What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Baltimore got the wrong quarterback (1 Viewer)

FYI,

Failing a drug test in Stage 3 of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse results in a ban of not less than one year.

I'm pretty sure Carter was in Stage 3 after his failed test with the Cowboys, as he was already in the program prior to that failed test.

www.nflpa.org
How can he serve a full year suspension without serving a 4 game suspension? That can't happen.
You have already quoted (Post #66) and replied (Post #72) to a post, showing you when he served the suspension.Besides being unaware that Quincy Carter is now retired from the NFL, my bet is that you also didn't know Carter was placed in Stage 1 of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse when he entered the NFL from his College days with the Georgia Bulldogs.

But for arguments sake, let us say Carter never served the four game suspension while with the Jets.

That would mean any team signing him today, would be without Carter for at least the first quarter of the season, as he would still have to serve the four game suspension.

What team is going to sign a QB, who has been out of football for a year, has well documented difficulties with drug addiction, can't play for the first 4 games of the season and is one relapse away from a year ban?

I am sure if you had been aware of the fact that Carter had retired from the NFL and what stage of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse Carter was in, when he filed his retirement papers, you would not have even started this thread.

But now that I have made you aware of these surrounding conditions that would prevent Carter from playing at least the first four games, if not an entire season, I do not understand why you would continue with this thread? :confused:

 
FYI,

Failing a drug test in Stage 3 of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse results in a ban of not less than one year.

I'm pretty sure Carter was in Stage 3 after his failed test with the Cowboys, as he was already in the program prior to that failed test.

www.nflpa.org
How can he serve a full year suspension without serving a 4 game suspension? That can't happen.
You have already quoted (Post #66) and replied (Post #72) to a post, showing you when he served the suspension.Besides being unaware that Quincy Carter is now retired from the NFL, my bet is that you also didn't know Carter was placed in Stage 1 of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse when he entered the NFL from his College days with the Georgia Bulldogs.

But for arguments sake, let us say Carter never served the four game suspension while with the Jets.

That would mean any team signing him today, would be without Carter for at least the first quarter of the season, as he would still have to serve the four game suspension.

What team is going to sign a QB, who has been out of football for a year, has well documented difficulties with drug addiction, can't play for the first 4 games of the season and is one relapse away from a year ban?

I am sure if you had been aware of the fact that Carter had retired from the NFL and what stage of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse Carter was in, when he filed his retirement papers, you would not have even started this thread.

But now that I have made you aware of these surrounding conditions that would prevent Carter from playing at least the first four games, if not an entire season, I do not understand why you would continue with this thread? :confused:
I knew from the start of this thread that Carter is most likely (there is no proof) suspended for four games. I also knew that he had entered Stage 1 when he was drafted from Georgia. I know he has never served a four game suspension yet. You say you BELIEVE he already did because he didn't play until Week 8, yet he was on the sidelines in uniform for every game.
 
LOL, I seriously think this guy is related to Quincy carter or something. Why else would you make a name or avatar like that, and be so defensive of him?

McNair in 2005 was much better than Carter has ever been.
I have no relation to Quincy Carter, as a matter of fact I am white. I can tell by your post that you haven't seen Quincy play very much at all. In 2003, Carter had to play with Troy Hambrick at running, an offensive line that almost broke the NFL record for sacks allowed the previous year when a less mobile quarterback (Chad Hutchinson) was playing, and three receivers (Galloway, Glenn, Antonio Bryant) that were very prone to dropping balls. Despite all of this, Quincy led Dallas to the playoffs for the first time since Troy Aikman was under center. In fact, Carter is the ONLY quarterback in Dallas to go to the playoffs since Aikman retired.
Maybe this says more about how bad the boyz were rather than how "good" quincy was?
So let me get this straight. He's a bad quarterback because he took a bad team to the playoffs? :confused: I'm confused.
 
FYI,

Failing a drug test in Stage 3 of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse results in a ban of not less than one year.

I'm pretty sure Carter was in Stage 3 after his failed test with the Cowboys, as he was already in the program prior to that failed test.

www.nflpa.org
How can he serve a full year suspension without serving a 4 game suspension? That can't happen.
You have already quoted (Post #66) and replied (Post #72) to a post, showing you when he served the suspension.Besides being unaware that Quincy Carter is now retired from the NFL, my bet is that you also didn't know Carter was placed in Stage 1 of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse when he entered the NFL from his College days with the Georgia Bulldogs.

But for arguments sake, let us say Carter never served the four game suspension while with the Jets.

That would mean any team signing him today, would be without Carter for at least the first quarter of the season, as he would still have to serve the four game suspension.

What team is going to sign a QB, who has been out of football for a year, has well documented difficulties with drug addiction, can't play for the first 4 games of the season and is one relapse away from a year ban?

I am sure if you had been aware of the fact that Carter had retired from the NFL and what stage of the NFL Policy & Program For Substances of Abuse Carter was in, when he filed his retirement papers, you would not have even started this thread.

But now that I have made you aware of these surrounding conditions that would prevent Carter from playing at least the first four games, if not an entire season, I do not understand why you would continue with this thread? :confused:
I knew from the start of this thread that Carter is most likely (there is no proof) suspended for four games. I also knew that he had entered Stage 1 when he was drafted from Georgia. I know he has never served a four game suspension yet. You say you BELIEVE he already did because he didn't play until Week 8, yet he was on the sidelines in uniform for every game.
You are not making any sense here quincycarter17.If you knew Carter was to serve a four game suspension when you started this thread, then it is even more ridiculous for you to have done so, considering your opening statement is that the Ravens should have signed Carter.

The Ravens want a QB who can start week 1, not week 4, as evidenced by Ozzie trading a 4th rounder to get McNair now, instead of waiting for him to be cut July 1st.

Regardless of the above, you have still failed to address this;

"What team is going to sign a QB, who has been out of football for a year, has well documented difficulties with drug addiction, can't play for the first 4 games of the season and is one relapse away from a year ban?"

I'm sorry, but I doubt there is an NFL team / GM out there, who would be willing to take on the risk of signing Carter with all of his associated baggage. :shrug:

 
For a guy that mainly posts these :yawn: elsewhere, (on REAL threads no less)don't you (personally) find this entire thread a little ironic?

I'll have to admit though, it's like driving by a car wreck when passing this thread on the SP list. I have a hard time looking away from the carnage you are continuing to inflict upon yourself. :lmao:

At least it's entertaining, but curiously at the same time a little :X

 
Looks like the fake Quincy Carter has been "cut" by FBGs.

I'm going to read the press release to see if they are careful not to refer to a positive drug test. :D

 
Wow, you guys are right this thread is a train wreck! In case anyone missed it the Q called up the dallas sports radio stations 1310 the Ticket. I think it was the Hardline. It was about 5-10 months ago and was..., well there is no nice way to put it. He was all over the place and making no sense at all. My first thought was "Dude, take your meds". Im sure it is in the stations archives for anyone wanting to here someone making no sense. Well anyway just my :2cents:

Kevin

 
Looks like the fake Quincy Carter has been "cut" by FBGs.
Changed his screen name form quincycarter17 to 20431, then goes & gets himself 86'ed from FBGs.Besides this being a less than stellar thread, I wonder whose Cheerios he peed in?

 
Looks like the fake Quincy Carter has been "cut" by FBGs.
Changed his screen name form quincycarter17 to 20431, then goes & gets himself 86'ed from FBGs.Besides this being a less than stellar thread, I wonder whose Cheerios he peed in?
Those 20431 type memeber names usually mean someone has been banned. all I know is that he posted :yawn: on several threads including some that had pretty well thought out opinions. On one in particular several of us dropped a couple of one liners his way. When I checked back for some late night entertainment, several posts had been deleted off the thread and he had been banned. I am assuming yesterday afternoon something over the line happened. I suspect because we won't let it die naturally, this thread will go to the land of deletion before too long.

 
I'm curious to know what you have to do or say to get yourself banned. I mean, I thought he was acting like a #### putting bored smilies on other people's threads while pimping QUINCY CARTER of all frigging people in his own thread, but what's the line you don't cross?

 
I'm curious to know what you have to do or say to get yourself banned. I mean, I thought he was acting like a #### putting bored smilies on other people's threads while pimping QUINCY CARTER of all frigging people in his own thread, but what's the line you don't cross?
Actually, it could be that simple per this threadhttp://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...howtopic=177520

General Posting Stuff.

We've had a few people who post on the board with the primary reason to just incite people and then go back to their home board and brag about how many "fish" they "caught" or what they could stir up. Posters who do that and don't have anything positive to bring to the board will have their ability to post removed.

In a similar light, hijacking threads for the sole purpose of killing them is looked at the same way.

Again, I hate the fact that I even have to spell that out for people but apparently I do. And as with the avatars, there won't be any discussion or argument about it when someone goes over that line. Our moderators simply don't have the time to deal with each case and discuss it. It takes 15 seconds to disable the ability for a member to post. That is all the time they usually have to deal with it and that will be the route they go.
and maybe this one alsohttp://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...howtopic=120951

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I get Joe's rules and all, but quincycarter17 (23421...whatever) got banned for putting bored smilies in threads and being stupid about McNair/Carter? There's gotta be more to that story...

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top