Are you sure he's not the same back that finished outside the top 10 in four of his five years in the league?Time for Jamal Lewis to get a break, he's still the same back that ran for 2000 yards, he just was carrying an injury and spent the off-season in prison.
Sure, his early years were blighted by the ACL and his return from that. The 2000 yard season is the real measure of what he can achieve when healthy.Are you sure he's not the same back that finished outside the top 10 in four of his five years in the league?
| 2000 nyg | 16 | 213 1006 4.7 8 | 70 719 10.3 1 |And some guys just don't play well when they have to split time. Look at Tiki Barber.
He was healthy the entire 2000 season; he finished as RB#16. I guess his excuse for 2002 was his 2001 injury, although he had more than a year to come back, and didn't seem any stronger at the end of the season than at the beginning. And the excuse for both 2004 and 2005 is that he was injured? (He finished as RB#25 both years). So in the six years since joining the league, he has been mediocre or worse because of injury four times, mediocre once, and good once (RB#4 in his 2000-yard season; don't forget that he doesn't catch passes, so isn't as valuable as other comparable RBs). Sounds like a bad risk to me if you're giving up anything worthwhile for him.Sure, his early years were blighted by the ACL and his return from that. The 2000 yard season is the real measure of what he can achieve when healthy.Are you sure he's not the same back that finished outside the top 10 in four of his five years in the league?
I disagree. 2000 was his rookie year and 1364 yards was a pretty good start.2001 he got hurt with the ACL and missed the whole season.2002 he was clearly still recovering from the ACL2003 was the uber-year with 2000 yards2004/5 have both been down years but for good reasons such as injuryThe reasonable conclusion to draw is that when he's been healthy ie 2000 and 2003 he's been superb.If he's healthy next year, watch out!He was healthy the entire 2000 season; he finished as RB#16. I guess his excuse for 2002 was his 2001 injury, although he had more than a year to come back, and didn't seem any stronger at the end of the season than at the beginning. And the excuse for both 2004 and 2005 is that he was injured? (He finished as RB#25 both years). So in the six years since joining the league, he has been mediocre or worse because of injury four times, mediocre once, and good once (RB#4 in his 2000-yard season; don't forget that he doesn't catch passes, so isn't as valuable as other comparable RBs). Sounds like a bad risk to me if you're giving up anything worthwhile for him.
2000 yards=great. I don't think it's a fair evaluation if you minimize thatand good once (RB#4 in his 2000-yard season; don't forget that he doesn't catch passes, so isn't as valuable as other comparable RBs).
I have heard this a bunch lately, but it is simply not true. There is not more RBBC than at any other time in football history. You could far more easily argue there is less rbbc.In today's NFL every team seems to be going to a RBBC. I would hate to have both of these guys in a committee next year.
I certainly wouldn't count on it. Musa needs to stay healthy before he can even be considered in the teams long range plans.bring this one back from the grave...
Wtih Anderson and Lewis looking to carry the load this year... does musa look to be the back next year or in 2008? or is the he not on the roster....
yes, PJ Daniels, GA i think....I think Musa was re-signed and IIRC they drafted a RB too.
Same thing when he was at Georgia. Big hype coming out of high school but not sure he ever saw the field - at least not against my GatorsI certainly wouldn't count on it. Musa needs to stay healthy before he can even be considered in the teams long range plans.bring this one back from the grave...
Wtih Anderson and Lewis looking to carry the load this year... does musa look to be the back next year or in 2008? or is the he not on the roster....