Sounds like a depth play to me.Bush will get most of the work.Rotoworld is reporting the Bears to be working out Slaton this weekend. Thoughts? Any "shark"-like moves to be made here?
Sure, no doubt. Just wondering what people think of that in terms of "length that might indicate Forte to be out" as well as how that might be a good or bad fit.Sounds like a depth play to me.Bush will get most of the work.Rotoworld is reporting the Bears to be working out Slaton this weekend. Thoughts? Any "shark"-like moves to be made here?
High ankle sprains are tough to predict IMO - could be a couple of weeks but some guys never quite recover during the season. Forte may be hobbled for months, depending on the severity. If it's mild he could be back in a week or two.Sure, no doubt. Just wondering what people think of that in terms of "length that might indicate Forte to be out" as well as how that might be a good or bad fit.Sounds like a depth play to me.Bush will get most of the work.Rotoworld is reporting the Bears to be working out Slaton this weekend. Thoughts? Any "shark"-like moves to be made here?
Not sure about the fit or length of Forte's absence. They have to sign someone. At least Slaton has some talent. Or at least he did have some talent at one time.Sure, no doubt. Just wondering what people think of that in terms of "length that might indicate Forte to be out" as well as how that might be a good or bad fit.Sounds like a depth play to me.Bush will get most of the work.Rotoworld is reporting the Bears to be working out Slaton this weekend.
Thoughts? Any "shark"-like moves to be made here?
I know the run scheme of the texans when Slaton was there. I don't THINK (not sure) that what the Bears do is really very similar at all. SO, I'm kinda thinking Slaton's fit would be a 3rd down, COP guy. Wondering what others might think or know about that.Not sure about the fit or length of Forte's absence. They have to sign someone. At least Slaton has some talent. Or at least he did have some talent at one time.Sure, no doubt. Just wondering what people think of that in terms of "length that might indicate Forte to be out" as well as how that might be a good or bad fit.Sounds like a depth play to me.Bush will get most of the work.Rotoworld is reporting the Bears to be working out Slaton this weekend.
Thoughts? Any "shark"-like moves to be made here?
On his first carry he literally almost had his head ripped off. He looked rather weak to me.What about Armando Allen? Anything to see here?
Kevin Smith last year?How many rb's have ever been signed off the street in the middle of the season and contributed? I can think of Leroy Hoard off the top of my head but nobody else is coming to mind.
kevin smith?How many rb's have ever been signed off the street in the middle of the season and contributed? I can think of Leroy Hoard off the top of my head but nobody else is coming to mind.
Yes he did. By the facemask too - and yet, shockingly, there was no flag.On his first carry he literally almost had his head ripped off.What about Armando Allen? Anything to see here?
I don't know why he was cut for Allen in the first place. Money maybe? I like Bell's game. I thought he was screwed the last two years when they brought in Taylor and Barber when he was better than both.Why not just resign kalil bell
I read it was over money, that the Bears wanted to cut his salary and he refused. Now I guess there either exists some bad blood or Bell is just holding strong to his stance.'shnikies said:I don't know why he was cut for Allen in the first place. Money maybe? I like Bell's game. I thought he was screwed the last two years when they brought in Taylor and Barber when he was better than both.'Hipple said:Why not just resign kalil bell
Because you mistook a guy's shoulder pad for his facemask.HTHIf you want to whine about the lack of flags...there were many many many missed holds on that Bear OL.As for this situation...I too was surprised they did not just keep Bell.Perhaps there was more this offseason on him that I missed or things they did not like...thought he looked pretty good and showed promise last year.Think he won me a title last year against the Packers...or at least got me to the finals.'DoubleG said:Yes he did. By the facemask too - and yet, shockingly, there was no flag.'SameSongNDance said:On his first carry he literally almost had his head ripped off.'ponchsox said:What about Armando Allen? Anything to see here?![]()
Because you mistook a guy's shoulder pad for his facemask.HTH'DoubleG said:Yes he did. By the facemask too - and yet, shockingly, there was no flag.'SameSongNDance said:On his first carry he literally almost had his head ripped off.'ponchsox said:What about Armando Allen? Anything to see here?![]()
The Bears OL was whipped like the crew that tried to take on Moby **** last night. They looked immature and truly should have started to pound the ball last night. The Pack won this game with defense and STs- old school NFC North stuff. The Bears? They pranced around like antelope in a gator pit. On the road- you better run it. You paid the money for your horses- u use them on the road. Slaton here shows a weakness in RB depth.Because you mistook a guy's shoulder pad for his facemask.HTHIf you want to whine about the lack of flags...there were many many many missed holds on that Bear OL.As for this situation...I too was surprised they did not just keep Bell.Perhaps there was more this offseason on him that I missed or things they did not like...thought he looked pretty good and showed promise last year.Think he won me a title last year against the Packers...or at least got me to the finals.'DoubleG said:Yes he did. By the facemask too - and yet, shockingly, there was no flag.'SameSongNDance said:On his first carry he literally almost had his head ripped off.'ponchsox said:What about Armando Allen? Anything to see here?![]()
he did a nice job last year'Hipple said:Why not just resign kalil bell
No it doesn't. It shows that one of your RBs just got injured. As such the other RBs move up a "slot" (Bush now starting) - but you need to add a guy to make up for the one that went down. It's pretty simple math actually.Slaton here shows a weakness in RB depth.
Cedric Benson is close enough.'Area51Inhabitant said:How many rb's have ever been signed off the street in the middle of the season and contributed? I can think of Leroy Hoard off the top of my head but nobody else is coming to mind.
They are not looking for someone to contribute - at least not ideally. Bush will now start. They are simply looking to fill a back up roll in the case where Bush and Allen need a blow or one of them gets dinged up during a game. Most temas like to carry at least 3 RBs. If one goes down, you need to add another - even if he is 3rd on the depth chart.'Area51Inhabitant said:How many rb's have ever been signed off the street in the middle of the season and contributed? I can think of Leroy Hoard off the top of my head but nobody else is coming to mind.
Simple math? Who is your third string RB? What did he do last night? No RB depth on this roster tells me simple math- the Bears have two professional RBs on this roster and that is it. You now have to go out and grab Steve Slaton? At week 2? Simple math? This is simple planning as in simpleton planning.No it doesn't. It shows that one of your RBs just got injured. As such the other RBs move up a "slot" (Bush now starting) - but you need to add a guy to make up for the one that went down. It's pretty simple math actually.Slaton here shows a weakness in RB depth.
Simple math? Who is your third string RB? What did he do last night? No RB depth on this roster tells me simple math- the Bears have two professional RBs on this roster and that is it. You now have to go out and grab Steve Slaton? At week 2? Simple math? This is simple planning as in simpleton planning.No it doesn't. It shows that one of your RBs just got injured. As such the other RBs move up a "slot" (Bush now starting) - but you need to add a guy to make up for the one that went down. It's pretty simple math actually.Slaton here shows a weakness in RB depth.
Choice isn't available. He's going to be playing every week for awhile.Sign of the apocalypse for the Bears. If Slaton doesn't work out, maybe they trade for Tashard Choice
Haha no kidding. How many RBs are the Bears expected to roster? One of their guys got hurt, they have a capable back up and now need to sign someone else for depth it's not rocket science. I hope this guy doesn't figure out the Bears only have 2 QBs on the roster or he's really going to lose it.Simple math? Who is your third string RB? What did he do last night? No RB depth on this roster tells me simple math- the Bears have two professional RBs on this roster and that is it. You now have to go out and grab Steve Slaton? At week 2? Simple math? This is simple planning as in simpleton planning.No it doesn't. It shows that one of your RBs just got injured. As such the other RBs move up a "slot" (Bush now starting) - but you need to add a guy to make up for the one that went down. It's pretty simple math actually.Slaton here shows a weakness in RB depth.Name the 3rd string RB on the Cardinals...or the Dolphins...or the Vikings (hint: they only have 2) or the Jags. On top of that, there aren't but a handful of teams that has a #2 RB as talented as Bush. There are a LOT of things you can rip Bears management for - not having 3 starter quality RBs all on their roster (especially given what they're paying the firs 2) is definately NOT one of them. Oh my.
Good call. I actually think I'm going to take a flyer on him again this year.They should bring Bell back at his original salary.