. Again, you honestly don't understand Autism until you live with it 24/7, day, after day, after day.
:goodposting: One reason I don't get in too deep a discussion about these issues on this board. Too many holier-than-thous and know-it-alls who really aren't any better than anyone else and who don't know jack. You're right. Until you've lived with it, you just don't get it. And, even as much as I've dealt with my own Asperger's Syndrome, my son's bipolar/ADHD issues, my step-daughter's PTSD and major depression, my ex-wife's bipolar issues, I really don't have much in the way of advice to offer anyone on any of these subjects. And believe me, I've worked with some of the best shrinks in the world on these... most professors at Harvard Medical School. About all you can do is what you think is the best thing for your own situation and try to muddle through the best you can. And it ain't easy. I have found that having a sense of humor about the day-to-day mishaps can be a big help, though.
 
'Hooper31 said:
It isn't parenting, it's biological.
My apologies if you took it that I was suggesting it was parenting. I would suggest there are wonderful parents that just don't know what to do and see medication as a last gasp effort when other approaches they are aware of have been exhausted. I've had success in my class with the "Abuse it - Lose it" strategy that Kiersey discusses in the link above. I'm not suggesting that its a cure-all strategy, but its one of many.
You know what used to be a strategy for dealing with ADD AD/HD kids? Corporal punishment...paddling, swatting, rulers on the knuckles etc and they worked...temporarily. You know why? Because the pain, the fear, and the anxiety caused basically the same chemical "rush" in the brain that stimulants do.
 
'Hooper31 said:
'Socrates11 said:
I have no problem with dissenting opinions. I do believe some kids are medicated as an easy way out but I also believe some kids really do suffer from ADHD/ADD and benefit from medication. We've held off for a long time and tried other alternatives but nothing has worked. Our son is not one of many kids in the class that act up, we have been told in pre-k, kindergarted, 1st grade, and now 2nd grade that he is the worst in the class. It is starting to affect his grades and his socialization.
I posted a link to an article above that I think is worth reading IMO. The follow up article to that one: Logical consequences. This isn't the right place to have this discussion. People are going to feel attacked and get defensive. That's never productive. If you want to discuss the two articles feel free to send me a PM.Good luck to you, Socrates11.
This article totally mischaracterizes how stimulants work for folks with ADHD. When kids that have ADHD take stimulants, they work differently than with folks who do not. While both parties will be able to stay focused for longer periods of time, kids with ADHD report feeling calm, while folks without ADHD will feel speedy, energized, or anxious. Giving a kid stimulant medication is really the best way to figure out whether or not they have ADHD. It's the best test out there. Sure kids can fake self reports, but kids without ADHD will respond to stimulants with behaviors that can be objectively observed, such as picking, nervous tics, sleeplessness, increased agitation, or aggression. If you see these behaviors or you kid says they feel "amped" or "energized", either their dosage is way off, or they don't have ADHD. That said, stimulants will still "work" for kids who do not have ADHD in the sense that they'll be able to focus for longer periods of time (just as anybody will taking uppers), and this is how these meds end up being overprescribed.

 
7 yeare old son...Focalin is wonderful...and anyone against it can bite me. His behavior, and more importantly his performance in school is night and day from pre-medication days.

 
'Hooper31 said:
If ADHD is really a brain issue that can be measured and analyzed, how do we respond to these questions:

Why is it disproportionately diagnosed and treated in the USA when compared to other nations?

Why is it disproportionately diagnosed and treated across the USA from east to west?

Why is it disproportionately diagnosed and treated in boys as opposed to girls?

Why is it disproportionately diagnosed and treated in different income brackets?

The OP is in a tough spot. He's asking for information. My assumption is that he isn't asking for moral support to back up his decisions.
Wrong again you ignoramus.
How prevalent is the disorder? Well, before we invented that inattentive type, it was around 1-3 percent. When we invented that type, we more than doubled the prevalence up to at least 7 percent or more of the population, in some cases even higher than that. Notice, by the way, that the disorder is not equi-prevalent, meaning equally prevalent across all populations. So that for somebody to come in and say, “Oh, I have a school district that I consult with and we have 10 percent of the kids in that school district with AD/HD; is that too much?” What’s your population? Do you service a military base? Why do military dependents have twice the prevalence of AD/HD?

Okay, does it occur in adults? Three to 5 percent of the adult population meets those criteria. What’s the prevalence? Depends on the type of the disorder as to the gender ratio, by the way. It’s around 3-4:1 males to females for the real AD/HD. That’s the Combined and Hyperactive [types]. It’s only 2:1 for the Inattentive type. So that females are more likely to be represented in that Inattentive type, more males tend to be in the Hyperactive-Impulsive type. You can see females with the Hyperactive or Combined type. But it’s not as much, so it’s about 4:1 that of Combined type. Put it together, you wind up with about 3:1.

Are we the only country that has it [AD/HD]? Absolutely not. Every country, every study in the world has AD/HD, so let’s get over this we have more AD/HD than anybody else in the world. No, that is not true. We identify and diagnose more than the rest of the world, because our population is more aware of this disorder and people get referred earlier and they get better assistance over here than elsewhere in the world. But the prevalence of the disorder is approximately the same around the world. It varies,to some extent, depending upon which version of the DSM you’re using and how you diagnose it. But there is no country in which AD/HD does not exist. So this idea that you may have read in the media (e.g., in Newsweek) that we have more AD/HD than the rest of the world is false. We diagnose it more often than the rest of the world.

People around the world with money who have relatives with mental illnesses bring them here. Why? Because we know more and do more research on mental illness than any other country. I’m tired of apologizing for what the United States does based on what the rest of the world does. It’s just possible that the rest of the world is not as advanced as we are in the way we treat children’s mental illness.
 
An article in Psychiatric Times (August 11, 2011), entitled, "Problems of Overdiagnosis and Overprescribing in ADHD" may be worth a read.

Continued controversy over whether ADHD is overdiagnosed and stimulants overprescribed despite much scientific data to the contrary reflects ongoing public discomfort about ADHD as a valid and legitimate disorder. For example, the public perceives that children and adults with a medical disorder should look and act sick, whereas many of the core ADHD symptoms are seen in lively, willful, and exuberant persons. Moreover, the general perception is that medications prescribed to treat illness (ie, antibiotics) are supposed to act differently in sick persons than in healthy individuals and that stimulants work the same way in children and adults to enhance sustained vigilance whether they have a diagnosis of ADHD or not. Furthermore, the definition of ADHD seems to change frequently. If the definition of ADHD keeps changing, is it a genuine medical disorder?

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence of the legitimacy of ADHD as a CNS neurobiological disorder, the general public appears confused about ADHD: is it a medical illness, a psychiatric syndrome, a mental disorder, a behavioral health disorder, a behavioral problem, a motivational problem, or a school-based learning and socialization problem?1,7,8 Doubt and confusion as to where this disorder fits into the general spectrum of illness further feeds the general perception that ADHD is a socially constructed disorder rather than a valid neurobiological disorder. This increases the publics concern that ADHD is overdiagnosed and stimulants are overprescribed.

The publics fear that ADHD is overdiagnosed and that stimulants are overprescribed is not generally supported by the current scientific research. Reasons for the continued controversy include fears of stimulant abuse and diversion, physician overprescribing, limited payer resources to support evidence-based standards of ADHD evaluation and treatment, and continuing unease as to the legitimacy of the ADHD diagnosis. Comprehensive physician ADHD evaluation practices are essential to accomplishing evidence-based stimulant prescribing and to reduce unwanted variation in stimulant prescribing rates that should, in turn, reassure the public that management is accomplished consistently and with due expertise.
fwiw, the Joseph Biederman cited in footnote 19 is the one who made the initial diagnosis of bipolar/adhd in my son. And he spent like 3 full days evaluating him. The article, on page 3, makes reference to time constraints imposed by managed care, possibly resulting in errors in diagnosing adhd. The patients seen by Biederman and his team have generally hit the bottom of the barrel, having gone through many, many shrinks without success. They come from all over the U.S. as a last resort. Many marriages get torn apart because parents do not fully understand the problems with their kid... they may wind up blaming each other for not handling the kid properly, etc. So upwards of 80% of Biederman's patients are from broken homes.. ours included. To get our son help, we wound up consenting to use him as a guinea pig in Biederman's clinical trials. So instead of managed care footing the bill for the diagnosis, it was big pharma... a BIG reason why he was able to spend 3 full days on the diagnosis - to ensure a proper diagnosis before including my son in his study. No way would managed care have paid for the time it took to make the diagnosis. At the end of the clinical trial, the question then comes up regarding continuing care for the patient... this is how we got our boy "into" the MGH system... after the trial, we continued to see highly qualified shrinks on the Biederman team on a private-pay basis.

Anyhow, take it for what it's worth.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The "H" is the easy part. Very easy to identify the ultra hyper kids, and typically you can see night and day differences with medication (as with my nephew). When it's more of a focus issue it gets tougher. I've always been in the "this is way over prescribed" mentality, and may have held back having my own son evaluated. Thought it was just typical immaturity, can't see past Friday teenage boy behavior. Procrastinating, etc. So he had a couple of rocky years and underachieved late in high school (he was young, graduated at 17) and first 2 years in college. But now he's met a girl who's into school, they study together, he gets all A's in his major (Psychology) so his focus has to be OK now.

As for growing out of it, I know a very successful 50 year old guy who just started taking meds after being diagnosed by his doc. Said focus is night and day for him. So I'm more confused than ever on the topic.

 
'Hooper31 said:
I've worked with some of the best shrinks in the world on these... most professors at Harvard Medical School.
Yeah, well Shick! is a middle school math teacher. Check and Mate.
IMO middle school teacher is more of a compliment. That's a tougher job than what I do teaching high school. If you have a problem with teachers in general, well, okay. I don't have a response to that.If ADHD is really a brain issue that can be measured and analyzed, how do we respond to these questions:Why is it disproportionately diagnosed and treated in the USA when compared to other nations?Why is it disproportionately diagnosed and treated across the USA from east to west?Why is it disproportionately diagnosed and treated in boys as opposed to girls?Why is it disproportionately diagnosed and treated in different income brackets?The OP is in a tough spot. He's asking for information. My assumption is that he isn't asking for moral support to back up his decisions.
Fibromyalgia is a disease that cannot be confirmed through definitive scientific tests, but tell sufferers it is a 'made up' disease. It is also far more common in women than men, should we assume women just can't deal with pain as well as men? Ridiculous.While there may be a very small percentage of parents who would rather medicate their child than work with them, I'd wager there is a much larger percentage of parents of 'normal' kids who take no interest in their child's education, behavior etc. For most parents it is not an easy decision to medicate your child and by no means is medicine a cure all and anyone with an ADD child fully understands this. While college kids may be faking ADD to get meds to help study for finals, a child with ADD requires intensive work even with meds. My son was diagnosed with ADD, Tourette's and mild OCD. If not for medication he'd never make it through school, and my wife & I work with him nightly on school work, weekends and vacation. I'd pay 5x the co-pay if we could give him the medicine and have him get through school like everyone else. I too am open to other's opinions, but like others have said, unless you've lived with it you have no idea.
 
'Hooper31 said:
FWIW, I get the defensive attitude. If in the same situation it would be a hot button for me as well. No one wants to be told (or even insinuated) that they might be a bad parent.

I know students on medication. IMO some parents would rather drug their kids into submission as opposed to being an active parent. I also know students that benefit from medication, but that doesn't matter. All one has to do is mention that some students shouldn't be medicated and its taken as a blanket assessment of everyone in all situations. That's not true, but that's how any commentary that doesn't make people automatically feel validated will be perceived. As sho nuff said above, the medication for his child works wonders. Is it for everyone? Would he recommend it for every kid in all situations? Of course not.

I hope people can appreciate different views. I see that Monsieur and johnnycakes shared some quotations. They're worth reading. I would advise anyone having their child assessed to read as much as you can, but be prepared to read lots of varying opinions. Further, what qualifies as a "study" to one person doesn't hold water for another. Here is the Google link for ADHD +"Studies show". If I can find a link with the words "studies show" in it, does that mean it has to be true?
Any insinuation of 'bad parenting' is extremely insulting. By no means am I claiming to be the Dr Spock of parenting,but to consider ADD a result of parenting is ignorant. I have seen plenty of 'normal' kids whose parents let them run wild. I've coached numerous youth sports teams and have witnessed numerous non-ADD kids who act like terrors because their parents let them. Yet they have no problems in school. When my son stops in the middle of a math problem to stare at his pencil point for an extended period, or needs to be tapped on the shoulder in class to 'bring him back', it wouldn't matter if I was Ward Cleaver, he needs medication.
 
'Hooper31 said:
'Hooper31 said:
drug their kids into submission
:rolleyes: Get over yourself.
Are you saying it doesn't happen? By me bringing it up does that mean that's all that's happening? is there no middle ground?
No kid on Ritalin is being "drugged into submission". This isn't Thorazine we're talking about here. I'm not saying that there can't be serious negative side effects, but shrieking about "drugging kids into submission" isn't the type of language thats going to generate any discussion.
 
'Hooper31 said:
FWIW, I get the defensive attitude.
I don't think it is defensive as much as people just think you are wrong. A bunch of anecdotal and folksy evidence isn't enough to support the strong language you've used in this thread. I'd advise you to educate yourself on this subject. From the silly questions you have posted in here in support of your position, it's very clear you don't have an understanding of ADHD or mental health in general.
 
'Hooper31 said:
FWIW, I get the defensive attitude. If in the same situation it would be a hot button for me as well. No one wants to be told (or even insinuated) that they might be a bad parent.

I know students on medication. IMO some parents would rather drug their kids into submission as opposed to being an active parent. I also know students that benefit from medication, but that doesn't matter. All one has to do is mention that some students shouldn't be medicated and its taken as a blanket assessment of everyone in all situations. That's not true, but that's how any commentary that doesn't make people automatically feel validated will be perceived. As sho nuff said above, the medication for his child works wonders. Is it for everyone? Would he recommend it for every kid in all situations? Of course not.

I hope people can appreciate different views. I see that Monsieur and johnnycakes shared some quotations. They're worth reading. I would advise anyone having their child assessed to read as much as you can, but be prepared to read lots of varying opinions. Further, what qualifies as a "study" to one person doesn't hold water for another. Here is the Google link for ADHD +"Studies show". If I can find a link with the words "studies show" in it, does that mean it has to be true?
You keep using that drug them into submission line and it only shows that you have no freaking clue what you are talking about.NONE!!!

 
I read half the posts before I wanted to puke so forwarded to a response. Your son is seven... Let him grow up the way nature intended before you make decisions. He is obviously bored crapless. The people close to education will suggest medication because it makes their job easier (this will undoubtedly ruffle feathers). I personally would not consider or think about medication until he is in 8th grade.

Our experience: In 4th grade my son's teacher swore he was ADHD. We independently had him tested and he had zero signs of it. Now he is in 7th grade and gets Bs and a couple As... no meds. My son is now the most laid back, polite, super-cool kid you will ever run into.

I would suggest you let him grow up a bit and if his "educators" can't bring the best out of him find a school that can.

GL no matter what you decide. We simply do the best we can as parents and, in the end, it just works out.

 
I read half the posts before I wanted to puke so forwarded to a response. Your son is seven... Let him grow up the way nature intended before you make decisions. He is obviously bored crapless. The people close to education will suggest medication because it makes their job easier (this will undoubtedly ruffle feathers). I personally would not consider or think about medication until he is in 8th grade.Our experience: In 4th grade my son's teacher swore he was ADHD. We independently had him tested and he had zero signs of it. Now he is in 7th grade and gets Bs and a couple As... no meds. My son is now the most laid back, polite, super-cool kid you will ever run into.I would suggest you let him grow up a bit and if his "educators" can't bring the best out of him find a school that can.GL no matter what you decide. We simply do the best we can as parents and, in the end, it just works out.
Pretty sure Hooper called dibs on being the wrongest person in this thread, guy. Ease back.
 
Looks like the dooshbaggery going on in here is sadly about as high as i expected it to be.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I read half the posts before I wanted to puke so forwarded to a response. Your son is seven... Let him grow up the way nature intended before you make decisions. He is obviously bored crapless. The people close to education will suggest medication because it makes their job easier (this will undoubtedly ruffle feathers). I personally would not consider or think about medication until he is in 8th grade.Our experience: In 4th grade my son's teacher swore he was ADHD. We independently had him tested and he had zero signs of it. Now he is in 7th grade and gets Bs and a couple As... no meds. My son is now the most laid back, polite, super-cool kid you will ever run into.I would suggest you let him grow up a bit and if his "educators" can't bring the best out of him find a school that can.GL no matter what you decide. We simply do the best we can as parents and, in the end, it just works out.
The path any child will take scholastically is well in motion by the time a student reaches eighth grade. This is ridiculous.
What is rediculous? I stated fax about our situation which will obviously shape my views about the situation. Perhaps I am wrong and can easily admit this.You stated, well, nothing of substance.Do you think Einstein would have been labeled ADHD by today's standards? How about Michelangelo? Beethoven? How abot Van Gogh? I submit one of these four needed meds but not all. I think kids need to grow up a bit before we medicate them... call me rediculous.eta: four
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I read half the posts before I wanted to puke so forwarded to a response. Your son is seven... Let him grow up the way nature intended before you make decisions. He is obviously bored crapless. The people close to education will suggest medication because it makes their job easier (this will undoubtedly ruffle feathers). I personally would not consider or think about medication until he is in 8th grade.Our experience: In 4th grade my son's teacher swore he was ADHD. We independently had him tested and he had zero signs of it. Now he is in 7th grade and gets Bs and a couple As... no meds. My son is now the most laid back, polite, super-cool kid you will ever run into.I would suggest you let him grow up a bit and if his "educators" can't bring the best out of him find a school that can.GL no matter what you decide. We simply do the best we can as parents and, in the end, it just works out.
The path any child will take scholastically is well in motion by the time a student reaches eighth grade. This is ridiculous.
What is rediculous? I stated fax about our situation which will obviously shape my views about the situation. Perhaps I am wrong and can easily admit this.You stated, well, nothing of substance.Do you think Einstein would have been labeled ADHD by today's standards? How about Michelangelo? Beethoven? How abot Van Gogh? I submit one of these four needed meds but not all. I think kids need to grow up a bit before we medicate them... call me rediculous.eta: four
Oooo- I think I get to be the one to call "strawman". Who on Earth suggested that Beethoven or Michelangelo had trouble concentrating or sitting still? Just naming random famous people really isn't relevant.The ridiculous part comes where a non-professional told you your child had ADHD, but the professionals corrected the misdiagnosis. In no fashion does this mean the diagnosis doesn't exist or that some other child needs early intervention for the best results.So get over it.
 
I read half the posts before I wanted to puke so forwarded to a response. Your son is seven... Let him grow up the way nature intended before you make decisions. He is obviously bored crapless. The people close to education will suggest medication because it makes their job easier (this will undoubtedly ruffle feathers). I personally would not consider or think about medication until he is in 8th grade.Our experience: In 4th grade my son's teacher swore he was ADHD. We independently had him tested and he had zero signs of it. Now he is in 7th grade and gets Bs and a couple As... no meds. My son is now the most laid back, polite, super-cool kid you will ever run into.I would suggest you let him grow up a bit and if his "educators" can't bring the best out of him find a school that can.GL no matter what you decide. We simply do the best we can as parents and, in the end, it just works out.
The path any child will take scholastically is well in motion by the time a student reaches eighth grade. This is ridiculous.
What is rediculous? I stated fax about our situation which will obviously shape my views about the situation. Perhaps I am wrong and can easily admit this.You stated, well, nothing of substance.Do you think Einstein would have been labeled ADHD by today's standards? How about Michelangelo? Beethoven? How abot Van Gogh? I submit one of these four needed meds but not all. I think kids need to grow up a bit before we medicate them... call me rediculous.eta: four
Your kid didn't have ADHD bud. Who knows about Einstein etc. Are you reading off some list you found on Google?I guess you have a point that you shouldn't take a teacher's diagnosis as gospel and run off to the drugstore post haste, but I don't see anyone in here doing that.I don't have children but I sympathize with those struggling to find a way to help their kids with a difficult to treat disorder. Including my own parents.If your kid is in danger of flunking out of school and being ostracized by his peers, how long do you wait for them to "grow out of it"? I am assuming parents are exercising due diligence before making the decision to medicate their kids. Obviously that is advisable in any situation. However, these medications can be a godsend for those that truly have the disorder, which your child obviously doesn't. And it's ridiculous with an "i". I learned that in fourth grade because I was able to pay attention.
Thanks for helping me make my point... you don't have children but are in here giving advice to the OP who has a gut-wrenching decision to make that you could never understand. You feel power by pointing out that I mispelled a word... congrats. My point is twofold: 1: If the OP is considering medication he should consider all information available to him (which is a ton to digest), 2: No matter what he does his son will likely turn out just fine. As parents we tend to agonize over every detail when, just perhaps, we don't have too. Only time can tell I guess.It's definitely a polarizing topic and I sympathize with the OP as the the consensus, advertising, lobbying community, etc. lead people to think medication is the best option. I totally respect those that decided to medicate, those that decided to not medicate, and those in between...its difficult to decide what to do. I also understand that medication is the best choice sometimes and have seen this work as well. I also know that the pressure to comply with what the educators feel is strong and should be considered. Good luck with your decision, OP and others facing this decision.eta: sometimes
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for helping me make my point... you don't have children but are in here giving advice to the OP who has a gut-wrenching decision to make that you could never understand.
Amd this is just plain wrong. I have no children. That doesn't mean I cannot understand or sympathise with those whose children have this problem. Are pediatricians who don't have kids unqualified? How about oncalogists who've never had cancer? I've never been enslaved, imprisoned, or tortured either. But plainly some people who have never had these experiences relate to them, or we wouldn't have organizations such as Doctors Without Borders.If all we can know about are the things we personally experienced, we are all in deep doodoo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Hooper31 said:
'proninja said:
Right, so if there are kids who it helps, what's the issue?
Sometimes the cure does more harm than good. Who are we helping here? Who benefits besides the child and in what way? Do a few Google searches for "long term effects of ritalin/adderall/focalin".
I was thinking of you as I dropped my son at the bus stop today. Before medication, it would have been impossible for him to be there at all. Now I watch, as I do every day, with a broken heart, as he has to stand far away from the group of kids because it causes him so much anxiety.
 
'Hooper31 said:
It isn't parenting, it's biological.
My apologies if you took it that I was suggesting it was parenting. I would suggest there are wonderful parents that just don't know what to do and see medication as a last gasp effort when other approaches they are aware of have been exhausted. I've had success in my class with the "Abuse it - Lose it" strategy that Kiersey discusses in the link above. I'm not suggesting that its a cure-all strategy, but its one of many.
We've tried more strategies than you can imagine. Again, coupled with Asperger's, (at the age of 3 he could run the DVD/DVR had every song on the Beatles 6 DVD set memorized & knew some of the quick keys in Excel) medication has been a God send. Psychological approaches don't work for my kid. You may have some success in your class but that doesn't translate to the home environment. Again, you honestly don't understand Autism until you live with it 24/7, day, after day, after day.
:goodposting: One reason I don't get in too deep a discussion about these issues on this board. Too many holier-than-thous and know-it-alls who really aren't any better than anyone else and who don't know jack. You're right. Until you've lived with it, you just don't get it. And, even as much as I've dealt with my own Asperger's Syndrome, my son's bipolar/ADHD issues, my step-daughter's PTSD and major depression, my ex-wife's bipolar issues, I really don't have much in the way of advice to offer anyone on any of these subjects. And believe me, I've worked with some of the best shrinks in the world on these... most professors at Harvard Medical School. About all you can do is what you think is the best thing for your own situation and try to muddle through the best you can. And it ain't easy. I have found that having a sense of humor about the day-to-day mishaps can be a big help, though.
I almost certainly have it as well. Watching my son grow up has brought back bad memories of my early childhood. Teachers like Hooper liked to classify me and others like me as just being bad kids. I was cast aside as unteachable, a trouble maker, a low life that would never amount to anything. I would like to pummel people like this. This isn't shtick.
Alzheimer's currently has no diagnotic test either. I guess it's a fake too.

A bigger bunch of nonsense I never did see.
My Grandfather faked it to his death and my grandmother isn't too far behind.
Hoop!,

Do you believe that people that give their kids medications for depression or bipolar disorder are drugging their kids in to submission as well?
Now you're just making words up. :rolleyes:
 
Hooper, you seem to be vacillating between two different stances: ADHD is a “myth” and ADHD is over-diagnosed. It can’t be both. If it isn’t “real” then it’s not over-diagnosed in some cases, it’s misdiagnosed in all cases.

And you knew exactly how this was going to go, like Mel Gibson’s dad walking into the Holocaust Museum. Pretending to be here only to offer help to the OP is bogus. You obviously have your own agenda on the topic and wanted to preach it to potential converts. Which is fine, but you can do so without constantly trying to play the “dissenting victim getting bullied” role.

You’re not getting flamed for your opinion. You’re getting flamed because you’re presenting it like a DB, have spotty facts, little credibility and offer contradictory arguments.

 
AD/HD has its biggest toll in any domain of functioning in the educational environment, and these statistics just simply bear that out. Thirty-five to 40 percent of the normal population gets a college degree. Only 5 percent of these kids will do it. Here’s another one, very telling. Nine percent of teenagers do not finish high school. Thirty-seven percent of the teens in my follow-up study with AD/HD never finish high school, even though special education is available to them. So it’s education where AD/HD really takes a toll.What’s the second-most common one [domain impacted by AD/HD]? Interpersonal relationships, as you might guess. You’ve got a hot-headed, emotional, immature, impulsive individual who says what’s on their mind. Not good. Not going to make a lot of friends. Here’s the third one [domain]:the occupational environment. AD/HD individuals change jobs more often, are seven times more likely to be fired from the job, and will not rise up the economic or employment ladder as quickly as other people without the disorder from the same neighborhood of the same IQ and the same educational level.
My contention is that most teachers do not know how to effectively deal with ADHD children. My son is now in 4th grade, and he has only had one teacher who was able to have the patience to keep him on task, and she was an absolute blessing. Unfortunately this teacher is in a huge minority of competent individuals.Public education is mostly about conformity, and these kids do not conform to the structure that is currently in place. And teachers are either too lazy, too incompetent, or they are not given the resources to be able to give these kids the attention that they need. So by and large ADHD kids are labeled as disruptive trouble makers.
 
'Hooper31 said:
Somewhere along the way I specifically advised the OP that this isn't the sort of place to get solid advice.
This is exactly what I'm referring to. The OP specifically asked for advice from those that have a child with ADHD, and that's what he's getting. Don't thread crap in here and tell everyone it's raining, that's all.

 
Haven't read just throwin in my opinion. I've taught high school special ed (mild/moderate) for several years. I've been accused of being ADD myself several times. In my experience, this stuff is over-diagnosed bigtime. I think the issue is parenting (but I think almost every issue in this world goes back to parenting).

But I also believe there are legit cases and have seen complete 180s when kids are on their meds. But also the side effects can sometimes be just as bad or worse.

It's interesting to me how many ADD/ADHD kids do not have the basics in place:

Regular exercise

Good diet

Good rest

Time management

Supportive home environment

 
Haven't read just throwin in my opinion. I've taught high school special ed (mild/moderate) for several years. I've been accused of being ADD myself several times. In my experience, this stuff is over-diagnosed bigtime. I think the issue is parenting (but I think almost every issue in this world goes back to parenting). But I also believe there are legit cases and have seen complete 180s when kids are on their meds. But also the side effects can sometimes be just as bad or worse.It's interesting to me how many ADD/ADHD kids do not have the basics in place:Regular exerciseGood dietGood restTime managementSupportive home environment
And yet there are a whole hell of a lot of kids out there that have all of those things yet still have ADD/ADHD. Why don't we concentrate on those kids instead of trying to cherry pick "over-diagnosed" and "over prescribed".
 
'Hooper31 said:
In my experience, this stuff is over-diagnosed bigtime.
HERETIC! Burn the heretic! F'in teacher.
You never answered my question, Dr. Spock.Do you think that parents who give their kids meds for depression or bipolar disorder should try other methods to get their kids to "snap out of it"? Maybe something along the lines of "abuse it and lose it". Something like "cheer up or get out" or "stop moping so there's no doping"?
 
'Hooper31 said:
In my experience, this stuff is over-diagnosed bigtime.
HERETIC! Burn the heretic! F'in teacher.
Since you want to talk teacher, and anecdotal evidence, my wife (my 8 year-old’s step-mom) has taught in a public HS for 14 years. Prior to moving in with us and living with my son (half the time), she had a very similar stance on the issue as you do. “It’s the easy way out to call a kid ADHD,” “The parents don’t work hard enough to raise their kids right,” “It didn’t exist years ago, why all of a sudden does it now?”She moved in when my son was 2 ½. By the time he was 5, SHE was the one that urged me and his mom to get him tested because she could plainly see all of the things she previously thought would “cure” kids that supposedly had ADHD just weren’t working. It was something beyond anyone’s control, especially his own. She still has students she’s cynical about that have Special Ed plans and accommodations, but because she’s lived and experienced a “true” case of it, she’s able to better deal with the kids that truly need it. Before, and she has admitted this, she probably did a disservice to a lot of kids by being ignorant to the situation they were in.
 
Haven't read just throwin in my opinion. I've taught high school special ed (mild/moderate) for several years. I've been accused of being ADD myself several times. In my experience, this stuff is over-diagnosed bigtime. I think the issue is parenting (but I think almost every issue in this world goes back to parenting). But I also believe there are legit cases and have seen complete 180s when kids are on their meds. But also the side effects can sometimes be just as bad or worse.It's interesting to me how many ADD/ADHD kids do not have the basics in place:Regular exerciseGood dietGood restTime managementSupportive home environment
And yet there are a whole hell of a lot of kids out there that have all of those things yet still have ADD/ADHD.
Really? I've yet to meet one ADD/ADHD or not.
Why don't we concentrate on those kids instead of trying to cherry pick "over-diagnosed" and "over prescribed".
I agree there. Would love to just focus on the legit cases that have tried all the non-med adjustments. Unfortunately, I don't think there are too many of those.
 
As someone that has ADD (I was diagnosed in college) I would say that the thing thay helps me the most is day to day structure and routine .. Wake up-Shower-eat same time same order every day. For a kid it should be easy. Come home from school and get right back into the schedule. Better than all the drugs they gave me. Good luck.

 
Haven't read just throwin in my opinion. I've taught high school special ed (mild/moderate) for several years. I've been accused of being ADD myself several times. In my experience, this stuff is over-diagnosed bigtime. I think the issue is parenting (but I think almost every issue in this world goes back to parenting). But I also believe there are legit cases and have seen complete 180s when kids are on their meds. But also the side effects can sometimes be just as bad or worse.It's interesting to me how many ADD/ADHD kids do not have the basics in place:Regular exerciseGood dietGood restTime managementSupportive home environment
And yet there are a whole hell of a lot of kids out there that have all of those things yet still have ADD/ADHD.
Really? I've yet to meet one ADD/ADHD or not.
Why don't we concentrate on those kids instead of trying to cherry pick "over-diagnosed" and "over prescribed".
I agree there. Would love to just focus on the legit cases that have tried all the non-med adjustments. Unfortunately, I don't think there are too many of those.
I don't agree.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top