MarshallPlan
Footballguy
But at what cost are you playing "good teams?" And what defines a good team? We can finally see now who the "good teams" are now that we are 100 games into the season. Was Detroit considered "good" coming into the season? How about Cincy or even the Mets for that matter? It's all relative when we are talking records. The Yanks, Red Sox, and Chi Sox were percieved to be good coming into the season and they are still "good." But, play them every night and lay chalk, see if you come out ahead.Just what it sounds like. Good teams that will win! Here's the big difference in the way we look at gambling. I am not looking to win 40 bucks here and there going 4-3 on any given day. I don't mind paying -200 or -300. Heck I have gone way higher then that. I also like to play the alternate runline, at +2.5 on the favorite if any of my books will let me. I doubt anybody would be interested to follow along on those plays though. If I can buy down a 7 run total to 5 I will..."Play the losing teams when they win" Well I don't know when they are going to win, but I do like to play teams that nobody wants (like KC a few months ago).I like to play bad teams, but you know it's all relative to price, espeiclaly in bases. If I saw Detroit +110 today I'd play them. If I saw Cleveland +110, I'd play them. It basically ALL depends on price to me.so, basically you are saying fade the winning teams in spots, and play the losing teams when they win.They are playing great. They have the most wins in baseball and are 31-9 in their last 40 games. I'm not looking at how they have played so far this year, I'm looking into the future here. They are hot. But, I like playing against good teams and I like playing bad teams. Detroit really can't play much better than they have been playing. Will they play .500 ball from here on out? No, probably better. But, they will be lined as large favorites down the stretch and I will get much better value fading them. The optimal play is when they are at home as a large chalk. Just like when the Royals were a "triple A" team and everyone wanted to fade them. They were pitiful. But could they play any worse? No, they were only getting better. Fast forward a few months - the Royals are the favorite tonight. Who would have thought?why would you do that? I mean lean against Detroit? Don't you like the way they are playing? Do you think they will lose more from this point forward as big chalk?Charv: I will be looking to short Detroit, but mostly as larger favorites. I leaned Cleveland today, but didn't play it.anyway, if that's your game, good luck with that. I prefer to put my money on good teams with good matchups, but that's just me.
I'm not going to go out of the way to fade Detroit in the upcoming weeks. If I see a nice price going against them when they are at home, then I'll certainly play them. If the market price is Detroit -180 and I have a book that is still sitting at Detroit -165, then no doubt I'll play Detroit.
I look to get good numbers on bad teams. End of story.
When you like to play "good teams" with good matchups what do you mean? Teams like Boston/Detroit/Chi Sox at small chalk? As a dog?
Justin, I know you mean well, but I just couldn't shut up seeing that. It reminded me of all the people saying, "well the yankees have to turn it around, because it's the yankees" or "the Astros are a great second half team, just look at the last two years"...
ETA: I am talking baseball here, just to clarify before the followup questions about Hockey or Football![]()
I know we can point to Detroit and say well they are good and I have made tons of money betting on them this year. Well, yes after the fact (100 games into the season) we do see they are a good team and money was to be made betting ON this team. But, what about now? Are they going to be lined as dogs like they were earlier in the year when they were making people money? No. They were on the road today against Sabathia and a decent Indians team and they were a pk. The value has disappeared from them, IMO.
"I like playing against good teams and playing bad teams." Okay, I can state that in two sentences. I like playing against good teams. I like playing bad teams.
I like playing bad teams a lot more. There's much more room for improvement when we play bad teams. See KC this year. They were "percieved" to be quite possibly the worst team ever just a few months ago. How about now?
I know you are a good gambler Charv. I'm not trying to argue against you. You also know that I will/are on my way to being a good one as well. We have two different schools of thought and there's many different ones out there. You like searching for "odd" bets on off numbers. Bets that normal people don't think about playing. I need to do more or this, but it will take time for me to even think about wagering on things like this.
You go on your way making money the way you do, I'll make money my way. There's many ways to make money, it's just a matter of finding the way that best fits your style.
Now that was better!
:whoosh:
I read in the paper today that it is the 26th of July!
I'm off for some more poker...
I played it small, was thinking of adding on, but now I won't.
May want to reconsider 



I know but in all fairness it is a dog system play today.

started already... damn this left coast time zone!