What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Astrophysicists Announce Major Discovery Of Big Bang's Smoking Gun (1 Viewer)

matttyl said:
The Commish said:
matttyl said:
0% chance we have people on Mars in the next 21 years.
I thought I read somewhere that they were interviewing folks for a "one way trip" to Mars in the not to distant future :oldunsure:
They've been talking about that for years - specifically Buzz Aldrin I think. They call it "One way to Mars"....as in this is "one way to get to Mars", as well as being simply a "One way trip to Mars". The idea is that they would set up a "colony", and not have to worry about the expense and issues that would come up from having any return flight.

We're still decades away from that, though. Not sure why anyone would want to be that "one", though.
Seems closer than you think :shrug: 2023??
Where are you getting 2023 from? I just don't see a human walking on Mars in the next 21 years. While I'd love to be wrong, I don't think we're nearly that close.

The moon is a little less than a quarter of a million miles away.

Mars averages about 140 million miles away from us. That's just a little bit further.
Look at the "roadmap" link
Sounds all well and good, it really does and I'd love to be wrong. I just don't see humans walking on Mars in the next 21 years.

 
Sure they could get a person to mars, but then what? Walk around a bit and come back?

If there is any hope of establishing a base on Mars, the moon is the first logical step. It doesn't take a long time to get there, and we could work out the inevitable kinks.

Establish a permanent base on the moon, then duplicate it on Mars.

I would assume much of the knowledge that has been gained through having the ISS can be transferred to a stationary base.

 
Sure they could get a person to mars, but then what? Walk around a bit and come back?

If there is any hope of establishing a base on Mars, the moon is the first logical step. It doesn't take a long time to get there, and we could work out the inevitable kinks.

Establish a permanent base on the moon, then duplicate it on Mars.

I would assume much of the knowledge that has been gained through having the ISS can be transferred to a stationary base.
I agree that would be the preferred way to do this.

 
Sure they could get a person to mars, but then what? Walk around a bit and come back?

If there is any hope of establishing a base on Mars, the moon is the first logical step. It doesn't take a long time to get there, and we could work out the inevitable kinks.

Establish a permanent base on the moon, then duplicate it on Mars.

I would assume much of the knowledge that has been gained through having the ISS can be transferred to a stationary base.
I agree that would be the preferred way to do this.
moonbase!!!

 
Sure they could get a person to mars, but then what? Walk around a bit and come back?

If there is any hope of establishing a base on Mars, the moon is the first logical step. It doesn't take a long time to get there, and we could work out the inevitable kinks.

Establish a permanent base on the moon, then duplicate it on Mars.

I would assume much of the knowledge that has been gained through having the ISS can be transferred to a stationary base.
I don't think it quite captures the imagination the way Mars would, though. I'm in favor of both. But for the public, we've been to the moon. Selling Mars might be easier because it represents a whole new ball game. I agree that would be the preferred way to do this.
 
Sure they could get a person to mars, but then what? Walk around a bit and come back?

If there is any hope of establishing a base on Mars, the moon is the first logical step. It doesn't take a long time to get there, and we could work out the inevitable kinks.

Establish a permanent base on the moon, then duplicate it on Mars.

I would assume much of the knowledge that has been gained through having the ISS can be transferred to a stationary base.
I agree that would be the preferred way to do this.
moonbase!!!
Alpha

 
Simply put the Big Freeze Theory says in an infinitely expanding universe the stars will eventually all run out of fuel. The universe will achieve a uniform temp too cold to support life after they go out. Keep in mind we are talking about trillions of years from now.
I think that's perhaps the saddest thought there is...that if there is other intelligent life out there then it's getting further away all the time. How lonely.
Eventually the only stars we will be able to see are the ones in the Milky Way. All the rest will disappear beyond the horizon and we will truly seem to be alone in the universe.
To be fair, I don't think that you and I will be around when this occurs.
Speak for yourself. I am planning to live forever.
Well, make sure to say goodbye to Andromeda for me.
More like say hello.

 
Simply put the Big Freeze Theory says in an infinitely expanding universe the stars will eventually all run out of fuel. The universe will achieve a uniform temp too cold to support life after they go out. Keep in mind we are talking about trillions of years from now.
I think that's perhaps the saddest thought there is...that if there is other intelligent life out there then it's getting further away all the time. How lonely.
Eventually the only stars we will be able to see are the ones in the Milky Way. All the rest will disappear beyond the horizon and we will truly seem to be alone in the universe.
To be fair, I don't think that you and I will be around when this occurs.
Speak for yourself. I am planning to live forever.
Well, make sure to say goodbye to Andromeda for me.
More like say hello.
True we are on a collision course and it will be part of us before the whole horizon thing happens. I have that penned in on my 4 billion year calendar. I am thinking of having a party.

 
Simply put the Big Freeze Theory says in an infinitely expanding universe the stars will eventually all run out of fuel. The universe will achieve a uniform temp too cold to support life after they go out. Keep in mind we are talking about trillions of years from now.
I think that's perhaps the saddest thought there is...that if there is other intelligent life out there then it's getting further away all the time. How lonely.
Eventually the only stars we will be able to see are the ones in the Milky Way. All the rest will disappear beyond the horizon and we will truly seem to be alone in the universe.
To be fair, I don't think that you and I will be around when this occurs.
Speak for yourself. I am planning to live forever.
Well, make sure to say goodbye to Andromeda for me.
More like say hello.
True we are on a collision course and it will be part of us before the whole horizon thing happens. I have that penned in on my 4 billion year calendar. I am thinking of having a party.
So this is all a hoax like global warning?

 
matuski said:
NCCommish said:
jamny said:
Simply put the Big Freeze Theory says in an infinitely expanding universe the stars will eventually all run out of fuel. The universe will achieve a uniform temp too cold to support life after they go out. Keep in mind we are talking about trillions of years from now.
I think that's perhaps the saddest thought there is...that if there is other intelligent life out there then it's getting further away all the time. How lonely.
Eventually the only stars we will be able to see are the ones in the Milky Way. All the rest will disappear beyond the horizon and we will truly seem to be alone in the universe.
To be fair, I don't think that you and I will be around when this occurs.
Speak for yourself. I am planning to live forever.
Well, make sure to say goodbye to Andromeda for me.
More like say hello.
True we are on a collision course and it will be part of us before the whole horizon thing happens. I have that penned in on my 4 billion year calendar. I am thinking of having a party.
So this is all a hoax like global warning?
No. Eventually the only stars we can see will be our galaxy. It's just Andromeda will be all up in our business by then and be part of our galaxy.

 
matuski said:
NCCommish said:
jamny said:
Simply put the Big Freeze Theory says in an infinitely expanding universe the stars will eventually all run out of fuel. The universe will achieve a uniform temp too cold to support life after they go out. Keep in mind we are talking about trillions of years from now.
I think that's perhaps the saddest thought there is...that if there is other intelligent life out there then it's getting further away all the time. How lonely.
Eventually the only stars we will be able to see are the ones in the Milky Way. All the rest will disappear beyond the horizon and we will truly seem to be alone in the universe.
To be fair, I don't think that you and I will be around when this occurs.
Speak for yourself. I am planning to live forever.
Well, make sure to say goodbye to Andromeda for me.
More like say hello.
True we are on a collision course and it will be part of us before the whole horizon thing happens. I have that penned in on my 4 billion year calendar. I am thinking of having a party.
So this is all a hoax like global warning?
No. Eventually the only stars we can see will be our galaxy. It's just Andromeda will be all up in our business by then and be part of our galaxy.
That #####!

 
Just checking the estimates, it looks like the sun will evaporate all of Earth's water in about a billion years so you better stock up NCC if you want to see Andromeda up close and personal.

 
Just checking the estimates, it looks like the sun will evaporate all of Earth's water in about a billion years so you better stock up NCC if you want to see Andromeda up close and personal.
I don't plan to actually be on this planet by then. I figure by then I will be traveling the stars in my shiny new FTL cruiser.

 
Is there no actual center of the universe or have scientists not been able to calculate it? Shouldn't everything go outward from a single point?

 
Also the inflation theory includes matter moving faster than light at the moment of expansion? yes? Or is the thought the fabric of space expanded and matter came with it?

If matter was moving faster then light does this imply the speed of light is a speed limit , but one that might be diminishing as the universe expands?

 
Also the inflation theory includes matter moving faster than light at the moment of expansion? yes? Or is the thought the fabric of space expanded and matter came with it?

If matter was moving faster then light does this imply the speed of light is a speed limit , but one that might be diminishing as the universe expands?
Until the universe started to cool really physics as we know it didn't exist

 
jamny said:
Is there no actual center of the universe or have scientists not been able to calculate it? Shouldn't everything go outward from a single point?
That's what I don't get when they say that our galaxy is set to "collide" with Andromeda. Shouldn't all galaxies be moving away from one another (away from that point)?

 
jamny said:
Is there no actual center of the universe or have scientists not been able to calculate it? Shouldn't everything go outward from a single point?
That's what I don't get when they say that our galaxy is set to "collide" with Andromeda. Shouldn't all galaxies be moving away from one another (away from that point)?
Because in the case of Andromeda gravity is overcoming expansion:

"When we look at nearby galaxies, some are coming closer because of gravity, but others are moving away," says Associate Professor Charley Lineweaver from the Australian National University's Mount Stromlo Observatory.

"The Milky Way and Andromeda are part of a bunch of galaxies known as the local group which are gravitationally bound, so the forces of gravity locally, are able to overcome the expansion of the universe."

"The local group in turn is being gravitationally drawn to a bigger bunch of galaxies called the Virgo cluster at a velocity of about 500 kilometres per second."
 
bigger bunch of galaxies called the Virgo cluster at a velocity of about 500 kilometres per second."
Damn, that's pretty quick!! And it will still take billions of years or whatever for us to "collide" with them? Those kinda numbers just blow my mind.

 
bigger bunch of galaxies called the Virgo cluster at a velocity of about 500 kilometres per second."
Damn, that's pretty quick!! And it will still take billions of years or whatever for us to "collide" with them? Those kinda numbers just blow my mind.
Much, much longer for the rest of the Virgo Supercluster. I think the Andromeda "collision" is in about 3.75 billion years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bigger bunch of galaxies called the Virgo cluster at a velocity of about 500 kilometres per second."
Damn, that's pretty quick!! And it will still take billions of years or whatever for us to "collide" with them? Those kinda numbers just blow my mind.
Much, much longer for the rest of the Virgo Supercluster. I think the Andromeda "collision" is in about 3.75 billion years.
And then it will take about 2 billion more years for them to fully come together. Which will cause us to get kicked even further away from the galactic center it appears. And don't forget M31. Andromeda is dragging it along and it may get here first.

 
Interesting episode of Through the Wormhole on the Science Channel right now about dark matter and dark energy.

 
Is there no actual center of the universe or have scientists not been able to calculate it? Shouldn't everything go outward from a single point?
That's what I don't get when they say that our galaxy is set to "collide" with Andromeda. Shouldn't all galaxies be moving away from one another (away from that point)?
Everything is moving away from everything else is just on average. It doesn't strictly apply to any two particular objects at any given time -- like flies and windshields, baseballs and bats, or the Milky Way and Andromeda, etc.

 
http://astronomy.com/news/2014/04/boss-makes-the-most-precise-measurement-yet-of-the-universes-expansion

The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), the largest component of the third Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III), pioneered the use of quasars to map density variations in intergalactic gas at high redshifts, tracing the structure of the young universe. BOSS charts the history of the universe’s expansion in order to illuminate the nature of dark energy, and new measures of large-scale structure have yielded the most precise measurement of expansion since galaxies first formed.

The latest quasar results combine two separate analytical techniques. A new kind of analysis, led by physicist Andreu Font-Ribera of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, and his team, was published late last year. Analysis using a tested approach, but with far more data than before, has just been published by Timothée Delubac, of EPFL Switzerland and his team. The two analyses together establish the expansion rate at 68 kilometers per second per million light years at redshift 2.34, with an unprecedented accuracy of 2.2 percent.

“This means if we look back to the universe when it was less than a quarter of its present age, we’d see that a pair of galaxies separated by a million light years would be drifting apart at a velocity of 68 kilometers a second as the universe expands,” says Font-Ribera, a postdoctoral fellow in Berkeley Lab’s Physics Division. “The uncertainty is plus or minus only a kilometer and a half per second.” Font-Ribera presented the findings at the April 2014 meeting of the American Physical Society in Savannah, GA.

BOSS employs both galaxies and distant quasars to measure baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), a signature imprint in the way matter is distributed, resulting from conditions in the early universe. While also present in the distribution of invisible dark matter, the imprint is evident in the distribution of ordinary matter, including galaxies, quasars, and intergalactic hydrogen.

“Three years ago BOSS used 14,000 quasars to demonstrate we could make the biggest 3-D maps of the universe,” says Berkeley Lab’s David Schlegel, principal investigator of BOSS. “Two years ago, with 48,000 quasars, we first detected baryon acoustic oscillations in these maps. Now, with more than 150,000 quasars, we’ve made extremely precise measures of BAO.”

The BAO imprint corresponds to an excess of about five percent in the clustering of matter at a separation known as the BAO scale. Recent experiments, including BOSS and the Planck satellite study of the cosmic microwave background, put the BAO scale, as measured in today’s universe, at very close to 450 million light years — a “standard ruler” for measuring expansion.

BAO directly descends from pressure waves (sound waves) moving through the early universe, when particles of light and matter were inextricably entangled; 380,000 years after the big bang, the universe had cooled enough for light to go free. The cosmic microwave background radiation preserves a record of the early acoustic density peaks; these were the seeds of the subsequent BAO imprint on the distribution of matter.

Previous work from BOSS used the spectra of over a million galaxies to measure the BAO scale with a remarkable one percent accuracy. But beyond redshift 0.7 (roughly six billion light years distant), galaxies become fainter and more difficult to see. For much higher redshifts like those in the present studies, averaging 2.34, BOSS pioneered the “Lyman-alpha forest” method of using spectra from distant quasars to calculate the density of intergalactic hydrogen.

As the light from a distant quasar passes through intervening hydrogen gas, patches of greater density absorb more light. The absorption lines of neutral hydrogen in the spectrum (Lyman-alpha lines) pinpoint each dense patch by how much they are redshifted. There are so many lines in such a spectrum, in fact, that it resembles a forest — the Lyman-alpha forest.

With enough good quasar spectra close enough together, the position of the gas clouds can be mapped in three dimensions — both along the line of sight for each quasar and transversely among dense patches revealed by other quasar spectra. From these maps, scientists extract the BAO signal.

Although introduced by BOSS only a few years ago, this method of using Lyman-alpha forest data, called autocorrelation, by now seems almost traditional. The just-published autocorrelation results by Delubac and his colleagues employ the spectra of almost 140,000 carefully selected BOSS quasars.

Font-Ribera and his colleagues determine BAO using even more BOSS quasars in a different way. Quasars are young galaxies powered by massive black holes — extremely bright, extremely distant, and thus highly redshifted. Instead of comparing spectra to other spectra, Font-Ribera’s team correlated quasars themselves to the spectra of other quasars, a method called cross-correlation.

“Quasars are massive galaxies, and we expect them to be in the denser parts of the universe, where the density of the intergalactic gas should also be higher,” says Font-Ribera. “Therefor,e we expect to find more of the absorbing gas than average when we look near quasars.” The question was whether the correlation would be good enough to see the BAO imprint.

Indeed, the BAO imprint in cross-correlation was strong. Delubac and his team combined their autocorrelation results with the cross-correlation results of Font-Ribera and his team, and they converged on narrow constraints for the BAO scale. Autocorrelation and cross-correlation also converged in the precision of their measures of the universe’s expansion rate, called the Hubble parameter. At redshift 2.34, the combined measure was equivalent to 68 plus or minus 1.5 kilometers per second per million light years.

“It’s the most precise measurement of the Hubble parameter at any redshift, even better than the measurement we have from the local universe at redshift zero,” says Font-Ribera. “These results allow us to study the geometry of the universe when it was only a fourth its current age. Combined with other cosmological experiments, we can learn about dark energy and put tight constraints on the curvature of the universe — it’s very flat!”

David Schlegel remarks that when BOSS was first getting underway, the cross-correlation technique had been suggested, but “some of us were afraid it wouldn’t work. We were wrong. Our precision measures are even better than we optimistically hoped for.”

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top