Well for one it would mean inter-league games every day of the week.Peter Gammons tweeted this morning that the Astros sale will be approved in mid-November and they will move to the AL West so the leagues will have 15 teams in each.How is that supposed to work?
That's what I was worried about. That means more inter-league games. I don't like that.Well for one it would mean inter-league games every day of the week.Peter Gammons tweeted this morning that the Astros sale will be approved in mid-November and they will move to the AL West so the leagues will have 15 teams in each.How is that supposed to work?
I don't like inter-league either. But if they increase the number of inter-league games resulting in the cover of the local rivalries and also creating a balanced schedule, it would be an improvement.That's what I was worried about. That means more inter-league games. I don't like that.Well for one it would mean inter-league games every day of the week.Peter Gammons tweeted this morning that the Astros sale will be approved in mid-November and they will move to the AL West so the leagues will have 15 teams in each.How is that supposed to work?
With Houston in the tank for the next 5 years and Oak/Sea mired in suck this could upset the ALEast stranglehold on the wild card.The Silver Boot just got real.
With Houston in the tank for the next 5 years and Oak/Sea mired in suck this could upset the ALEast stranglehold on the wild card.The Silver Boot just got real.
I would love to see CC batAs long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
God no. The DH needs to be added to the NL.As long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
If he hits a rope in the alley, all the way to the track, what are the odds he gets to second base?I would love to see CC batAs long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
The few series that are major successes in inter-league ensures its survival even if we get 16 and 16.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
I've heard no way the union would approve that. 14 guys would have to play the field or find a new job.As long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
I begrudgingly accept that. I just assume that this Astros plan means more inter-league. But maybe I'm wrong. Maybe they can just spread it out over the entire season and not have more inter-league games.The few series that are major successes in inter-league ensures its survival even if we get 16 and 16.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
No it doesn't.God no. The DH needs to be added to the NL.As long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
Probably better than Ryan Howard getting to first base in game 5.If he hits a rope in the alley, all the way to the track, what are the odds he gets to second base?I would love to see CC batAs long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
Basically the avg DH makes a lot more than the avg 25th guy on the roster. So the union doesn't want fewer David Ortizes and more Don Kellies.Besides - how many more pitchers do we need to see strike out on three pitches? Or execute the exciting bunt play?The AL game is much, much better.I've heard no way the union would approve that. 14 guys would have to play the field or find a new job.As long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
Why? Not the union part - but why are you against expansion and for contraction?God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
Right, they will just spread it out over the whole year.Teams currently play 15-18 inter-league games. That doesn't have to change at all unless they choose to have all inter-league weekends.
The question would be if they try and balance the inter-league schedule.Right, they will just spread it out over the whole year.Teams currently play 15-18 inter-league games. That doesn't have to change at all unless they choose to have all inter-league weekends.
I'm skeptical about there being enough talent available to fill two more rosters.Why? Not the union part - but why are you against expansion and for contraction?God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
Mexico CityGod no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
This is an Astros threadI'm skeptical about there being enough talent available to fill two more rosters.Why? Not the union part - but why are you against expansion and for contraction?God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
doubt ESPN would care for thatTeams currently play 15-18 inter-league games. That doesn't have to change at all unless they choose to have all inter-league weekends.
But what about that exciting "double switch" that is such a key strategic move, that only happens in the NL.Basically the avg DH makes a lot more than the avg 25th guy on the roster. So the union doesn't want fewer David Ortizes and more Don Kellies.Besides - how many more pitchers do we need to see strike out on three pitches? Or execute the exciting bunt play?The AL game is much, much better.I've heard no way the union would approve that. 14 guys would have to play the field or find a new job.As long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
Just because the minors and colleges use the DH, doesn't make it right or the best thing to do.If they are both going to use the same rules I'd bet on the DH, since most minor & college teams already use it.
True, but that's what would happen if there was to be a change.Just because the minors and colleges use the DH, doesn't make it right or the best thing to do.If they are both going to use the same rules I'd bet on the DH, since most minor & college teams already use it.
By all accounts he's an excellent athlete and a solid hitterCareer .250 hitter with 3 homers and 14 RBI in 100 career ABsI would love to see CC batAs long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
How about losing Florida and Tampa?God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
Contraction in baseball has always been a bargaining chip in labor negotiations with the PA and with municipalities being shook down for new stadiums. As long as there are buyers for franchises, there's no real impetus for contraction.I think there's a more legitimate threat of this happening in the NBA since the league effectively owns the Hornets. But even in this case, I think it makes more sense to use contraction as a threat than to actually do it.How about losing Florida and Tampa?God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
No way on Florida, they just got a new stadium. It would be Oakland and Tampa Bay most likely. But even to contract those relatively inexpensive franchises would cost the other owners well north of 1 billion, maybe more than 2 billion.How about losing Florida and Tampa?God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
In. But you get to deal with the fallout from lighting the capella-signal.How about losing Florida and Tampa?God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
Livan Hernandez is of similar build (but unfortunately not of similar talent) and is a pretty good hitter. Carlos Zambrano isn't quite as fat but he's also pretty good. Come to think of it, Prince Fielder also falls into this category.Anyway, I've never understood why baseball fans in general, and NL Central fans in particular, tolerate the imbalance. Assuming all teams are equal, AL West teams have a 25% chance of winning the division and getting the automatic playoff spot that goes with that, while NL Central teams have only a 16.67% chance. It's ridiculous and MLB is the only sport that has anything like it. Now that we have interleague games they need to get rid of of it immediately.By all accounts he's an excellent athlete and a solid hitterCareer .250 hitter with 3 homers and 14 RBI in 100 career ABsI would love to see CC batAs long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
My personal favorite NL move is intentionally walking the 8th batter to get to the pitcher. Nothing like watching a team refuse to pitch to Gerardo Parra (16 IBB this season) or Daniel Descalso (9 IBB). Strategy at its finest.Basically the avg DH makes a lot more than the avg 25th guy on the roster. So the union doesn't want fewer David Ortizes and more Don Kellies.Besides - how many more pitchers do we need to see strike out on three pitches? Or execute the exciting bunt play?The AL game is much, much better.I've heard no way the union would approve that. 14 guys would have to play the field or find a new job.As long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
Yea I don't really buy that one. MLB is becoming more international by the day. Teams just put some academies in Europe. Its only a matter of time before they hit South Africa or South America. Even now - with the Latin and Asian players - I think there's plenty of talent. Especially if Cuba opens soon.I'm skeptical about there being enough talent available to fill two more rosters.Why? Not the union part - but why are you against expansion and for contraction?God no. I'd rather contract two, though obviously the union would never allow that.Overall, I get that we need balanced leagues. But it should have been resolved by adding expanding with two teams. Not having inter-league all year.
oolMy personal favorite NL move is intentionally walking the 8th batter to get to the pitcher. Nothing like watching a team refuse to pitch to Gerardo Parra (16 IBB this season) or Daniel Descalso (9 IBB). Strategy at its finest.Basically the avg DH makes a lot more than the avg 25th guy on the roster. So the union doesn't want fewer David Ortizes and more Don Kellies.Besides - how many more pitchers do we need to see strike out on three pitches? Or execute the exciting bunt play?The AL game is much, much better.I've heard no way the union would approve that. 14 guys would have to play the field or find a new job.As long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
A) I despise the DHB) The rivalry series unbalance the schedule within the divisionsC) There is no more novelty, i.e. interleague brings nothing to the tableAtleast if they do it this way we wouldn't need to have stretches where all but one series is interleague. Also, I don't get why the Astros are the team to move. The Brewers moved over in the first place, why not just ship them back, oh thats right, they're just screwing the new guy.I'd be for it.I can't really see the downside.It'd be about 1 interleague series every 2 months for most teams and they could get it done with fewer interleague games than are currently played (162 vs. 252).I don't know why people are resistant to alot of interleague play anyway.
That's probably part of it. Another part is the Astros suck right now, so you're not really affecting the balance of power like you would if you moved the Brewers.But the most "fair" reason is it just makes more sense from a geography/travel standpoint.Also, I don't get why the Astros are the team to move. The Brewers moved over in the first place, why not just ship them back, oh thats right, they're just screwing the new guy.
You mean if he doesn't stop on the way to get a red hot from the vendor?Christ, the guy sweats CriscoIf he hits a rope in the alley, all the way to the track, what are the odds he gets to second base?I would love to see CC batAs long as the DH gets abolished in the process.
Only contract Florida, let's keep Tampa because that's my gb Cappy's team.What about moving the Braves to Winnipeg? Would that help?