What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Arizona at Seattle (1 Viewer)

Last edited by a moderator:
There were two holds on that run, they called the one furthest down the field of course
LOL says the guy from Zona. Don't be so biased pal or just go to Zona forum and vent.
Watch the game, kiddo. I'm just as critical of AZ as Seattle.
Kiddo? STHU I'm old enough to be your father.
Why don't you try being mature then.
And you are?

 
There were two holds on that run, they called the one furthest down the field of course
LOL says the guy from Zona. Don't be so biased pal or just go to Zona forum and vent.
Watch the game, kiddo. I'm just as critical of AZ as Seattle.
Kiddo? STHU I'm old enough to be your father.
Why don't you try being mature then.
And you are?
Yikes...drinking tequila today?

 
Well this one's pretty much over. Was worried that the crowd would be too much for Stanton. AZ better get HFA or playoffs could be rough.

 
Was hoping for a better game but the O did absolutely nothing. Will be a different story when these teams meet in AZ, Stanton was terrible today. Seattle fighting for playoff life showed up big time.

 
Was hoping for a better game but the O did absolutely nothing. Will be a different story when these teams meet in AZ, Stanton was terrible today. Seattle fighting for playoff life showed up big time.
Seattle had D going today, got almost everyone back now. Stanton did look pretty rough on a few passes but they were up in his face all game and no running game didn't help.

Hope Hawks are playing you guys for division down there in a month!

 
GroveDiesel said:
seahawk 17 said:
GroveDiesel said:
Losing Harvin totally changed the offense. They lose that guy that stretches the defense and makes them respect the pass and stay in lanes. The Seahawks haven't been the same since. Horrible mistake by them.
They didn't have Harvin last season. I know what you're saying, but can't get behind it.
They did in the playoffs and he was a huge reason they won some of those games.

And they had Tate last year too. They couldn't afford to lose Harvin after losing Tate.
Harvin played in two playoff games. 4 catches for 26 yards. 3 carries for 54 yards. 1 kick return for a TD. Oh yeah, no way they're winning without his contributions.

HUGE!

LINK

 
GroveDiesel said:
seahawk 17 said:
GroveDiesel said:
Losing Harvin totally changed the offense. They lose that guy that stretches the defense and makes them respect the pass and stay in lanes. The Seahawks haven't been the same since. Horrible mistake by them.
They didn't have Harvin last season. I know what you're saying, but can't get behind it.
They did in the playoffs and he was a huge reason they won some of those games.And they had Tate last year too. They couldn't afford to lose Harvin after losing Tate.
Harvin played in two playoff games. 4 catches for 26 yards. 3 carries for 54 yards. 1 kick return for a TD. Oh yeah, no way they're winning without his contributions.

HUGE!

LINK
Just having him out there makes the defense have to account for so much more. He's dangerous in the screen game, dangerous deep, you have to account for him on end around, etc.

If they hadn't lost Tate too, they'd probably be OK, but Seattle fans that don't think Harvin made any difference are deluding themselves.

There's a reasons Russ Wilson was upset when Harvin got traded.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top