jonessed
Footballguy
There must be a ton of evidence no one has heard of yet.Homicide. All officers to be charged.
Officers did not have probable cause to arrest Gray, Mosby says, was an illegal arrest.
There must be a ton of evidence no one has heard of yet.Homicide. All officers to be charged.
Officers did not have probable cause to arrest Gray, Mosby says, was an illegal arrest.
or perhaps they find the known evidence to be more compelling than you do?There must be a ton of evidence no one has heard of yet.Homicide. All officers to be charged.
Officers did not have probable cause to arrest Gray, Mosby says, was an illegal arrest.
All six officers for murder?or perhaps they find the known evidence to be more compelling than you do?There must be a ton of evidence no one has heard of yet.Homicide. All officers to be charged.
Officers did not have probable cause to arrest Gray, Mosby says, was an illegal arrest.
.I could be wrong, but isn't this similar to the Tony Stewart thing? Send this to the grand jury and it won't go any further. But at least the person in charge doesn't look bad for saying the cops aren't guilty of murder.For murder?or perhaps they find the known evidence to be more compelling than you do?There must be a ton of evidence no one has heard of yet.Homicide. All officers to be charged.
Officers did not have probable cause to arrest Gray, Mosby says, was an illegal arrest..
if there's probable cause why not?All six officers for murder?or perhaps they find the known evidence to be more compelling than you do?There must be a ton of evidence no one has heard of yet.Homicide. All officers to be charged.
Officers did not have probable cause to arrest Gray, Mosby says, was an illegal arrest..
Just want to mention that I appreciated it. I (and I assume many others) were counting on this thread for updates.Ok, no more live reTweeting for me - sorry if that was spammy
So they must be going with the driver broke his spine on purpose with the rough ride? That seems impossible to prove.The_Man said:2nd Degree homicide for the driver, manslaughter and assault for the others
Should be a successories poster with a shot of bunk and mcnulty boozin by the railroad track.Baloney Sandwich said:I don't want to be a product of my environment. I want my environment to be a product of me.Apple Jack said:Of course not, but we are products of our environment to a large degree, especially attimschochet said:I'm waiting for my man...
Heroin dealers are not exactly my idea of the best our society have to offer. But neither they, no anyone else, deserve to die unlawfully at the
hands of police.
young ages, and that's the environment. Those of the jobs that pay. That is the way to be cool, when that is important. It's a way to have a sense of identity.
Hey, we can't all be right.Jack White said:Seems unlikely.Gary Coal Man said:Shall we place our predictions on whether Baltimore's State Attorney Marilyn Mosby will charge the officers?
I say, yes, she will. Put it in a jury's hands.
If there are charges, they will be minor. This will allow her to say, "See, I can be impartial even though I come from a cop family" while also making sure the cops can get off lightly.
Unless the other prisoner is a credible witness and says the driver took them for a rough ride, chances of a conviction of 2nd degree murder here is 0%.So they must be going with the driver broke his spine on purpose with the rough ride? That seems impossible to prove.The_Man said:2nd Degree homicide for the driver, manslaughter and assault for the others
Yep, color me surprised if not shocked. Wow.Hey, we can't all be right.Jack White said:Seems unlikely.Gary Coal Man said:Shall we place our predictions on whether Baltimore's State Attorney Marilyn Mosby will charge the officers?
I say, yes, she will. Put it in a jury's hands.
If there are charges, they will be minor. This will allow her to say, "See, I can be impartial even though I come from a cop family" while also making sure the cops can get off lightly.![]()
One of the other riders already said there was no unusual starts, stops, bumps, etc.Unless the other prisoner is a credible witness and says the driver took them for a rough ride, chances of a conviction of 2nd degree murder here is 0%.So they must be going with the driver broke his spine on purpose with the rough ride? That seems impossible to prove.The_Man said:2nd Degree homicide for the driver, manslaughter and assault for the others
Well, according to the internet Second-degree murder is ordinarily defined as: 1) an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable "heat of passion"; or 2) a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life.Unless the other prisoner is a credible witness and says the driver took them for a rough ride, chances of a conviction of 2nd degree murder here is 0%.So they must be going with the driver broke his spine on purpose with the rough ride? That seems impossible to prove.The_Man said:2nd Degree homicide for the driver, manslaughter and assault for the others
Um, you're kinda proving his point here.Apple Jack said:Says the most mocked poster in the history of the site.General Tso said:That might be the most idiotic thing you've ever said, and that's saying something. 99.9% of every heroin user is addicted and using against their own will. You've obviously never worked with drug addicts.Apple Jack said:Heroin, not heroine, use is the user's choice. Trying to justify killing corner boys because they were born into that life is asinine.![]()
I was a heroin addict for seven years. And yes, I have also "worked with drug addicts." But what would I know.
In your defense, that was a fast moving investigation and quick decision to charge immediately thereafter. I wonder if the rioters feel foolish for destroying their city in the short window in between or if they feel like they sped up the process and influenced the decision to charge.The_Man said:Mosby press conference at 10:30.
Also, word is that the Medical Examiner's report is complete. Hoping she lays out the timetable for charging decision to be made. Not going to be today, as had been the rumor earlier in the week
I don't care what she does just as long as I can keep looking at her. Hotter than the mayor IMO.Gary Coal Man said:Shall we place our predictions on whether Baltimore's State Attorney Marilyn Mosby will charge the officers?
I say, yes, she will. Put it in a jury's hands.
You are assuming the rioters have feelings.In your defense, that was a fast moving investigation and quick decision to charge immediately thereafter. I wonder if the rioters feel foolish for destroying their city in the short window in between or if they feel like they sped up the process.The_Man said:Mosby press conference at 10:30.
Also, word is that the Medical Examiner's report is complete. Hoping she lays out the timetable for charging decision to be made. Not going to be today, as had been the rumor earlier in the week
You were right, homicide!A lot of people here seem to be confusing a prosecutor's decision to bring certain charges against someone with a state's decision that the person is guilty of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. That's not how it works. This is how it's supposed to work ... and how usually does work when the person you're charging is not a cop.
Um, not really. Hint: it's not simply one or the other.Um, you're kinda proving his point here.Apple Jack said:Says the most mocked poster in the history of the site.General Tso said:That might be the most idiotic thing you've ever said, and that's saying something. 99.9% of every heroin user is addicted and using against their own will. You've obviously never worked with drug addicts.Apple Jack said:Heroin, not heroine, use is the user's choice. Trying to justify killing corner boys because they were born into that life is asinine.![]()
I was a heroin addict for seven years. And yes, I have also "worked with drug addicts." But what would I know.
Once you decide you're going to charge someone with criminal conduct you might as well throw the book at them. Like I said, that's how it would work if the alleged criminals were civilians. Refreshing to see a prosecutor actually playing the role of a prosecutor in one of these cases instead of playing judge and jury.You were right, homicide!A lot of people here seem to be confusing a prosecutor's decision to bring certain charges against someone with a state's decision that the person is guilty of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. That's not how it works. This is how it's supposed to work ... and how usually does work when the person you're charging is not a cop.
I'll be honest, I've never dealt with anyone addicted or who has even recreationally tried heroine (if that's a thing), but he's saying the vast majority of users are addicted, then you try to say he's wrong by saying "I was addicted to heroine", thus proving his point......Um, not really. Hint: it's not simply one or the other.Um, you're kinda proving his point here.Apple Jack said:Says the most mocked poster in the history of the site.General Tso said:That might be the most idiotic thing you've ever said, and that's saying something. 99.9% of every heroin user is addicted and using against their own will. You've obviously never worked with drug addicts.Apple Jack said:Heroin, not heroine, use is the user's choice. Trying to justify killing corner boys because they were born into that life is asinine.![]()
I was a heroin addict for seven years. And yes, I have also "worked with drug addicts." But what would I know.
Haven't followed which officer did what, but I would imagine you would need to prove that the driver knew that Gray wasn't buckled or restrained. If other officers forgot to buckle him, but the driver didn't know that, this seems like a tough charge, especially considering the recently modified protocol that called for all prisoners to be buckled. Of course, if the driver assisted in putting Gray in the van and therefore did know, this would become easier.Well, according to the internet Second-degree murder is ordinarily defined as: 1) an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable "heat of passion"; or 2) a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life.Unless the other prisoner is a credible witness and says the driver took them for a rough ride, chances of a conviction of 2nd degree murder here is 0%.So they must be going with the driver broke his spine on purpose with the rough ride? That seems impossible to prove.The_Man said:2nd Degree homicide for the driver, manslaughter and assault for the others
Don't think you need to prove intent for the second definition.
It took the US attorney here in New Orleans twice under much more egregious circumstances in two different cases.Once you decide you're going to charge someone with criminal conduct you might as well throw the book at them. Like I said, that's how it would work if the alleged criminals were civilians. Refreshing to see a prosecutor actually playing the role of a prosecutor in one of these cases instead of playing judge and jury.You were right, homicide!A lot of people here seem to be confusing a prosecutor's decision to bring certain charges against someone with a state's decision that the person is guilty of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. That's not how it works. This is how it's supposed to work ... and how usually does work when the person you're charging is not a cop.
Of course that does not mean they will be convicted. Eric Garner s case was declared Homicide too.You were right, homicide!A lot of people here seem to be confusing a prosecutor's decision to bring certain charges against someone with a state's decision that the person is guilty of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. That's not how it works. This is how it's supposed to work ... and how usually does work when the person you're charging is not a cop.
Using in the first place is a choice. As I said, addiction/maintenance is a whole other makeup of responsibility. But if there must be accountability, it's in letting the horse out of the barn in the first place.I'll be honest, I've never dealt with anyone addicted or who has even recreationally tried heroine (if that's a thing), but he's saying the vast majority of users are addicted, then you try to say he's wrong by saying "I was addicted to heroine", thus proving his point......Um, not really. Hint: it's not simply one or the other.Um, you're kinda proving his point here.Apple Jack said:Says the most mocked poster in the history of the site.General Tso said:That might be the most idiotic thing you've ever said, and that's saying something. 99.9% of every heroin user is addicted and using against their own will. You've obviously never worked with drug addicts.Apple Jack said:Heroin, not heroine, use is the user's choice. Trying to justify killing corner boys because they were born into that life is asinine.![]()
I was a heroin addict for seven years. And yes, I have also "worked with drug addicts." But what would I know.
You may be right that this is how it normally works when the defendants are civilians, but I don't think that's how it should work. Prosecutors shouldn't be overcharging with the intent to make a plea deal later. Such a practice would seem to be unfair to the poor, who can't afford good attorneys and have to rely on public defenders.Once you decide you're going to charge someone with criminal conduct you might as well throw the book at them. Like I said, that's how it would work if the alleged criminals were civilians. Refreshing to see a prosecutor actually playing the role of a prosecutor in one of these cases instead of playing judge and jury.
and the famous Rodney King caseOf course that does not mean they will be convicted. Eric Garner s case was declared Homicide too.You were right, homicide!A lot of people here seem to be confusing a prosecutor's decision to bring certain charges against someone with a state's decision that the person is guilty of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. That's not how it works. This is how it's supposed to work ... and how usually does work when the person you're charging is not a cop.
Union meeting?The_Man said:Wonder what all these fine gentlemen are doing on Pennsylvania Avenue this Friday morning.
Implications work both ways. I didn't imply that and I don't think it. In fact I stated the opposite (in my OP). Thanks.Apple Jack said:People he has killed? Zero.SaintsInDome2006 said:So then don't judge him, what's your estimate on his body count?Apple Jack said:Heroin, not heroine, use is the users choice to use. Trying to justify killing corner boys because they were born into that life is asinine.
Again, your implication that there was justification for his killing is pathetic.
It's the Washington Post. The story is credible.sadly, this sounds about as credible as the report yesterday that freddie gray had spinal surgury the week before.Because they were still investigating?IF this really was the case, did no one ask this prisoner before hand? And if so why not release that info earlier?
Yeah I agree. There's some gray there- you don't want them charging everything they can list despite the evidence, but you also don't want them restricting the charges only to things they feel 99% certain they can get guilty verdicts on. And obviously I can't tell exactly how much this prosecutor is reaching because I don't have all the evidence. Maybe a ton, maybe not at all.You may be right that this is how it normally works when the defendants are civilians, but I don't think that's how it should work. Prosecutors shouldn't be overcharging with the intent to make a plea deal later. Such a practice would seem to be unfair to the poor, who can't afford good attorneys and have to rely on public defenders.Once you decide you're going to charge someone with criminal conduct you might as well throw the book at them. Like I said, that's how it would work if the alleged criminals were civilians. Refreshing to see a prosecutor actually playing the role of a prosecutor in one of these cases instead of playing judge and jury.
It depends on if they have any actual evidence that "hard stops" we're involved. If they do, then I think the homicide charge would seem legit.Haven't followed which officer did what, but I would imagine you would need to prove that the driver knew that Gray wasn't buckled or restrained. If other officers forgot to buckle him, but the driver didn't know that, this seems like a tough charge, especially considering the recently modified protocol that called for all prisoners to be buckled. Of course, if the driver assisted in putting Gray in the van and therefore did know, this would become easier.Well, according to the internet Second-degree murder is ordinarily defined as: 1) an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable "heat of passion"; or 2) a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life.Unless the other prisoner is a credible witness and says the driver took them for a rough ride, chances of a conviction of 2nd degree murder here is 0%.So they must be going with the driver broke his spine on purpose with the rough ride? That seems impossible to prove.The_Man said:2nd Degree homicide for the driver, manslaughter and assault for the others
Don't think you need to prove intent for the second definition.