charvik
Footballguy
cutting back?1 million dollars on Seattle -128
cutting back?1 million dollars on Seattle -128
How many units is that and can I get a loan?cutting back?1 million dollars on Seattle -128
I believe that is 16.453 units if going by GM's normal unit...How many units is that and can I get a loan?cutting back?1 million dollars on Seattle -128
ETA: but that's only because he is going to scalp this later He said scalp.I believe that is 16.453 units if going by GM's normal unit...How many units is that and can I get a loan?cutting back?1 million dollars on Seattle -128ETA: but that's only because he is going to scalp this later
![]()

it's my new favorite word! I try to work that into my daily conversations at work too...:geronimo:He said scalp.I believe that is 16.453 units if going by GM's normal unit...How many units is that and can I get a loan?cutting back?1 million dollars on Seattle -128ETA: but that's only because he is going to scalp this later
![]()
![]()
if i wait 12 minutes maybe the cle/bos line will change or I can scalp some off in live wagering. I was hoping there would be live wagering on the tribe and bosox tonight but it does not look like it![]()

I must say I got a chuckle when reading this. I had a potential scalp in this game too. Had Under 11 -105 - could have scalped it, but stayed with it.I believe that is 16.453 units if going by GM's normal unit...How many units is that and can I get a loan?cutting back?1 million dollars on Seattle -128![]()
ETA: but that's only because he is going to scalp this later![]()

They have it at Matchbook.if i wait 12 minutes maybe the cle/bos line will change or I can scalp some off in live wagering. I was hoping there would be live wagering on the tribe and bosox tonight but it does not look like it![]()
I must say I got a chuckle when reading this. I had a potential scalp in this game too. Had Under 11 -105 - could have scalped it, but stayed with it.I believe that is 16.453 units if going by GM's normal unit...How many units is that and can I get a loan?cutting back?1 million dollars on Seattle -128![]()
ETA: but that's only because he is going to scalp this later![]()
![]()

thanksThey have it at Matchbook.if i wait 12 minutes maybe the cle/bos line will change or I can scalp some off in live wagering. I was hoping there would be live wagering on the tribe and bosox tonight but it does not look like it![]()
a 2 unit play on cle/bos O 11 - even![]()
parlay to make 3 units of
cle/bos O11
tex/min O10
seat
det
cws
GLTA
- with apologies to Leroy HoardGrand Slam. I'm done. :(U 9.5 in the Cubs game...2.5 units to win 1.
I have them as well. +115. Is that a good thing?Screw it, 3 units on Oakland.![]()

Oh holy mother of god.+117I have them as well. +115. Is that a good thing?Screw it, 3 units on Oakland.![]()
![]()
+117 - very impressive Sonny. You beat me. I have some RL, Over, and a parlay of both as well. I'm having a terrible day thus far by the way.Oh holy mother of god.+117I have them as well. +115. Is that a good thing?Screw it, 3 units on Oakland.![]()
![]()
I'll probably regret asking, but why do you have all those different lines on the same game, and how is your record playing like that?+117 - very impressive Sonny. You beat me. I have some RL, Over, and a parlay of both as well. I'm having a terrible day thus far by the way.![]()
I usually don't bet multiple lines on the same game, but I was looking to play Oakland all day. The Angels finally steamed late and I was able to get the ML number I wanted as well as the RL. This was a decent game to parlay with the Over as I think if the A's win this game will go Over. The bad thing is all of these wagers are coorelated, so it can get risky. That's one of the reasons I'm not betting a lot. I'm up a little bit so far this baseball season (just started 2 weeks ago). I have been making 20 plays a day or so. Some days less, some more. I'm trying this way of wagering. So far it's been mixed success.I'll probably regret asking, but why do you have all those different lines on the same game, and how is your record playing like that?+117 - very impressive Sonny. You beat me. I have some RL, Over, and a parlay of both as well. I'm having a terrible day thus far by the way.![]()
so you have Oakland RL, ML and the Over (plus a parlay Oakland/Over)? What was the lines, considering Oakland seems to be the dog? Or was it the +1.5?I usually don't bet multiple lines on the same game, but I was looking to play Oakland all day. The Angels finally steamed late and I was able to get the ML number I wanted as well as the RL. This was a decent game to parlay with the Over as I think if the A's win this game will go Over. The bad thing is all of these wagers are coorelated, so it can get risky. That's one of the reasons I'm not betting a lot. I'm up a little bit so far this baseball season (just started 2 weeks ago). I have been making 20 plays a day or so. Some days less, some more. I'm trying this way of wagering. So far it's been mixed success.I'll probably regret asking, but why do you have all those different lines on the same game, and how is your record playing like that?+117 - very impressive Sonny. You beat me. I have some RL, Over, and a parlay of both as well. I'm having a terrible day thus far by the way.![]()
Oakland +115 - 2 unitsOakland +1' -180so you have Oakland RL, ML and the Over (plus a parlay Oakland/Over)? What was the lines, considering Oakland seems to be the dog? Or was it the +1.5?I usually don't bet multiple lines on the same game, but I was looking to play Oakland all day. The Angels finally steamed late and I was able to get the ML number I wanted as well as the RL. This was a decent game to parlay with the Over as I think if the A's win this game will go Over. The bad thing is all of these wagers are coorelated, so it can get risky. That's one of the reasons I'm not betting a lot. I'm up a little bit so far this baseball season (just started 2 weeks ago). I have been making 20 plays a day or so. Some days less, some more. I'm trying this way of wagering. So far it's been mixed success.I'll probably regret asking, but why do you have all those different lines on the same game, and how is your record playing like that?+117 - very impressive Sonny. You beat me. I have some RL, Over, and a parlay of both as well. I'm having a terrible day thus far by the way.![]()
ok... that makes more sense... why +1, no +1.5 available? or is there a reason for the +1?I'm just curious...Oakland +115 - 2 unitsOakland +1' -180so you have Oakland RL, ML and the Over (plus a parlay Oakland/Over)? What was the lines, considering Oakland seems to be the dog? Or was it the +1.5?I usually don't bet multiple lines on the same game, but I was looking to play Oakland all day. The Angels finally steamed late and I was able to get the ML number I wanted as well as the RL. This was a decent game to parlay with the Over as I think if the A's win this game will go Over. The bad thing is all of these wagers are coorelated, so it can get risky. That's one of the reasons I'm not betting a lot. I'm up a little bit so far this baseball season (just started 2 weeks ago). I have been making 20 plays a day or so. Some days less, some more. I'm trying this way of wagering. So far it's been mixed success.I'll probably regret asking, but why do you have all those different lines on the same game, and how is your record playing like that?+117 - very impressive Sonny. You beat me. I have some RL, Over, and a parlay of both as well. I'm having a terrible day thus far by the way.![]()
Parlay: Oakland +112/Over 9 +105
Oakland/LAA Over 9 +112
The parlay is pretty good, I like the numbers I have. The others aren't great, but are good compared to what was available all throughout the day.
It is +1.5. I use the +1', same thing.ok... that makes more sense... why +1, no +1.5 available? or is there a reason for the +1?I'm just curious...Oakland +115 - 2 unitsOakland +1' -180so you have Oakland RL, ML and the Over (plus a parlay Oakland/Over)? What was the lines, considering Oakland seems to be the dog? Or was it the +1.5?I usually don't bet multiple lines on the same game, but I was looking to play Oakland all day. The Angels finally steamed late and I was able to get the ML number I wanted as well as the RL. This was a decent game to parlay with the Over as I think if the A's win this game will go Over. The bad thing is all of these wagers are coorelated, so it can get risky. That's one of the reasons I'm not betting a lot. I'm up a little bit so far this baseball season (just started 2 weeks ago). I have been making 20 plays a day or so. Some days less, some more. I'm trying this way of wagering. So far it's been mixed success.I'll probably regret asking, but why do you have all those different lines on the same game, and how is your record playing like that?+117 - very impressive Sonny. You beat me. I have some RL, Over, and a parlay of both as well. I'm having a terrible day thus far by the way.![]()
Parlay: Oakland +112/Over 9 +105
Oakland/LAA Over 9 +112
The parlay is pretty good, I like the numbers I have. The others aren't great, but are good compared to what was available all throughout the day.
It is +1.5. I use the +1', same thing.
never seen that before...Oh well, good luck on the plays. I was just curious of your reasoning for all those plays on a single game.Nice Gm! -charvik said:
1 million dollars on Florida +103
1 million dollars on Seattle -128
Up close to two million dollars on these two plays. i'm going to go buy a cabin now.how come all your bets are listed in PST? are you a left coaster?New York Mets/Florida Marlins 1-August-2006 4:05 PM PST Total Points OVER 9.5 for Game +108 M. Pelfrey must start S. Olsen must start
I just copy & paste from pinnacle. For some reason they list everything in PST.how come all your bets are listed in PST? are you a left coaster?New York Mets/Florida Marlins 1-August-2006 4:05 PM PST Total Points OVER 9.5 for Game +108 M. Pelfrey must start S. Olsen must start
Not sure I have a million dollar play in me today.Currently, I'm busy getting a tongue bath from the Penthouse Pet of the Year while I poop on my golden plated toilet with champagne bidet option.Life is grand.I'm waiting for the GM million dollar picks of the dayUntil then, I'm on the Mets over 9.5
Phew.Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll said:Screw it, 3 units on Oakland.![]()
Added AZ/Chc O13 +105This may be the highest MLB over I have ever bet.prosopis said:Today I have:Fla -109 for 7 unitsBig one for me todayI want the over in the Dbacks game but as of now there is no O/U being offered.
![]()

I wouldn't trust any money with Houston at this point. Good luck on the play though, sometimes they do manage to win one...Some decent looking underdogs out there....Pettitte +130 over San Diego. Peavy isn't the same guy he was last year. Gotta think the value lies with Houston tonight.Livan Hernandez +140 over the Giants. Hernandez has been better of late and this Giants team is mired in an 8 game skid....You could pair these two up for a good payday ~4.5 to 1....
I hear you, but Pettitte is a backable pitcher at this price, IMO. Yes, it's been a bad year for him, but any time he takes the mound at +130, I'm remotely interested.I wouldn't trust any money with Houston at this point. Good luck on the play though, sometimes they do manage to win one...Some decent looking underdogs out there....Pettitte +130 over San Diego. Peavy isn't the same guy he was last year. Gotta think the value lies with Houston tonight.Livan Hernandez +140 over the Giants. Hernandez has been better of late and this Giants team is mired in an 8 game skid....You could pair these two up for a good payday ~4.5 to 1....
That's totally understandable. Pettitte is normally a great catch at +130, but have you seen his starts? I have watched at least 6 of his games the last 2 months and the guy doesn't pitch with confidence. His mechanics doesn't seem to flow as well as prior seasons and he has big issues with his control of the strike zone. I'm not trying to talk you out of the play, he might finally get some backing from the Astros bats, but there's a reason he is +130.I hear you, but Pettitte is a backable pitcher at this price, IMO. Yes, it's been a bad year for him, but any time he takes the mound at +130, I'm remotely interested.I wouldn't trust any money with Houston at this point. Good luck on the play though, sometimes they do manage to win one...Some decent looking underdogs out there....Pettitte +130 over San Diego. Peavy isn't the same guy he was last year. Gotta think the value lies with Houston tonight.Livan Hernandez +140 over the Giants. Hernandez has been better of late and this Giants team is mired in an 8 game skid....You could pair these two up for a good payday ~4.5 to 1....
Not to mention that stout Astros bullpenThat's totally understandable. Pettitte is normally a great catch at +130, but have you seen his starts? I have watched at least 6 of his games the last 2 months and the guy doesn't pitch with confidence. His mechanics doesn't seem to flow as well as prior seasons and he has big issues with his control of the strike zone. I'm not trying to talk you out of the play, he might finally get some backing from the Astros bats, but there's a reason he is +130.

when did we start using logic around here?
Parlay tonight...
Dodgers +150
Pirates +132
Astros +130
$10 to win $130
true... 