TobiasFunke
Footballguy
The context in which he's discussing police being killed is in response to two other columns which highlighted it as part of an argument that "police operate in an increasingly dangerous environment." He's disproving that notion. That section of the op-ed has literally nothing to do with police brutality or with rioting.I'm referring to the Blako article comparing the civil unrest in 1968 to 2015. Declining police brutality numbers are no less relevant than the declining numbers of NY police offers killed, which he talked about at length. If anything the declining police brutality numbers are more relevant to any discussion about civil unrest and their impact on policy now and during the campaign, as that is what is likely to lead to more or less civil unrest in the coming months. People don't riot over cops being killed.He spent a lot of time talking about how 5 shootings of cops in New York is less than historical figures, but fails to mention that police brutality is also down dramatically in NY this year. Only 1 person has died at the hands of an NYPD cop in the last 5 months. 1. Totally disingenuous of him not to mention that stat as well.http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/05/06/this-isnt-1968-baltimore-isnt-watts-and-hillary-clinton-isnt-michael-dukakis/Detroit-Baltimore-Chicago. Dems have owned them for what, the last 50 years? I'm sure the powers to be had good intentions, but they failed miserably. In what aspects? Mostly all of them.
IMO
This article gives some fantastic incite into how these death spirals happen to people's lives. Second half of it is more relevant to the discussion at hand. First half is some Hillary cheerleading if you can keep your breakfast down the second half is awesome.![]()
One of the better op-eds I've written in a while, even with the meandering discussion of Clinton/election politics at the beginning. Anyone interested in any subject related to this story/thread should consider it mandatory reading.![]()
The point being made there has nothing whatsoever to do with police brutality rates. In fact there's no mention whatsoever of police brutality except arguably as a small part of the long narrative about Antonio Morgan's lifetime of experiences with law enforcement, where it mentions he was tased once. The word "brutality" doesn't even appear in the article, nor does the word "force" except following the word "police."
Edit- my word search initially missed two references to "excessive force." My bad. Both are in passing, though, so the point stands.
You're criticizing someone for not writing about something totally irrelevant to any of his points because you wanted him to write about it.