What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Are the Vikings as bad as it seems? (1 Viewer)

Gachi

Footballguy
I haven't seen any of the games, I keep up with them on my ESPN app. How is McNabb doing as QB? His stats look pretty solid, but numbers can be deceiving. I did not expect them to be 0-4. Nor did I expect the Eagles to be 1-3 :cry: . Or the Lions to be 4-0.

What the hell happening this season?

 
I pitched a lot of fastpitch in my day and keeping the ball at or below the batters knees worked well in that game but throwing a football at your receiver's knees doesn't work but McNabb must think its the right approach.

 
Yes. The only peices they have on offense are Harvin & AP. The o-line and receiving corps are awful.

The defensive front four is okay but the linebackers aren't making many plays. And the secondary - particularly the safeties - is really bad.

And the coaching staff is outmatched.

Other than that, everything's peachy.

 
McNabb is living on short crossing routes, his accuracy has been off an on. Vikings WRs can't get open with any consistency and Berrian has no business starting. Harvin is inexplicably absent for long stretches. They don't seem to trust AD in important short yardage situations or to put the game away late. The o-line struggles in both pass and run blocking. Defensively their pass rush and run D has been great, but they're being shredded through the air. Play calling has been questionable in critical game situations. They're really bad.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No but as a Packer fan I'm loving it none the less... :hophead:
Go back to peeing in the sink at your dimly lit bar and DIAF.I love this team and this season could lead to the Viking not being able to get enough support for their stadium and move to LA. Not the time to poke the bear. TIA.
 
No but as a Packer fan I'm loving it none the less... :hophead:
Go back to peeing in the sink at your dimly lit bar and DIAF.I love this team and this season could lead to the Viking not being able to get enough support for their stadium and move to LA. Not the time to poke the bear. TIA.
That would suck. They need to get Ponder in there ASAP. I like the rivalry the Packers and Viking have had over the years going back to the Chris Doleman and John Randle days.
 
'Sabertooth said:
'griff321 said:
'Wolfpack26 said:
No but as a Packer fan I'm loving it none the less... :hophead:
Go back to peeing in the sink at your dimly lit bar and DIAF.I love this team and this season could lead to the Viking not being able to get enough support for their stadium and move to LA. Not the time to poke the bear. TIA.
That would suck. They need to get Ponder in there ASAP. I like the rivalry the Packers and Viking have had over the years going back to the Chris Doleman and John Randle days.
Thanks Sabertooth and I agree. I mean we hate each other twice a year during Vikes-Pack week, but even then banter isn't too over the top or personal. Our fans live and work together and we share much of the same personal identity and experience. Even when one team is on a tear and the other isn't we don't always like it, but we have a respect for the other team. Heck for a lot of Packer fans that are far down the list for season tickets, MN presents one of the best opportunities to see their team live.(they'll really take over the dome this year :bag: ) Even the most diehard fans would hate to see the Packers or Vikings move. At least packer fans only have to worry about loosing a good rival. I don't know if I could ever watch the NFL again if the Vikes move. :cry:
 
'griff321 said:
'Wolfpack26 said:
No but as a Packer fan I'm loving it none the less... :hophead:
Go back to peeing in the sink at your dimly lit bar and DIAF.I love this team and this season could lead to the Viking not being able to get enough support for their stadium and move to LA. Not the time to poke the bear. TIA.
:goodposting: We knew going into this season that it wasn't going to be a great year, but this is far worse than I imagined. Not a good thing for a team trying to get a new stadium whose lease runs out this year.
 
The coaching is simply terrible. AP doesnt get the ball enough, and they sit there best player outside of AP way to much. Percy should be an impact player, yet they limit him to being a part time player some weeks, makes no sense whatsoever.

 
Peterson got a decent amount of carries yesterday at least, but the defense still disappointed.

Unfortunately it sounds like Frazier is sticking with McNabb, although I can't see why. I see this team and MIA currently in the lead for the Luck sweepstakes, and the question is whether the VIkings really need him or not. With the Pack and the Lions both at 4-0 in this division, if they're thinking they still have a ton to play for, I think they're delusional. Start Ponder now, give him some time to gel, and then you know what you need to do to give people a chance to feel good about the future. Frazier, don't be a Childress.

 
Peterson got a decent amount of carries yesterday at least, but the defense still disappointed.

Unfortunately it sounds like Frazier is sticking with McNabb, although I can't see why. I see this team and MIA currently in the lead for the Luck sweepstakes, and the question is whether the VIkings really need him or not. With the Pack and the Lions both at 4-0 in this division, if they're thinking they still have a ton to play for, I think they're delusional. Start Ponder now, give him some time to gel, and then you know what you need to do to give people a chance to feel good about the future. Frazier, don't be a Childress.
Of course they do. If you're bad enough to be in a position to draft Luck that means you're bad enough to not worry about what your previous year's first round pick was.Time to blow it up and start over again - including doing the unthinkable of trading AP.

 
Peterson got a decent amount of carries yesterday at least, but the defense still disappointed.

Unfortunately it sounds like Frazier is sticking with McNabb, although I can't see why. I see this team and MIA currently in the lead for the Luck sweepstakes, and the question is whether the VIkings really need him or not. With the Pack and the Lions both at 4-0 in this division, if they're thinking they still have a ton to play for, I think they're delusional. Start Ponder now, give him some time to gel, and then you know what you need to do to give people a chance to feel good about the future. Frazier, don't be a Childress.
Of course they do. If you're bad enough to be in a position to draft Luck that means you're bad enough to not worry about what your previous year's first round pick was.Time to blow it up and start over again - including doing the unthinkable of trading AP.
You can't trade the man you just paid to be the face of your franchise.
 
'Andy Dufresne said:
Yes. The only peices they have on offense are Harvin & AP. The o-line and receiving corps are awful.

The defensive front four is okay but the linebackers aren't making many plays. And the secondary - particularly the safeties - is really bad.

And the coaching staff is outmatched.Other than that, everything's peachy.
Frazier looks like a deer in the headlights on the sideline. During the Lions game he just stood there looking confused.

 
Peterson got a decent amount of carries yesterday at least, but the defense still disappointed.

Unfortunately it sounds like Frazier is sticking with McNabb, although I can't see why. I see this team and MIA currently in the lead for the Luck sweepstakes, and the question is whether the VIkings really need him or not. With the Pack and the Lions both at 4-0 in this division, if they're thinking they still have a ton to play for, I think they're delusional. Start Ponder now, give him some time to gel, and then you know what you need to do to give people a chance to feel good about the future. Frazier, don't be a Childress.
Of course they do. If you're bad enough to be in a position to draft Luck that means you're bad enough to not worry about what your previous year's first round pick was.Time to blow it up and start over again - including doing the unthinkable of trading AP.
You can't trade the man you just paid to be the face of your franchise.
They took a decent player at #12 and aren't paying him that much money. His deal was for 4 years and $11 million dollars (all guaranteed). We all need to get out of our heads that first rounders make mega-bucks. The new CBA changed all that.He wasn't taken to be the "face of the franchise." AP's deal was a seven-year deal worth a maximum $100 million, including $36 million guaranteed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Peterson got a decent amount of carries yesterday at least, but the defense still disappointed.

Unfortunately it sounds like Frazier is sticking with McNabb, although I can't see why. I see this team and MIA currently in the lead for the Luck sweepstakes, and the question is whether the VIkings really need him or not. With the Pack and the Lions both at 4-0 in this division, if they're thinking they still have a ton to play for, I think they're delusional. Start Ponder now, give him some time to gel, and then you know what you need to do to give people a chance to feel good about the future. Frazier, don't be a Childress.
Of course they do. If you're bad enough to be in a position to draft Luck that means you're bad enough to not worry about what your previous year's first round pick was.Time to blow it up and start over again - including doing the unthinkable of trading AP.
You can't trade the man you just paid to be the face of your franchise.
They took a decent player at #12 and aren't paying him that much money. His deal was for 4 years and $11 million dollars (all guaranteed). We all need to get out of our heads that first rounders make mega-bucks. The new CBA changed all that.He wasn't taken to be the "face of the franchise." AP's deal was a seven-year deal worth a maximum $100 million, including $36 million guaranteed.
I was talking about Peterson.
 
I would say trade Jared Allen before Peterson. I give him 1-2 more losses before he insists on it anyway. At least Peterson and Harvin can made a pedestrian QB look decent- which is why McNabb is still slated to start after 0-4.

 
Peterson got a decent amount of carries yesterday at least, but the defense still disappointed.

Unfortunately it sounds like Frazier is sticking with McNabb, although I can't see why. I see this team and MIA currently in the lead for the Luck sweepstakes, and the question is whether the VIkings really need him or not. With the Pack and the Lions both at 4-0 in this division, if they're thinking they still have a ton to play for, I think they're delusional. Start Ponder now, give him some time to gel, and then you know what you need to do to give people a chance to feel good about the future. Frazier, don't be a Childress.
Of course they do. If you're bad enough to be in a position to draft Luck that means you're bad enough to not worry about what your previous year's first round pick was.Time to blow it up and start over again - including doing the unthinkable of trading AP.
You can't trade the man you just paid to be the face of your franchise.
They took a decent player at #12 and aren't paying him that much money. His deal was for 4 years and $11 million dollars (all guaranteed). We all need to get out of our heads that first rounders make mega-bucks. The new CBA changed all that.He wasn't taken to be the "face of the franchise." AP's deal was a seven-year deal worth a maximum $100 million, including $36 million guaranteed.
I was talking about Peterson.
Oh. My bad. You're right, even though I threw it out there, there's no way they'd trade him.

I think it was a mistake to give him that contract.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would say trade Jared Allen before Peterson. I give him 1-2 more losses before he insists on it anyway. At least Peterson and Harvin can made a pedestrian QB look decent- which is why McNabb is still slated to start after 0-4.
In today's NFL, I'd rather have a stud pass rusher than stud ball carrier.
 
Peterson isn't going anywhere. They'd take too big of a hit if they traded him. However, it is time to unload Jared Allen and Kevin WIlliams while they can still get first rounders for them. The Vikings are 3 years, minimum, away from real playoff contention. Those guys only have 3 or 4 good years left. It seems too logical for it to happen though.

 
I would say trade Jared Allen before Peterson. I give him 1-2 more losses before he insists on it anyway. At least Peterson and Harvin can made a pedestrian QB look decent- which is why McNabb is still slated to start after 0-4.
In today's NFL, I'd rather have a stud pass rusher than stud ball carrier.
I know that one D-bag from the STrib had Allen on the list of players on the backend of their prime. I still think he has more then a few years of high production. :shrug: maybe my man crush is clouding my vision, but he's exactly the kind of guy I want on my team on the field, in the locker room, and in the community.
 
I pitched a lot of fastpitch in my day and keeping the ball at or below the batters knees worked well in that game but throwing a football at your receiver's knees doesn't work but McNabb must think its the right approach.
I believe it would be incomplete even if the receiver caught it. The ball bounced up off the ground from 3 yards in front of the receiver. His signature throw.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top