What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bears D a must start vs GB? (1 Viewer)

NajehHejan

Footballguy
Bears D has cooled off of late and GB is always a threat to put up monster points. Anyone benching Bears D for a better matchup play? Considering SD (vs Car) or Mia (vs Jax). Thoughts?

 
I would almost certainly go with Miami vs. Jacksonville over the Bears.

The Packers were available in one of my leagues- think I would roll with them over Chicago as well.

 
Packers D a must start vs. Chicago?
I don't think either are terrible starts...especially if you get big points for sacks.Though...if Clay is out...I would not trust the Packers D to get sacks...even against that OL.They do, usualy, pick Cutler a few times though.
 
'need2know said:
'sho nuff said:
'Chimp Magnet said:
Packers D a must start vs. Chicago?
I don't think either are terrible starts...especially if you get big points for sacks.Though...if Clay is out...I would not trust the Packers D to get sacks...even against that OL.They do, usualy, pick Cutler a few times though.
If Matthews and woodson come back I think gb is a great play. If not, I am playing det
Just a gut thing but I don't see Detroit putting up big team defense points this week. I know you have to lick your chops after last week but those kind of things don't tend to just keep happening every week. Yeah, there will be sacks and a pick or three but I can't see another shutout at home and the chances of defensive scores can't be that high in back to back weeks.
 
'need2know said:
'sho nuff said:
'Chimp Magnet said:
Packers D a must start vs. Chicago?
I don't think either are terrible starts...especially if you get big points for sacks.Though...if Clay is out...I would not trust the Packers D to get sacks...even against that OL.They do, usualy, pick Cutler a few times though.
If Matthews and woodson come back I think gb is a great play. If not, I am playing det
Just a gut thing but I don't see Detroit putting up big team defense points this week. I know you have to lick your chops after last week but those kind of things don't tend to just keep happening every week. Yeah, there will be sacks and a pick or three but I can't see another shutout at home and the chances of defensive scores can't be that high in back to back weeks.
i agree. part of me wants to play GB over det regardless because I know cutler will turn it over and I think gb is starting to play some better def as a whole. if they get woodson/mathews back could be great. detroit has been awful all year even though the matchup is sweet with arz, still nervous about rolling with a below average defense in a semi final playoff game...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My thinking as well. Detroit is just a terrible d and I don't even trust them against a train wreck like the cards. If Jennings comes back I am def rolling with Chicago. Lovie gets his team up for the packers at least one out of the two games.

 
My thinking as well. Detroit is just a terrible d and I don't even trust them against a train wreck like the cards. If Jennings comes back I am def rolling with Chicago. Lovie gets his team up for the packers at least one out of the two games.
not the past couple years he hasnt, but I agree I think since the division is on the line there really is no telling what is gonna happen this Sunday.
 
Starting Detroit over Chicago is equivalent to starting Nick Foles over Drew Brees because of the matchup. Foolish. Never bench your studs.

 
Rotoworld considers them a must start. Not sure I can disagree there.

This all hinges on Jennings. If he can play on Cobb they can contain the packers. If Hayden is on Cobb or Tillman has to play Cobb and leave Jennings with Hayden that secondary will get burned. On Dec 9 Jennings was targeting a return this week.

 
at this point I am having a hard time deciding between the lions and packers.

as far as the bears def goes, if they were at full strength I would play them. They are not and they are going against a top 5 QB. I would look for other options

 
Rain is in the forecast for Chicago, so expect them to make Soldier Field as slow and sloppy as they can. They don't call it home field advantage for nothing!

 
Rain is in the forecast for Chicago, so expect them to make Soldier Field as slow and sloppy as they can. They don't call it home field advantage for nothing!
Cobb loves the slop. It's in his bloodlines. His father was a mudder, his mother was a mudder.
 
'Kleck said:
'AB in DC said:
Rain is in the forecast for Chicago, so expect them to make Soldier Field as slow and sloppy as they can. They don't call it home field advantage for nothing!
Cobb loves the slop. It's in his bloodlines. His father was a mudder, his mother was a mudder.
Ya not sure how that helps Chicago at all? Personally I would think they would want the best field as possible to keep it a lower scoring game with the defense being able to cut better to keep up with the WRs.
 
'Kleck said:
'AB in DC said:
Rain is in the forecast for Chicago, so expect them to make Soldier Field as slow and sloppy as they can. They don't call it home field advantage for nothing!
Cobb loves the slop. It's in his bloodlines. His father was a mudder, his mother was a mudder.
Ya not sure how that helps Chicago at all? Personally I would think they would want the best field as possible to keep it a lower scoring game with the defense being able to cut better to keep up with the WRs.
Since when does good field = low scoring?Games played on astroturf (the least-sloppy field imaginable) have always been known as promoting high scoring, high flying offenses.
 
Every site I have seen ranks the Lions above the Bears this week.
It's not a bad bet with Lindley starting for the Cards as you are guaranteed at least two picks. They're a middle of the road defense going against the worst offense in the league. I just can't trust them.ETARegarding Jennings, Bears coach Lovie Smith said the cornerback is getting a lot better but still held him out of practice today."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Detroit is not an average defense -- more like a bottom-ten defense, maybe even bottom-five.

That said, all the injuries on the Chicago D really worry me. I'd like to see both Melton and Paea on the field before I can trust them against a team that's finally learned how to the run the ball.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top