Who is Williams backup?Hello, Ryan - welcome to the 80% touches club.
Yeah. That's the guy.LaRod could benefit as well. Williams has looked pretty bad thus far.
Does anyone want to start the hype thread? Choo Choo!!!!Rev up the Ryan Williams hype train, boys! Choo choo
Williams looked pretty good this past Sunday.LaRod could benefit as well. Williams has looked pretty bad thus far.
I agree.I keep saying that Powell is a guy to watch.
Could be but Alphonso Smith is back in uniform as of yesterday. Larod is too damn small in the JockQuiz category.I keep saying that Powell is a guy to watch.
He has a tough matchup this week against Miami, but after that its a pretty nice stretch to their week 10 bye (with the exception of the San Fran week 8).Williams looked pretty good this past Sunday.LaRod could benefit as well. Williams has looked pretty bad thus far.
This was part of a post I did in another thread:One thing to note about R. Williams is his upcoming schedule:He has a tough matchup this week against Miami, but after that its a pretty nice stretch to their week 10 bye (with the exception of the San Fran week 8).Williams looked pretty good this past Sunday.LaRod could benefit as well. Williams has looked pretty bad thus far.
Chris Johnson?Any RB looking at 15+ touches is extremely valuable, and they are likely in your starting lineup as a flex at worst unless you've been very lucky so far.
Touche. Ryan Williams will be in my lineup over Johnson this week.Chris Johnson?Any RB looking at 15+ touches is extremely valuable, and they are likely in your starting lineup as a flex at worst unless you've been very lucky so far.
Touche. Ryan Williams will be in my lineup over Johnson this week.Chris Johnson?Any RB looking at 15+ touches is extremely valuable, and they are likely in your starting lineup as a flex at worst unless you've been very lucky so far.![]()
I see a lot of games coming up that will be low scoring affairs in which I expect the Cards to control the flow and TOP. They have an OUTSTANDING defense.Boy do things change fast in the Not For Long league.This was part of a post I did in another thread:One thing to note about R. Williams is his upcoming schedule:Mia (#3 run D), @StL (21), Buf (14), @Min (12), SF (8), @GB (26), bye, @Atl (24), StL (21), @NYJ (28), @Sea (2), Det (11), Chi (6), SF (8)So I count 5 games vs. top 10 run D, 2 vs. top 5, and 4 against those ranked in the 20s.Four of his next 5 games aren't very easy. His schedule in the last 4 games of the season (3 if you don't count Wk 17) aren't too favorable, either. However, Weeks 9, 11, 12 and 13 look great though to finish off the fantasy regular season.He has a tough matchup this week against Miami, but after that its a pretty nice stretch to their week 10 bye (with the exception of the San Fran week 8).Williams looked pretty good this past Sunday.LaRod could benefit as well. Williams has looked pretty bad thus far.
^^ This. When Beannie came out of the tunnel and into the players parking lot where we were, he looked a lame horse going to the glue factory- Really limping bad. Cards are confident in Ryan being the guy, but this Powell kid is one to watch. I know Kolb has been talking about him for awhile.I keep saying that Powell is a guy to watch.
sure. talk to me when they give him 15+ touches.Chris Johnson?Any RB looking at 15+ touches is extremely valuable, and they are likely in your starting lineup as a flex at worst unless you've been very lucky so far.
I didn't see it, but based on the stat line it is clear Williams was the most effective of the 3. Beanie and Howling combined for 4 yards on 16 rushes, no catches. Williams was 13 for 83 and 1 catch for 12 yards. As appealing as Howlings -1.8 ypc average was this week, I have to think Williams is the one getting Beanie's carries this week.This was part of a post I did in another thread:One thing to note about R. Williams is his upcoming schedule:He has a tough matchup this week against Miami, but after that its a pretty nice stretch to their week 10 bye (with the exception of the San Fran week 8).Williams looked pretty good this past Sunday.LaRod could benefit as well. Williams has looked pretty bad thus far.
Mia (#3 run D), @StL (21), Buf (14), @Min (12), SF (8), @GB (26), bye, @Atl (24), StL (21), @NYJ (28), @Sea (2), Det (11), Chi (6), SF (8)
So I count 5 games vs. top 10 run D, 2 vs. top 5, and 4 against those ranked in the 20s.
Four of his next 5 games aren't very easy. His schedule in the last 4 games of the season (3 if you don't count Wk 17) aren't too favorable, either. However, Weeks 9, 11, 12 and 13 look great though to finish off the fantasy regular season.
One more note: Williams was in on 35% of Arizona's week 3 snaps; Beanie was in on 23%, and Stephens-Howling 34%. Source: http://rosterwatch.com/?p=5178
So last week it was about a 3-way split.
CJ's touches this year: 17, 11, 15.sure. talk to me when they give him 15+ touches.Chris Johnson?Any RB looking at 15+ touches is extremely valuable, and they are likely in your starting lineup as a flex at worst unless you've been very lucky so far.
Not much poorer? Huh?Given this news, I'm looking at Ryan Williams as basically a poor man's (albeit not that much poorer) TRich right now. This is the news that people that drafted RW were looking for.
Indeed. This is the cost of constantly churning over your roster. I think it's generally a winning strategy, but it can burn you from time to time.Wow. Brutal news for anyone who cut Williams after last week.
Wow do you understand fantasy football?When a guy goes from being #2 to #1 on the depth chart because of injury that is always a difference maker. Especially if that guy is someone the franchise wants to have the load as well.This is good news for Ryan Williams owners, obviously, but I don't think it's a difference maker. The line is still bad, the RBs were not all that productive, and the majority of the yards Williams garnered last week came when the Eagles had been whipped and had quit.
I think where we are now was going to be about the same even if beanie hadn't been put on the shelf. Turf toe is a nasty animal for a RB. It's neutered Eddie George, DMAC, Best, and other RBs that were either more powerful or explosive. So this is the very best thing for Beanie. Yeah, it sucks for his owners but if you we're starting Beanie, you needed this mercy killing.
I honestly don't think this ends in a situation where williams becomes an automatic every week starter.
Barry Sanders 1994 playoff game versus the Pack:13 - (-1) - 0, 3 - 4 - 0Yep, 3 total yards on 16 touches.'gradin123 said:LaRod had 8 carries for -14 yards last week. That might be the worst stat line I have ever seen from a RB
I understand football AND reality and unlike some people, my blind "want" and biases don't influence what I type. I get it. I own Williams in a league. I would love nothing more than for him to be this year's demarco Murray. But the REALITY is, it is NOT always a difference maker to the degree that is being tossed around here. Yes, it is a difference. And I said it IS good news. But the facts are what they are. Opportunity to start is one thing. But unless something changed last night, the cardinals are still not a great run blocking team. In the real world, a RB 's success is very dependent on the o-line. If you have watched the games and not just the box scores, you KNOW that Williams isn't one starting gig away from stardom. He's been good, not great.'Phenix said:Wow do you understand fantasy football?When a guy goes from being #2 to #1 on the depth chart because of injury that is always a difference maker. Especially if that guy is someone the franchise wants to have the load as well.'Shutout said:This is good news for Ryan Williams owners, obviously, but I don't think it's a difference maker. The line is still bad, the RBs were not all that productive, and the majority of the yards Williams garnered last week came when the Eagles had been whipped and had quit.
I think where we are now was going to be about the same even if beanie hadn't been put on the shelf. Turf toe is a nasty animal for a RB. It's neutered Eddie George, DMAC, Best, and other RBs that were either more powerful or explosive. So this is the very best thing for Beanie. Yeah, it sucks for his owners but if you we're starting Beanie, you needed this mercy killing.
I honestly don't think this ends in a situation where williams becomes an automatic every week starter.
"Good" is good enough to be a difference maker in FF, especially in leagues with 12+ teams. He had 83 yards on 13 carries, he easily has the talent to be a legit RB2. If I had him as my 3rd or 4th RB I'd be feeling really good.I understand football AND reality and unlike some people, my blind "want" and biases don't influence what I type. I get it. I own Williams in a league. I would love nothing more than for him to be this year's demarco Murray. But the REALITY is, it is NOT always a difference maker to the degree that is being tossed around here. Yes, it is a difference. And I said it IS good news. But the facts are what they are. Opportunity to start is one thing. But unless something changed last night, the cardinals are still not a great run blocking team. In the real world, a RB 's success is very dependent on the o-line. If you have watched the games and not just the box scores, you KNOW that Williams isn't one starting gig away from stardom. He's been good, not great.'Phenix said:Wow do you understand fantasy football?When a guy goes from being #2 to #1 on the depth chart because of injury that is always a difference maker. Especially if that guy is someone the franchise wants to have the load as well.'Shutout said:This is good news for Ryan Williams owners, obviously, but I don't think it's a difference maker. The line is still bad, the RBs were not all that productive, and the majority of the yards Williams garnered last week came when the Eagles had been whipped and had quit.
I think where we are now was going to be about the same even if beanie hadn't been put on the shelf. Turf toe is a nasty animal for a RB. It's neutered Eddie George, DMAC, Best, and other RBs that were either more powerful or explosive. So this is the very best thing for Beanie. Yeah, it sucks for his owners but if you we're starting Beanie, you needed this mercy killing.
I honestly don't think this ends in a situation where williams becomes an automatic every week starter.
As for the other part, your statement about the franchise "wanting" williams to have the load is false. The HC is very content with wells and much of Williams playing time at the moments he has played have been from necessity, not a desire to give Williams the load. What the lions did with leshoure is an example of a franchise wanting to give the ball to a player. What the cardinals did was a share based on need. Beanie has been fighting this injury for a few weeks. It's been obvious watching the games that he hasn't been right.
So, overall, my statement is simple. It's a good thing but temper your expectations.
Better than Larod. That is 0.18 yards per touch for Barry. Larod averaged -1.75 ypc. Atleaat Barry wasn't moving backwards at the rate Larod was.Barry Sanders 1994 playoff game versus the Pack:13 - (-1) - 0, 3 - 4 - 0Yep, 3 total yards on 16 touches.'gradin123 said:LaRod had 8 carries for -14 yards last week. That might be the worst stat line I have ever seen from a RB
Yeah exactly. Larod didn't have 8 carries for 14 yards, he had 8 carries for negative 14 yards. Thats hard to do.Better than Larod. That is 0.18 yards per touch for Barry. Larod averaged -1.75 ypc. Atleaat Barry wasn't moving backwards at the rate Larod was.Barry Sanders 1994 playoff game versus the Pack:13 - (-1) - 0, 3 - 4 - 0Yep, 3 total yards on 16 touches.'gradin123 said:LaRod had 8 carries for -14 yards last week. That might be the worst stat line I have ever seen from a RB
Thanks for sharing. For the newcomers who don't know, G-King is^^ This. When Beannie came out of the tunnel and into the players parking lot where we were, he looked a lame horse going to the glue factory- Really limping bad. Cards are confident in Ryan being the guy, but this Powell kid is one to watch. I know Kolb has been talking about him for awhile.I keep saying that Powell is a guy to watch.
Better than Larod. That is 0.18 yards per touch for Barry. Larod averaged -1.75 ypc. Atleaat Barry wasn't moving backwards at the rate Larod was.Barry Sanders 1994 playoff game versus the Pack:13 - (-1) - 0, 3 - 4 - 0'gradin123 said:LaRod had 8 carries for -14 yards last week. That might be the worst stat line I have ever seen from a RB
Yep, 3 total yards on 16 touches.
I have some reservations on him as well, but if you don't have another solid option, I'd start himI'm going to see another week of Williams before setting him in my line up. I like the confidence he gained but I'd rather be a week late on a RB.
Starting with confidence over here.I have some reservations on him as well, but if you don't have another solid option, I'd start himI'm going to see another week of Williams before setting him in my line up. I like the confidence he gained but I'd rather be a week late on a RB.![]()
Maybe I have misunderstood then. Based on what was being said above, I didn't know hype trains were launched for a RB3 or RB4. Again, just saying temper the expectations. Even at 20 carries a game (if that is what it comes to), I just don't think that will translate into a every week "don't even have to think about it..just plug him in" type of fantasy RB."Good" is good enough to be a difference maker in FF, especially in leagues with 12+ teams. He had 83 yards on 13 carries, he easily has the talent to be a legit RB2. If I had him as my 3rd or 4th RB I'd be feeling really good.I understand football AND reality and unlike some people, my blind "want" and biases don't influence what I type. I get it. I own Williams in a league. I would love nothing more than for him to be this year's demarco Murray. But the REALITY is, it is NOT always a difference maker to the degree that is being tossed around here. Yes, it is a difference. And I said it IS good news. But the facts are what they are. Opportunity to start is one thing. But unless something changed last night, the cardinals are still not a great run blocking team. In the real world, a RB 's success is very dependent on the o-line. If you have watched the games and not just the box scores, you KNOW that Williams isn't one starting gig away from stardom. He's been good, not great.'Phenix said:Wow do you understand fantasy football?When a guy goes from being #2 to #1 on the depth chart because of injury that is always a difference maker. Especially if that guy is someone the franchise wants to have the load as well.'Shutout said:This is good news for Ryan Williams owners, obviously, but I don't think it's a difference maker. The line is still bad, the RBs were not all that productive, and the majority of the yards Williams garnered last week came when the Eagles had been whipped and had quit.
I think where we are now was going to be about the same even if beanie hadn't been put on the shelf. Turf toe is a nasty animal for a RB. It's neutered Eddie George, DMAC, Best, and other RBs that were either more powerful or explosive. So this is the very best thing for Beanie. Yeah, it sucks for his owners but if you we're starting Beanie, you needed this mercy killing.
I honestly don't think this ends in a situation where williams becomes an automatic every week starter.
As for the other part, your statement about the franchise "wanting" williams to have the load is false. The HC is very content with wells and much of Williams playing time at the moments he has played have been from necessity, not a desire to give Williams the load. What the lions did with leshoure is an example of a franchise wanting to give the ball to a player. What the cardinals did was a share based on need. Beanie has been fighting this injury for a few weeks. It's been obvious watching the games that he hasn't been right.
So, overall, my statement is simple. It's a good thing but temper your expectations.