Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Ashley Madison hacked - Start hiding everything (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Plorfu
- Start date
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
G
Guest
Guest
www.ibtimes.co.uk/john-mcafee-ashley-madison-database-stolen-by-lone-female-who-worked-avid-life-media-1516833
Fascinating analysis by John McAfee. Makes some good points. Only thing I disagree with is his assertion that only a woman would call a man a scumbag. His points about Valentines Day, difficulty in obtaining certain files, plus the spite and personal nature are excellent IMO.
Fascinating analysis by John McAfee. Makes some good points. Only thing I disagree with is his assertion that only a woman would call a man a scumbag. His points about Valentines Day, difficulty in obtaining certain files, plus the spite and personal nature are excellent IMO.
Fat Nick
Footballguy
Heard that on the radio this AM. I guess if you have only a handful of people in your zip code, there's only so many chances. Not to mention, I doubt the people in those Alaska towns need AM...they probably know everyone in the town personally. I also wonder how many folks up there even have internet.
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
I just thought the more amazing thing is that someone in the small town where I live has an account. Or, hell, in every small town besides those three.
Fat Nick
Footballguy
I'll be honest, I'm dying to see the full list so I can search my street and co-workers, and a few select individuals from my past that I always thought were "that type." I'm flat out nosy. I'd never do anything with the info. I just want to know...but I still can't find the full list.
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
Fat Nick
Footballguy
Fingers crossed...I have a feeling that won't happen simply because of all the legal pressure lately. They've been pulling search sites right and left. I'd settle for just getting the file and searching it myself, but I'm rarely online at home, and sure as #### not getting into that at work.
ChiefD
Footballguy
Sweet J
Footballguy
Fat Nick
Footballguy
Lol. I deserve that. But seriously, personal issues are not something to mess with. I've been in an awkward spot with a friend cheating on his wife before...Not a place I want to be.
moleculo
Footballguy
G
Guest
Guest
Don't know if it's a rumor, but read that a DA in Texas charged 3 people with posting information that was related to the credit card data (names, zips). What was reported is that it's a serious felony if you post private information that identifies more than 50 individuals with personal information. Certainly anything contained in credit card records is PCI data, and no bueno to post. Probably why we're not seeing these lists that everyone is looking for.
Also read "download at your leisure," but be very careful what you upload it post that contains information that can identify someone.
Also read "download at your leisure," but be very careful what you upload it post that contains information that can identify someone.
Last edited:
CBusAlex
Footballguy
"I changed the sig line on his email to link to his Ashley Madison profile. Let's see how long it takes him to notice."
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
Yes, but I don't think if name and address fall into the private information category. I don't know the answer on that.
G
Guest
Guest
I don't know either. But I think the difference is that the email addresses that were hacked are less protected than the information that was tied to credit cards, and is protected as PCI data with a whole slew of laws and regulations that are more strict and protective of privacy.
I also believe that there is a very big difference legally between saying that the email address "bigjohnson69@aol.com exists" as a record, and "bigjohnson69@aol belongs to John Smith at 123 Elm Street."
...which, is probably why there are lists to look up emails, but not to look up names or addresses.
Last edited:
Fat Nick
Footballguy
RUSF18
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
The_Man
Footballguy
One of my sister's friends (who lives in DC, and whose husband appears on the DC list) just posted this on Facebook:
She Tells Her Grandma That She’s Just Been Cheated On So Grandma Tells Her To Do ThisUgh. Not sure why she would do that publicly, unless it's to signal to her friends that she is fullly aware that her husband is on the list and they can stop telling her as she tries to figure out what to do.
She Tells Her Grandma That She’s Just Been Cheated On So Grandma Tells Her To Do ThisUgh. Not sure why she would do that publicly, unless it's to signal to her friends that she is fullly aware that her husband is on the list and they can stop telling her as she tries to figure out what to do.
Random
Footballguy
The Z Machine
Footballguy
SoylentGreen
Footballguy
Seems like the 4-5 meetups with actual females I had that came out of AM were pretty damned rare.
Loan Sharks
Not a Wolf
Man people are stupid.
It’s worth noting that those 12,108 <paid_delete> women’s accounts may represent the only true number we’ve got for women who used the site.
So, 31,000,000 men and 12,108 women, 1492 women that actually checked their messages from men. 
http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944
It’s worth noting that those 12,108 <paid_delete> women’s accounts may represent the only true number we’ve got for women who used the site.
Code:
About two-thirds of the men, or 20.2 million of them, had checked the messages in their accounts at least once. But only 1492 women had ever checked their messages.
Code:
Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created.http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944
sublimeone
Footballguy
This is the story that just keeps on giving... hackers, attempted blackmail, infidelity (or lack thereof), fraudulent business... truth is stranger than fiction indeed.
fruity pebbles
Footballguy
Best part of the story isnt even the names of the guys, i couldnt care less about that. Its the numbers that are being released. Theyve made a mint off guys with the mere illusion of women ready to put out. Kind of like a digital strip club. Basically a site of guys conversing with other guys and fake women.
It's supposed to have be posted at torrent sites and usenet now. Fairly certain you could find it if you wanted to. It's like 9GB tho.
shadyridr
Footballguy
or they did a good job tucking their balls
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
I found a list of local towns in my area:
1. West Chester - 10,691
2. Philadelphia - 8,618
3. Levittown - 6,591
4. Norristown - 4,325
5. Doylestown - 4,166
6. Pottstown - 4,049
7. Bensalem - 3,550
8. King of Prussia - 2,967
9. Downingtown - 2,826
10. Media - 2,422
11. Warminster - 2,262
12. Phoenixville - 2,226
13. Quakertown - 2,197
14. Langhorne - 2,142
15. Collegeville - 2,102
16. Exton - 1,764
17. Havertown - 1,686
18. Drexel Hill - 1,665
19. Conshohocken - 1,654
20. Upper Darby - 1,602
21. Royersford - 1,589
22. North Wales - 1,548
23. Horsham - 1,475
24. Willow Grove - 1,414
25. Glenside - 1,368
26. Marcus Hook - 1,262
27. Hatboro - 1,102
28. Clifton Heights - 1,083
29. Hatfield - 1,058
30. Broomall - 1,043
31. Lansdowne - 1,020
32. Harleysville - 1,013
33. Huntingdon Valley - 1,005
34. Plymouth Meeting - 999
35. Chestnut Hill - 801
36. Chester - 785
37. Narberth - 462
38. Haverford - 343
39. Gladwyne - 275
40. Perkiomenville - 214
41. Limerick - 169
42. Montgomeryville - 136
43. Radnor - 68
Not sure if these are true numbers or fake accounts. One example they gave was that Pottstown has a population of about 22,000 and has 4,049 members. That's 18% of residents.
1. West Chester - 10,691
2. Philadelphia - 8,618
3. Levittown - 6,591
4. Norristown - 4,325
5. Doylestown - 4,166
6. Pottstown - 4,049
7. Bensalem - 3,550
8. King of Prussia - 2,967
9. Downingtown - 2,826
10. Media - 2,422
11. Warminster - 2,262
12. Phoenixville - 2,226
13. Quakertown - 2,197
14. Langhorne - 2,142
15. Collegeville - 2,102
16. Exton - 1,764
17. Havertown - 1,686
18. Drexel Hill - 1,665
19. Conshohocken - 1,654
20. Upper Darby - 1,602
21. Royersford - 1,589
22. North Wales - 1,548
23. Horsham - 1,475
24. Willow Grove - 1,414
25. Glenside - 1,368
26. Marcus Hook - 1,262
27. Hatboro - 1,102
28. Clifton Heights - 1,083
29. Hatfield - 1,058
30. Broomall - 1,043
31. Lansdowne - 1,020
32. Harleysville - 1,013
33. Huntingdon Valley - 1,005
34. Plymouth Meeting - 999
35. Chestnut Hill - 801
36. Chester - 785
37. Narberth - 462
38. Haverford - 343
39. Gladwyne - 275
40. Perkiomenville - 214
41. Limerick - 169
42. Montgomeryville - 136
43. Radnor - 68
Not sure if these are true numbers or fake accounts. One example they gave was that Pottstown has a population of about 22,000 and has 4,049 members. That's 18% of residents.
John Bender
Footballguy
ClownCausedChaos2
Footballguy
James Daulton
Footballguy
And guys PAID for this? I call bs on 31M men. That's a huge % of the US of-age men.Loan Sharks said:Man people are stupid.
It’s worth noting that those 12,108 <paid_delete> women’s accounts may represent the only true number we’ve got for women who used the site.Code:About two-thirds of the men, or 20.2 million of them, had checked the messages in their accounts at least once. But only 1492 women had ever checked their messages.So, 31,000,000 men and 12,108 women, 1492 women that actually checked their messages from men.Code:Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created.
http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944
In fact, everything about this stupid site seems to be bs.
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
I think those numbers are for Earth, not just America.And guys PAID for this? I call bs on 31M men. That's a huge % of the US of-age men.Loan Sharks said:Man people are stupid.
It’s worth noting that those 12,108 <paid_delete> women’s accounts may represent the only true number we’ve got for women who used the site.Code:About two-thirds of the men, or 20.2 million of them, had checked the messages in their accounts at least once. But only 1492 women had ever checked their messages.So, 31,000,000 men and 12,108 women, 1492 women that actually checked their messages from men.Code:Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created.
http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944
In fact, everything about this stupid site seems to be bs.
James Daulton
Footballguy
How big could they possibly be in other countries? I'm calling BS on this whole thing!I think those numbers are for Earth, not just America.And guys PAID for this? I call bs on 31M men. That's a huge % of the US of-age men.Loan Sharks said:Man people are stupid.
It’s worth noting that those 12,108 <paid_delete> women’s accounts may represent the only true number we’ve got for women who used the site.Code:About two-thirds of the men, or 20.2 million of them, had checked the messages in their accounts at least once. But only 1492 women had ever checked their messages.So, 31,000,000 men and 12,108 women, 1492 women that actually checked their messages from men.Code:Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created.
http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944
In fact, everything about this stupid site seems to be bs.
SacramentoBob
Footballguy
SacramentoBob
Footballguy
Probably a lot of fake accounts from guys trying to hide their identity.
Fat Nick
Footballguy
Based on the NoVa list, it seems there is a high correlation between AM users and people who can't remember their user ID's or passwords. Many of the NoVa users had 2 or more accounts. I'm sure that's at play here as these aren't unique users, just unique user ID's.
G
Guest
Guest
A zip code searchable list would be interesting. 
Fat Nick
Footballguy
That's what I'm really holding out for. I don't see why it'd be so hard to do. Clearly somebody has already stripped out certain subsets by zip, so why not a search?A zip code searchable list would be interesting.
cstu
Footballguy
Just as I suspected - it was a scam site.So, 31,000,000 men and 12,108 women, 1492 women that actually checked their messages from men.
http://gizmodo.com/a...base-1725558944
RUSF18
Footballguy
Ray Karpis
Footballguy
Does anyone have a clear explanation of what the various charges represent?
I've heard about the guarantee, but what are you paying for when you see a charge of 19.99, 29.70, 68.99, 79.00?
I would be really interested to have an understanding of how the pay structure was setup.
I've heard about the guarantee, but what are you paying for when you see a charge of 19.99, 29.70, 68.99, 79.00?
I would be really interested to have an understanding of how the pay structure was setup.
matttyl
Footballguy
Funny, I read that a DA in Texas was found to have had multiple different AM profiles.
Probably not the same one, though.
sublimeone
Footballguy
Just think of all the anxious dudes out there who have been sweating this for weeks... worrying if/when an easily searchable database is available.
Leeroy Jenkins
Footballguy
So it's all guys on there? How does the site stay alive and make money?
![[icon]](/data/avatars/s/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
