What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Atlanta Falcons Depth Chart (1 Viewer)

You would have noticed then that Robinson has been the most impressive of all the receivers. I think this may be Roddy's last shot to prove he can be a starting NFL WR, and the staff has seemingly already decided that Jenkins is a nice slot receiver. I like him there, he faced a lot of tough coverages as a # 1 guy, but was still probably our best receiver last year, plus he got a lot of redzone looks. Robinson could be nice value as a sleeper, he's sliding right to the back of drafts and has a huge upside if he displaces White by midseason.

 
Not surprised by this. White seemed to have a good pre-season and was targeted quite a bit by Harrington.

Whether Roddy can hold onto the starting role remains to be seen, of course.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have been monitoring the Falcons all preseason and M. Jenkins has been the starter at the WRX position. The depth chart, dated Sept. 3, now shows Roddy White at the X and Joe Horn at the Z. Jenkins backs up Horn and L. Robinson backs up White.

http://www.atlantafalcons.com/People/Roster/Depth_Chart.aspx
White will give way to Robinson at some point this season. And I wouldn't be surprised to see Robinson often in 3WR sets, over Jenkins.
 
I have been monitoring the Falcons all preseason and M. Jenkins has been the starter at the WRX position. The depth chart, dated Sept. 3, now shows Roddy White at the X and Joe Horn at the Z. Jenkins backs up Horn and L. Robinson backs up White.

http://www.atlantafalcons.com/People/Roster/Depth_Chart.aspx
White will give way to Robinson at some point this season. And I wouldn't be surprised to see Robinson often in 3WR sets, over Jenkins.
Deep league here. What do you think Robinson's upside is? Is he worth rostering now? Haven't paid much attention to the Falcons' receivers this preseason out of habit I guess.
 
Deep league here. What do you think Robinson's upside is? Is he worth rostering now? Haven't paid much attention to the Falcons' receivers this preseason out of habit I guess.
I think Robinson starts to have Value/Upside around WR7 in a 12-team redraft league.
My league starts at least 48 every week with the possibility (although highly unlikely) of as many as 60 with flex. Can any Atlanta homers provide a more concise picture of how the Falcons' receiving corp? I'd appreciate it.
 
Deep league here. What do you think Robinson's upside is? Is he worth rostering now? Haven't paid much attention to the Falcons' receivers this preseason out of habit I guess.
I think Robinson starts to have Value/Upside around WR7 in a 12-team redraft league.
My league starts at least 48 every week with the possibility (although highly unlikely) of as many as 60 with flex. Can any Atlanta homers provide a more concise picture of how the Falcons' receiving corp? I'd appreciate it.
Falcons season ticket holder here (your condolences, please). Anyway, here is how I see it.....Jenkins: The most consistent reciever last year (which isn't saying much). I like him over Roddy.White: Joey threw the ball at him in preseason more than any other receiver. He caught more balls than he did last year, but he dropped a couple of easy ones. I think the fans will get on him quickly with some drops, and his confidence will be gone. Bottom line...makes me nervous.Horn: I think he's the odd man out. I would be shocked to see him put up any numbers at all.Robinson: I dont think he will be on the field much in the first several games. I wouldnt bother drafting him.I like Jenkins the most, but I wouldn't expect big numbers out of any of these guys.....
 
Roddy has taken some heat and deserves it to a degree, but I think he's the best Wr on the team and expect him to put up the best numbers of the bunch. He's the only one that I would draft (redraft) and that would be as a late round flyer w/ some upside.

 
Deep league here. What do you think Robinson's upside is? Is he worth rostering now? Haven't paid much attention to the Falcons' receivers this preseason out of habit I guess.
I think Robinson starts to have Value/Upside around WR7 in a 12-team redraft league.
My league starts at least 48 every week with the possibility (although highly unlikely) of as many as 60 with flex. Can any Atlanta homers provide a more concise picture of how the Falcons' receiving corp? I'd appreciate it.
Falcons season ticket holder here (your condolences, please). Anyway, here is how I see it.....Jenkins: The most consistent reciever last year (which isn't saying much). I like him over Roddy.

White: Joey threw the ball at him in preseason more than any other receiver. He caught more balls than he did last year, but he dropped a couple of easy ones. I think the fans will get on him quickly with some drops, and his confidence will be gone. Bottom line...makes me nervous.

Horn: I think he's the odd man out. I would be shocked to see him put up any numbers at all.

Robinson: I dont think he will be on the field much in the first several games. I wouldnt bother drafting him.

I like Jenkins the most, but I wouldn't expect big numbers out of any of these guys.....
Thanks for the local flavor. Being desperate, I'll take the Dumb & Dumber approach in regards to White. "So You're Sayin' There's a Chance!"
 
Falcons season ticket holder here (your condolences, please). Anyway, here is how I see it.....Jenkins: The most consistent reciever last year (which isn't saying much). I like him over Roddy.White: Joey threw the ball at him in preseason more than any other receiver. He caught more balls than he did last year, but he dropped a couple of easy ones. I think the fans will get on him quickly with some drops, and his confidence will be gone. Bottom line...makes me nervous.Horn: I think he's the odd man out. I would be shocked to see him put up any numbers at all.Robinson: I dont think he will be on the field much in the first several games. I wouldnt bother drafting him.I like Jenkins the most, but I wouldn't expect big numbers out of any of these guys.....
Condolences. :shrug: Thanks for the input.
 
Another season ticket holder here:

I disagree with my fellow wallower to a certain extent. While I don't think White is aprimed for any type of superstar type season, I think Jenkins is garbage. Consider:

- With all the crap White endured, he still had 70 more receiving yards than Jenkins.

- He was not the only Falcons WR to drop passes, Jenkins most certainly had his fair share as well - just not as public as the one against New Orleans

By no means am I promoting the roster inclusion of Roddy White at this point. The jury is not only still out on the Falcons passing game, it's yet to be selected. But IMO, White holds more promise of breakout ability than Jenkins. Jenkins might be the smallest 6'5 WR in the NFL if you catch my drift.

I do like the rookie Robinson, but he got dinged up toward the end of training camp and I think he's going to have to bulk up to endure. But his natural ability is extremely promising.

 
Joe Horn could sneak up and have a very solid season.

horn has great hands unlike the others,and knows how to get open.

 
My gut says Robinson is the best WR on the team. Whether or not that will play out in the statistics this season remains to be seen.

 
Joe Horn could sneak up and have a very solid season.horn has great hands unlike the others,and knows how to get open.
I would agree with you but i cant. Horn just doesn't respect his body enough for me and I think he'll be injuried early and often. If he could learn to get what he can and get down you'll be right by a long ways. But he just leaves his feet and takes too many punishing hits for a wr for me.
 
mijatra said:
dirtywaters20 said:
Illegal Pants Downfield said:
dirtywaters20 said:
Deep league here. What do you think Robinson's upside is? Is he worth rostering now? Haven't paid much attention to the Falcons' receivers this preseason out of habit I guess.
I think Robinson starts to have Value/Upside around WR7 in a 12-team redraft league.
My league starts at least 48 every week with the possibility (although highly unlikely) of as many as 60 with flex. Can any Atlanta homers provide a more concise picture of how the Falcons' receiving corp? I'd appreciate it.
Falcons season ticket holder here (your condolences, please). Anyway, here is how I see it.....Jenkins: The most consistent reciever last year (which isn't saying much). I like him over Roddy.

White: Joey threw the ball at him in preseason more than any other receiver. He caught more balls than he did last year, but he dropped a couple of easy ones. I think the fans will get on him quickly with some drops, and his confidence will be gone. Bottom line...makes me nervous.

Horn: I think he's the odd man out. I would be shocked to see him put up any numbers at all.

Robinson: I dont think he will be on the field much in the first several games. I wouldnt bother drafting him.

I like Jenkins the most, but I wouldn't expect big numbers out of any of these guys.....
The Falcons signed Joe Horn to a 4-year 19 million dollar contract. Something tells me the Front Office and Coaching Staff dont expect him to be the odd man out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mijatra said:
dirtywaters20 said:
Illegal Pants Downfield said:
dirtywaters20 said:
Deep league here. What do you think Robinson's upside is? Is he worth rostering now? Haven't paid much attention to the Falcons' receivers this preseason out of habit I guess.
I think Robinson starts to have Value/Upside around WR7 in a 12-team redraft league.
My league starts at least 48 every week with the possibility (although highly unlikely) of as many as 60 with flex. Can any Atlanta homers provide a more concise picture of how the Falcons' receiving corp? I'd appreciate it.
Falcons season ticket holder here (your condolences, please). Anyway, here is how I see it.....Jenkins: The most consistent reciever last year (which isn't saying much). I like him over Roddy.

White: Joey threw the ball at him in preseason more than any other receiver. He caught more balls than he did last year, but he dropped a couple of easy ones. I think the fans will get on him quickly with some drops, and his confidence will be gone. Bottom line...makes me nervous.

Horn: I think he's the odd man out. I would be shocked to see him put up any numbers at all.

Robinson: I dont think he will be on the field much in the first several games. I wouldnt bother drafting him.

I like Jenkins the most, but I wouldn't expect big numbers out of any of these guys.....
The Falcons signed Joe Horn to a 4-year 19 million dollar contract. Something tells me the Front Office and Coaching Staff dont expect him to be the odd man out.
Yeah... what a weird post. By the end of the year, it will be Horn, Robinson, White, Jenkins.... in that order.
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.

 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
:thumbup:
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
Nothing to see here Switz!Long time Falcons fan here! Bobby Petrino's offense has us looking like a Mike Martz team!Joe Horn will be the #1 WR on this offense period!Michael Jenkins could be alot harder to contain as the toughest coverage corners will be on Joe Horn. Jenkins did catch 7 TD's last year.Whoever plays vs the weaker coverage (R. White and or L. Robinson) could be a pretty darn good value in this offense.
 
I have been monitoring the Falcons all preseason and M. Jenkins has been the starter at the WRX position. The depth chart, dated Sept. 3, now shows Roddy White at the X and Joe Horn at the Z. Jenkins backs up Horn and L. Robinson backs up White.

http://www.atlantafalcons.com/People/Roster/Depth_Chart.aspx
The depth chart you were looking at was probably not updated. Horn and White have been the starters all along. linkJenkins likely got the starts in the preseason for the coaches to evaluate him.

 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
 
Joe Horn will be the #1 WR on this offense period!
Brees is a far better QB than Joey. Aaron Brooks, with the Saints, was better than Joey ever was. Horn hasn't had over 700 yards in 3 years. If he's your #1 WR by the end of 07 you're in trouble.
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"

Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
Whether they feel pressure or not is not the point. Rather, the intention behind bringing in the players is what's important. Horn was never in any way brought in to be anything but the starter. Regardless of how well motivated or pressure the other WRs were by his arrival, he was going to start. You imply that the coaches really wanted Jenkins and White to start, but that's not the case.As for Robinson, he too was not brought in with the intention to pressure White or Jenkins to elevate their play. Rather he was drafted to be groomed to replace them. Whether they feel pressure or not has no bearing on the intention behind drafting him.

You clearly stated the reason Horn and Robinson were brought in was to pressure White and Jenkins, and then implied that White and Jenkins would remain the starters because they would respond to this pressure.

On the other hand, whether they feel pressure or not, the reason Horn was brought in was to start. The reason Robinson was drafted was to eventually start.

BTW, I don't think you understand debate: because that's exactly what I did in response to your post.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
I disagree. I think Horn was brought in and Robinson drafted because Jenkins/White arent who Petrino wants playing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joe Horn will be the #1 WR on this offense period!
Brees is a far better QB than Joey. Aaron Brooks, with the Saints, was better than Joey ever was. Horn hasn't had over 700 yards in 3 years. If he's your #1 WR by the end of 07 you're in trouble.
he was the #2 WR three years agohe was the #20 WR in ppg last year.he is far and away the best WR on the roster, even at 35
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"

Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
Whether they feel pressure or not is not the point. Rather, the intention behind bringing in the players is what's important. Horn was never in any way brought in to be anything but the starter. Regardless of how well motivated or pressure the other WRs were by his arrival, he was going to start. You imply that the coaches really wanted Jenkins and White to start, but that's not the case.As for Robinson, he too was not brought in with the intention to pressure White or Jenkins to elevate their play. Rather he was drafted to be groomed to replace them. Whether they feel pressure or not has no bearing on the intention behind drafting him.

You clearly stated the reason Horn and Robinson were brought in was to pressure White and Jenkins, and then implied that White and Jenkins would remain the starters because they would respond to this pressure.

On the other hand, whether they feel pressure or not, the reason Horn was brought in was to start. The reason Robinson was drafted was to eventually start.

BTW, I don't think you understand debate: because that's exactly what I did in response to your post.
you're still mixing wordshave a good night

 
Joe Horn will be the #1 WR on this offense period!
Brees is a far better QB than Joey. Aaron Brooks, with the Saints, was better than Joey ever was. Horn hasn't had over 700 yards in 3 years. If he's your #1 WR by the end of 07 you're in trouble.
he was the #2 WR three years ago
Actually #3 http://subscribers.footballguys.com/players/HornJo00-2.phpIn 2004 he was very good, your point, but mine is that it's been 3 years since he was.

he was the #20 WR in ppg last year.
When's the last time he played a full season? Do you think he'll become more or less durable with age?
he is far and away the best WR on the roster, even at 35
like I said, if he is by the end of 07, then I think they're in trouble....or probably better worded as I think that will mean the season did not go well
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
I disagree. I think Horn was brought in and Robinson drafted because Jenkins/White arent who Petrino wants playing.
so then you can link to negative quotes by Petrino about Roddy and Michael then right? Something Petrino said to make you feel that way?Here's but one quote by the GM that is positive and mentions Roddy and Michael improving:"I think our offense will be different in style," Falcons General Manager Rich McKay said. "I also believe wide receiver is the most improved position on our team, not only because of the players we added but because our returning guys worked so hard to improve during the offseason."
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"

Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
Whether they feel pressure or not is not the point. Rather, the intention behind bringing in the players is what's important. Horn was never in any way brought in to be anything but the starter. Regardless of how well motivated or pressure the other WRs were by his arrival, he was going to start. You imply that the coaches really wanted Jenkins and White to start, but that's not the case.As for Robinson, he too was not brought in with the intention to pressure White or Jenkins to elevate their play. Rather he was drafted to be groomed to replace them. Whether they feel pressure or not has no bearing on the intention behind drafting him.

You clearly stated the reason Horn and Robinson were brought in was to pressure White and Jenkins, and then implied that White and Jenkins would remain the starters because they would respond to this pressure.

On the other hand, whether they feel pressure or not, the reason Horn was brought in was to start. The reason Robinson was drafted was to eventually start.

BTW, I don't think you understand debate: because that's exactly what I did in response to your post.
You claim to know the INTENTION of the coaches? That's quite an accomplishment. In literature there is a concept called the "intentional fallacy," which is when a reader claims to know what the writer intended. Of course we never know what a writer's true intention was; we also do not know what a coaches' intention was and you don't quote the coach to support your claim. Of course, coaches lie or dissemble; but at least then you could claim you had some access to the coaches' intention. Everything you say above is complete and utter fabrication.Above, in a previous post you provide a link to an oudated article that also does not quote anyone with the team: it just asserts who the starters are. Following that kind of journalism is how a lot of people were misled about KJ and the PUP. That same kind of reporting was telling us that Mike Walker was the future starter in Jacksonville, where he now sits on the IR. Frankly, I don't see how that has more weight than the teams depth chart.

I am admittedly confused by the team's plans. I don't know what they are doing. It could be that they don't know what they are doing. But I won't claim to know what I don't know.

 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"

Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
Whether they feel pressure or not is not the point. Rather, the intention behind bringing in the players is what's important. Horn was never in any way brought in to be anything but the starter. Regardless of how well motivated or pressure the other WRs were by his arrival, he was going to start. You imply that the coaches really wanted Jenkins and White to start, but that's not the case.As for Robinson, he too was not brought in with the intention to pressure White or Jenkins to elevate their play. Rather he was drafted to be groomed to replace them. Whether they feel pressure or not has no bearing on the intention behind drafting him.

You clearly stated the reason Horn and Robinson were brought in was to pressure White and Jenkins, and then implied that White and Jenkins would remain the starters because they would respond to this pressure.

On the other hand, whether they feel pressure or not, the reason Horn was brought in was to start. The reason Robinson was drafted was to eventually start.

BTW, I don't think you understand debate: because that's exactly what I did in response to your post.
You claim to know the INTENTION of the coaches? That's quite an accomplishment. In literature there is a concept called the "intentional fallacy," which is when a reader claims to know what the writer intended. Of course we never know what a writer's true intention was; we also do not know what a coaches' intention was and you don't quote the coach to support your claim. Of course, coaches lie or dissemble; but at least then you could claim you had some access to the coaches' intention. Everything you say above is complete and utter fabrication.Above, in a previous post you provide a link to an oudated article that also does not quote anyone with the team: it just asserts who the starters are. Following that kind of journalism is how a lot of people were misled about KJ and the PUP. That same kind of reporting was telling us that Mike Walker was the future starter in Jacksonville, where he now sits on the IR. Frankly, I don't see how that has more weight than the teams depth chart.

I am admittedly confused by the team's plans. I don't know what they are doing. It could be that they don't know what they are doing. But I won't claim to know what I don't know.
:tinfoilhat:
 
Horn is the only one i want on my roster right now.
I agree. Every Falcon WR was available when I used my last pick....I took Horn. (12 man team 20 man roster) Right now the other WRs have a lot to show during game time. I had heard Joey making comments about how good Horn was during camp....Since Horn didnt get much time during preseason (why did he need it when your evaluating a bunch of guys) people forgot about him. I expect I will only use him in a Bye situation...but you never know
 
The Falcons signed Joe Horn to a 4-year 19 million dollar contract. Something tells me the Front Office and Coaching Staff dont expect him to be the odd man out.
Unfortunately NFL players often don't play out their contract. Horn got a mil this year and his salary progresses considerably higher each year ending with 4.6 mil.Personally I don't imagine he'll be 38 and earning that 4.6 mil.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
I disagree. I think Horn was brought in and Robinson drafted because Jenkins/White arent who Petrino wants playing.
so then you can link to negative quotes by Petrino about Roddy and Michael then right? Something Petrino said to make you feel that way?Here's but one quote by the GM that is positive and mentions Roddy and Michael improving:"I think our offense will be different in style," Falcons General Manager Rich McKay said. "I also believe wide receiver is the most improved position on our team, not only because of the players we added but because our returning guys worked so hard to improve during the offseason."
Have you watched an Atlanta Falcons game the past couple of seasons? Petrino need not say a word that Jenkins/White have played below par. I watch the games, no link needed to know these two players have underachieved.As for White improving, I'm not sure if he could have got any worse - there was nowhere to go but up. :thumbdown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Horn is the only one i want on my roster right now.
I agree. Every Falcon WR was available when I used my last pick....I took Horn. (12 man team 20 man roster) Right now the other WRs have a lot to show during game time. I had heard Joey making comments about how good Horn was during camp....Since Horn didnt get much time during preseason (why did he need it when your evaluating a bunch of guys) people forgot about him. I expect I will only use him in a Bye situation...but you never know
Wouldn't playing time in preseason be helpful if you were learning a new offense and getting acclimated to a new QB? This doesn't ring true to me.
 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
I disagree. I think Horn was brought in and Robinson drafted because Jenkins/White arent who Petrino wants playing.
so then you can link to negative quotes by Petrino about Roddy and Michael then right? Something Petrino said to make you feel that way?Here's but one quote by the GM that is positive and mentions Roddy and Michael improving:"I think our offense will be different in style," Falcons General Manager Rich McKay said. "I also believe wide receiver is the most improved position on our team, not only because of the players we added but because our returning guys worked so hard to improve during the offseason."
Have you watched an Atlanta Falcons game the past couple of seasons? Petrino need not say a word that Jenkins/White have played below par. I watch the games, no link needed to know these two players have underachieved.As for White improving, I'm not sure if he could have got any worse - there was nowhere to go but up. ;)
You do realize my initial post says they weren't getting it done, right?
 
Here we go, just so we can officially end this......

Roddy White was formally named a starter on Thursday.

White and Joe Horn will come out when Atlanta uses its two receiver set. Michael Jenkins is the slot and third receiver, as expected. Rookie Laurent Robinson and special teamer Adam Jennings round out the depth chart

Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution Sep. 6 - 4:21 pm et

 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"

Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
Whether they feel pressure or not is not the point. Rather, the intention behind bringing in the players is what's important. Horn was never in any way brought in to be anything but the starter. Regardless of how well motivated or pressure the other WRs were by his arrival, he was going to start. You imply that the coaches really wanted Jenkins and White to start, but that's not the case.As for Robinson, he too was not brought in with the intention to pressure White or Jenkins to elevate their play. Rather he was drafted to be groomed to replace them. Whether they feel pressure or not has no bearing on the intention behind drafting him.

You clearly stated the reason Horn and Robinson were brought in was to pressure White and Jenkins, and then implied that White and Jenkins would remain the starters because they would respond to this pressure.

On the other hand, whether they feel pressure or not, the reason Horn was brought in was to start. The reason Robinson was drafted was to eventually start.

BTW, I don't think you understand debate: because that's exactly what I did in response to your post.
you're still mixing wordshave a good night
No I'm NOT mixing words. Perhaps you can't make the distinction between what you said and what I said, but they were clearly very different.And, BTW, I think you meant mincing, not mixing. G'nite!

 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"

Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
Whether they feel pressure or not is not the point. Rather, the intention behind bringing in the players is what's important. Horn was never in any way brought in to be anything but the starter. Regardless of how well motivated or pressure the other WRs were by his arrival, he was going to start. You imply that the coaches really wanted Jenkins and White to start, but that's not the case.As for Robinson, he too was not brought in with the intention to pressure White or Jenkins to elevate their play. Rather he was drafted to be groomed to replace them. Whether they feel pressure or not has no bearing on the intention behind drafting him.

You clearly stated the reason Horn and Robinson were brought in was to pressure White and Jenkins, and then implied that White and Jenkins would remain the starters because they would respond to this pressure.

On the other hand, whether they feel pressure or not, the reason Horn was brought in was to start. The reason Robinson was drafted was to eventually start.

BTW, I don't think you understand debate: because that's exactly what I did in response to your post.
You claim to know the INTENTION of the coaches? That's quite an accomplishment. In literature there is a concept called the "intentional fallacy," which is when a reader claims to know what the writer intended. Of course we never know what a writer's true intention was; we also do not know what a coaches' intention was and you don't quote the coach to support your claim. Of course, coaches lie or dissemble; but at least then you could claim you had some access to the coaches' intention. Everything you say above is complete and utter fabrication.Above, in a previous post you provide a link to an oudated article that also does not quote anyone with the team: it just asserts who the starters are. Following that kind of journalism is how a lot of people were misled about KJ and the PUP. That same kind of reporting was telling us that Mike Walker was the future starter in Jacksonville, where he now sits on the IR. Frankly, I don't see how that has more weight than the teams depth chart.

I am admittedly confused by the team's plans. I don't know what they are doing. It could be that they don't know what they are doing. But I won't claim to know what I don't know.
:thumbup:
So then, are you saying the intention of bringing Horn in was anything other than for him to start?This is not an exercise in determining author intention in a piece of fiction. This is based on what coaches have stated, never mind the depth chart which is as good as coming out of the coaches mouth, and actions (which speak louder than words) taken by the organization.

Here are some Petrino quotes on Robinson

I'm not sure what made either of you want to "attack" me, but nothing I said was false, fabricated, or anything synonymous with those concepts.

 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"

Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
Whether they feel pressure or not is not the point. Rather, the intention behind bringing in the players is what's important. Horn was never in any way brought in to be anything but the starter. Regardless of how well motivated or pressure the other WRs were by his arrival, he was going to start. You imply that the coaches really wanted Jenkins and White to start, but that's not the case.As for Robinson, he too was not brought in with the intention to pressure White or Jenkins to elevate their play. Rather he was drafted to be groomed to replace them. Whether they feel pressure or not has no bearing on the intention behind drafting him.

You clearly stated the reason Horn and Robinson were brought in was to pressure White and Jenkins, and then implied that White and Jenkins would remain the starters because they would respond to this pressure.

On the other hand, whether they feel pressure or not, the reason Horn was brought in was to start. The reason Robinson was drafted was to eventually start.

BTW, I don't think you understand debate: because that's exactly what I did in response to your post.
You claim to know the INTENTION of the coaches? That's quite an accomplishment. In literature there is a concept called the "intentional fallacy," which is when a reader claims to know what the writer intended. Of course we never know what a writer's true intention was; we also do not know what a coaches' intention was and you don't quote the coach to support your claim. Of course, coaches lie or dissemble; but at least then you could claim you had some access to the coaches' intention. Everything you say above is complete and utter fabrication.Above, in a previous post you provide a link to an oudated article that also does not quote anyone with the team: it just asserts who the starters are. Following that kind of journalism is how a lot of people were misled about KJ and the PUP. That same kind of reporting was telling us that Mike Walker was the future starter in Jacksonville, where he now sits on the IR. Frankly, I don't see how that has more weight than the teams depth chart.

I am admittedly confused by the team's plans. I don't know what they are doing. It could be that they don't know what they are doing. But I won't claim to know what I don't know.
:hifive:
So then, are you saying the intention of bringing Horn in was anything other than for him to start?This is not an exercise in determining author intention in a piece of fiction. This is based on what coaches have stated, never mind the depth chart which is as good as coming out of the coaches mouth, and actions (which speak louder than words) taken by the organization.

Here are some Petrino quotes on Robinson

I'm not sure what made either of you want to "attack" me, but nothing I said was false, fabricated, or anything synonymous with those concepts.
I don't see anything in that link that talks about Robinson being "recruited to replace White and Jenkins." It talks about how Petrino saw him play in college, really wanted him on his team, and has worked hard to help him learn the system. I would expect that to be true of any rookie a team goes out and gets: if they haven't watched the guy and liked him why did they draft him? If they drafted him, why wouldn't they help him learn the system? It doesn't say anything about Petrino's opinion about White or Jenkins or about his future plans for the WR position.
 
I know I picked him up as soon as possible upon hearing this news. People don't realize that Atlanta is going to go vertical early and often this year, likely 550+ attempts. Even if White and Harrington aren't exactly Holt and Bulger, he should get plenty of opportunities. White is the Falcons' most talented receiver. This isn't Greg "take a" Knapp's offense anymore and Michael Vick isn't the QB, so I think whomever Atlanta's #1 WR will be (and I think it will be White) will be bargain price for a reserve WR.

 
Robinson and Horn were brought in to pressure the starters that weren't getting it done. Personally I think Roddy and Jenkins will both respond. In addition, I think Vick threw a weird ball.
Huh?Horn was brought in because he was a better WR than anyone on the roster. He's being paid better than the pre-existing WRs, which are both getting paid sub 1.5 million. Robinson was drafted, not to "put pressure" on the starters, but to replace them after grooming.
huh?sorry you disagree
It's not a matter of what I think. What do you base your claim on? Because I'm basing mine on who started in the preseason, salaries, and coaches comments.
you choose to play a word game rather than debate anythingI said "to pressure the starters" you said "not to pressure" them "but to replace them after grooming"

Well you tell me in what sport doesn't the starter feel pressure when someone was brought in to replace them?
Whether they feel pressure or not is not the point. Rather, the intention behind bringing in the players is what's important. Horn was never in any way brought in to be anything but the starter. Regardless of how well motivated or pressure the other WRs were by his arrival, he was going to start. You imply that the coaches really wanted Jenkins and White to start, but that's not the case.As for Robinson, he too was not brought in with the intention to pressure White or Jenkins to elevate their play. Rather he was drafted to be groomed to replace them. Whether they feel pressure or not has no bearing on the intention behind drafting him.

You clearly stated the reason Horn and Robinson were brought in was to pressure White and Jenkins, and then implied that White and Jenkins would remain the starters because they would respond to this pressure.

On the other hand, whether they feel pressure or not, the reason Horn was brought in was to start. The reason Robinson was drafted was to eventually start.

BTW, I don't think you understand debate: because that's exactly what I did in response to your post.
You claim to know the INTENTION of the coaches? That's quite an accomplishment. In literature there is a concept called the "intentional fallacy," which is when a reader claims to know what the writer intended. Of course we never know what a writer's true intention was; we also do not know what a coaches' intention was and you don't quote the coach to support your claim. Of course, coaches lie or dissemble; but at least then you could claim you had some access to the coaches' intention. Everything you say above is complete and utter fabrication.Above, in a previous post you provide a link to an oudated article that also does not quote anyone with the team: it just asserts who the starters are. Following that kind of journalism is how a lot of people were misled about KJ and the PUP. That same kind of reporting was telling us that Mike Walker was the future starter in Jacksonville, where he now sits on the IR. Frankly, I don't see how that has more weight than the teams depth chart.

I am admittedly confused by the team's plans. I don't know what they are doing. It could be that they don't know what they are doing. But I won't claim to know what I don't know.
:thumbup:
So then, are you saying the intention of bringing Horn in was anything other than for him to start?This is not an exercise in determining author intention in a piece of fiction. This is based on what coaches have stated, never mind the depth chart which is as good as coming out of the coaches mouth, and actions (which speak louder than words) taken by the organization.

Here are some Petrino quotes on Robinson

I'm not sure what made either of you want to "attack" me, but nothing I said was false, fabricated, or anything synonymous with those concepts.
Dude, let it go......all you are doing is going back and forth about who thinks they ahave the better opinion.....but as we all know opinions are like arseholes...everyone has emn, and most of em stink
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top